Steinmann, Scott P.

Background: In recent years, there has been an increased push for diversity in orthopaedics at the residency level. There has also been a noticeable shift away from foot and ankle fellowship, with many fellowship positions open throughout the country annually. With the increase in osteopathic and female orthopaedic applications to orthopaedic surgery residency, we hypothesized that this would be reflected in the foot and ankle fellowship applications in the last decade. Methods: The San Franscisco Match data from 2012 to 2023 were analyzed for degree type and from 2013 to 2023 for gender. There were 1082 applicants for adult foot and ankle fellowships from 2012 to 2023, 74 osteopathic applicants (11.4%), and 573 allopathic applicants (88.6%). There were 126 female applicants (21.3%) and 465 male applicants (78.7%). The 435 international graduates were excluded from this analysis. The degree type, gender, number of applicants, and number of applicants matched into orthopaedic foot and ankle fellowship was reviewed. Results: The number of osteopathic applicants and female applications did not change significantly over the study period. There was a statistically significant decrease in the number of allopathic applicants ( P = .003) and a significant decrease in the number of male applicants to foot and ankle fellowship ( P = .00004). The match rate for allopathic, osteopathic, and male applicants all statistically increased over the study periods, whereas the female applicant match rate remained stable. Programs tended to rank their matched allopathic residents higher, whereas osteopathic applicants’ position in the fellowship program rank list remained steady. Female and male applicants matched at programs higher on their rank lists, whereas programs match applicants lower on theirs. Conclusion: More orthopaedic foot and ankle surgeons are needed nationwide. Understanding recent trends in applicant demographics and match outcomes may help inform strategies to increase interest and participation in this subspecialty. Level of Evidence: IV, cross-sectional study.

Background: Rotator cuff repair augmentation using biological materials has become popular in clinical practice to reduce the high retear rates associated with traditional repair techniques. Tissue engineering approaches, such as engineered tendon-fibrocartilage-bone composite (TFBC), have shown promise in enhancing the biological healing of rotator cuff tears in animals. However, previous studies have provided limited long-term data on TFBC repair outcomes. The effect of mechanical stimulation on TFBC has not been explored extensively. Purpose: To evaluate functional outcomes after rotator cuff repair with engineered TFBC subjected to mechanical stimulation in a 6-month follow-up using a canine in vivo model. Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: A total of 40 canines with an acute infraspinatus (ISP) tendon transection model were randomly allocated to 4 groups (n =10): (1) unilateral ISP tendon undergoing suture repair only (control surgery); (2) augmentation with engineered TFBC alone (TFBC); (3) augmentation with engineered TFBC and bone marrow-derived stem cells (BMSCs) (TFBC+C); and (4) augmentation with engineered TFBC and BMSCs, as well as mechanical stimulation (TFBC+C+M). Outcome measures—including biomechanical evaluations such as failure strength, stiffness, failure mode, gross appearance, ISP tendon and muscle morphological assessment, and histological analysis—were performed 6 months after surgery. Results: As shown in the mechanical test, the TFBC+C+M group exhibited higher failure strength compared with other repair techniques. The most common failure mode was avulsion fracture in the TFBC+C+M group, but tendon-bone junction rupture was observed predominantly in different groups. Engineered TFBC with mechanical stimulation showed over 70% relative failure strength compared with normal ISP, and the other groups showed about 50% relative failure strength. Histological analysis revealed less fat infiltration and closer-to-normal muscle fiber structure in the mechanical stimulation group. Conclusion: This study provides evidence that mechanical stimulation of engineered TFBC promotes rotator cuff regeneration, thus supporting its potential for rotator cuff repair augmentation. Clinical Relevance: This study provides valuable evidence supporting the use of a novel tissue-engineered material (TFBC) in rotator cuff repair and paves the way for advancements in the field of rotator cuff regeneration.

The objective of this study was to examine the effect of pulling angle on time-zero mechanical properties of intact infraspinatus tendon or infraspinatus tendon repaired with the modified Mason-Allen technique in a canine model in vitro. Thirty-six canine shoulder samples were used. Twenty intact samples were randomly allocated into functional pull (135°) and anatomic pull (70°) groups (n = 10 per group). The remaining sixteen infraspinatus tendons were transected from the insertion and repaired using the modified Mason-Allen technique before being randomly allocated into functional pull or anatomic pull groups (n = 8 per group). Load to failure testing was performed on all specimens. The ultimate failure load and ultimate stress of the functional pulled intact tendons were significantly lower compared with anatomic pulled tendons (1310.2 ± 167.6 N vs. 1687.4 ± 228.2 N, p = 0.0005: 55.6 ± 8.4 MPa vs. 67.1 ± 13.3 MPa, p = 0.0334). For the tendons repaired with the modified Mason-Allen technique, no significant differences were observed in ultimate failure load, ultimate stress or stiffness between functional pull and anatomic pull groups. The variance of pulling angle had a significant influence on the biomechanical properties of the rotator cuff tendon in a canine shoulder model in vitro. Load to failure of the intact infraspinatus tendon was lower at the functional pulling position compared to the anatomic pulling position. This result indicates that uneven load distribution across tendon fibers under functional pull may predispose the tendon to tear. However, this mechanical character is not presented after rotator cuff repair using the modified Mason-Allen technique.

Background: The retear rate after rotator cuff repair remains unacceptably high. Various biological engineered scaffolds have been proposed to reduce the retear rate. We have developed a double rip-stop repair with medial row knot (DRSK) technique to enhance suture-tendon strength and a novel engineered tendon-fibrocartilage-bone composite (TFBC) for rotator cuff repair. Hypothesis: DRSK rotator cuff repair augmented with TFBC will have better biomechanical properties than that of DRSK repair with an acellular dermal graft (DG). Study Design: Controlled laboratory study. Methods: Fresh-frozen canine shoulders (n = 30) and knees (n = 10) were used. TFBCs were harvested from the patellar tendon–tibia complex and prepared for rotator cuff repair. The infraspinatus tendon was sharply detached from its bony attachment and randomly assigned to the (1) control group: DRSK repair alone, (2) TFBC group: DRSK repair with TFBC, and (3) DG group: DRSK repair with DG. All specimens were tested to failure, and videos were recorded. The footprint area, tendon thickness, load to create 3-mm gap formation, failure load, failure modes, and stiffness were recorded and compared. Data were recorded as mean ± SD. Results: The mean load to create a 3-mm gap in both the control group (206.8 ± 55.7 N) and TFBC group (208.9 ± 39.1 N) was significantly higher than that in the DG group (157.7 ± 52.3 N) ( P < .05 for all). The failure load of the control group (275.7 ± 75.0 N) and TFBC group (275.2 ± 52.5 N) was significantly higher compared with the DG group (201.5 ± 49.7 N) ( P < .05 for both comparisons). The stiffness of the control group (26.4 ± 4.7 N/mm) was significantly higher than of the TFBC group (20.4 ± 4.4 N/mm) and the DG group (21.1 ± 4.8 N/mm) ( P < .05 for both comparisons). Conclusion: TFBC augmentation showed superior biomechanical performance to DG augmentation in rotator cuff tears repaired using the DRSK technique, while there was no difference between the TFBC and control groups. Clinical Relevance: TFBC may help to reduce retear or gap formation after rotator cuff repair using the DRSK technique.

Objective: To compare the clinical outcomes of static versus dynamic external fixation for elbow fracture-dislocations with persistent instability after surgical management. Design: Comparative, retrospective review. Setting: Two tertiary referral upper-extremity centers. Patients: Twenty-four elbows requiring external fixation for persistent elbow instability within 90 days of surgical management of an elbow fracture-dislocation. Intervention: Static and dynamic external fixation was used in 16 and 8 patients, respectively, for a median of 39 days (interquartile range, 33–48 days). Main Outcome Measurements: Elbow range of motion, complications, and revision surgeries. Results: Immediately after static and dynamic external fixation removal, there was no difference in elbow extension [33 degrees ± 16 degrees vs. 41 degrees ± 13 degrees, mean difference (MD) 7 degrees, 95% confidence interval (CI) −6 degrees–22 degrees] or flexion (114 degrees ± 35 degrees vs. 118 degrees ± 11 degrees, MD 4 degrees, 95% CI -23 degrees–132 degrees), respectively. At last follow-up, static and dynamic external fixation groups had no difference in elbow extension (27 degrees ± 13 degrees vs. 24 degrees ± 10 degrees, MD -3 degrees, 95% CI –15 degrees–7 degrees) or flexion (129 degrees ± 12 degrees vs. 128 degrees ± 14 degrees, MD -1 degree, 95% CI -13 degrees–10 degrees), respectively. Static and dynamic external fixation groups had no difference in complications [7 (44%) vs. 5 (63%), difference 19%, 95% CI -23%–54%] or revision surgeries [6 (38%) vs. 4 (50%), difference 13%, 95% CI -27%–49%]. Conclusions: No difference in range of motion, complications, and revision surgeries was detected after static versus dynamic external fixation of persistently unstable elbow fracture-dislocations. Due to ease of application, static external fixation is our preferred treatment for these injuries. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level IV. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

AimsMany biomechanical studies have shown that the weakest biomechanical point of a rotator cuff repair is the suture-tendon interface at the medial row. We developed a novel double rip-stop (DRS) technique to enhance the strength at the medial row for rotator cuff repair. The objective of this study was to evaluate the biomechanical properties of the DRS technique with the conventional suture-bridge (SB) technique and to evaluate the biomechanical performance of the DRS technique with medial row knots.MethodsA total of 24 fresh-frozen porcine shoulders were used. The infraspinatus tendons were sharply dissected and randomly repaired by one of three techniques: SB repair (SB group), DRS repair (DRS group), and DRS with medial row knots repair (DRSK group). Specimens were tested to failure. In addition, 3 mm gap formation was measured and ultimate failure load, stiffness, and failure modes were recorded.ResultsThe mean load to create a 3 mm gap formation in the DRSK and DRS groups was significantly higher than in the SB group. The DRSK group had the highest load to failure with a mean ultimate failure load of 395.0 N (SD 56.8) compared to the SB and DRS groups, which recorded 147.1 N (SD 34.3) and 285.9 N (SD 89.8), respectively (p < 0.001 for both). The DRS group showed a significantly higher mean failure load than the SB group (p = 0.006). Both the DRS and DRSK groups showed significantly higher mean stiffness than the SB group.ConclusionThe biomechanical properties of the DRS technique were significantly improved compared to the SB technique. The DRS technique with medial row knots showed superior biomechanical performance than the DRS technique alone.

Fractures of the olecranon are sometimes difficult to treat. The steps for operative plate fixation of olecranon fractures consist of (1) a dorsal incision, (2) exposure using full-thickness flaps, (3) removal of hematoma from the fracture site, (4) fracture reduction, (5) provisional fixation, (6) plate application, (7) proximal fixation, (8) distal fixation, and (9) layered wound closure. Although this is generally a straightforward procedure, several specific steps may make fixation easier and improve outcomes. Outcomes following olecranon fracture fixation are generally good. Patients should expect some loss of terminal extension and a potential for symptoms related to implant prominence, especially in slender patients. Ulnar nerve symptoms are unusual but possible.

Radial head fractures may commonly be treated by (1) open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), (2) radial head excision, or (3) radial head replacement. If there is no associated elbow instability with lateral ulnar collateral ligament (LUCL) injury, the preferred approach is via a split in the extensor digitorum communis (EDC) origin. This provides a wide exposure but limits the risk of injury to the LUCL and associated instability. The radial head is fixed, excised, or replaced. Open treatment of radial head fractures begins with the following steps: (1) a laterally based incision is centered over the radiocapitellar joint, (2) the EDC is split at the midline of the radial head and elevated off the bone anteriorly and superiorly, and dissection proceeds distally, splitting the extensor origin along its fibers, and (3) the capsule is opened and the radial head fracture, identified. For ORIF, provisional fixation is then obtained with Kirschner wires and small bone reduction clamps. Headless low-profile screws are preferred if possible. If a plate is used, the dissection proceeds distally and the posterior interosseous nerve may need to be identified and protected. Definitive fixation is applied in the safe zone for implant placement (i.e., a right angle based laterally when the forearm is in a neutral position). For excision of the radial head as definitive treatment or for radial head replacement, the fragments are removed and an oscillating saw is used to remove additional radial neck or other fragments. When radial head excision is the definitive treatment, the radial neck is planed to a smooth contour that allows for placement of the prosthesis or for smooth motion without impingement at the proximal radioulnar joint. An indication for radial head replacement is suspicion of an Essex-Lopresti-type injury or demonstration of longitudinal instability of the forearm with excessive motion when a “push-pull” test is performed under fluoroscopy of the wrist while traction is applied to the radial neck. The final step of open treatment of radial head fractures, before the wound is closed in layers, consists of assessment of the range of motion and use of fluoroscopy to confirm appropriate fixation, resection, or prosthetic position. Outcomes following radial head fixation, resection, or arthroplasty for isolated radial head fractures are generally favorable. Loss of motion is particularly problematic in the pronation-supination arc in the setting of plate fixation, and patients are generally counseled that implant removal is often necessary. Loss of motion in the flexion-extension arc, particularly loss of terminal extension, may be noted. Resection of the radial head results in radiographic evidence of degenerative changes along the ulnohumeral joint, but this may be well tolerated as symptoms develop slowly, particularly in older patients. Radial head replacement results in changes in the capitellum over time, but these are usually asymptomatic.

ABSTRACTSurgical repair is a common treatment for rotator cuff tear; however, the retear rate is high. A high degree of suture repair strength is important to ensure rotator cuff integrity for healing. The purpose of this study was to compare the mechanical performance of rotator cuffs repaired with a mesh suture versus traditional polydioxanone suture II and FiberWire sutures in a canine in vitro model. Seventy‐two canine shoulders were harvested. An infraspinatus tendon tear was created in each shoulder. Two suture techniques—simple interrupted sutures and two‐row suture bridge—were used to reconnect the infraspinatus tendon to the greater tuberosity, using three different suture types: Mesh suture, polydioxanone suture II, or FiberWire. Shoulders were loaded to failure under displacement control at a rate of 20 mm/min. Failure load was compared between suture types and techniques. Ultimate failure load was significantly higher in the specimens repaired with mesh suture than with polydioxanone suture II or FiberWire, regardless of suture technique. There was no significant difference in stiffness among the six groups, with the exception that FiberWire repairs were stiffer than polydioxanone suture II repairs with the simple interrupted technique. All specimens failed by suture pull‐out from the tendon. Based on our biomechanical findings, rotator cuff repair with the mesh suture might provide superior initial strength against failure compared with the traditional polydioxanone suture II or FiberWire sutures. Use of the mesh suture may provide increased initial fixation strength and decrease gap formation, which could result in improved healing and lower re‐tear rates following rotator cuff repair. © 2017 Orthopaedic Research Society. Published by Wiley Periodicals, Inc. J Orthop Res 36:987–992, 2018.