Wu, Tsung‐Teh

CTNNB1- mutated hepatocellular carcinomas are characterized by a distinctive morphology and activation of the Wnt pathway. AXIN1 also plays a key role in the Wnt pathway, but the morphology of AXIN1-mutated tumors has not been examined. In addition, there are ongoing questions on the ability of AXIN1 mutations to activate the Wnt pathway in hepatocellular carcinoma. AXIN1 mutated tumors (N=18) were studied, along with control groups: CTNNB1 (N=17), APC (6), or “Other” genes in the Wnt pathway (5). Wnt pathway activation was studied by immunostains for beta-catenin and glutamine synthetase. Findings were supplemented by gene expression analysis using TCGA data. On histologic examination, the classic morphology associated with beta-catenin mutations was found in all 4 groups: 8/18 AXIN1 (44%), 10/17 CTNNB1 (59%), 4/6 APC (67%), and 1/5 Other (20%). By immunohistochemistry, Wnt pathway activation was found in 11/18 AXIN1 (61%), 15/17 CTTNB1 (88%), 6/6 APC (100%), and 5/5 (100%) of Other. In AXIN1- mutated tumors, the Wnt pathway was weakly activated. Glutamine synthetase stains also highlighted a new “progressed pattern” associated with distinct subnodules of staining. Tertiary lymphoid structures were uncommon except for cases with CTTNNB1 mutations plus additional mutations in the Wnt pathway. In summary, the classic morphology associated with CTNNB1 mutations is found in hepatocellular carcinomas with mutations in AXIN1 , APC , and other Wnt genes. AXIN1 mutated tumors have Wnt activation that is detectable but at lower levels than CTNNB1 mutated tumors. As tumors progress, their level of Wnt activation can change.

Abstract Purpose: We aimed to assess the concordance of colorectal cancer–associated methylated DNA markers (MDM) in primary and metastatic colorectal cancer for feasibility in detection of distantly recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer in plasma. Experimental Design: A panel of previously discovered colorectal cancer–associated MDMs was selected. MDMs from primary and paired metastatic colorectal cancer tissue were assayed with quantitative methylation-specific PCR. Plasma MDMs were measured blindly by target enrichment long-probe quantitative-amplified signal assays. Random forest modeling was used to derive a prediction algorithm of MDMs in archival plasma samples from primary colorectal cancer cases. This algorithm was validated in prospectively collected plasma samples from recurrent colorectal cancer cases. The accuracy of the algorithm was summarized as sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). Results: Of the 14 selected MDMs, the concordance between primary and metastatic tissue was considered moderate or higher for 12 MDMs (86%). At a preset specificity of 95% (91%–98%), a panel of 13 MDMs, in plasma from 97 colorectal cancer cases and 200 controls, detected stage IV colorectal cancer with 100% (80%–100%) sensitivity and all stages of colorectal cancer with an AUC of 0.91 (0.87–0.95), significantly higher than carcinoembryonic antigen [AUC, 0.72 (0.65–0.79)]. This panel, in plasma from 40 cases and 60 healthy controls, detected recurrent/metastatic colorectal cancer with 90% (76%–97%) sensitivity, 90% (79%–96%) specificity, and an AUC of 0.96 (0.92–1.00). The panel was positive in 0.30 (0.19–0.43) of 60 patients with no evidence of disease in post-operative patients with colorectal cancer. Conclusions: Plasma assay of novel colorectal cancer–associated MDMs can reliably detect both primary colorectal cancer and distantly recurrent colorectal cancer with promising accuracy.

The absence of neuroendocrine (NE) cells in the intestinal mucosa in autoimmune enteropathy (AIE) has been occasionally reported. However, the status of NE cells has not been studied in detail in AIE. Small bowel and colonic biopsies were retrospectively retrieved from 18 AIE patients (26 baseline [18 small bowel and 8 colon]; and 15 follow-up [11 duodenum and 4 colon] biopsies in 11 patients). Thirty-three common variable immunodeficiency (CVID) patients (30 small bowel and 16 colon), 15 inflammatory bowel disease patients (5 duodenum and 10 colon), 13 immunoglobulinA deficiency patients (13 duodenum and 5 colon), and 10 normal controls (5 colon and 5 duodenum) were selected as control groups. Histologic features (villous atrophy, intraepithelial lymphocytosis, acute inflammation, crypt apoptosis, and absence or presence of goblet cells, Paneth cells and plasma cells) were recorded. Chromogranin immunostain was performed and chromogranin-positive NE cells were counted per 10 consecutive, well-oriented crypts. On the basis of the number of chromogranin-positive NE cells, cases were graded as being absent (≤3 NE cells), markedly decreased (≤15), and intact (>15). The NE cell status correlated with histologic features. The median age of 18 AIE patients was 38.5 years (range: 11 to 74 y) and 14 patients were male. Fourteen of 18 (78%) patients showed loss (absent or markedly decreased) of NE cells in the small bowel and/or colon in the baseline biopsies including 12 (of 18) small bowel and 6 (of 8) colon biopsies. Follow-up biopsy was available in 11 patients. Six of 7 (85%) patients who showed loss of NE cells in the baseline biopsies regained NE cells in the follow-up biopsies, and 1 patient continued to show loss of NE cells. Four patients who showed intact NE cells in the baseline remained unchanged in the follow-up. Among the control groups, 3 of 33 (9%) CVID patients showed loss of NE cells. NE cells were not lost in the biopsies of all 15 and 13 patients with inflammatory bowel disease and immunoglobulinA deficiency, respectively, or the 10 normal controls. In all 41 biopsies (26 baseline plus 15 follow-up) with AIE, NE cell loss was significantly associated with increased crypt apoptosis and loss of goblet cells (P=0.001, both) but not with other histologic findings. In conclusion, our study suggests that NE cells may also be the target cells in AIE and commonly lost in the intestinal crypts in AIE, and consequently loss of NE cells can be used as an adjunct histologic feature for diagnosis of AIE.

Gastric cancer is an aggressive and heterogeneous malignancy that often varies in presentation and disease among racial and ethnic groups. The Alaska Native (AN) people have the highest incidence and mortality rates of gastric cancer in North America. This study examines molecular markers in solid tumor samples from eighty-five AN gastric adenocarcinoma patients using next-generation sequencing, immunohistochemistry, and in situ hybridization analysis. AN patients have a low mutation burden with fewer somatic gene mutations in their tumors compared to other populations, with the most common mutation being TP53. Epstein-Barr virus (EBV) was associated with 20% of AN gastric cancers, which is higher than the world average of 10%. The inflammation marker, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2), is highly expressed in patients with the lowest survival rates. Mismatch repair deficiency was present in 10% of AN patients and was associated with patients who were female, 50 years or older, gene mutations, and tumors in the distal stomach. Program death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) was expressed in 14% of AN patients who were more likely to have MMR deficiency, EBV-associated gastric cancers, and mutations in the PIK3CA gene, all of which have been linked to clinical response to PD-1 inhibitors. These studies suggest a portion of AN gastric cancer patients could be candidates for immunotherapy. Overall, this study highlights future avenues of investigation for clinical and translational studies, so that we can improve early detection and develop more effective treatments for AN patients.

Immunostains are used to subtype hepatic adenomas to stratify for the risk of malignant transformation. The most common panel of immunostains used for this purpose includes liver fatty acid–binding protein (LFABP), serum amyloid A (SAA) protein, C-reactive protein (CRP), and glutamine synthetase (GS). Importantly, some pathologists use these stains in an attempt to distinguish hepatocellular carcinomas (HCC) from hepatic adenomas. However, there are limited data on the performance of these stains in HCCs. To investigate the staining characteristics of HCCs, we studied 159 HCCs (92 well-differentiated, 67 moderately differentiated, and 7 poorly differentiated) and 7 fibrolamellar carcinomas for the expression of LFABP, SAA, CRP, and GS. All of the stains were positive in at least a subset of HCCs: SAA was positive in 27 of 159 (17%), CRP in 86 of 159 (54%), and GS in 23 of 47 (49%) cases; LFABP showed loss of staining in 36 of 159 (23%) cases. Fibrolamellar carcinomas were consistently CRP positive (7 of 7 cases) and frequently showed loss of LFABP (4 of 7 cases). There was no association between expression of SAA, CRP, and GS as well as loss of LFABP expression and other clinicopathologic features. HCCs with loss of LFABP were more frequently associated with negative GS expression (11 of 14 cases, P =0.02). These data show that immunostains used to subtype hepatic adenomas are not useful for distinguishing HCCs from hepatic adenomas and should be used only after a diagnosis of hepatic adenoma has been made using other criteria.

Abstract Purpose: Esophageal cancer is an aggressive malignancy and often resistant to therapy. Overexpression of EGFR has been associated with poor prognosis of patients with esophageal cancer. However, clinical trials using EGFR inhibitors have not provided benefit for patients with esophageal cancer. Failure of EGFR inhibition may be due to crosstalk with other oncogenic pathways. Experimental Design: In this study, expression of YAP1 and EGFR were examined in EAC-resistant tumor tissues versus sensitive tissues by IHC. Western blot analysis, immunofluorescence, real-time PCR, promoter analysis, site-directed mutagenesis, and in vitro and in vivo functional assays were performed to elucidate the YAP1-mediated EGFR expression and transcription and the relationship with chemoresistance in esophageal cancer. Results: We demonstrate that Hippo pathway coactivator YAP1 can induce EGFR expression and transcription in multiple cell systems. Both YAP1 and EGFR are overexpressed in resistant esophageal cancer tissues compared with sensitive esophageal cancer tissues. Furthermore, we found that YAP1 increases EGFR expression at the level of transcription requiring an intact TEAD-binding site in the EGFR promoter. Most importantly, exogenous induction of YAP1 induces resistance to 5-fluorouracil and docetaxcel, whereas knockdown of YAP1 sensitizes esophageal cancer cells to these cytotoxics. Verteporfin, a YAP1 inhibitor, effectively inhibits both YAP1 and EGFR expression and sensitizes cells to cytotoxics. Conclusions: Our data provide evidence that YAP1 upregulation of EGFR plays an important role in conferring therapy resistance in esophageal cancer cells. Targeting YAP1-EGFR axis may be more efficacious than targeting EGFR alone in esophageal cancer. Clin Cancer Res; 21(11); 2580–90. ©2015 AACR.

Abstract Purpose: Recurrence risk assessment to make treatment decisions for early-stage colon cancer patients is a major unmet medical need. The aim of this retrospective multicenter study was to evaluate the clinical utility of guanylyl cyclase C (GCC) mRNA levels in lymph nodes on colon cancer recurrence. Methods: The proportion of lymph nodes with GCC-positive mRNA (LNR) was evaluated in 463 untreated T3N0 patients, blinded to clinical outcomes. One site's (n = 97) tissue grossing method precluded appropriate lymph node assessment resulting in post hoc exclusion. Cox regression models tested the relationship between GCC and the primary endpoint of time to recurrence. Assay methods, primary analyses, and cut points were all prespecified. Results: Final dataset contained 366 patients, 38 (10%) of whom had recurrence. Presence of four or more GCC-positive lymph nodes was significantly associated with risk of recurrence [hazard ratio (HR) = 2.46, 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.07–5.69, P = 0.035], whereas binary GCC LNR risk class (HR = 1.87, 95% CI, 0.99–3.54, P = 0.054) and mismatch repair (MMR) status (HR = 0.77, 95% CI, 0.36–1.62, P = 0.49) were not. In a secondary analysis using a 3-level GCC LNR risk group classification of high (LNR > 0.20), intermediate (0.10 < LNR ≤ 0.20), and low (LNR ≤ 0.10), high-risk patients had a 2.5 times higher recurrence risk compared with low-risk patients (HR = 2.53, 95% CI, 1.24–5.17, P = 0.011). Conclusions: GCC status is a promising prognostic factor independent of traditional histopathology risk factors in a contemporary population of patients with stage IIa colon cancer not treated with adjuvant therapy, but GCC determination must be performed with methodology adapted to the tissue procurement and fixation technique. Clin Cancer Res; 20(16); 4361–9. ©2014 AACR.

Key Points Leukocyte cell-derived chemotaxin-2–associated amyloidosis (ALect2) is a common cause of systemic amyloidosis involving the liver. Recognition and accurate diagnosis of hepatic ALect2 amyloidosis is essential for accurate management of patients with hepatic amyloidosis.