Ramos‐Rodriguez, Alvaro J.

Context.— Detecting copy number variations (CNVs) at certain loci can aid in the diagnosis of histologically ambiguous melanocytic neoplasms. Droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR) is a rapid, automated, and inexpensive method for CNV detection in other cancers, but not yet melanoma. Objective.— To evaluate the performance of a 4-gene ddPCR panel that simultaneously tests for ras responsive binding element protein 1 (RREB1) gain; cyclin-dependent kinase inhibitor 2A (CDKN2A) loss; MYC proto-oncogene, bHLH transcription factor (MYC) gain; and MYB proto-oncogene, transcription factor (MYB) loss in melanocytic neoplasms. Design.— One hundred sixty-four formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded skin samples were used to develop the assay, of which 65 were used to evaluate its performance. Chromosomal microarray analysis (CMA) data were used as the gold standard. Results.— ddPCR demonstrated high concordance with CMA in detecting RREB1 gain (sensitivity, 86.7%; specificity, 88.9%), CDKN2A loss (sensitivity, 80%; specificity, 100%), MYC gain (sensitivity, 70%; specificity, 100%), and MYB loss (sensitivity, 71.4%; specificity, 100%). When one CNV was required to designate the test as positive, the 4-gene ddPCR panel distinguished nevi from melanomas with a sensitivity of 78.4% and a specificity of 71.4%. For reference, CMA had a sensitivity of 86.2% and a specificity of 78.6%. Our data also revealed interesting relationships with histology, namely (1) a positive correlation between RREB1 ddPCR copy number and degree of tumor progression; (2) a statistically significant correlation between MYC gain and nodular growth; and (3) a statistically significant correlation between MYB loss and a sheetlike pattern of growth. Conclusions.— With further validation, ddPCR may aid both in our understanding of melanomagenesis and in the diagnosis of challenging melanocytic neoplasms.

AbstractBackgroundThe occurrence of chemotherapy‐related adverse cutaneous reactions in the setting of capillary leak syndrome (CLS) is quite rare. Our objective was to identify the type of skin reactions associated with CLS.MethodsLeukemia or hematopoietic stem cell transplant patients between January 2010 and December 2017 were identified, and medical records were reviewed for a dermatology consultation occurring concomitantly with CLS.ResultsFive patients were identified, two with a diagnosis of toxic erythema of chemotherapy (TEC) and three others with a skin diagnosis of toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN). Pathology of all patients was available for clinical‐pathologic confirmation.ConclusionsAlthough TEC is generally self‐limited, both TEC and TEN can present with severe adverse skin manifestations during CLS secondary to toxicity from chemotherapy.