Back to Authors

Humar, Atul

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1751-7159

Mayo Clinic

University Health Network

Citations 4

Consensus Definitions of Cytomegalovirus (CMV) Infection and Disease in Transplant Patients Including Resistant and Refractory CMV for Use in Clinical Trials: 2024 Update From the Transplant Associated Virus Infections Forum
Ljungman, Per , Chemaly, Roy F. , Khawaya, Fareed, Badshah, Cyrus, Boeckh, Michael, Fournier, Martha , Hodowanec, Aimee , Komatsu, Takashi , Manuel, Oriol , Pikis, Andreas, Westman, Gabriel , Griffiths, Paul , Kotton, Camille N. , Forum, for the CMV Definitions Working Group of the Transplant Associated Virus Infections, Komatsu, Takashi, Piki, Andreas, Westman, Gabriel, Caliendo, Angie, Chou, Sunwen, Humar, Atul , Wong, Michelle , Wolf, Dana G. , Razonable, Raymund R , Alain, Sophie , Avery, Robin K , Boeckh, Michael , Limaye, Ajit P. , Natori, Yoichiro , Navarro, David , Razonable, Raymund R. , Miller, Veronica , Forum, for the CMV Definitions Working Group of the Transplant Associated Virus Infections, Komatsu, Takashi, Westman, Gabriel, Randhawa, Parmjeet Singh , Slavin, Monica A. , Wong, Michelle

Clinical Infectious Diseases | June 20, 2024 | Volume: 79 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 787-794

10.1093/cid/ciae321 Get It

Abstract Cytomegalovirus (CMV) infection and disease are important causes of morbidity and mortality in transplant recipients. For the purpose of developing consistent reporting of CMV outcomes in clinical trials, definitions of CMV infection and disease were developed and most recently published in 2017. Since then, there have been major developments, including registration of new antiviral agents. Therefore, the Transplant Associated Virus Infections Forum, which consists of scientists, clinicians, regulators, and industry representatives, has produced an updated version of these definitions that incorporates recent knowledge with the aim of supporting clinical research and drug development. This also includes an update regarding the definition of resistant and refractory CMV infections previously published in 2019. As the field evolves, the need for updates of these definitions is clear, and collaborative efforts among clinicians, scientists, regulators, and industry representatives can provide a platform for this work.
Diabetogenic Effects of Immunosuppression: An Integrative Analysis
Bhat, Mamatha , Pasini, Elisa , Das, Aninditee, Baciu, Cristina , Angeli, Marc , Humar, Atul , Watt, Kymberly D. , Allard, Johane P. , Bhat, Mamatha

Transplantation | July 8, 2019 | Volume: 104 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 211-221

10.1097/tp.0000000000002815 Get It

Background. Posttransplant diabetes mellitus (PTDM) affects up to 50% of solid organ transplant recipients and compromises long-term outcomes. The goal of this study was to investigate how immunosuppressants affect gene expression in a manner that increases diabetes risk, by performing integrative analysis on publicly available, high-throughput gene expression data. Methods. All high-throughput gene expression datasets of solid organ transplant recipients were retrieved from the Gene Expression Omnibus. Significantly dysregulated genes and pathways were determined, and those in common with type 2 diabetes were identified. THP-1 and HepG2 cells were exposed in vitro to tacrolimus, and validation of genes involved in insulin signaling and glucose metabolism was performed using specific arrays. These cells were then treated with the hypoglycemic agents, metformin, and insulin to assess for appropriate reversion of specific diabetogenic genes. Results. Insulin signaling and secretion were the most commonly dysregulated pathways that overlapped with diabetes in transplant recipients. KRAS, GRB2, PCK2, BCL2L1, INSL3, DOK3, and PTPN1 were among the most significantly upregulated genes in both immunosuppression and diabetes subsets and were appropriately reverted by metformin as confirmed in vitro. Conclusions. We discovered that the significantly dysregulated genes in the context of immunosuppression are implicated in insulin signaling and insulin secretion, as a manifestation of pancreatic β-cell function. In vitro validation confirmed key diabetes-related genes in the context of immunosuppression. Further analysis and in vitro validation revealed that metformin optimally reverts diabetogenic genes dysregulated in the context of immunosuppression. The optimal therapeutic management of posttransplant diabetes mellitus needs to be further investigated, taking into account the mechanistic impact of immunosuppressants.
Cytomegalovirus in solid organ transplant recipients—Guidelines of the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice
Humar, Atul , Razonable, Raymund R.

Clinical Transplantation | February 28, 2019 | Volume: 33 | Issue: 9 | Pages: No page available

10.1111/ctr.13512 Get It

AbstractCytomegalovirus (CMV) is one of the most common opportunistic infections that affect the outcome of solid organ transplantation. This updated guideline from the American Society of Transplantation Infectious Diseases Community of Practice provides evidence‐based and expert recommendations for screening, diagnosis, prevention, and treatment of CMV in solid organ transplant recipients. CMV serology to detect immunoglobulin G remains as the standard method for pretransplant screening of donors and transplant candidates. Antiviral prophylaxis and preemptive therapy are the mainstays of CMV prevention. The lack of a widely applicable viral load threshold for diagnosis and preemptive therapy is highlighted, as a result of variability of CMV nucleic acid testing, even in the contemporary era when calibrators are standardized. Valganciclovir and intravenous ganciclovir remain as drugs of choice for CMV management. Strategies for managing drug‐resistant CMV infection are presented. There is an increasing use of CMV‐specific cell‐mediated immune assays to stratify the risk of CMV infection after solid organ transplantation, but their role in optimizing CMV prevention and treatment efforts has yet to be demonstrated. Specific issues related to pediatric transplant recipients are discussed.
A multicenter evaluation of pandemic influenza A/H1N1 in hematopoietic stem cell transplant recipients
Reid, Gail , Huprikar, Shirish , Patel, Gopi , Mossad, Sherif B. , Levi, Marilyn E. , Gregg, Kevin , Humar, Atul , Adams, William , Kumar, Deepali , Razonable, Raymund R. , Shoham, Shmuel

Transplant Infectious Disease | July 25, 2013 | Volume: 15 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 487-492

10.1111/tid.12116 Get It

AbstractBackgroundHematopoietic stem cell transplant (HSCT) recipients have increased morbidity from respiratory viral infections. Pandemic influenza A – A(H1N1)/pdm09 – in 2009–2010 was associated with increased severity of illness in patients with underlying co‐morbidities including HSCT, but the factors that contribute to severe disease in HSCT patients are not well characterized.MethodsWe conducted a multicenter review of microbiologically proven influenza A(H1N1)pdm09 in the HSCT population between April 2009 and April 2010 to determine factors that are associated with severe disease.ResultsWe identified 37 adult patients (26 allogeneic and 11 autologous HSCT recipients). Median time from transplant to diagnosis was 411 days (range 4 days–14.9 years). Three cases were hospital acquired. Twenty‐eight of 37 (75.7%) had confirmed A(H1N1)pdm09. Presumed viral lower respiratory tract infection was present in 12/37 (32.4%) patients. Antiviral therapy was given to 33/37 (89%) patients, primarily oseltamivir (n = 24) and oseltamivir before or after another antiviral (n = 8). Excluding those with nosocomial A(H1N1)pdm09, 18/34 (52.9%) were hospitalized and 6 (33%) required admission to an intensive care unit. Mortality within 30 and 60 days of symptom onset was 7/37 (18.9%) and 11/37 (29.7%), respectively. Factors associated with mortality included nosocomial acquisition (P = 0.023), receipt of mycophenolate mofetil (P = 0.001), or antilymphocyte antibody (P = 0.005) within the past 6 months, reduced‐intensity conditioning (P = 0.027), and bacteremia (P = 0.021).ConclusionsA(H1N1)pdm09 infection was particularly severe in HSCT recipients, specifically among those receiving augmented immunosuppression for graft‐versus‐host disease. The high mortality of the nosocomial cases highlights the need for strict infection‐control measures in hospitals during influenza outbreaks.