Wu, Qunfeng

Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the most prevalent form of primary liver cancer and ranks as the second leading cause of cancer-related mortality globally. Despite advances in current HCC treatment, it remains a malignancy with poor prognosis. Therefore, developing novel treatment options for patients with HCC is urgently needed. Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR)-modified natural killer (NK) cells have shown potent anti-tumor effects, making them as a promising immunotherapy strategy for cancer treatment. Glypican-3 (GPC3), a cell surface oncofetal glycoprotein, is highly expressed in most HCC tissues, but not in normal tissues, and functions as a key driver of carcinogenesis. Given its high expression level on the cell surface, GPC3 is considered as an attractive immunotherapy target for HCC. In this study, two GPC3-specific CAR-NK cells, NK92MI/NH3 and NK92MI/HS20, were established using NK92MI cells, a modified IL-2-independent NK cell line. These cell lines were engineered with third generation GPC3-specific CAR, and their activities were subsequently evaluated in the treatment of HCC. We found that NK92MI/NH3 cells, rather than NK92MI/HS20 cells, exhibited a significant cytotoxicity effect against GPC3 + HepG2 cells in vitro and efficiently suppressed tumor growth in a xenograft model using NSG mice. In addition, irradiated NK92MI/NH3 cells displayed similar anti-tumor efficacy to unirradiated NK92MI/NH3 cells. Furthermore, we observed that NK92MI/NH3 cells showed higher killing activity against the GPC3 isoform 2 overexpression cell line (SK-Hep1-v2) than those with GPC3 isoform 1 overexpression cell line (SK-Hep1-v1) both in vitro and in vivo. This suggest that the presence of different GPC3 isoforms in HCC may impact the cytotoxicity activity of NK92MI/NH3 cells and potentially influence therapeutic outcomes. These findings highlight the effective anti-HCC effects of NK92MI/HN3 cells, as well as the underlying therapy resistance, suggesting their potential as a promising therapy for HCC.

Abstract Background and Aims Chronic HCV infection is a leading etiologic driver of cirrhosis and ultimately HCC. Of the approximately 71 million individuals chronically infected with HCV, 10%‐20% are expected to develop severe liver complications in their lifetime. Epigenetic mechanisms including DNA methylation and histone modifications become profoundly disrupted in disease processes including liver disease. Approach and Results To understand how HCV infection influences the epigenome and whether these events remain as “scars” following cure of chronic HCV infection, we mapped genome‐wide DNA methylation, four key regulatory histone modifications (H3K4me3, H3K4me1, H3K27ac, and H3K27me3), and open chromatin in parental and HCV‐infected immortalized hepatocytes and the Huh7.5 HCC cell line, along with DNA methylation and gene‐expression analyses following elimination of HCV in these models through treatment with interferon‐α (IFN‐α) or a direct‐acting antiviral (DAA). Our data demonstrate that HCV infection profoundly affects the epigenome (particularly enhancers); HCV shares epigenetic targets with interferon‐α targets; and an overwhelming majority of epigenetic changes induced by HCV remain as “scars” on the epigenome following viral cure. Similar findings are observed in primary human patient samples cured of chronic HCV infection. Supplementation of IFN‐α/DAA antiviral regimens with DNA methyltransferase inhibitor 5‐aza‐2’‐deoxycytidine synergizes in reverting aberrant DNA methylation induced by HCV. Finally, both HCV‐infected and cured cells displayed a blunted immune response, demonstrating a functional effect of epigenetic scarring. Conclusions Integration of epigenetic and transcriptional data elucidate key gene deregulation events driven by HCV infection and how this may underpin the long‐term elevated risk for HCC in patients cured of HCV due to epigenome scarring.

Hepatocellular Carcinoma (HCC) is a highly fatal liver cancer with no effective treatments. HCC tumors, formed after long‐term viral or alcohol related inflammation and cirrhosis, have a surprisingly low number of genetic mutations. Prior research has found that epigenetic patterns, such as DNA methylation at gene promoter sites, are common in HCC patients. Recent improvements in genetic sequencing and online genetic databases, have allowed us to identify a set of gene targets, including FMO3, for HCC detection or treatment. The hypothesis is that FMO3 is reduced by epigenetic dysregulation, leading to tumor formation. To find the connection between FMO3, epigenetic events and HCC tumor pathways, our lab created novel HCV‐stable and non‐infected HCC cell lines. We also used Huh7 and Huh7.5 cells to show the epigenetic changes in stressed cells and methylation inhibited cells. To mimic inflammation and stress leading to epigenetic changes, Huh7 cells were exposed to heat shock at 40°C for 40 min. Huh7.5 cells were treated with epigenetic inhibitor 5‐Aza‐2 deoxycytidine. RT‐qPCR and Western Blot show that FMO3 is significantly reduced in stressed cells and upregulated when treated with the methylation inhibitor. These results indicate that FMO3 may be used for early cancer risk detection and/or to improve treatment options by identifying the relationship between epigenetic regulation and tumorigenesis. Support or Funding Information NIH NIDDK 1R01DK110024‐01A1

Disruption of epigenetic mechanisms has been intimately linked to the etiology of human cancer. Understanding how these epigenetic mechanisms (including DNA methylation [5mC], hydroxymethylation [5hmC], and histone post‐translational modifications) work in concert to drive cancer initiation and progression remains unknown. Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is increasing in frequency in Western countries but lacks efficacious treatments. The epigenome of HCC remains understudied. To better understand the epigenetic underpinnings of HCC, we performed a genome‐wide assessment of 5mC, 5hmC, four histone modifications linked to promoter/enhancer function (H3K4me1, H3K27ac, H3K4me3, and H3K27me3), and transcription across normal, cirrhotic, and HCC liver tissue. Implementation of bioinformatic strategies integrated these epigenetic marks with each other and with transcription to provide a comprehensive epigenetic profile of how and when the liver epigenome is perturbed during progression to HCC. Our data demonstrate significant deregulation of epigenetic regulators combined with disruptions in the epigenome hallmarked by profound loss of 5hmC, locus‐specific gains in 5mC and 5hmC, and markedly altered histone modification profiles, particularly remodeling of enhancers. Data integration demonstrates that these marks collaborate to influence transcription (e.g., hyper‐5hmC in HCC‐gained active enhancers is linked to elevated expression) of genes regulating HCC proliferation. Two such putative epigenetic driver loci identified through our integrative approach, COMT and FMO3 , increase apoptosis and decrease cell viability in liver‐derived cancer cell lines when ectopically re‐expressed. Conclusion : Altogether, integration of multiple epigenetic parameters is a powerful tool for identifying epigenetically regulated drivers of HCC and elucidating how epigenome deregulation contributes to liver disease and HCC.