Cyrille-Superville, Nicole B.

AbstractBackgroundInvasive hemodynamics are fundamental in assessing patients with advanced heart failure (HF). Several novel hemodynamic parameters have been studied; however, the relative prognostic potential remains ill‐defined.HypothesisAdvanced hemodynamic parameters provide additional prognostication beyond the standard hemodynamic assessment.MethodsPatients from the PRognostic Evaluation During Invasive CaTheterization for Heart Failure (PREDICT‐HF) registry who underwent right heart catheterization (RHC) were included in the analysis. The primary endpoint was survival to orthotopic heart transplant (OHT) or durable left ventricular assist device (LVAD), or death within 6 months of RHC.ResultsOf 846 patients included, 176 (21%) met the primary endpoint. In a multivariate model that included traditional hemodynamic variables, pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) (OR: 1.10, 1.04−1.15, p < .001), and cardiac index (CI) (OR: 0.86, 0.81−0.92, p < .001) were shown to be predictive of adverse outcomes. In a separate multivariate model that incorporated advanced hemodynamic parameters, cardiac power output (CPO) (OR: 0.76, 0.71−0.83, p < .001), aortic pulsatility index (API) (OR: 0.94, 0.91−0.96, p < .001), and pulmonary artery pulsatility index (OR: 1.02, 1.00−1.03, p .027) were all significantly associated with the primary outcome. Positively concordant API and CPO afforded the best freedom from the endpoint (94.7%), whilst negatively concordant API and CPO had the worst freedom from the endpoint (61.5%, p < .001). Those with discordant API and CPO had similar freedom from the endpoint.ConclusionThe advanced hemodynamic parameters API and CPO are independently associated with death or the need for OHT or LVAD within 6 months. Further prospective studies are needed to validate these parameters and elucidate their role in patients with advanced HF.