Back to Authors

Ljungman, Per

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8281-3245

Mayo Clinic

Karolinska University Hospital

Citations 3

Consensus Definitions of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection and Disease in Transplant Patients Including Resistant and Refractory CMV for Use in Clinical Trials: 2024 Update From the Transplant Associated Virus Infections Forum
Ljungman, Per , Chemaly, Roy F. , Khawaya, Fareed, Badshah, Cyrus, Boeckh, Michael, Fournier, Martha , Hodowanec, Aimee , Komatsu, Takashi , Manuel, Oriol , Pikis, Andreas, Westman, Gabriel , Griffiths, Paul , Kotton, Camille N. , Forum, for the CMV Definitions Working Group of the Transplant Associated Virus Infections, Komatsu, Takashi, Piki, Andreas, Westman, Gabriel, Caliendo, Angie, Chou, Sunwen, Humar, Atul , Wong, Michelle , Wolf, Dana G. , Razonable, Raymund R , Alain, Sophie , Avery, Robin K , Boeckh, Michael , Limaye, Ajit P. , Natori, Yoichiro , Navarro, David , Razonable, Raymund R. , Miller, Veronica , Forum, for the CMV Definitions Working Group of the Transplant Associated Virus Infections, Komatsu, Takashi, Westman, Gabriel, Randhawa, Parmjeet Singh , Slavin, Monica A. , Wong, Michelle

Clinical Infectious Diseases | June 20, 2024 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 787-794

10.1093/cid/ciae321 Get It

Abstract Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease are important causes of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. For the purpose of developing consistent reporting of CMV outcomes in clinical trials, definitions of CMV infection and disease were developed and most recently published in 2017. Since then, there have been major developments, including registration of new antiviral agents. Therefore, the Transplant Associated Virus Infections Forum, which consists of scientists, clinicians, regulators, and industry representatives, has produced an updated version of these definitions that incorporates recent knowledge with the aim of supporting clinical research and drug development. This also includes an update regarding the definition of resistant and refractory CMV infections previously published in 2019. As the field evolves, the need for updates of these definitions is clear, and collaborative efforts among clinicians, scientists, regulators, and industry representatives can provide a platform for this work.
A Phase 2, Randomized, Double-blind, Placebo-Controlled Trial of Presatovir for the Treatment of Respiratory Syncytial Virus Upper Respiratory Tract Infection in Hematopoietic-Cell Transplant Recipients
Chemaly, Roy F. , Dadwal, Sanjeet , Bergeron, Anne , Kim, Yae‐Jean , Pipavath, Sudhakar , Blanchard, Élodie , Winston, Drew J., Stiff, Patrick J. , Zuckerman, Tsila , Rahav, Galia , Small, Catherine B. , Mullane, Kathleen M. , Patron, Roberto L. , Lee, Dong‐Gun , Hirsch, Hans H. , McKevitt, Matt, Jordan, Robert , Guo, Ying , German, Polina , Porter, Danielle , Gossage, David, Watkins, Timothy R., Marty, Francisco M. , Chien, Jason W. , Ljungman, Per , Cheng, Guang‐Shing , Limaye, Ajit P. , Lachance, Silvy , Waghmare, Alpana , Boeckh, Michael

Clinical Infectious Diseases | December 3, 2019 | Volume: 71 | Issue: 11 | Pages: 2777-2786

10.1093/cid/ciz1166 Get It

AbstractBackgroundHematopoietic-cell transplant (HCT) recipients are at risk for severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection. We evaluated the RSV fusion inhibitor presatovir in a randomized, double-blind, Phase II trial in HCT recipients with RSV upper respiratory tract infections.MethodsPatients were stratified by lymphopenia (<200/µL) and ribavirin use; were randomized, stratified by lymphopenia (<200/μL) and ribavirin use, to receive oral presatovir at 200 mg or a placebo on Days 1, 5, 9, 13, and 17, and were followed through Day 28. The coprimary efficacy endpoints were the time-weighted average change in the nasal RSV viral load between Days 1 and 9 and the proportion of patients developing lower respiratory tract complications (LRTCs) through Day 28.ResultsFrom 23 January 2015 to 16 June 2017, 189 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (96 to presatovir and 93 to the placebo). Presatovir treatment, compared with the placebo treatment, did not significantly affect (prespecified α = 0.01) a time-weighted average decline in the RSV viral load from Day 1 to 9 (treatment difference, −0.33 log10 copies/mL; 95% confidence interval [CI] −.64 to −.02 log10 copies/mL; P = .040) or the progression to LRTC (11.2% vs 19.5%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, .22–1.18; P = .11). In a post hoc analysis among patients with lymphopenia, presatovir decreased LRTC development by Day 28 (2/15 [13.3%] vs 9/14 [64.3%], respectively; P = .008), compared with the placebo. Adverse events were similar for patients receiving presatovir and the placebo.ConclusionsPresatovir had a favorable safety profile in adult HCT recipients with RSV but did not achieve the coprimary endpoints. Exploratory analyses suggest an antiviral effect among patients with lymphopenia.Clinical Trials RegistrationNCT02254408; EUDRA-CT#2014-002474-36.
Definitions of Resistant and Refractory Cytomegalovirus Infection and Disease in Transplant Recipients for Use in Clinical Trials
Chemaly, Roy F. , Chou, Sunwen, Einsele, Hermann, Griffiths, Paul , Mullane, Kathleen M. , Kotton, Camille N. , Lundgren, Jens , Komatsu, Takashi , Lischka, Peter, Josephson, Filip, Douglas, Cameron, Umeh, Obi, Forum, Resistant Definitions Working Group of the Cytomegalovirus Drug Development, Lundgren, Jens , Avery, Robin K , Razonable, Raymund R. , Miller, Veronica , Ljungman, Per , Forum, Resistant Definitions Working Group of the Cytomegalovirus Drug Development

Clinical Infectious Diseases | August 17, 2018 | Volume: 68 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1420-1426

10.1093/cid/ciy696 Get It

Abstract Despite advances in preventive strategies, cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection remains a major complication in solid organ and hematopoietic cell transplant recipients. CMV infection may fail to respond to commercially available antiviral therapies, with or without demonstrating genotypic mutation(s) known to be associated with resistance to these therapies. This lack of response has been termed “resistant/refractory CMV” and is a key focus of clinical trials of some investigational antiviral agents. To provide consistent criteria for future clinical trials and outcomes research, the CMV Resistance Working Group of the CMV Drug Development Forum (consisting of scientists, clinicians, regulatory officials, and industry representatives from the United States, Canada, and Europe) has undertaken establishing standardized consensus definitions of “resistant” and “refractory” CMV. These definitions have emerged from the Working Group’s review of the available virologic and clinical literature and will be subject to reassessment and modification based on results of future studies.