Bethge, Wolfgang

Background: The prognosis of patients (pts) with relapsed or refractory B ALL (r/r B-ALL) treated with CAR T-cells and receive a 2nd CART infusion is unknown. Few reports with limited numbers of patients suggest that 2nd CART infusion is feasible with questionable efficacy. This GoCART coalition registry study aimed at compiling data to investigate the indications, efficacy, and toxicity of CART2 infusion in pts with r/r B-ALL. Methods: This is a multicenter, retrospective registry study that included pediatric and adult patients with r/r B-ALL who received autologous CD19-targeted CAR T-cell therapy (CART1) and subsequently were treated with a second administration of CD19 and/or CD22-targeted CAR-T cell therapy (CART2) from 2017 to 2023. Baseline features, prior stem cell transplant (SCT), indications for CART2 and outcomes were collected. Relapse incidence (RI) was defined as overt recurrence, non-relapse mortality (NRM) as death without relapse occurrence, leukemia free survival (LFS) as being alive without occurrence of relapse and overall survival (OS) as being alive. RI and NRM were estimated using cumulative incidence function and OS and LFS Kaplan-Meier estimation. Results: Out of 345 pts who received CART1, 39 (2y cumulative incidence of second CART: 12.4% (95%CI: 8.8-16.6)) received CART2. Reasons for CART2 were overt relapse (n= 26; 66.7%), molecular relapse by measurable residual disease (MRD+) (n=5; 12.8%), and B-cell recovery (BCR) in the absence of relapse (n=8; 20.5%). Seventeen pts (43.6%) were female and median age at CART2 infusion was 19 yrs (range: 6.9-67.1), including 19 children and 20 adults. 74.4% of the pts had received a prior SCT, 25 pts (64%) before CART1, 2 (5.1%) only between CART1 and CART2, and 2 (5.1%) before CART1 and between CART1 and CART2. Among the 31 pts who received CART2 for relapse, this was CD19+ in 24 (92.3%), CD19- in 2 (7.7%), and unknown in 5. CART1 products were varnimcabtagene autoleucel (ARI-0001) (23), tisagenlecleucel (13), brexucabtagene autoleucel (1), and other experimental (2). All CART2 products targeted CD19 except 2 (1 CD22 and 1 dual CD19-CD22). Median time between CART1 and CART2 was 11.0 months. For patients who received CART2 for BCR, median time between CART1 and CART2 was shorter than for those who received it for relapse: 2.4 (IQR: 2.3-3.3) months vs. 12.4 (IQR:6.4-19.3) months. Regarding leukemic burden at the time of CART2 infusion, 19 pts (48.8%) were in overt relapse (14/19 with extramedullary disease, including 7 in CNS), 12 (30.1%) were in complete remission (CR) MRD+ and 8 (20.5%) CR MRD-. With a median follow-up time of 2.3 yrs [95% CI: 1.2-3.4], the 2-yr OS and LFS after CART2 were 47.1% [95% CI: 27.8-64.3] and 39.9% [95% CI: 24-55.3], respectively. 2-yr RI was 54.5% (95% CI: 36.5-69.4) and NRM was 5.6% (95% CI 1-16.8). 2-yr OS, LFS and RI for pts in CR at CART2 infusion irrespective to MRD were 76.1%, 63.3% and 25.6% while for those not in CR these outcomes were 17.7%, 15% and 85%, respectively (p= 0.007, 0.006 and 0.002). 2-yr LFS (71.4% [95% CI 25.8-92]) and RI (0%) was significantly better for pts receiving CART2 for BCR than in those who received it for relapse (31.6% [15.6-48.9] and 68.4% [46.7-82.8]; p= 0.036, p=0.002). Conclusion: This is a large registry study describing indications and outcome of CART2 in patients with r/r B-ALL. At 2-yrs after CART2, the LFS was of 39.9% and for patients receiving CART2 due to B-cell recovery was of 71.4%. These results show that CART2 is associated with low NRM and might be a bridge to SCT or other additional therapies. Updated results with data about subsequent therapies after CART2 will be presented at ASH meeting.

Abstract Cytopenias represent the most common side effect of CAR T-cell therapy (CAR-T) and can predispose for severe infectious complications. Current grading systems, such as the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE), neither reflect the unique quality of post–CAR-T neutrophil recovery, nor do they reflect the inherent risk of infections due to protracted neutropenia. For this reason, a novel EHA/EBMT consensus grading was recently developed for Immune Effector Cell-Associated HematoToxicity (ICAHT). In this multicenter, observational study, we applied the grading system to a large real-world cohort of 549 patients treated with BCMA- or CD19-directed CAR-T for refractory B-cell malignancies (112 multiple myeloma [MM], 334 large B-cell lymphoma [LBCL], 103 mantle cell lymphoma [MCL]) and examined the clinical sequelae of severe (≥3°) ICAHT. The ICAHT grading was strongly associated with the cumulative duration of severe neutropenia (r = 0.92, P < .0001), the presence of multilineage cytopenias, and the use of platelet and red blood cell transfusions. We noted an increased rate of severe ICAHT in patients with MCL vs those with LBCL and MM (28% vs 23% vs 15%). Severe ICAHT was associated with a higher rate of severe infections (49% vs 13%, P < .0001), increased nonrelapse mortality (14% vs 4%, P < .0001), and inferior survival outcomes (1-year progression-free survival: 35% vs 51%, 1-year overall survival: 52% vs 73%, both P < .0001). Importantly, the ICAHT grading demonstrated superior capacity to predict severe infections compared with the CTCAE grading (c-index 0.73 vs 0.55, P < .0001 vs nonsignificant). Taken together, these data highlight the clinical relevance of the novel grading system and support the reporting of ICAHT severity in clinical trials evaluating CAR-T therapies.

Background: Hematological toxicity is a frequent side effect of CAR-T therapy and predisposes for severe infectious complications. Recently, the EHA/EBMT consensus grading for Immune Effector Cell Associated HematoToxicity (ICAHT) was developed ( Rejeski et al. Blood 2023). In contrast to existing grading systems such as the CTCAE, the novel ICAHT grading integrates both the depth and duration of neutropenia. We hypothesized that ICAHT severity is associated with key clinical sequelae such as transfusion requirements, hospitalization, severe infections, and adverse treatment outcomes. Methods: We applied the novel grading of early ICAHT (day 0-30) to a multicenter retrospective real-world cohort of 549 patients treated with BCMA- or CD19-directed CAR T-cells for relapsed/refractory B-cell malignancies (334 large B-cell lymphoma [LBCL], 112 multiple myeloma [MM], 103 mantle cell lymphoma [MCL]) across twelve international sites (Germany, France, Spain, USA). Hematotoxicity endpoints included the total cumulative duration of severe neutropenia (ANC <500/µL, day 0-60) and phenotypes of neutrophil recovery ( Rejeski et al. Blood 2021). Infections were studied until day +90 after CAR-T and were graded on a 5-grade scale as mild, moderate, severe, life-threatening, or fatal. Non-relapse mortality (NRM) was defined as death following CAR-T without evidence of relapse or progression. Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared using log-rank test. Results: Our study cohort included 424 patients without severe ICAHT (absent or grade 1-2) and 125 patients with severe ICAHT (grade 3-4). The distribution of mild (1°), moderate (2°), severe (3°) and life-threatening (4°) ICAHT was 36%, 29%, 17%, and 5%. Seventy patients (13%) did not develop ICAHT of any grade. When comparing ICAHT grades across disease entities, we noted a numeric trend towards increased severe ICAHT in MCL compared to LBCL or MM patients (Grade ≥3: 28% vs. 23% vs. 15%). Patients that subsequently developed severe ICAHT displayed elevated serum inflammatory markers and pronounced cytopenia at baseline - reflected by increased CAR-HEMATOTOX scores (median 3 vs. 1, p<0.0001). On multivariate binary logistic regression, co-stimulatory domain (CD28z), low platelet count, low ANC, low hemoglobin, increased serum ferritin, and the presence of bone marrow infiltration were independent risk factors for severe ICAHT. We noted a strong positive correlation between ICAHT severity and the cumulative duration of severe neutropenia (r=0.92, p<0.0001). The aplastic phenotype of neutrophil recovery was enriched in patients with grade 3 (73%) and especially grade 4 ICAHT (100%). Severe ICAHT was also associated with coincident multilineage cytopenias, resulting in increased transfusion requirements for both platelets (85% vs. 21%, p<0.0001) and red blood cells (86% vs. 41%, p<0.0001). In terms of management of hematotoxicity, the severe ICAHT group more commonly received G-CSF (72% vs. 44%, p=0.01), TPO mimetics (12% vs. 2%, p<0.0001) and hematopoietic stem cell boosts (6% vs. 0.2%, p<0.0001). Importantly, patients with severe ICAHT displayed a significantly increased rate of severe infections (49% vs. 13%, p<0.0001, Fig. 1a) and severe bacterial infections (36% vs. 8%, p<0.0001). This translated into a markedly increased 1-year NRM rate (14% vs. 4.5%, logrank p<0.0001, Fig. 1b), which was primarily attributed to fatal infections of fungal or bacterial origin. Of note, the ICAHT grading showed superior discrimination for severe infections (C-index 0.73, 95%CI: 0.67-0.78) compared to CTCAE grading (C-index 0.55, n.s.). Prolonged hospitalization was noted in case of severe ICAHT (median 21 vs. 16 days, p<0.0001) and intensive care admission was more common (23% vs. 4%, p<0.001). Finally, we observed inferior PFS (1-year PFS 35% vs. 51%, median 4 vs. 14 months, p<0.0001) and inferior OS (1-year OS 52% vs. 73%, median 12 months vs. not-reached, p<0.0001) in the patients that developed severe ICAHT. Conclusions: These data highlight the clinical relevance of the novel EHA/EBMT ICAHT grading system. Importantly, ICAHT severity was closely associated with transfusion dependence, increased infection incidence, and adverse treatment outcomes with high NRM. Taken together, these findings argue for reporting ICAHT grades in clinical trials evaluating established and novel CAR constructs.