Knutson, Darlene L.

Myxofibrosarcomas (MFS) present as slowly enlarging superficial masses in elderly patients. Even though these tumors fail to exhibit a distinct immunophenotype, diagnosis is straightforward when they present in subcutaneous tissue. Intramuscular MFS, however, are more challenging to diagnose as the differential also includes dedifferentiated liposarcoma with myxoid features. The vast majority of dedifferentiated liposarcomas show MDM2 amplification, whereas limited data exists as to the MDM2 status of MFS. We sought to explore the rate of MDM2 amplification in cases of classic MFS. Our archives were searched for MFS; only subcutaneous well-sampled resections were included. FISH for MDM2 amplification was performed on each tumor. A cohort of myxoid dedifferentiated liposarcoma resections was studied for comparison. Twenty-two MFS arose in patients aged 44 to 85 years. All tumors contained an infiltrative population of atypical cells embedded in a myxoid stroma with curvilinear blood vessels. MDM2 amplification by FISH was identified in 3 (of 22; 14%) tumors. Available follow up on 17 patients (range 1-96 months; median 13 months) revealed 6 patients with local recurrence and 1 with distant metastasis. Of 3 patients with MDM2- amplified MFS, 1 experienced recurrence and died of unrelated causes, while the second was alive without disease 12 months after diagnosis. Even though the rate of MDM2 amplification by FISH in MFS appears to be low, a subset of cases may show this genetic alteration, which pathologists should be aware of to avoid misclassification as myxoid dedifferentiated liposarcomas. Further studies are necessary to determine if amplification status adds prognostic value.

Context.— Comprehensive genomic profiling has demonstrated that approximately 20% of pancreatic carcinomas with acinar differentiation harbor potentially targetable BRAF fusions that activate the MAPK pathway. Objectives.— To validate the above finding by BRAF break-apart fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) in a large series of pure acinar cell carcinomas (ACCs), evaluate tumors for the presence of BRAF V600E mutations, and compare clinicopathologic features of tumors with BRAF rearrangements with those without. Design.— Thirty cases of pure ACC and 6 cases of mixed acinar-neuroendocrine carcinoma (ACC-NEC) were retrieved. A break-apart FISH probe was used to detect BRAF rearrangements. Immunohistochemistry for BRAF V600E was performed. Results.— BRAF rearrangements by FISH were found in 6 of 36 cases (17%), 5 of which were pure ACC and 1 was a mixed ACC-NEC. Follow-up was available in 29 of 36 cases (81%). The median survival was 22 months for BRAF-rearranged cases and 16 months for BRAF-intact cases; the 2-year overall survival was 50% for BRAF-rearranged cases and 35% for BRAF-intact cases. No significant clinicopathologic differences were identified in cases with BRAF rearrangement compared with those without BRAF rearrangement. BRAF V600E mutation was identified in 2 of 34 cases (6%), both of which were pure ACC and were BRAF-intact by FISH. Conclusions.— This study supports the finding that BRAF rearrangements are present in approximately 20% of cases and identified BRAF V600E mutations in approximately 5% of cases. These cases may benefit from targeted therapy.

3144 Background: Updated ASCO/CAP Guidelines for HER2 testing in breast cancer have been most impactful on the resolution of certain challenging groups of FISH results. We review the change in assignment of HER2 status in a large series of breast cancers referred to a large national reference laboratory for FISH testing since the introduction of the 2018 updated guidelines. Methods: Patient samples submitted to the Mayo Clinic Cytogenetics Laboratory (N = 2208) were analyzed by FISH. Samples with Group 2, Group 3, or Group 4 FISH results were reflexed to immunohistochemistry (IHC) in our central laboratory; FISH slides for those cases with equivocal 2+ IHC results were re-scored in the regions of invasive cancer showing more intense membranous staining. A subset of 202 samples with Group 4 FISH results were also reflexed to the previously employed reflex FISH assay (HER2/D17S122), and these were also re-analyzed according to the new reflex IHC/FISH process. Results: 382 of 2208 breast cancer samples tested (17.3%) had FISH results categorized as Group 2 (N = 17, 0.8%), Group 3 (N = 34, 1.5%), or Group 4 (N = 331, 15%) and required reflex IHC testing, and of those, 75% were 2+ equivocal and required targeted re-analysis of the FISH slide according to the 2018 updated guidelines. Re-analysis of the FISH slide resulted in switching between Groups 1-5 in 19.4% of cases, but HER2 status was changed by FISH re-scoring in only 7.7% of cases re-scored (1.0% of all samples), generally due to only minor shifts in HER2 copy number and HER2/control ratios between the initial and IHC-guided reflex FISH scores. In the subset of 202 cases tested by both reflex methods, the previously employed HER2/D17S122 reflex probe set was positive in 123 cases (60.9%), whereas reflex IHC/FISH was positive in only 10 cases (7.9%). Including positive reflex IHC (0.4%) and positive reflex FISH results (2.1%), the overall assignment of positive HER2 status on our series of 2208 cases was 11.5%. Conclusions: Overall rates of HER2 positive FISH results have declined under the most recent ASCO/CAP guideline update as a consequence of new recommendations for reflex testing for Groups 2-4. This change is largely due to reassignment of Group 2 and Group 4 results as negative in the absence of positive IHC.