Crestanello, Juan A.

Abstract Background Isolated tricuspid regurgitation (TR) repair or replacement carries significant operative mortality risk mainly due to delayed referral. We have recently developed the Tricuspid Regurgitation Impact on Outcomes (TRIO) score to assess risk in TR based on 8 simple variables (age, sex, severe TR, creatinine>2 mg/dl, history of heart failure, history of chronic lung disease, AST >40 units/L, heart rate >90). Whether this score can be used in assessment of TR surgical risk and long term outcome is unknown. Purpose To examine the impact of TRIO scores on the postoperative outcomes of isolated tricuspid valve surgery. Methods Adult patients with severe functional TR who underwent isolated tricuspid valve replacement or repair between 2000-2022 were identified. Postoperative outcomes were compared across low (0-3), intermediate (4-6), and high (7-12) TRIO risk score groups. Results 177 patients were included. Mean age was 70.7 ± 12.2 years, 69 (39%) were male, 34 (19%) were low TRIO score, 111 (63%) intermediate score and 32 (18%) high score. Tricuspid repair was performed in 43 (24.3%) and valve replacement in 134 (75.7%), reflecting the advanced disease stages of this patient cohort. At short term, higher TRIO scores were associated with more frequent need for urgent surgery, prolonged ventilation (>72h) and postoperative dialysis (p<0.05 for all). Perioperative 30-day mortality increased with the TRIO risk score (low: 0%; intermediate: 4.5%; high: 9.4%) but differences did not reach statistical significance (p=0.187). Low risk patients had a shorter hospital and ICU stay (Figure 1A-B). During a mean follow-up of 5.2 ± 3.2 years, 98 (55.4%) patients died. At long term follow-up, lower TRIO scores were associated with improved survival after tricuspid surgery (Figure 1C). Conclusions Patients with higher TRIO scores have more postoperative complications, require longer hospital stay and have higher all-cause mortality at long-term follow-up. Our findings suggest that TRIO score may also be used for risk stratification in patients considered for surgical management of isolated functional TR.

Transatrial transcatheter mitral valve replacement is a hybrid strategy involving placing the patient on cardiopulmonary bypass and direct implantation of a transcatheter valve in a calcified annulus for mitral annular calcification. We report a rare phenomenon of systolic anterior motion of the leaflets of a transcatheter heart valve prosthesis used for mitral valve replacement causing left ventricular outflow tract obstruction. Although reported in transcatheter mitral valve replacement, we believe this is the first report of left ventricular outflow tract obstruction after transatrial mitral valve replacement and discuss the pre-disposing risk factors.

Abstract Background and aims Benefit of tricuspid regurgitation (TR) correction and timing of intervention are unclear. This study aimed to compare survival rates after surgical or transcatheter intervention to conservative management according to a TR clinical stage as assessed using the TRI-SCORE. Methods A total of 2,413 patients with severe isolated functional TR were enrolled in TRIGISTRY (1217 conservatively managed, 551 isolated tricuspid valve surgery, and 645 transcatheter valve repair). The primary endpoint was survival at 2 years. Results The TRI-SCORE was low (≤3) in 32%, intermediate (4–5) in 33%, and high (≥6) in 35%. A successful correction was achieved in 97% and 65% of patients in the surgical and transcatheter groups, respectively. Survival rates decreased with the TRI-SCORE in the three treatment groups (all P < .0001). In the low TRI-SCORE category, survival rates were higher in the surgical and transcatheter groups than in the conservative management group (93%, 87%, and 79%, respectively, P = .0002). In the intermediate category, no significant difference between groups was observed overall (80%, 71%, and 71%, respectively, P = .13) but benefit of the intervention became significant when the analysis was restricted to patients with successful correction (80%, 81%, and 71%, respectively, P = .009). In the high TRI-SCORE category, survival was not different to conservative management in the surgical and successful repair group (61% and 68% vs 58%, P = .26 and P = .18 respectively). Conclusions Survival progressively decreased with the TRI-SCORE irrespective of treatment modality. Compared to conservative management, an early and successful surgical or transcatheter intervention improved 2-year survival in patients at low and, to a lower extent, intermediate TRI-SCORE, while no benefit was observed in the high TRI-SCORE category.

Surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR) has long been the standard treatment for severe symptomatic aortic stenosis (AS). However, transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has emerged as a minimally invasive alternative; it was initially intended for high-risk patients and has now expanded its use to patients of all risk groups. While TAVR has demonstrated promising outcomes in diverse patient populations, uncertainties persist regarding its long-term durability and potential complications, raising the issue of the ideal lifetime management strategy for patients with AS. Therefore, SAVR continues to play an important role in clinical practice, particularly in younger patients with longer life expectancies, those with complex aortic anatomy who are unsuitable for TAVR, and those requiring concomitant surgical procedures. The choice between TAVR and SAVR warrants personalized decision-making, considering patient characteristics, comorbidities, anatomical considerations, and overall life expectancy. A multidisciplinary approach involving an experienced heart team is crucial in the preoperative evaluation process. In this review, we aimed to explore the current role of surgical management in addressing aortic valve stenosis amidst the expanding utilization of less invasive transcatheter procedures.

Abstract Funding Acknowledgements Type of funding sources: None. Background Severe aortic-stenosis (AS) is the guideline-based indication for aortic-valve-replacement (AVR) performance, which has markedly increased with transcatheter approaches, suggesting possible increasing AS incidence. However, reported secular trends of AS incidence remain contradictory, uncertain and lacking quantitative Doppler-Echocardiographic ascertainment. Thus, population-based trends in presentation, treatment and outcome are unknown. Methods All adults residents our County (MN,USA) diagnosed with incident (first-diagnosis) severe AS based on quantitative Doppler-Echocardiography (aortic-valve-area≤1cm2, aortic-valve-area-index≤0.6cm2/m2, mean-gradient≥40mmHg, peak-velocity≥4m/s, Doppler-velocity-index≤0.25) between 1997–2016, were accounted for and trends for incidence, presentation, treatment and outcome analysed. Results Incident severe-AS was diagnosed in 1069 community-residents over 20-years. Incidence-rate was 52.5[49.4–55.8] per 100.000 patient/year, slightly higher in male vs. female and was almost unchanged after age and sex adjustment for the US population 53.8[50.6–57.0] per-100000 residents/year. Over 20-years severe AS-incidence remained stable (p = 0.20) but absolute-burden of incident-cases markedly increased (p = 0.0004) due to population growth. Incidence-trend differed by sex, stable in men (incidence-rate-ratio 0.99, p = 0.72) but declining in women: (incidence-rate-ratio 0.93, p = 0.024). AS clinical-presentation, age, symptoms, comorbidity, ventricular size/function, valve-area-index, low-flow or low-ejection-fraction AS, remained stable. Over the study 20 years, AVR performance grew (1997–2001 to 2012–2016, at 3-month:14% to 21%, p = 0.02; at 1-year 19% to 33%,p<0.0001), and was more prompt (from 1.3[0.11–3.3]years in 1997–2001 to 0.48[0.15–2.11]years in 2013–2016, p = 0.001) but severe AS undertreatment remained prominent (>40%). Early-AVR (within 3-months) was associated with survival benefit (adjusted-hazard-ratio 0.55[0.42–0.71], p<0.0001) stable throughout the 20-years. Despite these improvements, overall mortality, 8.3% within 3-months, 17.8% within 1-year, 36% within 3-years, was swift, considerable and unabated (all p≥0.44) throughout the 20-year study. Conclusion Over 20 years, the population incidence of severe-AS remained stable with increased absolute case-burden purely related to population growth. Despite stable severe-AS presentation, AVR performance grew notably, but while declining, undertreatment remained substantial and disease-lethality did not decline. These findings have important population-health management implications.

Introduction: Bioprosthetic valve thrombosis is a recognized cause of bioprosthetic valve dysfunction. It was found to be associated with accelerated bioprosthetic degeneration and higher rates of valve re-replacement. Hypothesis: Warfarin for 3 months after transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) protects against accelerated valve degeneration and is therefore associated with better outcomes compared to dual antiplatelet (DAPT) and single antiplatelet therapies (SAPT). Methods: Adult patients who underwent TAVR (2012-2019) were identified retrospectively (n=1,501). Patients with atrial fibrillation were excluded (n=657). Patients were classified into warfarin, DAPT, and SAPT groups based on antithrombotic regimen. Structural valve degeneration (SVD) was considered when patients developed new ≥ moderate trans-prosthetic regurgitation, increase in mean gradients ≥10 mmHg from baseline, or when gradients exceeded 20 mmHg. Discharge date was considered time zero. Results: Overall, 844 patients [mean age 80 (±9), 43% females, mean Society of Thoracic Surgeons risk score 6.7 (±5.0)] were included. Warfarin was used in 633 (75%) patients, DAPT in 164 (19%), and SAPT in 47 (6%). Median follow-up time was 2.5 (IQR 1.2-3.9) years. There was no difference in outcomes of ischemic stroke, death, valve re-intervention, SVD, their composite endpoint, or hemorrhagic stroke and hemorrhagic stroke/RBC transfusion events (Figures 1 & 2), even after adjustment for confounders. Conclusion: Warfarin after TAVR was not associated with better clinical or hemodynamic outcomes or with worse adverse events compared to DAPT and SAPT.

Background: The bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) exhibits abnormal geometry and transvalvular flow and is susceptible to calcification with subsequent cardioembolic stroke from calcific embolic material. However, the description of embolic ischemic strokes in patients with BAV is limited to case reports. Methods: Consecutive patients from 1975-2015 with BAV (n=5401) at our institution were retrospectively identified. Patients with ischemic stroke before aortic valve replacement (AVR) were analyzed, and the stroke was characterized. Patients were grouped according to stroke etiology: calcific embolism from a BAV (BAV stroke); large artery atherosclerotic or lacunar stroke (LA stroke); and non-BAV, non-large artery embolic stroke (nLA stroke). Results: There were 83/5401 (1.5%) patients with ischemic stroke. Mean age was 54 ± 12 years and 28% were female. Stroke etiology was BAV stroke in 26/83 (31%), LA stroke in 23/83 (28%), nLA stroke in 30/83 (36%), and other in 4/83 (5%). Stroke was embolic in 72/83 (87%), as shown in Figure 1. CHA 2 DS 2 -VASc score was not different in patients with BAV stroke (1.4 ± 1.2) versus nLA stroke (1.8 ± 1.2, p=0.188) but was higher in LA stroke (2.3 ± 1.2, p=0.005 vs. BAV stroke). Recurrent stroke occurred in 41% overall (50% BAV stroke vs. 30% LA stroke vs. 47% nLA stroke, both p=NS vs. BAV stroke). BAV stroke was more commonly located in the retinal circulation (39% BAV stroke vs. 13% LA stroke [p=0.044] vs. 0% nLA stroke [p=0.002]). Patients with BAV and LA stroke were more likely to have moderate-to-severe aortic stenosis and undergo AVR sooner after stroke compared to patients with nLA stroke. Conclusions: Stroke is an important complication in patients with BAV. The most common type of stroke in BAV is embolic. Greater than one-third of embolic stroke resulted from embolism from a calcific aortic valve. Patients with BAV stroke commonly have a history of recurrent cerebral ischemic events, severe valvular disease, and proceed to AVR soon after stroke.

AbstractBackgroundObesity has been associated with an increased risk of vascular complication during percutaneous coronary intervention, but there are no data on the risk of vascular complication during percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve insertion (TAVI).ObjectivesWe hypothesized there would be a similar increased risk associated with TAVI.MethodsWe reviewed the records of 1176 patients who received percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve insertion from September 2015 to September 2020. All patients received 1) preoperative computed tomoraphy angiography assessment of the abdomen and pelvis to delineate iliofemoral artery anatomy, 2) ultrasound‐guided percutaneous femoral arterial access, and 3) pre‐closure of the delivery sheath femoral access site. Vascular complication was recorded based on definitions set forth by Valve Academic Research Consortium 3.ResultsThe median age of patients was 81 years, and 60% were men. The median body mass index (BMI) was 29 kg/m2 (range, 11–67), and 91 (8%) patients had a value ≥40 kg/m2 (i.e., morbid obesity). Delivery sheath size was 14‐French in 859 (73%) patients, 16‐French in 311 (26%), and 18‐French in 6 (1%). Vascular complication occurred in 53 (5%) patients, including 39 (7%) among the first half of procedures and 14 (2%) among the second half (p < 0.001). When stratified by obesity status (BMI < or ≥30 kg/m2, p < 0.001), the complication rate was 4% in nonobese patients and 5% in obese patients. Multivariable analysis showed no overall association between risk of vascular complication and BMI categories (p = 0.583)BMI continuous values (p = 0.529), or sheath size (p = 0.217).ConclusionsObesity is not associated with a vascular complication during percutaneous transfemoral transcatheter aortic valve insertion. The operation should not be denied in obese patients.

Background Description of cerebral and retinal infarction in patients with bicuspid aortic valve (BAV) is limited to case reports. We aimed to characterize cerebral and retinal infarction and examine outcomes in patients with BAV. Methods and Results Consecutive patients from 1975 to 2015 with BAV (n=5401) were retrospectively identified from the institutional database; those with confirmed cerebral or retinal infarction were analyzed. Infarction occurring after aortic valve replacement was not included. Patients were grouped according to infarction pathogenesis: embolism from a degenerative calcific BAV (BAVi); non‐BAV, large artery atherosclerotic or lacunar infarction (LAi); and non‐BAV, non‐large artery embolic infarction (nLAi). There were 83/5401 (1.5%) patients, mean age 54±12 years and 28% female, with confirmed cerebral or retinal infarction (LAi 23/83 [28%]; nLAi 30/83 [36%]; BAVi 26/83 [31%]; other 4/83 [5%]). Infarction was embolic in 72/83 (87%), and 35/72 (49%) were cardioembolic. CHA 2 DS 2 ‐VASc score was 1.4±1.2 in BAVi ( P =0.188 versus nLAi) and 2.3±1.2 in LAi ( P =0.005). Recurrent infarction occurred in 41% overall (50% BAVi, P =0.164 and 0.803 versus LAi and nLAi). BAVi was more commonly retinal (39% BAVi versus 13% LAi, P =0.044 versus 0% nLAi, P =0.002). Patients with BAVi and LAi were more likely to have moderate‐to‐severe aortic stenosis and undergo aortic valve replacement compared with patients with nLAi. Conclusions Cardioembolism, often from degenerative calcification of the aortic valve, is a predominant cause of cerebral and retinal infarction in patients with BAV and is frequently recurrent. Cerebral and retinal infarction should be regarded as a complication of BAV.

Abstract OBJECTIVES Delayed sternal closure (DSC) after cardiac surgery is a temporizing measure to address coagulopathy or haemodynamic instability after cardiac surgery. We sought to study: (i) indications and temporal trends for DSC, (ii) factors associated with time to chest closure and (iii) its impact on short-term and long-term outcomes. METHODS From January 2007 to December 2017, 494 patients (median age 67 years, 66% males) required DSC after cardiac surgery. Medical records were reviewed for indications, risk factors, time to DSC and outcomes. Multivariable Cox regression via landmark analysis of 486 5-day survivors was used to investigate the impact of time to chest closure on early and late survival. RESULTS Coagulopathy and haemodynamic instability were the most common indications. Median time to chest closure was 2 days. Pre-/intraoperative extracorporeal membranous oxygenation, severe right ventricular dysfunction and diabetes mellitus were associated with longer time to chest closure. Longer time to closure was associated with increased risk of operative complications and operative mortality, but did not have a statistically significant association with late mortality. Increasing age, pulmonary hypertension and a greater number of prior sternotomies were also found to be associated with overall mortality. CONCLUSIONS While longer time to chest closure was associated with increased rates of operative complications and operative mortality, it did not reveal a statistically significant association with long-term survival.