Zuckerman, Tsila

Background: The prognosis of patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory B ALL (r/r B-ALL) treated with CAR T-cells and receive a 2nd CART infusion is unknown. Few reports with limited numbers of patients suggest that 2nd CART infusion is feasible with questionable efficacy. This GoCART coalition registry study aimed at compiling data to investigate the indications, efficacy, and toxicity of CART2 infusion in pts with r/r B-ALL. Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective registry study that included pediatric and adult patients with r/r B-ALL who received autologous CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy (CART1) and subsequently were treated with a second administration of CD19 and/or CD22-targeted CAR-T cell therapy (CART2) from 2017 to 2023. Baseline features, prior stem cell transplant (SCT), indications for CART2 and outcomes were collected. Relapse incidence (RI) was defined as overt recurrence, non-relapse mortality (NRM) as death without relapse occurrence, leukemia free survival (LFS) as being alive without occurrence of relapse and overall survival (OS) as being alive. RI and NRM were estimated using cumulative incidence function and OS and LFS Kaplan-Meier estimation. Results: Out of 345 pts who received CART1, 39 (2y cumulative incidence of second CART: 12.4% (95%CI: 8.8-16.6)) received CART2. Reasons for CART2 were overt relapse (n= 26; 66.7%), molecular relapse by measurable residual disease (MRD+) (n=5; 12.8%), and B-cell recovery (BCR) in the absence of relapse (n=8; 20.5%). Seventeen pts (43.6%) were female and median age at CART2 infusion was 19 yrs (range: 6.9-67.1), including 19 children and 20 adults. 74.4% of the pts had received a prior SCT, 25 pts (64%) before CART1, 2 (5.1%) only between CART1 and CART2, and 2 (5.1%) before CART1 and between CART1 and CART2. Among the 31 pts who received CART2 for relapse, this was CD19+ in 24 (92.3%), CD19- in 2 (7.7%), and unknown in 5. CART1 products were varnimcabtagene autoleucel (ARI-0001) (23), tisagenlecleucel (13), brexucabtagene autoleucel (1), and other experimental (2). All CART2 products targeted CD19 except 2 (1 CD22 and 1 dual CD19-CD22). Median time between CART1 and CART2 was 11.0 months. For patients who received CART2 for BCR, median time between CART1 and CART2 was shorter than for those who received it for relapse: 2.4 (IQR: 2.3-3.3) months vs. 12.4 (IQR:6.4-19.3) months. Regarding leukemic burden at the time of CART2 infusion, 19 pts (48.8%) were in overt relapse (14/19 with extramedullary disease, including 7 in CNS), 12 (30.1%) were in complete remission (CR) MRD+ and 8 (20.5%) CR MRD-. With a median follow-up time of 2.3 yrs [95% CI: 1.2-3.4], the 2-yr OS and LFS after CART2 were 47.1% [95% CI: 27.8-64.3] and 39.9% [95% CI: 24-55.3], respectively. 2-yr RI was 54.5% (95% CI: 36.5-69.4) and NRM was 5.6% (95% CI 1-16.8). 2-yr OS, LFS and RI for pts in CR at CART2 infusion irrespective to MRD were 76.1%, 63.3% and 25.6% while for those not in CR these outcomes were 17.7%, 15% and 85%, respectively (p= 0.007, 0.006 and 0.002). 2-yr LFS (71.4% [95% CI 25.8-92]) and RI (0%) was significantly better for pts receiving CART2 for BCR than in those who received it for relapse (31.6% [15.6-48.9] and 68.4% [46.7-82.8]; p= 0.036, p=0.002). Conclusion: This is a large registry study describing indications and outcome of CART2 in patients with r/r B-ALL. At 2-yrs after CART2, the LFS was of 39.9% and for patients receiving CART2 due to B-cell recovery was of 71.4%. These results show that CART2 is associated with low NRM and might be a bridge to SCT or other additional therapies. Updated results with data about subsequent therapies after CART2 will be presented at ASH meeting.

Introduction: Failure to engraft donor cells is a devastating complication after allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation (HCT) while full engraftment remains a challenge in some recipients. Therapeutic approaches, such as recombinant hematopoietic growth factors, salvage only a minority of patients leaving affected patients at risk for recurrent infections and multiple blood products transfusions. PLX-R18 cells have been shown to mitigate bone marrow failure in rodent and non-human primate models. Further, these human placenta-derived mesenchymal-like adherent stromal cells secrete many cytokines after intramuscular (IM) injection that have been shown to stimulate growth and migration of bone marrow cells in vitro, e.g. MCP-1, IL-6, and IL-8. The initial results of the first cohort of this phase I trial were previously reported (ASH 2018 abstract 3379). Methods: Enrollment for this multi-center, open label, dose-escalation, phase I trial (ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03002519) began in October 2017. Eligibility criteria included patients age ≥18 years who underwent either autologous (auto) or allogeneic (allo) HCT but suffered from incomplete hematopoietic recovery at least 3 months post-transplant, defined as failure to maintain either hemoglobin (Hb) >8g/dL and/or neutrophil count (ANC) >1,000/μL and/or platelet (PLT) count >50,000/μL. Other eligibility criteria included no evidence of underlying malignancy at time of enrollment, no active infection and no evidence of grade 3-4 acute or severe chronic GvHD. Subjects were enrolled into 3 dose-escalating cohorts: low-dose at 1M cells/kg (n=3), intermediate-dose at 2M cells/kg (n=6), and high-dose at 4M cells/kg (n=10). The specified dose of PLX-R18 cells was injected IM in multiple locations and given twice, 1 week apart. Cohorts were recruited sequentially, and progression to the next cohort was based on the safety assessment of its predecessor. Adverse event grading used the NCI CTCAE criteria. As of July 2020, all patients in cohorts 1 and 2 (3 & 6 patients, respectively) and 10 patients in cohort 3 were treated. Data were analyzed using the lmerTest package (ver. 3.1.0) in R (ver. 3.6.1) to produce baseline-adjusted least square means. As study is in progress and data collection ongoing, not all subjects have data on all parameters for all time points. Results: Data on 19 subjects (29-75 yrs) with either allo (n=17) or auto (n=2) HCT are reported herein. Not all patients reached the 9 month time point. Four patients died while on study and 2 withdrew consent within the 1 year follow up period. All deaths and other severe adverse events (SAEs) occurred due to progression of primary disease and were assessed as not related by investigators and sponsor. Most frequent related AEs were injection-site reactions. The table summarizes number of patients who improved from below the critical level, as defined above, at day 0 to above the critical level for a sustained period. Only those patients that were below the critical blood levels at day 0 are shown. To date, the majority of such patients improved to above the critical level after treatment. For example, 9 patients had ANC <1000/μL at day 0. Of the 4 patients for which data currently exists, all improved to ≥1000/μL at 9 months. The plots show changes in Hb, ANC and PLT up to 9 months following treatment. The dashed lines represent respective critical levels. Overall, there was improvement in the 3 parameters, with the greatest improvement observed in patients receiving the predicted optimal dose of 4M cells/kg. In this cohort, Hb levels increased from 9.29±0.5 to 13.19±1.2 (p=0.0019), ANC increased from 1.09±0.6 to 5.13±1.7 (p=0.018) and PLT increased from 45.7±10 to 175.9±28 (p=0.000012). Conclusions: Treatment with PLX-R18 is safe, well-tolerated and clearly effective in some patients. The most frequent AEs were reversible injection site reactions, all without sequelae. An overall improvement was observed in most patients, and among the high-dose cohort clinically impressive improvements in Hb, ANC and PLT were observed. The trial continues to follow up on patients. Upon completion, a large phase II trial, using the optimal dose, is considered for the same indication. Other attractive clinical areas for PLX-R18 therapy include acute radiation syndrome, bone marrow failure, aplastic anemia, myelofibrosis and with HCT as a "pan" cytokine to enhance rapid count recovery in all cells lines. Figure Disclosures Lazarus: Pluristem ltd: Consultancy. McGuirk:Astellas: Research Funding; Bellicum Pharmaceutical: Research Funding; Gamida Cell: Research Funding; Pluristem Ltd: Research Funding; Kite Pharmaceuticals: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding, Speakers Bureau; Allo Vir: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Juno Therapeutics: Consultancy, Honoraria, Research Funding; Novartis: Research Funding; Fresenius Biotech: Research Funding. Rowley:AbbVie: Current equity holder in publicly-traded company; FATE Therapeutics: Consultancy. Ofir:Pluristem: Current Employment. Shani:Pluristem ltd: Current Employment. Rowe:Pluristem ltd: Consultancy.

AbstractBackgroundHematopoietic-cell transplant (HCT) recipients are at risk for severe respiratory syncytial virus (RSV) infection. We evaluated the RSV fusion inhibitor presatovir in a randomized, double-blind, Phase II trial in HCT recipients with RSV upper respiratory tract infections.MethodsPatients were stratified by lymphopenia (<200/µL) and ribavirin use; were randomized, stratified by lymphopenia (<200/μL) and ribavirin use, to receive oral presatovir at 200 mg or a placebo on Days 1, 5, 9, 13, and 17, and were followed through Day 28. The coprimary efficacy endpoints were the time-weighted average change in the nasal RSV viral load between Days 1 and 9 and the proportion of patients developing lower respiratory tract complications (LRTCs) through Day 28.ResultsFrom 23 January 2015 to 16 June 2017, 189 patients were randomly assigned to treatment (96 to presatovir and 93 to the placebo). Presatovir treatment, compared with the placebo treatment, did not significantly affect (prespecified α = 0.01) a time-weighted average decline in the RSV viral load from Day 1 to 9 (treatment difference, −0.33 log10 copies/mL; 95% confidence interval [CI] −.64 to −.02 log10 copies/mL; P = .040) or the progression to LRTC (11.2% vs 19.5%, respectively; odds ratio, 0.50; 95% CI, .22–1.18; P = .11). In a post hoc analysis among patients with lymphopenia, presatovir decreased LRTC development by Day 28 (2/15 [13.3%] vs 9/14 [64.3%], respectively; P = .008), compared with the placebo. Adverse events were similar for patients receiving presatovir and the placebo.ConclusionsPresatovir had a favorable safety profile in adult HCT recipients with RSV but did not achieve the coprimary endpoints. Exploratory analyses suggest an antiviral effect among patients with lymphopenia.Clinical Trials RegistrationNCT02254408; EUDRA-CT#2014-002474-36.