Citations

Abstract Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) and vulnerability are variably affected in patients with myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) and other cytopenic states; however, the heterogeneity of these diseases has limited our understanding of these domains. The National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute-sponsored MDS Natural History Study is a prospective cohort enrolling patients undergoing workup for suspected MDS in the setting of cytopenias. Untreated patients undergo bone marrow assessment with central histopathology review for assignment as MDS, MDS/myeloproliferative neoplasm (MPN), idiopathic cytopenia of undetermined significance (ICUS), acute myeloid leukemia (AML) with <30% blasts, or “At-Risk.” HRQoL data are collected at enrollment, including the MDS-specific Quality of Life in Myelodysplasia Scale (QUALMS). Vulnerability is assessed with the Vulnerable Elders Survey. Baseline HRQoL scores from 449 patients with MDS, MDS/MPN, AML <30%, ICUS or At-Risk were similar among diagnoses. In MDS, HRQoL was worse for vulnerable participants (eg, mean Patent-Reported Outcomes Management Information Systems [PROMIS] Fatigue of 56.0 vs 49.5; P < .001) and those with worse prognosis (eg, mean Euroqol-5 Dimension-5 Level [EQ-5D-5L] of 73.4, 72.7, and 64.1 for low, intermediate, and high-risk disease; P = .005). Among vulnerable MDS participants, most had difficulty with prolonged physical activity (88%), such as walking a quarter mile (74%). These data suggest that cytopenias leading to MDS evaluation are associated with similar HRQoL, regardless of eventual diagnosis, but with worse HRQoL among the vulnerable. Among those with MDS, lower-risk disease was associated with better HRQoL, but the relationship was lost among the vulnerable, showing for the first time that vulnerability trumps disease risk in affecting HRQoL. This study is registered at www.clinicaltrials.gov as NCT02775383.

AbstractIntroductionMost patients undergoing a left atrial appendage occlusion (LAAO) procedure are admitted for overnight observation. A same‐day discharge strategy offers the opportunity to improve resource utilization without compromising patient safety. We compared the patient safety outcomes and post‐discharge complications between same‐day discharge versus hospital admission (HA) (>1 day) in patients undergoing LAAO procedure.MethodsA systematic search of MEDLINE and Embase was conducted. Outcomes of interest included peri‐procedural complications, re‐admissions, discharge complications including major bleeding and vascular complications, ischemic stroke, all‐cause mortality, and peri‐device leak >5 mm. Mantel–Haenszel risk ratios (RRs) with 95% CIs were calculated.ResultsA total of seven observational studies met the inclusion criteria. There was no statistically significant difference between same‐day discharge versus HA regarding readmission (RR: 0.61; 95% confidence interval [CI]: [0.29–1.31]; p = .21), ischemic stroke after discharge (RR: 1.16; 95% CI: [0.49–2.73]), peri‐device leak >5 mm (RR: 1.27; 95% CI: [0.42–3.85], and all‐cause mortality (RR: 0.60; 95% CI: [0.36–1.02]). The same‐day discharge study group had significantly lower major bleeding or vascular complications (RR: 0.71; 95% CI: [0.54–0.94]).ConclusionsThis meta‐analysis of seven observational studies showed no significant difference in patient safety outcomes and post‐discharge complications between same‐day discharge versus HA. These findings provide a solid basis to perform a randomized control trial to eliminate any potential confounders.

AbstractBackgroundDiscrete spot scanning (DSS) is the commonly used method for proton pencil beam scanning (PBS). There is lack of data on the dose‐driven continuous scanning (DDCS).PurposeTo investigate delivery benefits and dosimetric implications of DDCS versus DSS for PBS systems.MethodsThe irradiation duty factor, beam delivery time (BDT), and dose deviation were simulated for eight treatment plans in prostate, head and neck, liver, and lung, with both conventional fractionation and hypofractionation schemes. DDCS results were compared with those of DSS.ResultsThe DDCS irradiation duty factor (range, 11%–41%) was appreciably improved compared to DSS delivery (range, 4%–14%), within which, hypofractionation schemes had greater improvement than conventional fractionation. With decreasing stop ratio constraints, the DDCS BDT reduction was greater, but dose deviation also increased. With stop ratio constraints of 2, 1, 0.5, and 0, DDCS BDT reduction reached to 6%, 10%, 12%, and 15%, respectively, and dose deviation reached to 0.6%, 1.7%, 3.0%, and 5.2% root mean square error in PTV DVH, respectively. The 3%/2‐mm gamma passing rate was greater than 99% with stop ratio constraints of 2 and 1, and greater than 95% with a stop ratio of 0.5. When the stop ratio constraint was removed, five of the eight treatment plans had a 3%/2‐mm gamma passing rate greater than 95%, and the other three plans had a 3%/2‐mm gamma passing rate between 90% and 95%.ConclusionsThe irradiation duty factor was considerably improved with DDCS. Smaller stop ratio constraints led to shorter BDTs, but with the cost of larger dose deviations. Our finding suggested that a stop ratio of 1 constraint seems to yield acceptable DDCS dose deviation.