Citations

Background: Prior studies have reported higher rates of periprosthetic fracture, superficial infection, and neurologic deficit with the direct anterior approach (DAA), and higher rates of dislocation with the posterior approach (PA) for total hip arthroplasty (THA). Despite these differences, the overall clinical burden of complications between approaches remains unclear. The purpose of this study was to compare the profiles, severity, impact, and resolution of 5 clinically important complications between DAA and PA THA. Methods: A retrospective review was conducted of 11,783 consecutive primary THAs performed between 2010 and 2021 across 3 centers within a single healthcare system, using either the DAA (n = 4,451) or the PA (n = 7,332). Complications assessed included dislocation, infection, periprosthetic fracture (PPFx), aseptic loosening, and neurologic deficit. Severity was graded using the Clavien-Dindo classification (I = minor, V = death). Impact was defined by reoperation burden, and outcomes were categorized as resolved or persistent. Kaplan-Meier survivorship and propensity-weighted Cox proportional hazards models were used to compare complication risk. Results: The overall 1-year risk of surgical complications did not differ between DAA and PA (hazard ratio [HR], 0.89; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.75-1.06; p = 0.208). Dislocation occurred more frequently with PA THA than DAA THA (1.9% vs. 0.4%; HR, 5.20; 95% CI, 3.04-8.90; p < 0.001). Superficial infections were more frequent with the DAA (1.6% vs. 0.8%; HR, 2.43; 95% CI, 1.68-3.53; p < 0.001). The risk of deep infection, PPFx, aseptic loosening, and neurologic deficit did not differ significantly between approaches. Among patients with complications, the proportion classified as severe (Clavien-Dindo III–V) was similar, and adjusted analyses showed no difference in the odds of severe complications (adjusted odds ratio 1.34 for PA vs DAA; 95% CI, 0.95-1.91; p = 0.099). Complication impact and resolution were likewise comparable. Conclusion: Although the profile of complications differed between DAA and PA THA, the severity, early clinical impact, and resolution of complications appeared similar. Notably, DAA was associated with a lower risk of dislocation and a higher risk of superficial infection compared with PA THA. Level of Evidence: Level III , Retrospective Comparative Study. See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Purpose To investigate outcomes among patients undergoing total hip arthroplasty after hip arthroscopy (HA‐THA) compared with a matched cohort undergoing primary THA without prior arthroscopy (Only‐THA). Methods Patients who underwent THA after primary hip arthroscopic labral repair from 2009 to 2022 at a single institution were identified. Cases were propensity‐matched 1:4 to primary THA controls by age at THA, sex, body mass index (BMI), surgical approach, and year of surgery. At minimum 2‐year follow‐up, patient‐reported outcomes (PROs)—Forgotten Joint Score (FJS), modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), and Hip Disability and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score Pain (HOOS‐Pain)—were analyzed. Results Sixty‐two hips (age: 47.5 ± 9.3 years, BMI: 29.7 ± 6.2 kg/m 2 ) were matched to 248 Only‐THA hips (age: 47.9 ± 10 years, BMI: 29.5 ± 5.8 kg/m 2 ). Although both HA‐THA and Only‐THA patients showed significant ( P < .001) postoperative improvements in PROs, HA‐THA patients reported significantly lower postoperative FJS, mHHS, HOOS‐Pain, and inferior Visual Analog Scale pain scores ( P < .001) compared with Only‐THA controls. A cohort‐specific minimal clinical important difference for mHHS was calculated as 9.6 points, with 75.7% of HA‐THA and 87.5% Only‐THA patients achieving this threshold ( P = . 077). At mean 6.6 ± 3.3 years follow‐up, HA‐THA patients with preoperative Tönnis grades 1 reported significantly decreased FJS, mHHS, and HOOS‐Pain compared with HA‐THA patients with preoperative Tönnis grade 2‐3 ( P ≤ .05). HA‐THA patients with Tönnis grade 1 also exhibited worse PROs ( P < .001) compared with Only‐THA controls. Although there were no differences in complication rates between HA‐THA and Only‐THA patients (8% vs. 5%, P = .49), all‐cause reoperation was greater amongst HA‐THA (10% vs. 2%, P = .01). Conclusions Patients undergoing THA after prior hip arthroscopy showed modestly inferior subjective outcomes at mid‐term follow up compared with an age‐matched cohort without prior arthroscopy. Although both groups showed meaningful improvement, a smaller proportion of HA‐THA patients achieved the cohort‐specific MCID for mHHS compared with Only‐THA controls. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.

Introduction Historic series have demonstrated the importance of construct rigidity in the treatment of pelvic discontinuities, but there remains limited data comparing different constructs, especially contemporary cup-cages and custom triflange components. The aim of this study was to evaluate reconstructive constructs with emphasis on implant survivorship, radiographic results, complications, and clinical outcomes. Methods We reviewed 184 revision THAs with unilateral pelvic discontinuity at a single institution between 1998–2022. Mean age was 66 years, 83% were female, and mean BMI was 29 kg/m2. Constructs included uncemented cup and plating (n=66, 36%), cup-cages (n=59, 32%), jumbo uncemented acetabular components (n=30, 16%), conventional antiprotrusio cages (n=16, 9%), and custom triflanges (n=13, 7%). Since 2013, 73% of cases were treated with either a cup-cage or custom triflange. Acetabular distraction (n=36, 20%) and porous augments (n=33, 18%) were used as adjuncts. Mean follow-up was 8 years. Results The 5-year survivorships free of revision for aseptic loosening, any revision, and any reoperation were 92%, 79%, and 75%. Of 43 revisions, the most common indications were aseptic loosening (n=15) and dislocation (n=15). For each construct, the 5-year survivorships free of revision for aseptic loosening were 100% (triflange), 94% (cup-cage), 92% (uncemented jumbo acetabular component), 90% (plating), and 86% (conventional anti-protrusio cage). Radiographic analysis demonstrated discontinuity healing in 85% of unrevised patients. Of the 15 re-revisions for aseptic loosening, 92% involved loss of fixation from inferior hemipelvis. There were 63 complications with dislocation (n=32), nerve palsy (n=10), and wound problems (n=9) most common. Mean Harris hip scores improved from 51 to 70 at 5 years. Conclusion In this series, the 5-year survivorship free from aseptic loosening was very good (92%), especially with contemporary techniques like custom triflange (100%) and cup-cage constructs (94%). Survivorship free from any revision (79%) and reoperation (75%) remain lower due to dislocation and infection.

Abstract Introduction Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is performed in the setting of hip dysplasia to increase acetabular coverage of the femoral head and improve joint biomechanics and longevity. PAO fixation is generally achieved with two or three 4.5 mm screws, as compared to the generally more substantial plate and screw constructs used in the setting of acetabular fractures or pelvic ring injuries. The purpose of this study was to evaluate postoperative changes in hip joint center medialization and lateral acetabular coverage following PAO, understanding that these radiographic measures are generally used to guide intra-operative assessment of correction. Methods A retrospective chart review of 100 consecutive PAOs during 2021-2023 at a single academic institution by four surgeons was performed. Perioperative radiographs and fluoroscopy images were evaluated to measure lateral center edge angle (LCEA), Tönnis angle, and medialization of the hip joint center. The hip joint center was measured at one-third of the diameter of the femoral head from inferior to superior, to the ilioischial line, as previously validated by Fowler and colleagues. Results One hundred PAOs in 87 patients (87% female, mean age: 23.0 years) were included. Average preoperative radiographic parameters were 19.9° for LCEA, 12.5° for Tönnis angle, and 12.6 mm for distance from the femoral head to ilioischial line. Ninety-four cases (94%) used three screws, and 6 cases (6%) used two screws for unstable fragment fixation. On immediate postoperative films, average correction was to 28.3° for LCEA, 4.9° for Tönnis angle, and 1.9 mm of pre- to postoperative femoral head medialization (p≤0.001). Patients were radiographically followed for an average of 13.3 months, with an average time to radiographic union of 7.1 months. During the course of follow-up, LCEA increased to 29.3°, Tönnis angle remained to 5.0° (p=0.47), and medialization increased to 2.7 mm (p≤0.02), suggesting further significant but clinically modest increases in lateral coverage and femoral head medialization. Conclusion While the majority of lateral acetabular coverage and femoral head medialization occurs intra-operatively at the time of PAO, patients undergo modest but statistically significant postoperative increases in lateral coverage and medialization prior to radiographic union.

ABSTRACT Femoroacetabular impingement (FAI) of the hip results from altered morphology of the proximal femur and/or acetabulum, creating abnormal contact between these structures during normal hip range of motion. The etiology of this structural phenotype is unknown. This study aimed to identify common single‐nucleotide variants (SNVs) among two families with seemingly heritable FAI. Additionally, this study examined biologic networks among proteins encoded by identified SNVs and surveyed the literature regarding the role of these proteins in musculoskeletal development. Methodologically, blood samples were collected from affected and unaffected members of two separate families with a pattern of heritable FAI. Exome sequencing identified SNVs, and a protein–protein interaction network assessment, in addition to a literature review, was performed to better understand the role of variant‐associated genes in musculoskeletal development. Results showed 33 and 43 variant‐associated genes affected in Family 1 and Family 2, respectively. Although no overlap in variant‐associated genes was found between families, network analysis showed that variant‐associated genes are functionally interconnected and are known to interact with each other. Furthermore, the variant‐associated genes are broadly associated with musculoskeletal development. Ultimately, genetic analysis of two families of multiple generations of FAI revealed variations in genes regulating musculoskeletal development, with several being critical local regulators of bone morphogenesis.

Objectives: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is utilized for the treatment of hip dysplasia, with a growing trend towards hip arthroscopy at the time of PAO or in a planned, staged manner prior to PAO in order to address intra-articular pathology such as labral tears. For patients with persistent or new pain following isolated PAO, a subset undergo unplanned, primary hip arthroscopy. To date, there is a paucity of available evidence regarding the risk factors for and outcomes of unplanned hip arthroscopy for persistent or new pain after PAO. The purpose of this study was to determine demographic and radiographic characteristics of patients undergoing hip arthroscopy for persistent pain after PAO and also to compare radiographic parameters, surgical characteristics, and postoperative PROMs between patients that underwent hip arthroscopy following PAO and a demographically similar group of controls without acetabular dysplasia that underwent primary hip arthroscopy. Methods: An institutional database of 3014 hip arthroscopies performed between 1988 and 2022 was reviewed for patients having undergone unplanned (i.e. non-staged) first-time hip arthroscopy after PAO. These patients were propensity-matched on a 1:2 ratio with demographically similar, non-dysplastic patients undergoing primary hip arthroscopy with labral repair. All patients were contacted at final-follow-up to collect outcomes including subsequent procedures, progression to THA, and patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), including modified Harris Hip Score (mHHS), Hip Outcome Score (HOS), International Hip Outcome Tool (iHOT), Tegner Activity Scores, Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) for pain, and surgery satisfaction. Demographics, radiographic characteristics, and postoperative outcomes were compared. All statistical analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curve analysis was performed using R software (version 4.4.1). Results: We identified 22 hips in 21 patients (17 female, 4 male; age: 24.6 ± 8.5 years; BMI: 29.3 ± 7.4 kg/m²) who underwent first-time arthroscopy after ipsilateral PAO and were followed for a mean of 7.2 ± 2.8 years (Table 1). The median post-PAO LCEA was 28° (IQR: 24.6 – 31.7) and the mean Tönnis angle was 4.2° ± 5.9. The median time from the date of PAO to date of subsequent hip arthroscopy was 1.6 years (IQR: 1.1 - 3.4). Compared to the control group, there was a significantly lower rate of femoral osteochondroplasty (50% vs, 86%, p < 0.01), as well as trends towards lower rate of labral repair (77% vs. 95% p = 0.11), and higher rate of capsular repair (64% vs. 75%, p = 0.34). No differences were found between the PAO and control groups in any of the postoperative PROMs (Table 2). Among the PAO patients, 3 (20%) progressed to total hip arthroplasty (THA) compared to 1 (9%) in the control group (p=0.62). Conclusions: Hip arthroscopy after prior PAO was associated with postoperative improvements in pain and moderate rates of conversion to THA. When patients undergoing hip arthroscopy following PAO were compared to a demographically similar matched cohort of nondysplastic hips who underwent primary hip arthroscopy without a prior PAO, similar postoperative outcome scores were observed. This data provides valuable counselling information for clinicians discussing hip arthroscopy in the setting of patients with persistent pain following PAO.

Background: The U.S. Food and Drug Administration has approved a bupivacaine and meloxicam extended-release (ER) intra-articular injection for pain during total knee arthroplasty (TKA). However, the real-world evidence with regard to analgesic efficacy of that medication has been limited. This randomized clinical trial investigated the efficacy of this new medication compared with our standard periarticular injection for postoperative analgesia after primary TKA. Methods: Eligible patients undergoing primary, unilateral TKA for osteoarthritis at our academic center were enrolled. Patients were blinded and were randomized 1:1 to the bupivacaine-meloxicam ER (ZYNRELEF) injection group or the standard injection (ropivacaine, ketorolac, epinephrine) control group. A standardized, multimodal analgesic pathway was implemented. Numeric Rating Scale (NRS) pain scores and tallies of opioid consumption were collected. The primary outcome was the area under the curve (AUC) for NRS pain, adjusted for opioid consumption, over 72 hours. The minimal clinically important difference was considered to be 30%. Power analysis determined a minimum of 44 patients per group. The final groups included 53 patients in the experimental group and 48 patients in the control group. Results: Similar postoperative analgesia was observed, with an AUC for the adjusted NRS pain score up to 72 hours of 331 in the experimental group and 373 in the control group (p = 0.09). The mean maximum NRS pain scores were similar and reflected good, but not complete, analgesia. Scores were 3 to 5 on the day of the surgery, 4 to 6 on postoperative day (POD) 1, 5 to 6 on POD 2, and 4 to 5 on POD 3 (p > 0.05). One patient in the experimental group and 2 patients in the control group had early postoperative complications, none of which was deemed to be related to the analgesic choice. Conclusions: This randomized clinical trial demonstrated similar analgesia with a bupivacaine-meloxicam ER solution and a standard periarticular injection up to 72 hours after primary TKA. Cost, reimbursement, and convenience may ultimately prove to be more important than analgesic differences when choosing between these 2 effective options for managing postoperative pain. Level of Evidence: Therapeutic Level I . See Instructions for Authors for a complete description of levels of evidence.

Aims An angular proximal femoral deformity, in association with osteoarthritis (OA) of the hip, considerably increases the technical complexity of primary total hip arthroplasty (THA). The aims of this study were to determine the long-term implant survival, the risk factors for failure, complications, and clinical outcomes of contemporary primary THA in this difficult group of patients. Methods Our institutional total joint registry was used to identify 119 primary THAs performed in 108 patients with an angular proximal femoral deformity, between January 1997 and September 2017. The deformity was related to a previous femoral osteotomy in 102 THAs (86%), and developmental or metabolic disorders in 17 THAs (14%). A total of 62 hips (53%) had a predominantly varus deformity. The mean age of the patients was 44 years (SD 13), their mean BMI was 29 kg/m 2 (SD 6), and 70 (59%) were female. An uncemented femoral component with metaphyseal fixation was used in 35 THAs (30%), an uncemented femoral component with diaphyseal fixation in 34 (29%), an uncemented modular femoral component with a metaphyseal fixation sleeve in 29 (24%), and a cemented femoral component in 21 (18%). Simultaneous corrective femoral osteotomy was performed in 22 THAs (18%). Kaplan-Meier survival and Harris Hip Scores (HHSs) were reported. The mean follow-up was eight years (2 to 22). Results The ten-year survival free of femoral loosening, any femoral revision, any revision and any reoperation was 95%, 93%, 90%, and 88%, respectively. A total of 13 revisions were undertaken, for aseptic femoral loosening in three, fracture of the femoral component in two, dislocation in two, aseptic acetabular loosening in two, polyethylene liner exchange in two, and infection in two. A preoperative varus deformity was associated with a higher risk of any revision (hazard ratio (HR) 12.5, p = 0.020), and those with a simultaneous osteotomy had a higher risk of any reoperation (HR 3.6, p = 0.023). The mean HHSs improved significantly from 52 preoperatively to 82 at ten years (p < 0.001). Conclusion In the largest series to date of primary THAs in patients with hip OA and an angular proximal femoral deformity, we found a good ten-year survival free from any revision. Varus deformities, particularly those treated with a simultaneous osteotomy due to the magnitude or location of the deformity, had a higher rate of further surgery. Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2025;107-B(6 Supple B):101–108.

Background: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a complex procedure historically requiring inpatient stay. However, there is increased emphasis for other complex orthopaedic procedures (eg, arthroplasty) to be performed on an outpatient basis by insurance companies. Increasing resistance to insurance approval of inpatient listing for PAO patients at the participating institution suggests that this changing tide is affecting PAO surgery. Purpose: To (1) investigate the proportion of PAOs various surgical listing classifications (outpatient, outpatient-overnight, inpatient, etc), (2) determine the incidence of subsequent denial/request for additional documentation for approval of inpatient stay after PAO, and (3) characterize the accuracy of preoperative patient listing classification as well as mean length of stay (LOS) and incidence of successful same-day discharge after PAO at a single institution. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all PAOs, performed by 4 participating surgeons, at a single academic institution over a 2-year period. The initial listing status as an outpatient-overnight or inpatient procedure was identified. Whether a preoperative peer review was required for approval of inpatient listings as well as if additional documentation was necessary to convert outpatient-overnight listings to inpatient stays were also recorded. Results: A total of 140 PAOs among 117 patients were performed with 25 (17.9%) initially listed as an inpatient stay and 115 (82.1%) listed as outpatient-overnight. Of the 25 PAOs listed as inpatient, 2 (8.0%) required a preoperative peer review process to justify or clarify listing status. The mean LOS was 1.9 ± 1.4 days with 55.7% (78/140) of PAOs staying ≥2 nights in the hospital. Only 6 PAOs (4.3%) went home the same day as surgery. Patients who underwent PAO with concomitant hip arthroscopy stayed on average 2.4 ± 1.2 days in comparison with 1.6 ± 1.4 days for those who underwent PAO alone ( P < .001). Of the 115 PAOs listed as an outpatient-overnight, 53 (46.1%) converted to an inpatient stay, all of which required service documentation to support conversion to inpatient status. Conclusion: Over half of PAOs performed resulted in an inpatient stay with patients spending ≥2 nights in the hospital. Additionally, all conversions from outpatient-overnight to inpatient required additional service documentation to support status conversion. Understanding trends in postoperative hospitalizations and LOS may allow for better informed partnerships between surgeons and insurance companies creating more efficient preauthorizations, billing practices, and expected patterns of patient care and discharge.

Purpose To evaluate the differences in clinical outcomes and complication rates between open and arthroscopic iliopsoas (IP) tenotomy between 1998 and 2023 at our institution. Methods Patients who underwent arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening (IPFL) or open tenotomy for IP tendinitis following total hip arthroplasty (THA) between 1988 and 2023 were identified. Patients were excluded if they underwent revision IP tendon release, had additional concomitant procedures, or had less than a 24‐month postoperative follow‐up. Patient records were reviewed, and patient‐reported outcomes were collected via electronic survey. Results Fifty‐two patients (36 arthroscopic, 16 open) were followed for an average of 68.7 (24.0‐203.7) months. Overall surgery satisfaction was 7.9 (scale 0‐10) following arthroscopic IPFL and 6.0 following open tenotomy ( P = .178). Eighty‐six percent of patients reported improvement in their anterior groin pain following arthroscopic IPFL, compared to 45% following open tenotomy ( P = .065). In the arthroscopic cohort, 64% reported improved hip flexion strength, compared to 36% in the open cohort ( P = .158). Visual analog scale for pain at rest was lower following arthroscopic IPFL (1.1 ± 2.2 vs 3.3 ± 3.2, P = .0092), while pain with use did not differ between cohorts (3.1 ± 1.3 vs 2.6 ± 1.1, P = .786). There were no differences in postoperative Tegner (3.1 ± 1.3 vs 2.6 ± 1.1, P = .302), modified Harris Hip Score (77.0 ± 19.0 vs 69.2 ± 26.9, P = .073), or Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (70.9 ± 28.7 vs 66.7 ± 31.8, P = .571) scores between arthroscopic and open cohorts. Revision THA rates did not differ following arthroscopic or open procedures (8.3% vs 25%, P = .104). Conclusions Patients have improved pain at rest following arthroscopic IPFL when compared to open tenotomy for IP tendinitis following THA. Overall complication and reoperation rates were low for both techniques. Level of Evidence Level III, retrospective cohort study.