Bajor, David L.

3510 Background: Patients with RAS-mutated mCRC have limited treatment options. Chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab (Bev) has been the standard first-line treatment for the past two decades, yet the prognosis for these patients remains poor. Onvansertib (Onv), a selective PLK1 inhibitor, has previously demonstrated synergy with chemotherapy in the second line setting. The Phase 2 randomized CRDF-004 trial evaluated onvansertib plus standard-of-care (SoC; FOLFIRI or FOLFOX with Bev) in as first-line RAS-mutated mCRC. Methods: Patients with first-line KRAS or NRAS mutant mCRC were randomized to SoC alone or SoC plus onvansertib (20 mg or 30 mg). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as determined by a blinded-independent central review (BICR) using RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, and safety. PFS was assessed by BICR and investigator assessments combined. Results are presented in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). Results: At the data cutoff of 22 Jan 2026,110 patients were randomized with a median follow up of approximately 10 months. Baseline characteristics were relatively balanced across arms. Onv 30 mg + FOLFIRI + Bev demonstrated numerically higher ORR (n = 13/18, 72.2%, 95% CI: 46.5, 90.3) compared with the FOLFIRI + Bev control arm (n = 8/19, 42.1%, 95% CI: 20.3, 66.5), the FOLFOX + Bev control arm (n = 8/18, 44.4%, 95% CI: 21.5, 69.2) and the combined control arms (SoC: n = 16/37, 43.2%, 95% CI: 27.1-60.5). Onv 30mg + FOLFIRI + Bev demonstrated a p-value of 0.051 for confirmed ORR vs. SoC; and a p-value of 0.045 for the 6-month ORR compared to FOLFIRI + Bev (n = 10/18, 55.6%, 95% CI: 30.8-78.5 vs. n = 4/19, 21.1%, 95% CI: 6.1-45.6, respectively). The median PFS for the control arms was 10.97 months (95% CI: 7.52, NR) for FOLFIRI + Bev, 9.89 months (95% CI: 9.43, NR) for FOLFOX + Bev and 10.97 months (95% CI: 9.43-15.44) for the combined SoC arms. The median PFS in the Onv 30mg+ FOLFIRI + Bev arm was not reached (95% CI: 9.72-NR). The PFS HR of 30mg + Onv +FOLFIRI + Bev vs FOLFIRI + Bev was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.12-1.17) and vs SoC was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.13-1.02, p = 0.048). The clinical benefit from Onv treatment was further evidenced by the 12-month PFS rates, 61.9% (95% CI: 40.1, 95.8) in the Onv 30 mg + FOLFIRI + Bev arm vs. 28.4% (95% CI: 9.3, 86.9) in the FOLFIRI + Bev arm, and 30.1% (95% CI: 13.8-65.7) in the SoC. Onvansertib was well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicities observed; the most common grade ≥3 adverse event was neutropenia. PK data support moving forward with the onvansertib 30mg dose with FOLFIRI + Bev. Conclusions: Onvansertib plus FOLFIRI and bevacizumab demonstrated improved antitumor activity and manageable safety in first-line RAS-mutated mCRC. These results support further clinical and support planned confirmatory Phase 3 evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT06106308 .

733 Background: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1 RA) have advanced the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) yet their association with cancer risk remains subject of ongoing research. While case reports and pharmacovigilance data have linked GLP-1RA’s to pancreatitis, large randomized trials and observational studies have not consistently shown an increased risk of pancreatic cancer. Chronic pancreatitis (CP) is a well-established risk factor for pancreatic cancer, yet the impact of GLP-1 RA therapy in this high-risk population is unknown. In this study, we aim to evaluate the association between GLP-1 RA use and pancreatic cancer incidence among patients with CP, and among those with CP and T2DM. Methods: We performed a retrospective cohort study using ICD-10 codes within TriNetX, a healthcare database of over 150 million patients in the United States. In the first analysis, adult patients with pre-existing CP were identified, and the 5-year incidence of pancreatic cancer between GLP-1 RA (semaglutide, dulaglutide, tirzepatide, exenatide, liraglutide, and lixisenatide) users and non-users was compared from 2015-2025. In the subsequent analysis, we restricted the cohort to adults with CP and T2DM and repeated the comparison. Patients with prior diagnosis of pancreatic cancer were excluded from both analyses. All cohorts were propensity score matched (PSM) on age, sex, race, tobacco use, alcohol use, hypertension, hyperlipidemia, obesity, and pancreatic cysts. Results: We identified 95,391 with CP, including 3,139 GLP-1 RA users and 92,252 non-users. After PSM, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower incidence of pancreatic cancer (0.6% vs. 1.5%, OR 0.39 [0.22, 0.67]). Similarly, amongst patients with CP and T2DM, GLP-1 RA use was associated with a lower incidence of pancreatic cancer (0.7% vs. 1.6%, OR 0.44 [0.25, 0.75]). Conclusions: GLP-1 RA use was associated with a significantly reduced incidence of pancreatic cancer in all patients with CP and in those with CP and T2DM. Given the elevated cancer risk in CP, these findings suggest a potential protective effect of GLP-1RA use in this high risk population. Prospective studies will be important to further analyze and confirm this potential benefit.

605 Background: Multiple treatment modalities are available for localized hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), and current Barcelona Clinic Liver Cancer (BCLC) guidelines recommend ablation for patients with a limited number of small tumors, not amenable to resection or transplantation. However, in recent years, stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) has been increasingly used for localized disease. Patient outcomes based on treatment modality are not well understood. Methods: We conducted a retrospective analysis using the National Cancer Database (NCDB) to identify patients with a history of stage I/II HCC with tumors ≤ 5 cm who had received local therapy with either radiofrequency ablation (RFA) or SBRT between 2006 and 2021. A propensity score matched analysis was conducted accounting for patient demographics, facility region and tumor level characteristics, as well as an inverse probability of treatment weight-adjusted (IPTW) analysis. Overall survival was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Results: We identified 14,516 patients meeting inclusion criteria, including 13,036 who received RFA and 1,480 who received SBRT. Demographic factors associated with receipt of SBRT included age >50 years, female sex, and treatment in the Middle Atlantic and East North Central regions, as well as clinical factors including larger tumor size (>3 to 5 cm), severe fibrosis/cirrhosis, and stage II disease ( p <0.05 for all). Factors associated with receipt of RFA include black race, higher Charlson-Deyo Comorbidity Scores, treatment at a comprehensive cancer program or integrated network cancer program, and treatment in the East South Central, West North Central, West South Central, Mountain, and Pacific Regions ( p <0.05 for all). Median time from diagnosis to treatment initiation was longer for those who received SBRT (66.3 vs 84.6 days, p <0.001). In a propensity matched analysis, mOS was 45.1 months for those receiving RFA vs 30.8 months for those receiving SBRT ( p <0.001). An IPTW analysis showed similar survival benefit with RFA over SBRT (mOS 51.0 vs 30.5 months, p <0.001). This OS benefit was observed in subset of patients with tumors <3cm in size. Conclusions: In this propensity matched analysis controlling for relevant patient and tumor factors, RFA was associated with improved survival. Prospective studies will be important to further analyze differences in patient outcomes.

Introduction This was the first phase 1 study conducted in the United States. It consisted of dose-escalation (part A) and multiple indication-specific cohort expansion (part B), investigating the safety and preliminary efficacy of toripalimab (anti–programmed cell death-1 inhibitor) in patients with advanced malignancies. Methods Patients with advanced malignancies that progressed after treatment with at least one prior line of standard systemic therapy, including the patients with advanced/recurrent cholangiocarcinoma (CCA), received toripalimab 240 mg every 3 weeks in part B. The primary endpoint was safety assessment. Efficacy endpoints included objective response rate (ORR), disease control rate (DCR), duration of response (DoR), progression-free survival (PFS) as assessed by the investigators according to Response Evaluation Criteria in Solid Tumors (version 1.1) and overall survival (OS). Results In part B, 166 patients, including the 42 patients with CCA, were enrolled and received toripalimab. Among the 166 patients, treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) of any grade occurred in 158 (95.2%) patients, and 97 (58.4%) patients experienced TEAEs of Grade 3 or greater. The most common TEAE was fatigue (42.2%). Seven (4.2%) patients experienced TEAEs with a fatal outcome, none of which were identified by investigators as related to toripalimab. Investigator-assessed immune-related adverse events (irAE) of Grade 3 or higher occurred in 7 (4.2%) patients. In the CCA cohort, with the median follow-up of 4.4 months, the ORR and DCR were 4.8% (95% CI: 0.58, 16.16) and 40.5% (95% CI: 25.63, 56.72), respectively; median DoR was 7.8 (range 4.4+ to 7.8) months; median PFS was 2.1 (95% CI: 1.91, 3.88) months; median OS was not estimable. Conclusions Toripalimab had manageable side effects in patients with refractory cholangiocarcinoma and exhibited preliminary evidence of anti-tumor activity. However, further information regarding biomarkers is needed. ClinicalTrials.gov ID: NCT03474640

(1) Background: Local therapies offer a potentially curative approach for patients with oligometastatic colorectal cancer (CRC). An evidence-based consensus recommendation for systemic therapy following definitive locoregional therapy is lacking. Tumor-informed circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) might provide information to help guide management in this setting. (2) Methods: A multi-institutional retrospective study was conducted, including patients with CRC that underwent curative-intent locoregional therapy to an isolated site of metastatic disease, followed by tumor-informed ctDNA assessment. The Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank tests were used to compare disease-free survival based on ctDNA results. ctDNA test performance was compared to carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) test results using McNemar’s test. (3) Results: Our study cohort consisted of 87 patients treated with locoregional interventions who underwent ctDNA testing. The initial ctDNA test post-intervention was positive in 28 patients and negative in 59 patients. The median follow-up time was 14.0 months. Detectable ctDNA post-intervention was significantly associated with early disease recurrence, with a median disease-free survival (DFS) of 6.63 months compared to 21.30 months in ctDNA-negative patients (p < 0.001). ctDNA detected a numerically higher proportion of recurrences than CEA (p < 0.097). Post-intervention systemic therapy was not associated with improved DFS (p = 0.745). (4) Conclusions: ctDNA results are prognostically important in oligometastatic CRC, and further prospective studies are urgently needed to define its role in guiding clinical decisions.

3509 Background: HER2 overexpression/amplification (HER2+) occurs in ~3%-5% of pts with metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) and up to ~10% of pts with RAS/BRAF wild-type (WT) mCRC. The primary results of the MOUNTAINEER study (NCT03043313) demonstrated that the combination of tucatinib (TUC), a highly selective HER2-directed TKI, and trastuzumab (Tras) was well tolerated with clinically meaningful activity in pts with chemo-refractory HER2+ mCRC. Confirmed ORR was 38.1%, median DOR was 12.4 months, and median OS was 24.1 months. Here, we present results from the final analysis of MOUNTAINEER. Methods: MOUNTAINEER is a multi-center, open-label, randomized, phase 2 trial. Eligible pts had HER2+ and RAS WT mCRC with progression on or intolerance to last systemic therapy. Previous HER2-directed therapies were not permitted. The trial consisted of Cohort A, comprising pts treated with TUC (300 mg PO BID) + Tras (8 mg/kg IV then 6 mg/kg IV Q3W), as well as pts randomized 4:3 to receive TUC+Tras (Cohort B) or TUC monotherapy (Cohort C). Pts randomized to Cohort C were allowed to crossover and receive TUC+Tras on radiographic progression or if they did not achieve a complete or partial response by Week 12. Study endpoints evaluated at final analysis include DOR per BICR, PFS per BICR, OS, and safety. Results: The median duration of follow-up was 32.4 months (IQR, 25.1-46.7), with an additional 16.1 months of follow-up since the primary analysis (data cutoff, 02-Nov-2023). A total of 116 pts received at least 1 dose of study treatment (Cohorts A+B, N = 86; Cohort C, N = 30). In Cohorts A+B, median DOR per BICR was 15.2 months (95% CI, 8.9-20.5), median PFS per BICR was 8.1 months (95% CI, 4.2-10.2), and median OS was 23.9 months (95% CI, 18.7-28.3). In Cohort C post-crossover (N = 28), median DOR was not reached (95% CI, 2.8 months-NE). Median OS in Cohort C was 21.1 months (95% CI, 17.0-NE). The most common TEAEs in Cohorts A+B were diarrhea (66.3%), fatigue (44.2%), and nausea (34.9%). The majority of TEAEs were low grade, and rates were stable with longer follow-up. The most common grade ≥3 TEAE was hypertension (7.0%). TEAEs leading to TUC discontinuation in Cohorts A+B occurred in 5.8% of pts, which was unchanged from the primary analysis. In Cohort C, the most common TEAEs post-crossover were diarrhea (39.3%), back pain (21.4%), and pyrexia (21.4%); the most common grade ≥3 TEAE was AST increase (10.7%). No deaths resulted from TEAEs in any cohort and no new safety signals were identified. Conclusions: TUC+Tras continued to be well tolerated with sustained efficacy in pts with chemo-refractory RAS WT HER2+ mCRC, demonstrating clinically meaningful activity of the combination on longer follow-up. TUC+Tras is an important chemotherapy-free treatment option in HER2+ mCRC. TUC+Tras is being further evaluated in the first-line setting in combination with chemotherapy in the ongoing phase 3 MOUNTAINEER-03 trial (NCT05253651) for pts with HER2+ mCRC. Clinical trial information: NCT03043313 .

736 Background: Patients with dMMR/MSI-H gastrointestinal (GI) cancer occasionally receive neoadjuvant immunotherapy (NIT) due to various clinical considerations. To systematically evaluate the outcome of these patients, we initiated the DREAM-GI national database, intending to harness real-world data to provide crucial insights into the outcomes, safety profile, and response patterns of dMMR/MSI-H GI cancer patients undergoing NIT. Herein, we present the initial findings. Methods: We developed a centralized database to collect de-identified clinical data from patients with dMMR/MSI-H GI cancers receiving NIT. We collected data retrospectively and prospectively through September 15, 2023. Results: The current report includes 50 patients with a median age of 67 years (range 32 to 90); 21 (42%) were female, 9 (18%) were Black, and the remaining were White. The cohort included the following tumor types- 31 (62%) colorectal, 7 (14%) gastroesophageal, and 12 (24 %) pancreaticobiliary. Most patients had localized disease (34, 68%), while the rest had oligometastatic disease. NIT consisted of pembrolizumab monotherapy in 40 (80%) patients, ipilimumab plus nivolumab in 8 (16%), and nivolumab plus chemotherapy in 2 (4%) patients. Most patients, 33 (66%), were treatment-naive. The median duration of NIT was 6 months (range: 1.5 to 55), with a time to best response of 3 months (range: 1.5 to 12). Among 47 evaluable patients, the best responses were as follows: an overall response rate of 75% (35/47), consisting of radiologic complete response (CR) in 20 (43%), pathologic CR in 4 (9%), and partial response in 11 (24%). The median progression-free survival and overall survival were not reached after a median follow-up of 14 months (range: 2-80), calculated from the date of the first immunotherapy dose to the last follow-up or death. Among 24 patients achieving CR, all remained progression-free after a median follow-up of 25.5 months (range: 3-80). Stable and progressive diseases were observed in 7 (15%) and 5 (10%) patients, respectively. Only 5 (10%) patients underwent surgery following NIT, with 4 (80%) achieving pathologic CR. The reasons for not proceeding with surgery were comorbidities in 40 (80%) patients, disease extent in 4 (8%), and patient refusal in 1 (2%). Out of the 12 patients who expired at the data cut-off, 1 was due to immunotherapy-related pneumonitis, 6 due to disease progression, and the remainder from underlying comorbidities. Conclusions: Our study underscores the remarkable response rates and durability of responses achieved with NIT in patients with dMMR/MSI-H GI cancers. Progression on NIT was infrequent. These real-world data support further investigation into non-operative approaches for patients with dMMR/MSI-H GI cancers.

Background SEA-CD40 is an investigational, non-fucosylated, humanized monoclonal IgG1 antibody that activates CD40, an immune-activating tumor necrosis factor receptor superfamily member. SEA-CD40 exhibits enhanced binding to activating FcγRIIIa, possibly enabling greater immune stimulation than other CD40 agonists. A first-in-human phase 1 trial was conducted to examine safety, pharmacokinetics, and pharmacodynamics of SEA-CD40 monotherapy in patients with advanced solid tumors and lymphoma. Methods SEA-CD40 was administered intravenously to patients with solid tumors or lymphoma in 21-day cycles with standard 3+3 dose escalation at 0.6, 3, 10, 30, 45, and 60 µg/kg. An intensified dosing regimen was also studied. The primary objectives of the study were to evaluate the safety and tolerability and identify the maximum tolerated dose of SEA-CD40. Secondary objectives included evaluation of the pharmacokinetic parameters, antitherapeutic antibodies, pharmacodynamic effects and biomarker response, and antitumor activity. Results A total of 67 patients received SEA-CD40 including 56 patients with solid tumors and 11 patients with lymphoma. A manageable safety profile was observed, with predominant adverse events of infusion/hypersensitivity reactions (IHRs) reported in 73% of patients. IHRs were primarily ≤grade 2 with an incidence associated with infusion rate. To mitigate IHRs, a standardized infusion approach was implemented with routine premedication and a slowed infusion rate. SEA-CD40 infusion resulted in potent immune activation, illustrated by dose dependent cytokine induction with associated activation and trafficking of innate and adaptive immune cells. Results suggested that doses of 10–30 µg/kg may result in optimal immune activation. SEA-CD40 monotherapy exhibited evidence of antitumor activity, with a partial response in a patient with basal cell carcinoma and a complete response in a patient with follicular lymphoma. Conclusions SEA-CD40 was tolerable as monotherapy and induced potent dose dependent immune cell activation and trafficking consistent with immune activation. Evidence of monotherapy antitumor activity was observed in patients with solid tumors and lymphoma. Further evaluation of SEA-CD40 is warranted, potentially as a component of a combination regimen. Trial registration number NCT02376699.

105 Background: Patients with potentially resectable dMMR/MSI-H colon cancer (CC) often receive neoadjuvant immunotherapy (IO) if co-morbid conditions or the extent of disease preclude upfront surgery. We investigated the outcome of such patients treated in a real-world setting. Methods: This is a single-center retrospective study that included patients with dMMR/MSI-H localized and oligometastatic CC receiving neoadjuvant IO between January 1, 2016, and July 31, 2022 with a data cut-off date of September 15, 2022. Electronic charts were reviewed to gather data on patient characteristics, tumor characteristics, detailed treatment, toxicity, treatment response, and survival. The response was assessed by radiologic studies, endoscopy, pathology in resected patients, and circulating tumor DNA. Results: The study included 24 patients with a median age of 69 years (range, 32 to 91); 12 (50%) patients were female, and 5 (21%) patients were African American. Among the patients included, 12 (50%) had localized CC (9 of whom had clinical stage III disease), and the rest had oligometastatic CC. The reasons for not undergoing upfront surgery were co-morbidity in 12 patients (50%), disease extent in 11 (46%), and both in 1 (4%). Four patients (17%) received the ipilimumab/nivolumab combination, and the rest received pembrolizumab. Most patients (63%) received IO in the first-line setting. The median duration of IO and the time to best response were 7.5 months (range, 2 to 55) and 3 months (range, 3 to 12), respectively. Among 23 evaluable patients, the overall response rate (ORR) was 74 % (17/23), with complete response (CR) in 13 (57%), and partial response (PR) in 4 (17%) patients. Response assessment is pending in 1 patient. Four patients (17%) had stable disease (SD), and 2 patients (8 %) experienced progressive disease (PD) on IO (1 with localized and the other with metastatic CC). The median progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) did not reach for the whole group after a median follow-up of 12.5 months (range, 2 to 69 months), with 19/24 (79 %) patients remaining progression-free. Three patients underwent surgery with 2/3 achieving pathological CR. Among the 12 patients with localized CC, ORR was 73% (6 CR, 2 PR, 2 SD, 1 PD, and 1 assessment pending); median PFS and OS were not reached after a median follow-up of 9 months (range, 2 to 45) with 1 patient experiencing progression on IO at the time of data cut-off. No unexpected toxicity was observed. Conclusions: In this small cohort of patients with dMMR/MSI-H localized and oligometastatic CC, most patients showed deep and durable responses to neoadjuvant IO, obviating the need for surgery. Progression on IO was rare. This real-world data support investigating a non-operative paradigm in patients with dMMR/MSI-H localized and oligometastatic CC.

4023 Background: Metastatic pancreatic cancer (mPC) remains a deadly disease with very limited treatment options. FFX is a standard first-line therapy for mPC with a median overall survival (mOS) of 11.1 months. CPI-613 is a stable intermediate of a lipoate analog that inhibits pyruvate dehydrogenase and α-ketoglutarate dehydrogenase enzymes of the tricarboxylic cycle preferentially within the mitochondria of cancer cells. In a phase I study, CPI-613+mFFX was safe and exhibited promising signal of efficacy. Methods: A global, randomized phase 3 trial was conducted across 73 sites to investigate the efficacy and safety of CPI-613 in combination with mFFX compared to standard dose FFX in treatment-naïve patients with mPC. Treatment was administered in 2-weekly cycles until progression or intolerable toxicity. In the experimental arm, CPI-613 at 500 mg/m2 was given intravenously on days 1 and 3. The doses of irinotecan, oxaliplatin, and 5-fluorouracil in the experimental arm were 65 mg/m2, 140 mg/m2, and 2,400 mg/2, respectively. Primary endpoint was OS. Secondary endpoints were progression-free survival (PFS), overall response rate (ORR), duration of response, pharmacokinetics, patient reported outcomes and safety. Results: 528 patients were randomly assigned (266 in test and 262 in control arm). There were 362 deaths, with a mOS of 11.1 months for CPI-613+mFFX vs. 11.7 months for FFX [hazard ratio (HR), 0.95; 95% CI, 0.77 to 1.18; P = 0.655]; mPFS was 7.8 months vs. 8.0 months respectively [HR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.76 to 1.29; P = 0.94]; ORR was 39% in the test arm vs. 34% in the control arm [ORR ratio, 1.23 (95% CI, 0.86 to 1.75)]. Grade ≥ 3 treatment-emergent adverse events with ≥ 10% frequency in CPI-613 plus mFFX vs. FFX arm were diarrhea (11.2% vs. 19.6%), hypokalemia (13.1% vs. 14.9%), anemia (13.9% vs. 13.6%), neutropenia (11.2% vs. 14.0%), thrombocytopenia (11.6% vs. 13.6%) and fatigue (10.8% vs. 11.5%). Conclusions: The addition of CPI-613 to mFFX failed to show significant improvements of ORR, PFS or OS. The mFFX in the test arm that had the lowest prospectively tested doses of FFX was without compromise on PFS or OS and may be considered as a reference for future FFX administration. Clinical trial information: NCT03504423.