Citations

e17594 Background: Cardiovascular disease (CVD) is the leading cause of death among women with ovarian cancer. This study investigates cardiovascular mortality in women with ovarian cancer across the United States, assessing trends by geography and urbanization. Methods: Mortality data from the CDC WONDER database (1999–2020) were analyzed. Females with ovarian cancer listed on the death certificate and cardiovascular disease as the cause of death were identified using ICD-10 codes. Age-adjusted mortality rates (per 100,000) were calculated and stratified by census region and urbanization. Trends were evaluated using Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC) calculated by the Joinpoint Regression Program V5.4.0. Results: From 1999 to 2018, cardiovascular mortality in ovarian cancer patients declined, with an APC of –2.09%, consistent across regions and urbanization levels. However, from 2018 to 2020, a concerning reversal occurred, with mortality increasing by +3.79% per year. The abrupt rise in mortality is observed in the Midwest region, with an APC of +3.99, and in small and medium metro regions, with APCs of +7.38 and +6.46, respectively. This reversal in cardiovascular mortality in ovarian cancer from 2018 to 2020 is likely due to the COVID-19 pandemic that disrupted screening and treatment. Conclusions: This 21-year analysis demonstrates a long-term decline in cardiovascular mortality among women with ovarian cancer, followed by a sharp reversal from 2018 to 2020. This increase suggests the urgent need for public health interventions to reduce cardiovascular risk among ovarian cancer patients.

e17524 Background: Cervical cancer remains one of the leading causes of female cancer mortality, while heart failure drives chronic disease burden. Their coexistence complicates outcomes through shared risk factors, cardiotoxicity, and mortality. This study examined cervical cancer mortality trends in patients with heart failure, assessed disparities, and aimed to inform integrated management strategies. Methods: We analyzed death certificates from CDC WONDER Database (1999–2020), using ICD-10 C53 (cervical cancer) and I50 (heart failure). Female mortality was stratified by race and urbanization. Joinpoint Regression Program V5.4.0 calculated Annual Percent Change (APC) and Average Annual Percent Change (AAPC). Results: A total of 5,534 deaths were identified. Age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMR) declined overall, but trends varied. Among females, mortality fell from 0.1102 per 100,000 in 1999 to 0.076 in 2020 (AAPC -1.28%). Three phases emerged: a modest decline (1999-2006, APC -1.45%), a rapid decline (2006-2009, APC -17.6%), and a concerning reversal (2009-2020, APC +3.27%). The latter increase may reflect reduced screening, declining vaccination rates, or COVID-19 disruptions.By urbanization, large central metropolitan areas showed a steady decline (APC -4.13%). By race, White women demonstrated a consistent reduction (APC -2.61%), indicating sustained benefits of screening and vaccination. Conclusions: Cervical cancer mortality in heart failure patients declined from 1999-2020, reflecting prevention and healthcare advances. However, disparities persist, with notable increases among women since 2009. These findings highlight successes but stress the urgent need for vaccination and screening.

e16229 Background: Liver cancer is a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, with rising incidence linked to metabolic disorders. Conditions such as obesity, diabetes mellitus, and metabolic syndrome contribute substantially to non-viral liver carcinogenesis. However, long-term temporal trends and mortality disparities among adults with metabolic disorders in the United States remain incompletely characterized. Methods: Mortality data for liver cancer among adults with metabolic disorders were obtained from the centers for disease control and prevention (CDC) mortality database. Adults aged 25 years and older were included and age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) per 100,000 were calculated. Temporal trends were evaluated using joinpoint regression and average annual percent change (AAPC) with 95% confidence intervals. Results: From 1999–2023, AAMR for liver cancer in adults with metabolic disorders rose from 0.17 to 0.65 per 100,000 in the U.S., with an overall AAPC of 5.95% [95% CI 5.2–6.7]. Men had higher absolute mortality (0.25→0.93; AAPC 5.68%), while women showed a sharper recent rise (0.11→0.41; AAPC 7.08%), peaking at 11.86% annually after 2016. Hispanic/Latino (0.27→0.89; AAPC 6.73%) and Black populations (0.15→0.75; AAPC 6.15%) experienced steady increases, whereas White mortality accelerated post-2011 (AAPC 9.37%). Regionally, the West had highest rates, the South showed highest growth, and Northeast/Midwest had sharp recent increases. Rural mortality overtook urban by 2020 (0.50 vs. 0.48). Most deaths occurred in medical facilities (48.2%) or home (33.1%), with highest state rates in Hawaii (0.56), Texas (0.47), and Rhode Island (0.47). Conclusions: Mortality from liver cancer in adults with metabolic disorders rose sharply in the U.S. since 1999, with accelerating trends and marked disparities by sex, race/ethnicity, region, and urbanization. These findings highlight an urgent need for targeted metabolic risk reduction and equity-focused prevention strategies. Trends in Age-Adjusted Mortality Rates (AAMR) from 1999 to 2023 by demographic and geographic variables. Variable AAMR 1999 (per 100,000) AAMR 2023 (per 100,000) AAPC (95% CI) Overall 0.16 0.64 5.94* (5.22 – 6.67) Males 0.25 0.92 5.67* (4.82 – 6.5) Females 0.11 0.40 7.08* (5.79 – 8.38) White 0.16 0.63 6.12* (5.41 – 6.82) Black 0.15 0.75 6.15* (5.11 – 7.19) Hispanic or Latino 0.27 0.89 6.73* (5.98 – 7.48) Variable AAMR 1999 (per 100,000) AAMR 2020 (per 100,000) AAPC (95% CI) Urban 0.16 0.47 5.38* (4.43 – 6.33) Rural 0.19 0.50 5.73* (4.48 – 6.99) AAPC denotes the average annual percent change; * indicates p < 0.05.

e16067 Background: Gastric carcinoma remains a significant cause of cancer mortality in the United States. Although overall mortality rates have declined, persistent disparities exist across racial, age, and geographic groups. For cancer patients, sepsis—a life-threatening infection response—is a major fatal complication. Analyzing linked mortality data is crucial for identifying high-risk populations, understanding the burden of cancer-associated infections, and guiding targeted prevention and treatment strategies to improve outcomes and achieve health. Methods: This cross-sectional study used CDC WONDER mortality data from 1999–2020 for adults aged 25 years and older. Causes of death were identified using ICD-10 codes, and age-adjusted mortality rates (AAMRs) were calculated across sex, race/ethnicity, age, census regions, and urban–rural categories. Mortality trends were assessed using Joinpoint regression to estimate average annual percentage changes (AAPC) with 95% confidence intervals (CIs) and statistical significance. Results: From 1999 to 2020, U.S. stomach cancer mortality declined overall, with AAMRs decreasing from 0.29 to 0.22 per 100,000 (AAPC = –0.8%, 95% CI: –1.64 to 0.04). Significant declines occurred among adults aged 65–74 (APC = –1.7%, 95% CI: –2.32 to –1.05), 75–84 (APC = –1.9%, 95% CI: –2.65 to –1.05), and ≥85 years (APC = –3.0%, 95% CI: –4.02 to –1.99). Adults 45–54 years experienced increasing mortality after 2005 (APC = 5.1%, 95% CI: 2.82 to 7.46), while rates among 55–64 years remained stable. Male mortality declined significantly (AAPC = –1.24%, 95% CI: –1.93 to –0.54), whereas female mortality showed no significant long term change (AAPC = –0.93%, 95% CI: –2.44 to 0.60). Black (AAPC = –2.25%, 95% CI: –3.02 to –1.47) and Hispanic/Latino populations (AAPC = –1.50%, 95% CI: –2.26 to –0.74) experienced significant declines. Regionally, the Northeast showed the largest decline (AAPC = –2.30%, 95% CI: –3.52 to –1.07), while the Midwest, South, and West demonstrated no significant long term trends. Metropolitan areas declined from 1999–2011 (APC = –2.80%, 95% CI: –4.44 to –1.14). Conclusions: While overall U.S. gastric cancer mortality declined from 1999–2020, this progress is uneven. Significant increases among adults aged 45–54 and stable rates for those 55–64 highlight an emerging concern. Furthermore, declining trends are concentrated in specific demographic groups and regions, such as the Northeast, revealing persistent disparities. These findings underscore the need for targeted prevention and research focused on younger adults and lagging geographic areas.

9524 Background: Unresectable melanoma in-transit metastases (ITM) can pose a significant clinical challenge. Our recently published data comparing first-line treatments for ITM, isolated limb infusion or perfusion (ILI/ILP), immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and intralesional talimogene laherparepvec (TVEC), found superior outcomes with TVEC. However, TVEC was used more often in patients with lower disease burden and earlier stage (IIIB vs. IIIC/D). Therefore, we sought to better investigate these differences with a propensity score-matched (PSM) analysis. Methods: A multi-institutional, international IRB- approved retrospective analysis was conducted for unresectable melanoma ITM from 2016-2022. PSM analysis comparing first-line ILI/ILP, ICI, and TVEC for was performed. Patients were matched for stage, number of ITM, anatomical site, CLND status, gender and age. Kaplan-Meier curves (OS, PFS, DMFS) and Cumulative incidence function (MSS) were used to visualize time-to-event outcomes in the PSM cohort, though both methods do not account for the matched structure. Results: 274 patients were identified, 120 female/154 male; 96 treated with ILI/ILP, 111 with ICI, and 67 with TVEC. Median follow-up was 40 months (range, 1-80). PSM was performed and identified 36 TVEC–ICI pairs and 27 TVEC–ILI pairs. These were combined resulting in a final cohort of 108 observations (45 TVEC, 36 ICI and 27 ILI). The groups were well balanced. No statistical difference was found for metastasis-free survival (DMFS), progression-free survival (PFS), melanoma-specific survival (MSS), and overall survival (OS) between treatment modalities. TVEC was associated with significant improvement in local PFS (median was 2.2 years (y) for ILI/ILP, 1.5y for ICI and not reached for TVEC, p=0.048). While not statistically significant, a clinical benefit was seen in PFS being longer for TVEC (2.1y for TVEC vs. 1.2y for ILI/ILP and 1.1y for ICI; p=0.2) and OS (not reached vs 2.9y for ILI/ILP and 5.2y for ICI; p=0.2). On mixed effect Cox regression proportional hazard model using the matched data set, there were no significant differences in any of the survival and recurrence outcomes. Conclusions: When patients are propensity-matched, there were no significant differences in first-line treatment modalities for unresectable melanoma ITM. Treatment with TVEC did result in clinically meaningful improved overall and local PFS and OS. This supports that selection of ITM therapy should incorporate an individualized approach, incorporating disease distribution, stage, burden, treatment side effects and patient priorities.

Background Grade group 5 (GG5) prostate cancer (PCa) carries a less favorable prognosis after standard-of-care (SOC) therapy, necessitating novel therapeutic approaches. High-dose rate brachytherapy (HDRBT) and androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) may modulate immune response in GG5 PCa, particularly in tumors with increased immune content. This study evaluated whether the addition of nivolumab to SOC was associated with improved disease control in patients with high-volume GG5 PCa, including those with oligometastatic disease. Methods In this non-randomized phase II trial, 31 patients with localized or oligometastatic GG5 PCa and >30% positive biopsy cores were evaluated between September 2018 and April 2021. Patients received four doses of nivolumab (240 mg every 2 weeks) beginning 4 weeks prior to HDRBT, alongside ADT, HDRBT, and external beam radiation. The primary endpoint was to evaluate whether the 2-year freedom from biochemical recurrence (FFBR) rate would exceed a prespecified historical control rate of 75%. Results Among the 31 patients, the median follow-up was 38.8 months (IQR 31.0–46.5 months). The addition of nivolumab to SOC RT with ADT was associated with a 2-year FFBR rate of 90.3% (95% CI 74.3% to 98.0%) (median FFBR not reached), exceeding the prespecified historical control rate of 75% (one-sided p value from binomial test=0.024). Definitive and probable nivolumab-related toxicity included 6.3% acute grade 2 and 6.3% acute grade 3 adverse events (AEs), with no grade 4+ AEs observed. A higher Decipher immunosuppression score at diagnosis correlated with early pathologic response (p=0.005) and was independently associated with time to metastatic failure (p=0.044). Conclusions Nivolumab combined with SOC was associated with encouraging FFBR in this high-risk GG5 PCa population and may represent a promising therapeutic intensification strategy. The Decipher immunosuppression score may serve as a predictive biomarker for response. These findings warrant further investigation in randomized trials.

AbstractBackgroundIsolated limb infusion and perfusion (ILI/ILP) has been a mainstay treatment for unresectable melanoma in‐transit metastases (ITM), but increased use of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and intralesional therapy (talimogene laherparepvec [TVEC]) introduced several different management options. This study compares first‐line ILI/ILP, ICI, and TVEC.MethodsRetrospective review from 12 international institutions included patients treated from 1990 to 2022 with first‐line ILI/ILP, ICI, or TVEC for unresectable melanoma ITM.ResultsA total of 551 patients were treated, with ILI/ILP (n = 356), ICI (n = 125), and TVEC (n = 70) with median follow‐up of 5.5 years. Tumor burden was highest with ILI/ILP and lowest with TVEC (p = .002). Breslow thickness was lowest with TVEC (p = .007). TVEC was mostly used in stage IIIB disease versus IIIC for ILI/ILP and ICI (p = .01). Using ICI as the reference category, TVEC had the highest odds of a complete response (CR) (odds ratio, 1.96; p = .029) and a longer local progression‐free survival (PFS) (hazard ratio [HR], 0.40; p = .003). ILI/ILP had shorter local PFS (HR, 1.72; p = .012), PFS (HR, 1.79; p < .001), distant metastasis‐free survival (DMFS) (HR, 1.75; p = .014), overall survival (HR, 1.82; p = .009), and melanoma‐specific survival (HR, 2.29; p = .004). Stage IIIB disease had longer DMFS (HR, 0.24; p < .001) compared to IIIC/D.ConclusionsTVEC as first‐line therapy for unresectable melanoma ITM was associated with superior CR rates and local PFS. Notably, TVEC was used in patients with a lower Breslow thickness, disease stage, and tumor burden. Therefore, when compared to ILI/ILP and ICI, TVEC should be considered as first‐line therapy for unresectable stage IIIB melanoma ITM with minimal tumor burden and lower Breslow thickness.

Abstract Disclosure: S. Maraka: None. R. Owen: None. N.M. Singh Ospina: None. M. Knox: None. T. Dodds: None. H. Spencer: None. A. Albashaireh: None. A. Shah: None. S. Syed: None. S. Naqvi: None. H. Motahari: None. S. Thumma: None. E. Ambrogini: None. J.P. Brito: None. Objective: Levothyroxine (LT4) therapy has not been shown to improve quality of life (QoL), thyroid-related symptoms, cardiovascular events, or mortality for patients with subclinical hypothyroidism (SCH) in clinical trials. We conducted this pilot, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial to evaluate the effects of LT4 discontinuation among adults with SCH. Methods: We aimed to randomize 50 adults 1:1 to continue receiving LT4 (25-75 mcg/day) for SCH or discontinue it (switch to placebo). The primary outcome was feasibility. Secondary outcomes included changes in QoL measures (Thyroid-specific QoL Patient-Reported Outcome [ThyPRO]-Hypothyroid Symptoms and Tiredness scores, EuroQoL 5-Dimension Self-Report Questionnaire [EQ-5D]) assessed at baseline and 6 months post-randomization, and incidence of adverse events (overt hypothyroidism, hyperthyroidism, atrial fibrillation, stroke, acute coronary syndrome, heart failure, fracture, mortality). Higher scores for ThyPRO indicate more symptoms and tiredness and for EQ-5D, better health state. Data are reported as mean (standard deviation). Analysis of covariance model adjusting for age and baseline measure of the variable was performed for the outcomes based on the intention-to-treat principle. Results: Fifty participants were enrolled (33% recruitment rate); 24 were randomized to the LT4 and 26 to the discontinuation group. Five patients were excluded post-randomization due to lack of ascertainment of SCH diagnosis (final N=45; 21 LT4, 24 discontinuation). There was no statistically significant difference at baseline between the discontinuation and LT4 groups in age [65.7 (10.6) vs. 71.0 (7.9) yrs], gender (male 75 vs. 86%), LT4 dose (25 mcg; 29.2 vs. 33.3%, 50 mcg; 54.2 vs. 47.6%, 75 mcg; 16.7 vs. 19.0%), TSH [3.1 (1.0) vs. 3.2 (1.4) mIU/L], TPOAb positivity (17 vs. 19%), ThyPRO-Hypothyroid Symptoms [27.1 (20.4) vs. 21.1 (18.4)] and Tiredness score [33.2 (23.7) vs. 31.1 (23.9)], and EQ-5D [0.746 (0.229) vs. 0.758 (0.193)]. A patient in the discontinuation group withdrew for personal reasons (98% completion rate). Two patients in the discontinuation group met study criteria to restart LT4 (TSH&gt;10 mIU/L; n=1, fatigue; n=1). At final visit, 34.8% of patients in the discontinuation group had mild SCH compared to 9.5% of patients on LT4 (p=0.07). There was no statistically significant difference between the discontinuation and LT4 groups in ThyPRO-Hypothyroid Symptoms [28.3 (22.8) vs. 22.9 (19.5)], Tiredness [27.6 (22.8) vs. 32.8 (22.1)], and EQ-5D score [0.750 (0.232) vs. 0.741 (0.180)]. A patient suffered rib fracture (placebo); no other adverse event of interest was reported. Conclusion: This pilot clinical trial showed the feasibility and safety of discontinuing LT4 in patients with SCH. These findings support proceeding with a larger multi-site clinical trial to fully assess the effects of LT4 discontinuation. Presentation: Thursday, June 15, 2023

9574 Background: Surgery remains the gold standard for resectable melanoma in-transit metastases (ITM). Unresectable ITM is a heterogenous disease with multiple treatment (tx) options including systemic therapies such as immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI), regional therapies such as isolated limb infusion or perfusion (ILI/P), and intratumoral therapies such as talimogene laherparepvec (IT). Until now, there has been no direct comparison of these first-line tx for unresectable ITM. Methods: A retrospective chart review of patients (pts) with ITM treated first-line with IT, ILI/P, or ICI was performed at 11 institutions. Pts with unresectable ITM, synchronous nodal or distant metastatic disease were excluded. Results: 560 pts (54% women) were identified, 86 received IT, 353 received ILI/P, and 121 received ICI from 1990-2022. ICI pts were youngest, IT pts were oldest (p<0.001). Limb was the most common site of ITM. There was no difference in largest ITM size, but number of lesions (burden of disease (BOD)) was highest in ILI/P pts and lowest in IT pts (p=0.003). Toxicity (tox) requiring <90 days (p<0.001) or > 90 days (p=0.034) of pharmacologic tx as well as tox requiring hospitalization (p<0.001) was greatest in ICI pts. Lymphedema was more likely in ILI/P pts (p=0.016). Median follow-up was much longer for ILI/P pts at 8.0 yrs compared to 2.5 yrs for IT pts and 3.1 yrs for ICI pts. Overall response rate (ORR) was 82.2% in ILI/P pts, significantly higher than IT (72.1%, p=0.047) or ICI pts (63.6%, p<0.001). Overall survival was similar between modalities (p=0.167); however, ILI/P pts had worse progression-free survival (PFS) (p<0.0001) and melanoma-specific survival (MSS) (p=0.003). On multivariable analysis of MSS by number of ITM present, MSS remained worst if ILI/P was used for low BOD, ≤3 ITM (p=0.005), but no difference was seen between tx modalities for higher BOD, >3 ITM (p=0.211). Conclusions: ICI was used more often in younger pts with less BOD, IT in older pts with less BOD, and ILI/P in older pts with high BOD. Short and long-term tox was greater in ICI. ILI/P had the best ORR, but ICI and IT resulted in greater overall MSS. Multidisciplinary consideration of risks and benefits of each modality should guide ITM tx selection. [Table: see text]