Citations

Abstract Recent publications have reported that common variants on 8q24 are associated with both prostate and colorectal cancers (CRC). In addition, one of these studies (the ARCTIC study) initially observed an association with a single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) on 9p24 that was not confirmed in some of their validation data sets. In the research described here, we conducted a case-unaffected sibling analysis using population- and clinic-based discordant sibships (N = 1,567 sibships) from the Colon Cancer Family Registry (Colon CFR) to investigate the associations between common variants at 9p24 and 8q24 and risk of CRC. We also evaluated whether these associations differed by age, family history, and tumor characteristics, including microsatellite instability and tumor site. Associations were estimated using conditional logistic regression, treating sibship as the matching factor. Analyses were adjusted for age and sex, and stratified by ascertainment source (population versus clinic). We observed an association between a SNP on 9p24 (rs719725) and risk of CRC in the population-based series (AA versus CC: odds ratios, 1.46; 95% confidence interval, 1.06–2.02; AC versus CC: odds ratios, 1.50; 95% confidence interval, 1.14–1.98; P = 0.011 on 2 df). In the population-based series, we also detected statistically significant associations between two SNPs on 8q24, rs10505477 and rs6983267, and risk of CRC (P = 0.005 and P = 0.002, respectively). There was no evidence of statistically significant heterogeneity by age at diagnosis, family history of CRC, microsatellite instability, or tumor site at either locus and no evidence of interaction between SNPs on 8q24 and 9p24. These data suggest that common variants may play important roles in the risk of CRC. [Cancer Res 2007;67(23):11128–32]

Abstract Purpose: Glioblastoma multiforme is the most frequent primary brain tumor in adults and represents one of the most lethal malignancies with a median survival of 12-16 months. We have previously shown that an oncolytic measles virus derivative expressing soluble human carcinoembryonic antigen (MV-CEA) has significant antitumor activity against glioblastoma multiforme cell lines and xenografts. Radiation therapy (RT) represents one of the mainstays of glioma treatment. Here we tested the hypothesis that the combination of RT with MV-CEA would have synergistic activity against gliomas. Experimental Design: 3-(4,5-Dimethyl-thiazol-2yl)-5-(3-carboxymethoxyphenyl)-2-(4-sulfophenyl)-2H-tetrazolium (MTS) and clonogenic assays were used to test cytoxicity of the combination treatment in vivo. To examine the mechanism of synergy, one-step viral growth curves, terminal deoxyribonucleotidyl transferase–mediated dUTP nick end labeling (TUNEL) assays, and Western blot analyses were performed. In vivo assessment of synergistic antitumor activity was conducted in a U87 glioma model. Results: MTS and clonogenic assays showed a strong synergistic interaction between MV-CEA and RT in glioblastoma multiforme cells including both primary and established glioma lines. Furthermore, significant antitumor efficacy was observed in vivo in a subcuteneous U87 xenograph model. There was significant prolongation of survival (P = 0.001) in the combination treatment group as compared with single modality– or control-treated animals. One-step viral growth curves showed increased viral burst size by up to 2 log in MV/RT combination–treated cells, as compared with single agent MV-CEA–treated glioma cells. Changes in CEA levels and expression of viral N and H protein were also consistent with increased viral production. Furthermore, TUNEL assays and Western blot analysis showed increase in apoptosis in MV/RT combination–treated cells. The pan-caspase inhibitor Z-VAD-FMK and the caspase-8 inhibitor Z-IETD-FMK, but not the caspase-9 inhibitor Z-IEHD-FMK, protected glioma cells from MV-CEA/RT–induced cleavage of poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase (PARP), indicating that the apoptotic death in combination-treated cells is mostly mediated via the extrinsic caspase pathway. The Fas/Fas ligand interaction blocking antibody NOK-1 blocked MV/RT–induced PARP cleavage whereas the Fas agonistic antibody CH11 increased PARP cleavage in MV/RT combination–treated cells. Reverse transcription-PCR, fluorescence-activated cell sorting analysis and immunohistochemistry showed up-regulation of Fas in combination-treated tumor in vitro and in vivo cells. Conclusions: There is synergy between MV-CEA and RT in vitro and in vivo. The synergistic effect of the combination seems to be due to increase in viral burst size and increase in apoptotic cell death. This latter effect is mostly mediated via the extrinsic caspase-8 pathway, activated via increased signaling through the Fas death receptor pathway. These results could have translational implications in glioma therapy.

Abstract Purpose: The glutathione S-transferases (GSTs) catalyze the glutathione conjugation of reactive electrophiles, including carcinogens and many antineoplastic drugs. GSTT1 and GSTM1 are polymorphically deleted, but the full range of genetic variation in these two genes has not yet been explored. We set out to systematically identify common polymorphisms in GSTT1 and GSTM1, followed by functional genomic studies. Experimental Design: First, multiplex PCR was used to determine GSTT1 and GSTM1 copy number in 400 DNA samples (100 each from 4 ethnic groups). Exons, splice junctions, and 5′-flanking regions (5′-FR) were then resequenced using DNA samples that contained at least one copy of GSTT1 or GSTM1. Results: Gene deletion frequencies among ethnic groups were from 33.5% to 73.5% for GSTT1 and from 50.5% to 78.0% for GSTM1. GSTT1 deletion data correlated with the results of mRNA microarray expression studies. The 18 single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNP) observed in GSTT1 included three nonsynonymous coding SNPs (cSNPs) and one single-nucleotide deletion, whereas the 51 GSTM1 SNPs included two nonsynonymous cSNPs. Two of the GSTT1 nonsynonymous cSNPs resulted in decreases in levels of immunoreactive protein to 56% and 12% of wild type (WT), whereas those in GSTM1 resulted in modest increases in protein levels. Reporter gene assays showed that one GSTT1 5′-FR haplotype, with a frequency of 32% in African-American subjects, resulted in an increase in transcription in JEG-3 cells to 351% of that for the WT sequence, and one GSTM1 5′-FR haplotype resulted in an increase in transcription in JEG-3 cells to 129% of WT. Conclusions: These observations suggest that functionally significant pharmacogenomic variation beyond GSTT1 and GSTM1 gene deletion may contribute to carcinogenesis or individual variation in antineoplastic drug therapy response.

This study used semistructured interviews and grounded theory to look for characteristics among college undergraduates that predicted persistence into Ph.D. and M.D./Ph.D. training. Participants in the summer undergraduate and postbaccalaureate research programs at the Mayo Clinic College of Medicine were interviewed at the start, near the end, and 8–12 months after their research experience. Of more than 200 themes considered, five characteristics predicted those students who went on to Ph.D. and M.D./Ph.D. training or to M.D. training intending to do research: 1) Curiosity to discover the unknown, 2) Enjoyment of problem solving, 3) A high level of independence, 4) The desire to help others indirectly through research, and 5) A flexible, minimally structured approach to the future. Web-based surveys with different students confirmed the high frequency of curiosity and/or problem solving as the primary reason students planned research careers. No evidence was found for differences among men, women, and minority and nonminority students. Although these results seem logical compared with successful scientists, their constancy, predictive capabilities, and sharp contrast to students who chose clinical medicine were striking. These results provide important insights into selection and motivation of potential biomedical scientists and the early experiences that will motivate them toward research careers.

Abstract Elbow arthroscopy has developed over the past several years. Indications have evolved from simple loose body removal to the treatment of rheumatoid arthritis. There have been few published reports of elbow arthroscopy compared to reports of knee or shoulder arthroscopy. Complications are more frequently reported after elbow arthroscopy than after arthroscopy of larger joints; therefore, careful attention to detail is necessary to help prevent neurovascular complications. Elbow arthroscopy can be a useful technique for the orthopaedic surgeon. This review will describe the operative setup and appropriate portal placement. Currently, several different pathologies have been addressed arthroscopically, including loose bodies, arthritis, fracture, instability, and osteochondritis dissecans.