Reuter, Zachary C.

Abstract Introduction The utilization of total hip arthroplasty (THA) in skeletally immature patients remains controversial, with an open triradiate cartilage traditionally perceived as a relative contraindication due to concerns of acetabular fixation and component loosening. Early evidence suggests that THA may be a feasible option in this patient population yielding favorable short-term outcomes, however larger series and mid-term data are lacking. This study presents the largest series of THA in patients with open triradiate cartilage to date with mid-term clinical, radiographic, and patient-reported outcomes. Methods A retrospective review of our institutional Total Joint Registry identified 19 patients (22 hips) who underwent THA while having an open triradiate cartilage growth plate between the year 2000 and 2024. Skeletal maturity was assessed utilizing the modified Oxford bone age and all patients had a score of “1” or “2” on the triradiate cartilage stage of maturation. Demographics, surgical characteristics, implant data, radiographic parameters, and clinical outcomes were collected. Functional hip scores were assessed via the Harris Hip Score (HHS). Kaplan-Meier analysis was performed to analyze reoperation rates. Results The average age at surgery was 14 years (SD=1.68), the average BMI was 24 (SD=7.1) and 64% were male. Mean follow-up was 6.05 years (range 1-15). The mean modified Oxford bone age for this cohort was 23 (SD=1.4). The most common indications for THA were avascular necrosis (64%), degenerative joint disease (27%), and neoplasia (9%). Preoperatively, 54.5% of patients utilized gait aids. Postoperatively, all patients reported independent ambulation without assistive devices with an average HHS of 91.65 (SD=11.42). Ninety-six percent of implants were stable at final radiographic follow up. Both reported complications involved acetabular cup loosening, requiring revision of the acetabular component. Conclusion This study presents the largest cohort in the literature of patients who underwent THA with open triradiate cartilage. Our results highlight high patient reported outcomes and low revision rates at mid-term follow up. All patients had excellent implant fixation without radiographic signs of loosening at final radiographic follow up. These results support the use of THA in skeletally immature patients without the need to delay THA for closure of the triradiate cartilage.

Abstract Introduction Periacetabular osteotomy (PAO) is a well-established procedure for hip preservation, traditionally performed on conventional radiolucent tables that provide rigid support to the lower extremity. The Pivot Guardian™ Distraction System extension was recently introduced to facilitate concomitant hip arthroscopy and PAO, enhancing surgical efficiency. However, flexible leg support may alter the biomechanical stability of the pelvis during osteotomy cuts, particularly the ischial osteotomy. This study compared intraoperative and perioperative outcomes of PAOs performed with the Guardian Table extension to those performed on conventional radiolucent tables. Methods All PAOs performed by one surgeon since the introduction of the guardian extension were reviewed. Seventy-two PAO cases were identified; 26 were performed on a Guardian table concomitantly with arthroscopic procedures, while 46 were performed on a conventional radiolucent Demographic variables, surgical characteristics, intraoperative complications and perioperative outcomes were compared between the groups. Groups were comparable in age, BMI, smoking status, history of previous hip arthroscopy, and primary diagnoses. Results The use of the Guardian extension had a higher proportion of women (96.2% vs. 73.9%, p=0.018) and longer operative times due to the addition of the hip arthroscopy (170 ± 54 vs. 90 ± 18 min, p < 0.0001). Notably, intraoperative posterior column fractures only occurred with the use of the Guardian table (15.4% vs. 0%, p=0.0062). No other identifiable risk factors contributed to this finding. Fractures were diagnosed based on intraoperative fluoroscopic images, or immediate postop X-rays, or X-rays at the first follow up. Rates of other complications were similar between the two groups. Conclusion While the Guardian Table extension facilitates simultaneous arthroscopic procedures in the context of PAO procedures, its use was associated with an increased risk of intraoperative posterior column fractures. This may be due to the flexible structure of the leg extension component. Surgeons should be aware of the flexible nature of the table and plan for intraoperative stabilization of the distal portion to increase rigidity.

Abstract There are multiple underlying etiologies of patellar instability including both osseous and soft‐tissue factors. Obligate flexion dislocation consists of lateral dislocation of the patella, occurring each time the knee flexes. This generally results from a predominantly lateral contracture of the extensor mechanism and can be technically challenging to manage. Quadricepsplasty can be of particular clinical utility for obligate flexion dislocation and constitutes a realignment of the proximal soft‐tissue attachments of the patella. The described technique features isolation of the 4 muscles of the quadriceps and subsequent stepwise lengthening of the vastus lateralis, advancement of the vastus medialis obliquus, and Z‐lengthening of the rectus femoris and vastus intermedius. This technique can be used in isolation or in combination with other procedures, such as medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction, to surgically address patellofemoral maltracking. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Abstract The standard of care for hip labral tears is arthroscopic repair, with labral reconstruction performed more commonly for irreparable tears in order to avoid isolated labral debridement. However, labral reconstruction can be technically demanding. We provide a concise step‐by‐step guide for performing labral reconstruction or augmentation using a modified retrograde pull‐through technique, including tips, tricks, and surgeon pearls, and pitfalls. Despite the procedure's technically challenging nature, we believe our technique highlights several important steps to improve the practicality and efficiency of the case and produce satisfactory patient outcomes. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.

Background: Patients with persistent symptomatic iliopsoas tendonitis following total hip arthroplasty may benefit from iliopsoas fractional lengthening. We present an arthroscopic approach utilizing an air bursogram that provides safe and predictable access to the iliopsoas tendon for efficient tendon lengthening without violating the capsule or unintentional instrumentation of the nearby medial neurovascular bundle. Indications: Arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening is indicated for patients with clinical evidence of symptomatic iliopsoas tendonitis following total hip arthroplasty and have no radiographic evidence of frank acetabular malpositioning. A diagnosis of iliopsoas tendinitis amenable to surgical management can be established with substantial but nondurable relief following image-guided anesthetic injection to the iliopsoas bursa. Technique Description: Under fluoroscopic guidance, an air bursogram is employed in the anatomic plane of the iliopsoas tendon to accurately identify its course. This allows for hip portal placement with precise subsequent instrumentation. This technique is preferred in the setting of postarthroplasty anatomy because it avoids capsular violation and the challenge of working in an altered anatomic space with a nearby, medially based neurovascular bundle. Results: Arthroscopic and endoscopic approaches to iliopsoas release have been shown to provide excellent functional and patient-reported outcomes in >85% of patients, and several studies have shown that an arthroscopic approach not only provides a less invasive technique but also results in comparable or improved clinical outcomes with lower revision rates compared to open release or acetabular cup revision. Our technique for arthroscopic iliopsoas fractional lengthening using the air bursogram is both safe and reproducible and offers distinct advantages, including maintenance of an intact capsule, visual confirmation of the correct anatomic structure to be released, and percutaneous access with standard arthroscopic access cannulas without the need for hip distraction. Conclusions: Arthroscopic fractional iliopsoas lengthening is a minimally invasive and successful treatment option for patients with persistent groin pain after total hip arthroplasty, especially without substantial acetabular component malpositioning. This technique includes using an air bursogram to safely identify and navigate to the iliopsoas tendon without violating the hip capsule, thereby reducing the risk of inadvertent instrumentation of adjacent critical neurovascular structures. Patient Consent Disclosure Statement: The author(s) attests that consent has been obtained from any patient(s) appearing in this publication. If the individual may be identifiable, the author(s) has included a statement of release or other written form of approval from the patient(s) with this submission for publication.

Abstract Labral tears most commonly occur anteriorly between the 12‐ and 3‐o'clock positions, with the 12‐o'clock position denoted as superior and the 3‐o'clock position denoted as anterior. When approaching the 3‐o'clock position and beyond, suture anchor placement becomes difficult given the challenging arthroscopic trajectory and an overall thin anterior rim of cortical bone for anchor purchase, resulting in a narrow angle of safe drilling. The purpose of this technical note is to present a safe and reproducible method of suture anchor placement during acetabular labral repair approaching the 3‐ and 4‐o'clock positions, with the 12‐o'clock position representing the superior anatomic location and the 3‐o'clock position representing the anterior anatomic location regardless of hip laterality. We use an inside‐out anchor placement technique to place far medial anchors, which differs from the conventional techniques (e.g., outside‐in technique) in which anchor placement is performed along the external margin of the acetabular labrum. Technique Video video See video under supplementary data.