Belkin, Mark N.

AbstractBackgroundInvasive hemodynamics are fundamental in assessing patients with advanced heart failure (HF). Several novel hemodynamic parameters have been studied; however, the relative prognostic potential remains ill‐defined.HypothesisAdvanced hemodynamic parameters provide additional prognostication beyond the standard hemodynamic assessment.MethodsPatients from the PRognostic Evaluation During Invasive CaTheterization for Heart Failure (PREDICT‐HF) registry who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was survival to orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) or durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD), or death within 6 months of RHC.ResultsOf 846 patients included, 176 (21%) met the primary endpoint. In a multivariate model that included traditional hemodynamic variables, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (OR: 1.10, 1.04−1.15, p < .001), and cardiac index (CI) (OR: 0.86, 0.81−0.92, p < .001) were shown to be predictive of adverse outcomes. In a separate multivariate model that incorporated advanced hemodynamic parameters, cardiac power output (CPO) (OR: 0.76, 0.71−0.83, p < .001), aortic pulsatility index (API) (OR: 0.94, 0.91−0.96, p < .001), and pulmonary artery pulsatility index (OR: 1.02, 1.00−1.03, p .027) were all significantly associated with the primary outcome. Positively concordant API and CPO afforded the best freedom from the endpoint (94.7%), whilst negatively concordant API and CPO had the worst freedom from the endpoint (61.5%, p < .001). Those with discordant API and CPO had similar freedom from the endpoint.ConclusionThe advanced hemodynamic parameters API and CPO are independently associated with death or the need for OHT or LVAD within 6 months. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these parameters and elucidate their role in patients with advanced HF.

Background: Despite the clear association between atrial fibrillation and risk for thromboembolic events (TEs), the clinical significance of new-onset device-detected atrial tachyarrhythmia (DDAT) and TE remains disputed. We aimed to determine the risk of TE in patients with new-onset DDAT. Methods and Results: The OVID Medline, Cochrane, and Scopus databases (inception to November 2016) were searched. Randomized controlled trials, prospective, or retrospective studies of pacemaker or defibrillator patients reporting incidence of DDAT were selected. Summary statistics were used for analysis. Of 4893 reports identified, 28 studies following 24 984 patients were included: average age 69.9 years, 34.7% women, mean study duration 21.8±18.6 months. New-onset DDAT was observed in 23% of patients. Among 9 studies (n=8181) reporting TE, the absolute incidence was 2.1%. TE risk was significantly greater among patients with new-onset DDAT (relative risk [RR], 2.88; 95% CI, 1.79–4.64; P <0.001). TE risk was correlated with DDAT duration, with an increased risk associated with DDAT ≥5 minutes (RR, 3.86; 95% CI, 2.04–7.30; P <0.001) compared with <1 minute (RR, 1.77; 95% CI, 1.15–2.74; P =0.01). Notably, the risk of TE was also increased in patients with adjudicated atrial electrograms (RR, 3.60; 95% CI, 2.06–6.30; P <0.001) compared with nonadjudicated electrograms (RR, 2.05; 95% CI, 1.06–3.97; P =0.03), even when lower mean thresholds for detection were used. Conclusions: New-onset DDAT is common, affecting close to one quarter of all patients with implanted pacemakers or defibrillators. Adjudication of atrial electrograms further identifies at-risk patients, even when relatively short detection thresholds are used.