Citations

Abstract Background Minimally invasive colorectal surgery is characterized by significant procedural variability, a difficult learning curve, and complications that affect patient outcomes. Video-based assessment offers an opportunity to generate data-driven insights to reduce variability, optimize training, and improve surgical performance. This mixed-methods study aimed to develop and validate a video-based assessment tool for workflow analysis across minimally invasive colorectal procedures. Methods An international steering committee panel of seven members coordinated a three-round modified Delphi process. Experts in colorectal surgery and video-based assessment were invited to reach consensus (≥ 70% agreement) on the phases and steps that describe workflows across colorectal surgery procedural videos. The resulting framework informed the development of ColoWorkflow. Four independent raters then applied ColoWorkflow to a multicentre video data set of laparoscopic and robotic colorectal procedures. Applicability and inter-rater reliability were evaluated. Results Of 66 invited experts, 41 (62%) from 11 countries completed round 1, 40 (98%) completed round 2, 20 attended the final online consensus meeting, and all (40 of 40) approved the final workflow descriptors. Consensus was achieved on nine procedure-agnostic phases (port placement and abdomen exploration; vascular dissection and ligation, mesocolon/mesorectum dissection, additional lymphadenectomy; colon and/or rectum mobilization; colorectal transection; anastomosis; completion of operation; preplanned additional procedures; unplanned procedures; extracorporeal procedures) and 34 procedure-specific steps that describe colorectal surgery workflows. ColoWorkflow was developed and applied to 54 colorectal surgery videos (left and right hemicolectomies, sigmoid and rectosigmoid resections, and total proctocolectomies) from five centres in four countries. The tool demonstrated broad applicability, as all phase and step labels, except one, were represented in at least one video. Inter-rater reliability was moderate, with a mean Cohen’s κ value of 0.72 for phases and 0.67 for steps. Most discrepancies arose at phase transitions and step boundary definitions. Conclusion Based on this preliminary work, ColoWorkflow is a promising tool for workflow analysis across minimally invasive colorectal procedures. Its adoption may help standardize training, accelerate competency acquisition, and advance data-informed surgical quality improvement.

Abstract Background Stigma associated with tuberculosis (TB) and TB diagnosis is a major social factor in delay of diagnosis and non-adherence to TB treatment among Asian American and Pacific Islander (AAPI) populations. Main sources of stigma include misconceptions regarding TB transmission and lack of knowledge about symptoms or treatment.Figure 1.Respondent demographicsBreakdown of respondent demographics by age, gender, and AAPI subgroup.Figure 2.Demographic breakdown of TB awarenessTB awareness by AAPI subgroup, age, and gender. Methods A cross-sectional survey of 666 AAPI individuals analyzed TB symptom recognition, transmission misconceptions, and awareness in two AAPI community centers. Data were segmented by AAPI subgroup, metropolitan area (Seattle/Tacoma vs. Las Vegas), age, and gender.Figure 3.TB transmission beliefs.Figure 4.TB treatment, curability, and latent TB infection awareness. Results Overall, 76.6% of respondents reported TB awareness, varying by AAPI subgroup. Awareness was highest among Korean (95%) and Filipino (91%) participants, and lowest among Vietnamese (52%) and Cambodian (50%) respondents. Regionally, TB awareness was similar between Tacoma (76%) and Las Vegas (79%). Age and gender significantly impacted awareness. Respondents under 18 had the lowest TB awareness (59%), while those aged 18-34 had the highest (84%). Females reported higher TB awareness (79%) and symptom recognition (61%) than males (74% and 46%, respectively). Symptom knowledge varied. 55% were aware of TB symptoms, but only 16% were able to recognize five common TB symptoms. Misconceptions about transmission also persisted broadly. Out of the 71% of respondents who were aware that TB is transmissible, many incorrectly believed TB spread via shaking hands (35%), sharing food/drinks (50%), or touching items in public areas (37%). The 45-64 and 65+ age groups were most prone to misconceptions about transmission. While 72% of respondents were aware that TB could be treated, only 57% knew TB could be cured. 30% of respondents were aware of latent TB infection. Conclusion Significant disparities in TB awareness exist in AAPI communities. Females demonstrated greater TB awareness perhaps due to cultural differences (“caretaker role”), while TB transmission misconceptions were prevalent among older individuals. Limited knowledge on LTBI and TB treatment represent significant barriers to effective TB control. Tailored educational efforts will be required to improve TB awareness and reduce misconceptions within AAPI communities. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Older adults with dementia account over 15% of intensive care unit (ICU) admissions and face higher risks of functional decline and complications. We systematically evaluated the difference in ICU-related outcomes in patients with and without dementia, (e.g., mortality, resuscitation and code status decisions, complications, duration of life support and hospital stay). Searches were performed in MEDLINE, EMBASE, SCOPUS, and Web of Science between 2003 and 2024. A random-effects meta-analysis was done of odds ratios (OR) and mean differences (MD) and their corresponding 95% confidence intervals (CI) were calculated. Fifteen studies, including 1,231,037 patients (12% with dementia), met the inclusion criteria. Adjusted analysis showed that patients with dementia had a higher risk of ICU mortality (OR = 1.05, 95% CI 1.00–1.11), 30-day mortality (OR = 1.54, 95% CI 1.47–1.62) and 12-month mortality (OR = 1.95, 95% CI 1.88–2.02). They were less likely to receive mechanical ventilation (OR = 0.73, 95% CI 0.62–0.85, I2 0.0%) and more likely to develop delirium (OR = 4.80, 95% CI 1.81–12.72). In patients with dementia, ICU stays were slightly shorter (MD = –1 day, 95% CI –1.7 to –0.4), and discharge home was less common (OR = 0.40, 95% CI 0.39–0.42). Older adults with dementia experienced greater risk of mortality and delirium, alongside less aggressive intervention use and healthcare utilization (i.e., shorter ICU stays). These findings underscore the need for prospective studies to optimize ICU decision-making and post-discharge care for this vulnerable population.

Background The association between lifestyle factors and Alzheimer's disease (AD) pathophysiology remains incompletely understood. Objective The aim of this study was to assess the association of alcohol consumption, smoking behavior, sleep quality and physical, cognitive, and social activity with cerebral amyloid pathology. Methods For this cross-sectional study, we selected participants from the Amyloid Biomarker Study data pooling initiative. We used generalized estimating equations to assess associations of dichotomized lifestyle measures with amyloid pathology. Results We included 9171 participants with normal cognition (NC) and 2555 participants with mild cognitive impairment (MCI) from the Amyloid Biomarker Study. Of participants with NC, 58% were women, 34% were APOE ε4 carrier, and 27% had amyloid pathology. Of participants with MCI, 48% were women, 47% were APOE ε4 carrier, and 57% had amyloid pathology. In NC, cognitively active participants were less likely to have amyloid pathology (OR = 0.77, 95%CI 0.66–0.89, p < 0.001). In MCI, participants who had ever smoked or had sleep problems were less likely to have amyloid pathology (OR = 0.85, 95%CI 0.73–0.99, p = 0.029; OR = 0.62, 95%CI 0.45–0.86, p = 0.004). Conclusions In NC, cognitive activity was associated with a lower frequency of amyloid pathology. In MCI, favorable lifestyle behaviors were not associated with a lower frequency of amyloid pathology. The results of the current study contribute to the broader evidence base on lifestyle and AD by further characterizing the role of lifestyle behaviors in AD pathology across different clinical stages.

ABSTRACT Introduction Sinonasal sarcomas are exceedingly rare entities, constituting less than 7% of head and neck sarcomas. Their complex histology needs specialized treatment, which is often based on multimodal approaches including surgery, radiation therapy, and/or chemotherapy. This manuscript aims to gather expert opinions to establish common management principles for sinonasal sarcomas. Methods This international consensus followed a modified Delphi method in seven steps, including statements definition by the core group, expert panel recruitment, and a two‐round survey. Sixty‐two statements on sinonasal sarcoma management were developed. Experts from multiple continents participated, and results were anonymized and analyzed between March and May 2025. Results A total of 44 invited experts were recruited, 43.2% otorhinolaryngologists/head and neck surgeons, 31.8% medical oncologists, and 25% radiation oncologists. Participants varied in age and experience, representing Europe (70.5%), North America (18.2%), South America (6.8%), and Asia (4.5%). Among all histologies, biphenotypic sarcoma, chondrosarcoma, leiomyosarcoma, and myofibrosarcoma are principally treated with an upfront surgical management, differently from Ewing sarcoma and rhabdomyosarcoma in which chemotherapy, eventually associated with radiotherapy, is often chosen. In the remaining histologies (angiosarcoma, liposarcoma, malignant peripheral nerve sheath tumor [MPNST], osteosarcoma, and synovial sarcoma), a precise multimodal treatment is less standardized and needs to be discussed on a case‐by‐case basis. Conclusion Sinonasal sarcomas require a histology‐driven approach to determine upfront treatment, whether surgical, medical, or multimodal. Despite this structured strategy, prognosis remains highly variable across subtypes. Multidisciplinary evaluation and individualized management in referral centers are crucial to address the biological diversity and anatomical complexity of these rare malignancies.

ABSTRACT Objective There is limited consensus on endoscopic skull base surgery (ESBS) reconstruction principles. This study aims to generate comprehensive themes regarding ESBS reconstruction by pooling the experiences of ESBS experts, with comparison to a literature review of current published evidence. Methods Structured qualitative interviews of ESBS experts regarding postoperative management and reconstruction of various defect locations were conducted. Results A total of 68 experts comprising 40 academic teams across 13 countries with an average of 18 years of ESBS experience were included. We propose 10 stepwise algorithms for common skull base reconstruction scenarios based on these expert interviews. When available, the nasoseptal flap is used for all high_flow cerebrospinal leak defects. Multilayered reconstruction is favored at all anatomical subsites with increasing number of layers for increasing defect size and complexity. Heterogeneity exists in terms of inlay technique and materials, free grafting versus various pedicled flap options for low‐flow defects or in the absence of a nasal septum, nasal packing, tissue sealant, lumbar drain use, and postoperative management. Commonalities and discrepancies between experts were summarized. Conclusion Skull base reconstruction and post‐ESBS management is highly complex with a wide variety of practice patterns and expert strategies. Further research of higher quality evidence is warranted to identify optimal management patterns, though the current work aims to inform surgeons on these controversial areas by drawing from numerous experiences.

BACKGROUND: Data registries lack a definitive classification system that distinguishes different locations of colon cancer from one another. OBJECTIVE: To establish an international consensus on the definition of primary colon cancer segment locations. DESIGN: Between December 2022 and June 2023, Delphi survey study was conducted to seek opinions from relevant international experts and eventually develop a consensus definition of each colon cancer segment. SETTING: Three-round online-based Delphi survey study. INTERVENTIONS: Online survey included 17 questions. In the first two rounds, participating experts were asked to rank each statement on a scale of 1–9 (9 is the most relevant). Consensus statements and definitions were revised according to results, obtaining a consensus score of 7–9. During the third round and online meeting, definitions and statements reached a moderate or high consensus(above 4 in more than 70% of participants) were included. MAIN OUTCOME AND MEASURE: Primary goal of our project was focused on precisely localizing the specific segment affected by primary colon cancer, rather than to identify surgical treatment or type of resection needed for particular segment. RESULTS: The first round included 331 experts, 301 (91%) completed the second round, and 295 (98%) completed the final round. Experts strongly supported the use of a “10 cm rule” to describe colon cancer sites at the flexures and anatomical landmarks for other segments. Regarding the definition of rectosigmoid cancer, experts from America and Europe reached a high consensus that the term rectosigmoid as a colon cancer location must be abolished in contrast to experts from Asia. Description of cancers overlapping segments achieved a consensus of 64%. LIMITATIONS: Subjective decisions are based on individual expert clinical experience. CONCLUSIONS: This Delphi survey, the first internationally conducted consensus study, achieved a remarkable level of consensus among a panel of global experts. Ambiguity still exists regarding overlapping lesions. See Video Abstract .