Meta, Fabien

Background: Recent reports suggest increasing trends in injuries, primarily among pitchers and upper extremity injuries, among Major League Baseball (MLB) and Minor League Baseball (MiLB) players. Accordingly, an updated comprehensive report on injury epidemiology in professional baseball is needed. Purpose: To (1) update the literature with a comprehensive epidemiological report of all injuries in MLB and MiLB; (2) provide a detailed breakdown of characteristics of the top 50 injuries; and (3) analyze long-term trends in injuries and days missed (DM) over time. Study Design: Case Series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The MLB Health and Injury Tracking System was used to identify injuries in MLB and MiLB players from 2011 to 2023. The inclusion criteria consisted of injuries occurring during spring training, regular season, or postseason activities that resulted in ≥1 DM from play. Basic and advanced player and injury characteristics were analyzed—including a list of the top 50 most common injuries. Results: From 2011 to 2023, a total of 83,215 musculoskeletal injuries occurred among MLB and MiLB players, resulting in 1,280,887 total DM, with a mean (median) DM per injury of 18 (11). The upper extremity accounted for 46% of injuries, and the lower extremity for 30%. The most common injury was hamstring strains (n = 6603; 7.9%); hamate fractures had the highest rate of surgery (81%); and elbow medial ulnar collateral ligament injury resulted in the highest DM (583,070 days). From 2011 to 2023, a significant increase was observed in the number of annual injuries (excluding 2020) ( P = .028) and injuries per game ( P = .003). However, 2018 and 2019 saw the highest number of injuries, and injuries did not rise after 2020. Conclusion: The annual number of injuries and rate of injuries per game increased significantly from 2011 to 2023; however, injuries did not increase over the final 3 years of the study (2021 to 2023). The percentage of overall injuries was dominated by upper extremity injuries among pitchers, although hamstring strains were the most common injury type overall.

Purpose To use publicly available injured list (IL) data to 1) describe Major League Baseball injury trends from 2010 to 2024; 2) analyze injury types and body regions affected to report the highest impact injuries; and 3) report the financial implications of time lost due to injury over this 15‐year period. Methods IL data for every Major League Baseball player (pitchers and position players) from the 2010 to 2024 regular seasons were collected using publicly available sources, including player demographics, IL placements, body part injured, and length of each IL stay. Player salaries were compiled to determine the “financial loss” per injury. Results Across 15 seasons, 8078 players were placed on the IL, totaling 478,085 days. The mean IL placements/year was 634, and the annual number increased by an additional 27 injuries/year ( P < .001). Mean total IL days/season was 31,872, and this increased year‐over‐year ( P = .008). Shoulder injuries represented the most IL placements (n = 1555), followed by elbow (n = 1344) and upper leg (n = 769). Elbow injuries averaged the most days missed/IL placement (mean: 93, median: 74) and the greatest total days missed (129,610), followed by shoulder (95,189). Pitchers comprised 55% of IL placements and most commonly injured their shoulder or elbow. Infielders and outfielders accounted for 21% and 16% of IL placements, respectively. A total financial loss of $9,636,753,291 was accumulated over 15 seasons. Financial loss increased season‐to‐season (+$32,309,178/year, P = .002). Elbow injuries accounted for the highest financial loss at $1,932,048,168 ($1,379,049 lost/injury). In 2024, $2,220,432 was lost/elbow injury, $1,110,573/shoulder injury, $1,397,322/any injury, and $952,973,760 total for the season. Conclusions This study observed that the number of players, IL placements, days spent on the IL, and financial loss due to injury increased steadily each year. Pitchers were the most frequently injured players with shoulder and elbow injuries being most common. Over the 15‐season study period, there was a total financial loss of nearly $9.7 billion due to salary paid to injured players, with elbow injuries contributing the highest loss at just under $2 billion. Clinical Relevance Injury trends and financial data from Major League Baseball highlight the growing burden of shoulder and elbow injuries, particularly in pitchers. These findings underscore the need for orthopaedic surgeons to focus on prevention, early intervention, and optimized surgical management of high‐impact injuries to reduce long‐term morbidity and associated financial costs at the elite level.

Objectives: The medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) is the primary stabilizer of valgus forces across the elbow. Injury to the MUCL has a large impact on the throwing athlete, particularly in baseball. The incidence of MUCL injury in baseball pitchers is on the rise. Surgical treatment and rehabilitation is evolving to improve outcomes and improve return to sport time frames. The purpose of this study was to highlight the trends in MUCL repair and reconstruction in professional baseball pitchers, describe relevant outcomes such as return to any level of play (RTP) for surgical repair and reconstruction, and distinguish what factors might impact these outcomes. The authors hypothesize that primary and revision MUCL surgery is increasing with revision surgery requiring the greatest time to RTP. Methods: The Major League Baseball (MLB) Health and Injury Tracking System (MLB HITS) database was used to procure data during the targeted study period (2010 – 2023). All professional pitchers who underwent MUCL surgery within the study period were included. Variables analyzed included age, career length, and level of play. Surgical variables included date and type of procedure, RTP status, time required to RTP, return to same level of play (RTSL), career length before and after surgery, number of revision surgeries, and time between surgeries. Successful RTP was designated if a pitcher had returned in at least one professional game after index surgery. Analyses of trends over time were performed. The year 2020 was considered an outlier and omitted from the analysis of trends due to the coronavirus pandemic which limited games played. Results: A total of 2,287 pitchers underwent MUCL surgery during the study period (Table 1). The annual number of MUCL surgeries on all pitchers increased year over year (R 2 = 0.821, p < 0.001), as did the annual number of reconstructions with internal brace (IB) augmentation (R 2 = 0.896, p < 0.001) (Figure 1). The RTP rate (93%) for MLB pitchers was significantly higher compared to the RTSL rate (71%, P < 0.001). This difference was not observed in Minor League Baseball (MiLB) (RTP 76% vs. RTSL 74%, P = 0.142) (Figure 2). The percentage of players who RTP after revision surgery was significantly lower compared to primary surgery (71%vs. 80% respectively, P = 0.020). Mean time to RTP is significantly shorter (470 ± 135 days) compared to the mean time to RTSL (499 ± 153 days, P < 0.001) (Figure 3). The annual number of revision MUCL surgeries on all pitchers increased year over year as well (R 2 = 0.322, p = 0.043). Conclusions: MUCL surgery continues to increase, also leading to increasing numbers of revisions in professional pitchers. Overall, 80% of pitchers were able to RTP at a mean of 470 days (15.5 months), while only 71% were able to RTSL at a mean of 499 days (16.5 months), but this varied based on level of play. Surgical techniques continue to evolve as MUCL repairs and reconstructions with IB augmentation have increased significantly in recent years. This study will help guide athlete expectations and surgeon decision-making.

Background: Injuries of the medial ulnar collateral ligament (MUCL) among baseball pitchers are increasing. Surgical treatment is evolving to optimize outcomes. Purpose/Hypothesis: This study’s purpose was to highlight trends in MUCL repair and reconstruction in professional pitchers, describe outcomes such as return to any level of play (RTP), and identify factors impacting these outcomes. It was hypothesized that primary and revision MUCL surgery is increasing, with revision surgery requiring greater RTP time. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: The Major League Baseball (MLB) Health and Injury Tracking System database was used to procure data during the study period (2010-2023). All professional pitchers who underwent MUCL surgery during this period were included. RTP was defined as a pitcher returning to at least 1 professional game after index surgery. Return to the same level of play (RTSL) was defined as return to at least 1 game in the same league of play as before surgery. Because of the coronavirus pandemic, the year 2020 was considered an outlier and omitted from time-trend analysis. Results: A total of 2281 pitchers who underwent MUCL surgery during the study period were included for analysis. The number of MUCL surgeries for pitchers increased yearly ( R 2 = 0.821; P < .001), as did the number of reconstructions with internal brace augmentation ( R 2 = 0.896; P < .001). The RTP rate for MLB pitchers was significantly higher than the RTSL rate (93% vs 71%; P < .001). This difference was not observed in Minor League Baseball (MiLB) pitchers (RTP 76% vs RTSL 74%; P = .142). RTP rates after revision surgery were lower than those after primary surgery (71% vs 80%; P = .020). The mean time to RTP was shorter (470 ± 135 days) than the mean time to RTSL (499 ± 153 days; P < .001). Conclusion: The incidence of MUCL surgery and revision surgery is increasing among professional pitchers. Overall, 79% of pitchers returned to any level of play at a mean of 470 days, while 74% returned to the same level of play at a mean of 499 days, but this varied based on level of play. This study will guide athlete expectations and surgeon decision-making.

Background: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a complex procedure historically requiring inpatient stay. However, there is increased emphasis for other complex orthopaedic procedures (eg, arthroplasty) to be performed on an outpatient basis by insurance companies. Increasing resistance to insurance approval of inpatient listing for PAO patients at the participating institution suggests that this changing tide is affecting PAO surgery. Purpose: To (1) investigate the proportion of PAOs various surgical listing classifications (outpatient, outpatient-overnight, inpatient, etc), (2) determine the incidence of subsequent denial/request for additional documentation for approval of inpatient stay after PAO, and (3) characterize the accuracy of preoperative patient listing classification as well as mean length of stay (LOS) and incidence of successful same-day discharge after PAO at a single institution. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all PAOs, performed by 4 participating surgeons, at a single academic institution over a 2-year period. The initial listing status as an outpatient-overnight or inpatient procedure was identified. Whether a preoperative peer review was required for approval of inpatient listings as well as if additional documentation was necessary to convert outpatient-overnight listings to inpatient stays were also recorded. Results: A total of 140 PAOs among 117 patients were performed with 25 (17.9%) initially listed as an inpatient stay and 115 (82.1%) listed as outpatient-overnight. Of the 25 PAOs listed as inpatient, 2 (8.0%) required a preoperative peer review process to justify or clarify listing status. The mean LOS was 1.9 ± 1.4 days with 55.7% (78/140) of PAOs staying ≥2 nights in the hospital. Only 6 PAOs (4.3%) went home the same day as surgery. Patients who underwent PAO with concomitant hip arthroscopy stayed on average 2.4 ± 1.2 days in comparison with 1.6 ± 1.4 days for those who underwent PAO alone ( P < .001). Of the 115 PAOs listed as an outpatient-overnight, 53 (46.1%) converted to an inpatient stay, all of which required service documentation to support conversion to inpatient status. Conclusion: Over half of PAOs performed resulted in an inpatient stay with patients spending ≥2 nights in the hospital. Additionally, all conversions from outpatient-overnight to inpatient required additional service documentation to support status conversion. Understanding trends in postoperative hospitalizations and LOS may allow for better informed partnerships between surgeons and insurance companies creating more efficient preauthorizations, billing practices, and expected patterns of patient care and discharge.

Abstract Introduction: Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a complex procedure historically requiring inpatient stay. There is increased emphasis for these to be performed on an outpatient basis by insurance companies. The purpose of this study was to investigate the proportion of various surgical listing classifications (outpatient, outpatient-overnight, inpatient), the incidence of subsequent denial/request for additional documentation for approval of inpatient stay, and to characterize the average length of stay (LOS) following PAO. Methods: A retrospective chart review was performed to identify all PAOs, performed by four participating surgeons, at a single academic institution over a two-year period. The initial listing status as an outpatient-overnight or inpatient procedure was identified. Whether a preoperative peer review was required for approval of inpatient listings as well as if additional documentation was necessary to convert outpatient-overnight listings to inpatient stays were also recorded. Results: A total of 140 PAOs amongst 117 patients were performed with 25 (17.9%) initially listed as an inpatient stay and 115 (82.1%) listed as outpatient-overnight. Of the 25 PAOs listed as inpatient, 2 (8.0%) required a preoperative peer review process to justify or clarify listing status. The average LOS was 1.9 ± 1.4 days with 55.7% (78/140) of PAOs staying two or more nights in the hospital. Only 6 PAOs (4.3%) went home the same day as surgery. Of the 115 PAOs listed as an outpatient-overnight, 53 (46.1%) converted to an inpatient stay. Conclusion: Over half of PAOs performed required inpatient stay beyond outpatient-overnight status. Preoperative peer-to-peer review for inpatient stay approval was modestly frequent (8% of inpatient listings), and all conversions to inpatient required additional service documentation to support status conversion. Understanding trends in postoperative hospitalizations and LOS might allow for better informed partnerships between surgeons and insurance companies creating more efficient pre-authorizations, billing practices, and expected patterns of patient care and discharge.

Background: While patients may report painful or prominent hardware after tibial tubercle osteotomy (TTO), little is known about the frequency, associated factors, and outcomes after removal of symptomatic hardware. Purpose/Hypothesis: The purpose was to investigate the incidence of hardware removal after TTO due to pain or complications, factors associated with hardware removal, and postoperative outcomes after removal. It was hypothesized that clinical outcomes would be similar between patients who underwent TTO without hardware removal and those who underwent TTOs and subsequently hardware removal. Study Design: Case-control study; Level of evidence, 3. Methods: A retrospective analysis was performed on patients who underwent TTO at a single institution from 2000 to 2023. Age at the time of the index surgery, sex, race, body mass index, number and size of screws, tibial tubercle–trochlear groove distance, and reason for hardware removal were collected retrospectively. Knee radiographs were reviewed for measurement of soft tissue–hardware distance. Patients were contacted via email to capture final patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs). A univariate logistic regression model was used to determine factors associated with hardware removal. Results: A total of 152 patients representing 171 knees were included. Of the overall cohort, 38 knees (22.2%) in 32 patients underwent TTO with subsequent hardware removal. The most common reason for hardware removal was anterior knee pain (79%). Compared with patients aged 11 to 20 years, patients aged 21 to 30 years demonstrated higher odds of undergoing hardware removal (OR, 3.67; 95% CI, 1.51-9.44; P = .009). Compared with a soft tissue–hardware distance of 0 to 4.9 mm, a distance of 10.0 to 14.9 mm demonstrated lower odds of hardware removal (OR, 0.24; 95% CI, 0.07-0.84; P = .027). Visual analog scale scores (0-10 scale) improved by a mean of 3.6 points after hardware removal ( P = .003). In patients undergoing hardware removal for pain, no difference in final PROMs was found compared with patients who underwent TTO without hardware removal. Conclusion: Hardware removal in patients undergoing TTO was mainly attributed to hardware-related pain/irritation. On average, pain scores improved after hardware removal. There was no difference in final PROMs between patients who had their hardware removed due to pain (eg, without any clinically relevant concomitant pathology) and patients who did not require hardware removal. Size and number of screws were not associated with a subsequent hardware removal procedure. The thickness of the soft tissue envelope overlying implanted hardware was inconsistently associated with lower odds of hardware removal.

Background: Patients with persistent symptomatic iliopsoas tendonitis following total hip arthroplasty may benefit from iliopsoas fractional lengthening. We present an arthroscopic approach utilizing an air bursogram that provides safe and predictable access to the iliopsoas tendon for efficient tendon lengthening without violating the capsule or unintentional instrumentation of the nearby medial neurovascular bundle. Indications: Arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening is indicated for patients with clinical evidence of symptomatic iliopsoas tendonitis following total hip arthroplasty and have no radiographic evidence of frank acetabular malpositioning. A diagnosis of iliopsoas tendinitis amenable to surgical management can be established with substantial but nondurable relief following image-guided anesthetic injection to the iliopsoas bursa. Technique Description: Under fluoroscopic guidance, an air bursogram is employed in the anatomic plane of the iliopsoas tendon to accurately identify its course. This allows for hip portal placement with precise subsequent instrumentation. This technique is preferred in the setting of postarthroplasty anatomy because it avoids capsular violation and the challenge of working in an altered anatomic space with a nearby, medially based neurovascular bundle. Results: Arthroscopic and endoscopic approaches to iliopsoas release have been shown to provide excellent functional and patient-reported outcomes in >85% of patients, and several studies have shown that an arthroscopic approach not only provides a less invasive technique but also results in comparable or improved clinical outcomes with lower revision rates compared to open release or acetabular cup revision. Our technique for arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening using the air bursogram is both safe and reproducible and offers distinct advantages, including maintenance of an intact capsule, visual confirmation of the correct anatomic structure to be released, and percutaneous access with standard arthroscopic access cannulas without the need for hip distraction. Conclusions: Arthroscopic fractional iliopsoas lengthening is a minimally invasive and successful treatment option for patients with persistent groin pain after total hip arthroplasty, especially without substantial acetabular component malpositioning. This technique includes using an air bursogram to safely identify and navigate to the iliopsoas tendon without violating the hip capsule, thereby reducing the risk of inadvertent instrumentation of adjacent critical neurovascular structures. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Abstract Meniscal root tears have been shown to significantly impact tibiofemoral mechanics and contribute to accelerated development of osteoarthritis. A common finding in conjunction with a meniscal root tear is extrusion of the meniscus. Meniscal extrusion is an independent risk factor for tibiofemoral cartilage loss and the progression of osteoarthritis. Meniscus centralization was first introduced to directly address extrusion alongside root repair techniques. To date, reported techniques for meniscus centralization generally involve anchoring the meniscus directly to the tibia in some fashion, which can limit the normal anatomic motion of the meniscus. We present a technique for meniscus centralization that aims to maintain natural meniscal motion by utilizing the meniscotibial ligaments. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Objectives: Based in part on the results of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) that suggest a beneficial effect over alternative treatment options, the use of platelet-rich plasma (PRP) for the management of knee osteoarthritis (OA) is widespread and increasing. However, the extent to which these studies are vulnerable to slight variations in the outcomes of patients remains unknown. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the statistical fragility of conclusions from RCTs that reported outcomes of patients with knee OA who were treated with PRP versus alternative nonoperative management strategies. Methods: All RCTs comparing PRP to alternative nonoperative treatment options for knee OA were identified. The fragility index (FI) and reverse fragility index (RFI) were applied to assess the robustness of conclusions regarding the efficacy of PRP for knee OA. Meta-analyses were performed to determine the minimum number of patients from one or more trials included in the meta-analysis for which a modification on the event status would change the statistical significance of the pooled treatment effect. Results: In total, this analysis included outcomes from 1993 patients with a mean (± standard deviation) age of 58.0 ± 3.8 years. The mean number of events required to reverse significance (FI) was 4.57 ± 5.85. This corresponded to a fragility quotient of 0.060 ± 0.075, meaning the significance of the results was contingent on 6 events per 100 participants. For non-significant outcome events, the mean number of events required to reverse statistical nonsignificance (RFI) was 4.41 ± 2.22. This corresponded to a reverse fragility quotient of 0.065 ± 0.056, meaning the non-significance of the results was contingent on 6.5 events per 100 participants (Figure 1). Based on random-effects meta-analyses, PRP demonstrated a significantly higher rate of successful outcomes when compared to hyaluronic acid (p = 0.002, odds ratio 95% CI = 2.19 [1.33-3.62]) (Figure 2) as well as higher rates of patient-reported symptom relief (p = 0.019, odds ratio [95% CI] = 1.55 [1.07-2.24]) (Figure 3), not requiring a reintervention after the initial injection treatment (p = 0.002, odds ratio [95% CI] = 2.17 [1.33-3.53]) (Figure 4), and achieving the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) for pain improvement (p = 0.007, odds ratio [95% CI] = 6.19[1.63-23.42]) when compared to all alternative nonoperative treatments. Overall, the mean number of events per meta-analysis required to change the statistical significance of the pooled treatment effect was 8.67 ± 4.50. Conclusions: Individual RCTs evaluating PRP for knee OA possess slight robustness. Upon meta-analysis, PRP demonstrated a significant advantage over HA as well as improved symptom relief, lower rates of reintervention, and more frequent achievement of the MCID for pain improvement when compared to alternative, nonoperative treatment options. Statistically significant pooled treatment effects evaluating PRP for knee OA are more robust than approximately half of all comparable meta-analyses in medicine and healthcare. Future RCTs and meta-analyses should consider reporting fragility indices and quotients to facilitate interpretation of results in their proper context. In addition, the robustness of these findings suggests that reconsideration of the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons clinical practice guidelines around the use of PRP for knee OA may be warranted.