Abstract 1747: Oncolytic Vesicular Stomatitis Virus expressing a species relevant interferon-beta is safe and provides a survival benefit when added as neoadjuvant to the standard of care for dogs with naturally occurring bone cancer
Abstract The goal of this study was to evaluate safety, efficacy, and immunological activity of Vesicular Stomatitis Virus (VSV) expressing a species relevant (canine) interferon-beta (IFN-β) and the sodium iodide symporter (NIS), henceforth called VSV, in companion dogs with naturally occurring appendicular osteosarcoma. The hypothesis was that VSV would track to the tumor, induce oncolysis, and lead to enhanced infiltration of immune cells, expansion of virus- and tumor specific T-cell clones, and improved survival outcomes.The first 15 dogs enrolled in the VSV Immunotherapy and Genomics of Osteosarcoma Research (VIGOR) study received a single iv dose of VSV (1x109 TCID50/kg) 10 days before amputation and adjuvant carboplatin chemotherapy. The final 13 dogs were randomized in a double-blinded fashion to receive either a single dose of VSV or placebo. Outcome data were compared to those from an historical control group of 57 dogs with appendicular osteosarcoma treated between 2006 and 2018 using the standard of care of alone. VSV treatment was associated with mild systemic effects (fever and inflammation), which were self-limiting and caused no symptomatology. Alterations in the tumor microenvironment (micronecrosis, increased fibrosis, and increased inflammation) were more common and more pronounced in VSV treated dogs than in placebo-treated dogs.Reduction in the expression of co-regulated cell cycle gene clusters in tumors after VSV-treatment was observed in dogs with longer survival. Conversely, increased expression of co-regulated immune/inflammatory gene clusters was observed in both VSV-treated dogs and in placebo-treated dogs, suggesting this might be, at least partly, due to the biopsy procedures. Assessment of changes in the clonal composition of T cells within the tumors, draining lymph nodes, and systemic circulation is in progress. No differences were evident in median event-free or overall survival times among the different groups, although aspects of the study design and sample size could obscure differences. Intriguingly, a “tail” of nine dogs (41%) that were long-term survivors (>450 days) was apparent in the VSV-treated group. All but one of these long-term survivors had evidence of inflammation in the pre-treatment tumor samples or showed increased inflammation in the post-treatment samples. We conclude that neoadjuvant VSV has an excellent safety profile and provides a survival benefit for a subset of dogs with spontaneous bone cancer. Ongoing work seeks to establish distinguishing characteristics that identify those individuals most likely to benefit from this therapy, as well as to evaluate the potential to enhance this benefit through the addition of novel immunomodulatory agents as part of our efforts to translate this approach to human cancer patients. Citation Format: Kelly M. Makielski, Aaron L. Sarver, Aishwarya Sathyanarayan, Michael S. Henson, Kathleen M. Stuebner, Alexandru-Flaviu Tabaran, Ingrid Cornax, Gerard O'Sullivan, Andrea Chehadeh, Donna Groschen, Kelly Bergsrud, Lauren J. Mills, Amber L. Winter, Sara Pracht, Milcah C. Scott, Michael A. Farrar, Gary R. Cutter, Joseph S. Koopmeiners, Stephen J. Russell, Shruthi Naik, Jaime F. Modiano. Oncolytic Vesicular Stomatitis Virus expressing a species relevant interferon-beta is safe and provides a survival benefit when added as neoadjuvant to the standard of care for dogs with naturally occurring bone cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2021; 2021 Apr 10-15 and May 17-21. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2021;81(13_Suppl):Abstract nr 1747.
Guidelines for the use and interpretation of assays for monitoring autophagy (4th edition)
1
Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is a highly fatal liver cancer with no effective treatments. HCC tumors, formed after long‐term viral or alcohol related inflammation and cirrhosis, have a surprisingly low number of genetic mutations. Prior research has found that epigenetic patterns, such as DNA methylation at gene promoter sites, are common in HCC patients. Recent improvements in genetic sequencing and online genetic databases, have allowed us to identify a set of gene targets, including FMO3, for HCC detection or treatment. The hypothesis is that FMO3 is reduced by epigenetic dysregulation, leading to tumor formation. To find the connection between FMO3, epigenetic events and HCC tumor pathways, our lab created novel HCV‐stable and non‐infected HCC cell lines. We also used Huh7 and Huh7.5 cells to show the epigenetic changes in stressed cells and methylation inhibited cells. To mimic inflammation and stress leading to epigenetic changes, Huh7 cells were exposed to heat shock at 40°C for 40 min. Huh7.5 cells were treated with epigenetic inhibitor 5‐Aza‐2 deoxycytidine. RT‐qPCR and Western Blot show that FMO3 is significantly reduced in stressed cells and upregulated when treated with the methylation inhibitor. These results indicate that FMO3 may be used for early cancer risk detection and/or to improve treatment options by identifying the relationship between epigenetic regulation and tumorigenesis. Support or Funding Information NIH NIDDK 1R01DK110024‐01A1
Integrating the Epigenome to Identify Drivers of Hepatocellular Carcinoma
Disruption of epigenetic mechanisms has been intimately linked to the etiology of human cancer. Understanding how these epigenetic mechanisms (including DNA methylation [5mC], hydroxymethylation [5hmC], and histone post‐translational modifications) work in concert to drive cancer initiation and progression remains unknown. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in frequency in Western countries but lacks efficacious treatments. The epigenome of HCC remains understudied. To better understand the epigenetic underpinnings of HCC, we performed a genome‐wide assessment of 5mC, 5hmC, four histone modifications linked to promoter/enhancer function (H3K4me1, H3K27ac, H3K4me3, and H3K27me3), and transcription across normal, cirrhotic, and HCC liver tissue. Implementation of bioinformatic strategies integrated these epigenetic marks with each other and with transcription to provide a comprehensive epigenetic profile of how and when the liver epigenome is perturbed during progression to HCC. Our data demonstrate significant deregulation of epigenetic regulators combined with disruptions in the epigenome hallmarked by profound loss of 5hmC, locus‐specific gains in 5mC and 5hmC, and markedly altered histone modification profiles, particularly remodeling of enhancers. Data integration demonstrates that these marks collaborate to influence transcription (e.g., hyper‐5hmC in HCC‐gained active enhancers is linked to elevated expression) of genes regulating HCC proliferation. Two such putative epigenetic driver loci identified through our integrative approach, COMT and FMO3 , increase apoptosis and decrease cell viability in liver‐derived cancer cell lines when ectopically re‐expressed. Conclusion : Altogether, integration of multiple epigenetic parameters is a powerful tool for identifying epigenetically regulated drivers of HCC and elucidating how epigenome deregulation contributes to liver disease and HCC.