Citations

ABSTRACT Background The Society of Pediatric Liver Transplantation (SPLIT) has undergone tremendous growth with > 45 sites contributing data focusing on improving outcomes in pediatric liver transplantation (LT). We report and compare outcomes from the SPLIT Registry. Methods Patients < 18 years with first‐time LT only enrolled into the SPLIT Registry between 2011 and 2023 were included. Data was stratified into eras from the last published registry update (era 1: 2011–2018, era 2: 2018–2023). Results Three thousand five hundred four participants from 47 centers were included (era 1: n = 2159; era 2: n = 1345). Age distribution differed with more children < 1 year. of age at LT in era 2 (era 1: 29% vs. era 2: 33%, p = 0.01). Indications for LT were similar, with biliary atresia (38.8%) and metabolic disease (16.0%) being most common. Exception point use was higher in era 2 (era 1: 45% vs. era 2: 56%, p < 0.001). No difference in graft type (deceased: 81% era 1 vs. 78% era 2, p = 0.78), patient survival at 90 days (era 1: 98.7% vs. era 2: 98.3%), 1 year (era 1: 97.2 vs. era 2: 96.8%), or 3 years (era 1: 95.3% vs. era 2: 95.2%) was noted. Rate of hepatic artery thrombosis was lower in era 2 (era 1: 7% vs. era 2: 5%, p = 0.02). Conclusions Trends in pediatric LT within SPLIT note similar LT indications and graft type, higher utilization of exception points, and lower HAT rates despite transplanting more children < 10 kg. This data underscores the evolution of pediatric LT toward higher survivability and overall patient outcomes.

Background: Despite the association of insulin resistance (IR) in the pathophysiology of Metabolic Dysfunction-Associated Steatotic Liver Disease (MASLD), few studies have evaluated the utility of acanthosis nigricans (AN) as a clinical predictor for this condition. Thus, we aimed to determine the role of AN as a risk factor and clinical predictor of MASLD. Methods: This cross-sectional study conducted a comprehensive clinical history and physical examination. The presence of acanthosis nigricans was assessed in the neck, elbows, axillae, and knuckles. Liver biochemical parameters were measured, hepatic fat was analyzed using the controlled attenuation parameter (CAP), while hepatic stiffness was evaluated in kilopascals (kPA) with the FibrosScan 530 Compact and Smart Exam software. Multiple analyses were performed to determine the relationship between acanthosis nigricans and MASLD. Results: We recruited 251 adult participants. The mean BMI was 29.9 ± 7.3 kg/m 2 , including 40.2% of participants with obesity and 63.7% with AN. Transient elastography evaluation resulted in 65.7% and 6% participants with hepatic steatosis (S3, 48.6%) and fibrosis, respectively. A non-adjusted (OR 2.63, 95% CI 1.57-4.52) and adjusted model (OR 1.97, 95% CI 0.95-4.12) were determined for AN as a risk factor for liver steatosis. Furthermore, the presence of AN in knuckles resulted in an association to predict liver steatosis (OR 2.09, 95% CI 1.01-4.35), while a multivariate analysis indicated that AN predicts a higher steatosis grade (S2 OR = 6.58, CI 95% 1.18-36.53; S3 OR = 2.36, CI 95% 1.04-5.3). Conclusions: Acanthosis nigricans demonstrated to predict a higher steatosis grade in adults with overweight and obesity. Our study supports the clinical applicability of AN as a screening tool for MASLD to identify high-risk subjects in resource-limited settings. Additional studies are needed to define alternative diagnostic tools for the early identification of metabolic risk factors in populations with specific clinical or demographic characteristics.

Despite significant improvements in survival of patients with multiple myeloma (MM), outcomes remain heterogeneous, and a significant proportion of patients experience suboptimal outcomes. Importantly, traditional prognostic factors based on data from patients treated with older therapies no longer capture prognosis accurately in the contemporary era of novel triplet or quadruplet therapies. Therefore, risk stratification requires refinement in the context of available and investigational treatment options in routine practice and clinical trials, respectively. The current identification of high-risk MM (HRMM) in routine practice is based on the Revised International Staging System, which stratifies patients using a combination of widely available serum biomarkers and chromosomal abnormalities assessed via fluorescence in situ hybridization. In recent years, a substantial body of evidence concerning additional clinical, biological, and molecular/genomic prognostic factors has accumulated, along with new MM risk stratification tools and consensus reports. The International Myeloma Society, along with the International Myeloma Working Group, convened an Expert Panel with the primary aim of revisiting the definition of HRMM and formulating a practical and data-driven consensus definition, based on new evidence from molecular/genomic assays, updated clinical data, and contemporary risk stratification concepts. The Panel proposes the following Consensus Genomic Staging (CGS) of HRMM which relies upon the presence of at least one of these abnormalities: (1) del(17p), with a cutoff of >20% clonal fraction, and/or TP53 mutation; (2) an IgH translocation including t(4;14), t(14;16), or t(14;20) along with 1q+ and/or del(1p32); (3) monoallelic del(1p32) along with 1q+ or biallelic del(1p32); or (4) β2 microglobulin ≥5.5 mg/L with normal creatinine (<1.2 mg/dL).

Numerous factors including social determinants of health, knowledge gaps, economic challenges, workforce limitations, and health system deficiencies are associated with significant disparities in access to health care services and health outcomes for people with epilepsy (PWE). The American Epilepsy Society (AES) and the International League Against Epilepsy—North America (ILAE-NA) established a joint task force to explore and develop recommendations to address health care disparities experienced by PWE. The task force gathered foundational knowledge through meetings, public and patient organization comments and discussions to develop consensus recommendations. We enumerate the recommendations and discuss the rationale behind them to reduce disparities in epilepsy care through comprehensive research, inclusive clinical practices, robust advocacy, and targeted educational initiatives. While our recommendations are focused on the United States, we acknowledge that similar barriers and limitations exist for PWE globally and that these also need to be addressed within their local domains and with attention to unique factors therewithin.

Abstract Obesity is a chronic, heterogeneous, and complex disease associated with increased morbidity, mortality, and health-care costs. By 2030, 1 in 2 people in the United States will have obesity. Lifestyle interventions are the cornerstone of obesity management. However, they often fail to achieve clinically significant weight loss, necessitating additional treatments involving pharmacotherapy or procedures. Advancements in obesity pharmacotherapy have improved weight-loss outcomes and reduced associated comorbidities. Despite these advances, variability in response to treatment between individuals is still considerable. This variability reflects limitations in the current “one-size-fits-all” approach to obesity management. A precision medicine approach aims to address this gap by incorporating genetic, physiological, and behavioral characteristics to guide treatment selection and improve outcomes. Advances in multi-omics technologies, such as genomics, proteomics, metabolomics, and microbiome profiling, offer new opportunities to refine patient stratification and identify novel therapeutic targets. These tools may help move obesity care toward a more individualized and mechanism-based approach.

PURPOSE Tumor treating fields (TTFields) use alternating electric fields to disrupt cancer cell proliferation. Feasibility of TTFields therapy with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel was previously demonstrated in patients with advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma. PANOVA-3 was designed to confirm safety and efficacy of TTFields in patients with unresectable locally advanced pancreatic adenocarcinoma (LA-PAC). METHODS In this global phase III trial, 571 patients with newly diagnosed LA-PAC were randomly assigned to receive gemcitabine 1,000 mg/m 2 and nab-paclitaxel 125 mg/m 2 by intravenous infusion once a day on days 1, 8, and 15 of a 28-day cycle with or without TTFields. The primary end point was overall survival (OS). Secondary end points included progression-free survival (PFS), local PFS, pain-free survival, and overall response rate (ORR). Distant PFS was analyzed post hoc. RESULTS OS was significantly prolonged using TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (median, 16.2 months [95% CI, 15.0 to 18.0] v 14.2 months [95% CI, 12.8 to 15.4]; hazard ratio [HR], 0.82 [95% CI, 0.68 to 0.99]; P = .039). PFS, local PFS, and ORR were not improved. Pain-free survival was significantly prolonged with TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel (median, 15.2 months [95% CI, 10.3 to 22.8] v 9.1 months [95% CI, 7.4 to 12.7]; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.56 to 0.97]; P = .027), as was distant PFS (median, 13.9 months [95% CI, 12.2 to 16.8] v 11.5 months [95% CI, 10.4 to 12.9]; HR, 0.74 [95% CI, 0.57 to 0.96]; P = .022). Device-related skin adverse events (AEs) were experienced by 76.3% of patients. Most device-related skin AEs were mild to moderate, with 7.7% of patients reporting a grade 3 AE. CONCLUSION This study demonstrated significant OS, pain-free survival, and distant PFS benefits for TTFields with gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel versus gemcitabine/nab-paclitaxel in patients with unresectable LA-PAC, with no additive systemic toxicity.

Abstract Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of a 60‐day peripheral nerve stimulation (PNS) treatment targeting the occipital nerves for reducing pain and improving function in individuals diagnosed with cervicogenic headache or occipital neuralgia. Background Headache conditions are prevalent and commonly disabling, and conventional therapeutic strategies are often insufficient. Development of a percutaneous 60‐day PNS treatment has created new opportunities to evaluate PNS of the occipital nerves. Methods This study was an institutional review board‐approved, multicenter, prospective, single‐arm study that enrolled participants from October 2022 to March 2024. Participants with cervicogenic headache or occipital neuralgia received a 60‐day PNS treatment targeting the occipital nerves. The primary endpoint was the proportion reporting clinically significant (≥30%) reductions in average pain and/or pain interference at end of treatment (EOT). Additional analysis included the proportion of participants with ≥50% reduction in average pain intensity and/or pain interference and additional outcomes including Patient Global Impression of Change, six‐item Headache Impact Test, and Neck Disability Index. Results At EOT, 90% of participants (18/20) met the primary endpoint. Further, 85% (17/20) and 83% (15/18) reported ≥50% reductions in pain and/or pain interference at EOT and 3 months, respectively. Clinically meaningful improvements were observed in functional and headache‐related disability and quality‐of‐life measures. All study‐related adverse events were non‐serious. Conclusion Most participants reported significant reductions in pain and/or pain interference following 60‐day PNS targeting the occipital nerves. Outcomes through 3 months demonstrate how 60‐day PNS offers an effective approach for the treatment of headache.

Abstract Non-tubercular mycobacteria (NTM) present a serious challenge in managing lung transplant candidates and recipients. Pretransplant NTM isolation has been associated with post-transplant NTM infection and significantly increased mortality risk. Strategies for managing pre-transplant NTM isolation vary widely in clinical practice. We present a 35-year-old lung transplant candidate from a tuberculosis-endemic country with severe pulmonary hypertension and Eisenmenger Syndrome due to unrepaired atrial septal defect, who underwent bilateral lung transplantation. Two years prior to transplant, she was successfully treated for pulmonary tuberculosis with six months of an unknown regimen in her home country. After moving to the U.S., she received M. tuberculosis (MTB) clearance from her state tuberculosis board, with three negative sputum samples six months prior to transplant. During her transplant evaluation, multi-drug-resistant M. fortuitum complex was isolated from one mycobacterial sputum culture. There was no clinical or radiographic evidence of active lung infection, and no targeted therapies were added. Standard peri-transplant antibiotics (vancomycin, cefepime, and caspofungin) were given. The patient received basilixamab for induction immunosuppression, and tacrolimus, mycophenolate mofetil, and prednisone for maintenance immunosuppression. Explant pathology showed necrotizing granuloma in the right upper lobe with acid-fast bacilli (AFB). The differential diagnosis included non-viable MTB, viable MTB despite prior clearance, or M. fortuitum. Three bronchoscopy washings were obtained in the first week post-transplant and returned negative for MTB by PCR, AFB stain, and culture. In collaboration with the Mycobacteriology laboratory, broad-range PCR testing was performed on the formalin-fixed paraffin-embedded samples from the explanted right lung, which was positive for MTB complex DNA. In total, the patient completed six sputum samples within the year pre-transplant and six respiratory samples within a month post-transplant, all of which returned negative for MTB by PCR, AFB stain, and culture. Blood flow cytometric (FC) immunoprofiling with mycobacterial antigens and controls was conducted (Escalante et al. 2015). The patient's FC antigen-specific activated T-cell profiling was consistent with a reduced risk of latent TB infection (FC CD4+ CD25+CD134+ T-cells (RD1-peptides-nil) = 0.19%). T-cell reactivity to MTB300 and PPD antigens suggested prior MTB, NTM, and/or BCG vaccination exposures. She progressed well without any preventive therapy for LTBI. FC immunoprofiling one year after transplantation showed similar results. She continues to have good pulmonary function and quality of life in her second-year post-transplant without evidence of NTM or MTB infection. Escalante P, et al. Combinatorial Immunoprofiling in Latent Tuberculosis Infection. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2015;192(5):605-17. PMCID: PMC4595688.

ObjectiveThe objective is to provide evidence‐based and expert guidance for the screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis.MethodsThe Core Team developed clinical questions for screening, treatment, and management of lupus nephritis using the PICO format (population, intervention, comparator, and outcome). Systematic literature reviews were completed for each PICO question, and the Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) methodology was used to assess the quality of evidence and to formulate recommendations. The Voting Panel achieved a consensus ≥70% on the direction (for or against) and strength (strong or conditional) of each recommendation.ResultsWe present 28 graded recommendations (7 strong, 21 conditional) and 13 ungraded, consensus‐based good practice statements for the screening and management of lupus nephritis. Our recommendations focus on the unifying principle that lupus nephritis therapy is continuous and ongoing, rather than consisting of discrete induction/initial and maintenance/subsequent therapies. Therapy should include pulse glucocorticoids followed by oral glucocorticoid taper and two additional immunosuppressive agents for 3–5 years for those achieving complete renal response.ConclusionThis guideline provides direction for clinicians regarding screening and treatment decisions for management of lupus nephritis. These recommendations should not be used to limit or deny access to therapies, as treatment decisions may vary due to the unique clinical situation and personal preferences of each individual patient.