Lenz, Heinz-Josef

3593 Background: CUB domain-containing protein 1 (CDCP1) is a transmembrane protein shown to be over-expressed in colorectal cancer (CRC), with an important role in tumor initiation, growth and metastasis. Through interactions with EGFR, CDCP1 promotes nuclear translocation of the key regulators of Wnt signaling, β-catenin and E-cadherin. High CDCP1 expression has been associated with poor survival outcomes in multiple solid tumors but data in CRC remains limited. We investigated associations between CDCP1 level and survival outcomes in patients with metastatic CRC (mCRC) in the phase III clinical trial CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance). Methods: Data from 433 mCRC patients in the CALGB/SWOG 80405 (Alliance) trial were analyzed. Patients received bevacizumab (n = 226) or cetuximab (n = 207) plus chemotherapy as 1st-line treatment. Tumor RNA was extracted from FFPE samples and processed through the HiSeq 2500 (Illumina) platform. Overall survival (OS) and progression free survival (PFS) curves were evaluated in all treatment subgroups and stratified according to high or low CDCP1 expression. Likelihood ratio tests, hazard ratios (HRs), and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were calculated using Cox proportional hazards multivariate models, adjusting for age, sex, ECOG performance status, tumor location, number of metastatic sites, KRAS status, consensus molecular subtypes, and treatment arm. Results: Overall, low CDCP1 expression was associated with better OS compared to high expression (HR = 1.38; 95% CI 1.07-1.77; 35.8 vs 25.0 months, p = 0.045). Subgroup analysis re-demonstrated this pattern in males (HR = 1.64; 95% CI 1.64-2.28; 35.9 vs 23.6 months, p = 0.01), patients with MSS tumors (HR = 1.56; 95% CI 1.17-2.08; 36.7 vs 25.1 months, p = 0.0094), and patients treated with cetuximab+FOLFOX (HR = 1.79; 95% CI 1.16-2.77; 40.8 vs 24.0 months, p = 0.03). The effect of CDCP1 expression on PFS was less pronounced. Relative to high expression, low expression was associated with better PFS in males (HR = 1.49; 95% CI 1.10-2.03; 13.1 vs 9.8 months, p = 0.027) and left-sided tumors (HR = 1.50; 95% CI 1.10-2.04; 14.4 vs 10.1 months, p = 0.034). Conclusions: Our findings represent real-world data of the predictive role of CDCP1 in patients with mCRC undergoing anti-EGFR or anti-VEGF treatment. Consistent with studies of other cancers, we show that low CDCP1 expression is predictive of better survival outcomes, with subgroup analysis revealing associations in males, MSS tumors, and left-sided tumors. Among treatment groups, low CDCP1 expression is predictive of better OS in cetuximab+FOLFOX-treated patients, a key finding given CDCP1’s close mechanistic ties to EGFR. Further studies should explore whether these associations are seen in other treatment modalities and whether CDCP1 blockade could represent a viable strategy in patients with high expression.

3510 Background: Patients with RAS-mutated mCRC have limited treatment options. Chemotherapy in combination with bevacizumab (Bev) has been the standard first-line treatment for the past two decades, yet the prognosis for these patients remains poor. Onvansertib (Onv), a selective PLK1 inhibitor, has previously demonstrated synergy with chemotherapy in the second line setting. The Phase 2 randomized CRDF-004 trial evaluated onvansertib plus standard-of-care (SoC; FOLFIRI or FOLFOX with Bev) in as first-line RAS-mutated mCRC. Methods: Patients with first-line KRAS or NRAS mutant mCRC were randomized to SoC alone or SoC plus onvansertib (20 mg or 30 mg). The primary endpoint was objective response rate (ORR) as determined by a blinded-independent central review (BICR) using RECIST v1.1. Key secondary endpoints included progression-free survival (PFS), duration of response, and safety. PFS was assessed by BICR and investigator assessments combined. Results are presented in the intent-to-treat population (ITT). Results: At the data cutoff of 22 Jan 2026,110 patients were randomized with a median follow up of approximately 10 months. Baseline characteristics were relatively balanced across arms. Onv 30 mg + FOLFIRI + Bev demonstrated numerically higher ORR (n = 13/18, 72.2%, 95% CI: 46.5, 90.3) compared with the FOLFIRI + Bev control arm (n = 8/19, 42.1%, 95% CI: 20.3, 66.5), the FOLFOX + Bev control arm (n = 8/18, 44.4%, 95% CI: 21.5, 69.2) and the combined control arms (SoC: n = 16/37, 43.2%, 95% CI: 27.1-60.5). Onv 30mg + FOLFIRI + Bev demonstrated a p-value of 0.051 for confirmed ORR vs. SoC; and a p-value of 0.045 for the 6-month ORR compared to FOLFIRI + Bev (n = 10/18, 55.6%, 95% CI: 30.8-78.5 vs. n = 4/19, 21.1%, 95% CI: 6.1-45.6, respectively). The median PFS for the control arms was 10.97 months (95% CI: 7.52, NR) for FOLFIRI + Bev, 9.89 months (95% CI: 9.43, NR) for FOLFOX + Bev and 10.97 months (95% CI: 9.43-15.44) for the combined SoC arms. The median PFS in the Onv 30mg+ FOLFIRI + Bev arm was not reached (95% CI: 9.72-NR). The PFS HR of 30mg + Onv +FOLFIRI + Bev vs FOLFIRI + Bev was 0.38 (95% CI: 0.12-1.17) and vs SoC was 0.37 (95% CI: 0.13-1.02, p = 0.048). The clinical benefit from Onv treatment was further evidenced by the 12-month PFS rates, 61.9% (95% CI: 40.1, 95.8) in the Onv 30 mg + FOLFIRI + Bev arm vs. 28.4% (95% CI: 9.3, 86.9) in the FOLFIRI + Bev arm, and 30.1% (95% CI: 13.8-65.7) in the SoC. Onvansertib was well tolerated, with no unexpected toxicities observed; the most common grade ≥3 adverse event was neutropenia. PK data support moving forward with the onvansertib 30mg dose with FOLFIRI + Bev. Conclusions: Onvansertib plus FOLFIRI and bevacizumab demonstrated improved antitumor activity and manageable safety in first-line RAS-mutated mCRC. These results support further clinical and support planned confirmatory Phase 3 evaluation. Clinical trial information: NCT06106308 .