Back to Authors

Bellizzi, Andrew M.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8264-6379

Mayo Clinic

Columbia University

Citations 14

The path to a better biomarker: application of a risk management framework for the implementation of PD‐L1 and TILs as immuno‐oncology biomarkers in breast cancer clinical trials and daily practice
González-Ericsson, Paula I. , Stovgaard, Elisabeth Specht , Reisenbichler, Emily , Kos, Zuzana , Carter, Jodi M. , Michiels, Stefan , Quesne, John Le , Lænkholm, Anne‐Vibeke , Adam, Julien , Bartlett, John MS, Rimm, David L. , Quinn, Cecily , Cree, Ian A. , Hida, Akira I. , Haynes, Harry R. , Frahm, Isabel, Acosta‐Haab, Gabriela, Balancin, Marcelo Luiz , Bellolio, Enrique , Yang, Wentao , Kirtani, Pawan , Sugie, Tomoharu , Ehinger, Anna , Castaneda, Carlos, Kok, Marleen , McArthur, Heather L. , Siziopikou, Kalliopi P. , Fineberg, Susan , Gown, Allen M. , Viale, Giuseppe , Schnitt, Stuart J. , Pruneri, Giancarlo , Penault‐Llorca, Frederique, Hewitt, Stephen M. , Thompson, E. Aubrey , Allison, Kimberly H. , Symmans, W. Fraser , Bellizzi, Andrew M. , Brogi, Edi , Moore, David A. , Larsimont, Denis , Dillon, Deborah , Broeckx, Glenn , Bairi, Khalid El , Cimino‐Mathews, Ashley , Adams, Sylvia , Liu, S, Loibl, Sibylle , Chen, I‐Chun , Juco, Jonathan, Blackley, Elizabeth F. , Demaria, Sandra , Leon‐Ferre, Roberto A. , Zardavas, Dimitrios, Emancipator, Kenneth , Ely, Scott , Loi, Sherene , Salgado, Roberto , Group, International Immuno‐Oncology Biomarker Working, Cree, Ian , Haynes, Harry R , Balancin, Marcelo , Ehinger, Anna , Lazar, Alexander J , Broeckx, Glenn , El Bairi, Khalid , Leon-Ferre, Roberto, Gonzalez-Ericsson, Paula I , Bellizzi, Andrew M , Symmans, W Fraser , Loi, Sherene , Pruneri, Giancarlo , Rimm, David , Carter, Jodi , Sua, Luz Fernanda , Nielsen, Torsten O. , Fox, Stephen B. , Bartlett, John MS, Peeters, Dieter J. E. , Dieci, Maria Vittoria , Vincent‐Salomon, Anne , Balko, Justin M. , Badve, Sunil , Penault-Llorca, Frederique Madeleine , Lazar, Alexander J. , Lien, Huang‐Chun , Goetz, Matthew P. , Harbeck, Nadia , Sotiriou, Christos P. , Lakhani, Sunil R. , Denkert, Carsten , Gluz, Oleg , Sanders, Melinda E. , Group, International Immuno‐Oncology Biomarker Working

The Journal of Pathology | March 4, 2020 | Volume: 250 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 667-684

10.1002/path.5406 Get It

AbstractImmune checkpoint inhibitor therapies targeting PD‐1/PD‐L1 are now the standard of care in oncology across several hematologic and solid tumor types, including triple negative breast cancer (TNBC). Patients with metastatic or locally advanced TNBC with PD‐L1 expression on immune cells occupying ≥1% of tumor area demonstrated survival benefit with the addition of atezolizumab to nab‐paclitaxel. However, concerns regarding variability between immunohistochemical PD‐L1 assay performance and inter‐reader reproducibility have been raised. High tumor‐infiltrating lymphocytes (TILs) have also been associated with response to PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibitors in patients with breast cancer (BC). TILs can be easily assessed on hematoxylin and eosin–stained slides and have shown reliable inter‐reader reproducibility. As an established prognostic factor in early stage TNBC, TILs are soon anticipated to be reported in daily practice in many pathology laboratories worldwide. Because TILs and PD‐L1 are parts of an immunological spectrum in BC, we propose the systematic implementation of combined PD‐L1 and TIL analyses as a more comprehensive immuno‐oncological biomarker for patient selection for PD‐1/PD‐L1 inhibition‐based therapy in patients with BC. Although practical and regulatory considerations differ by jurisdiction, the pathology community has the responsibility to patients to implement assays that lead to optimal patient selection. We propose herewith a risk‐management framework that may help mitigate the risks of suboptimal patient selection for immuno‐therapeutic approaches in clinical trials and daily practice based on combined TILs/PD‐L1 assessment in BC. © 2020 Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland. Published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
A monoclonal antibody against SV40 large T antigen (PAb416) does not label Merkel cell carcinoma
Pelletier, Daniel , Czeczok, Thomas , Bellizzi, Andrew M. , Czeczok, Thomas W, Bellizzi, Andrew M

Histopathology | February 11, 2018 | Volume: 73 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 162-166

10.1111/his.13483 Get It

AimsMerkel cell carcinoma represents poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinoma of cutaneous origin. In most studies, the vast majority of Merkel cell carcinomas are Merkel cell polyomavirus (MCPyV)‐associated. SV40 polyomavirus immunohistochemistry is typically used in the diagnosis of other polyomavirus‐associated diseases, including tubulointerstitial nephritis and progressive multifocal leukoencephalopathy, given cross‐reactivity with BK and JC polyomaviruses. MCPyV‐specific immunohistochemistry is commercially available, but, if antibodies against SV40 also cross‐reacted with MCPyV, that would be advantageous from a resource‐utilisation perspective.Methods and resultsTissue microarrays were constructed from 39 Merkel cell carcinomas, 24 small‐cell lung carcinomas, and 18 extrapulmonary visceral small‐cell carcinomas. SV40 large T antigen immunohistochemistry (clone PAb416) was performed; MCPyV large T antigen immunohistochemistry (clone CM2B4) had been previously performed. UniProt was used to compare the amino acid sequences of the SV40, BK, JC and MCPyV large T antigens, focusing on areas recognised by the PAb416 and CM2B4 clones. SV40 immunohistochemistry was negative in all tumours; MCPyV immunohistochemistry was positive in 38% of Merkel cell carcinomas and in 0% of non‐cutaneous poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas. UniProt analysis revealed a high degree of similarity between SV40, BK, and JC viruses in the region recognised by PAb416. There was less homology between SV40 and MCPyV in this region, which was also interrupted by two long stretches of amino acids unique to MCPyV. The CM2B4 clone recognises a unique epitope in one of these stretches.ConclusionsThe PAb416 antibody against the SV40 large T antigen does not cross‐react with MCPyV large T antigen, and thus does not label Merkel cell carcinoma.
Clusterin in Neuroendocrine Epithelial Neoplasms: Absence of Expression in a Well-differentiated Tumor Suggests a Jejunoileal Origin
Czeczok, Thomas , Stashek, Kristen , O’Dorisio, Thomas M. , Howe, James R. , Bellizzi, Andrew M. , Czeczok, Thomas W, Bellizzi, Andrew M , Maxwell, Jessica E. , Hornick, Jason L. , Howe, James R

Applied Immunohistochemistry & Molecular Morphology | February 8, 2018 | Volume: 26 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 94-100

10.1097/pai.0000000000000563 Get It

Clusterin, a widely expressed, tissue-specific glycoprotein, is a diagnostic marker of several tumor types, including anaplastic large cell lymphoma, follicular dendritic cell sarcoma, and tenosynovial giant cell tumor. A recent study has suggested it is highly expressed by well-differentiated neuroendocrine tumors (NET) arising at most anatomic sites, with the exception of jejunoileal tumors, and that it is similarly not expressed by poorly differentiated neuroendocrine carcinomas (NEC). We sought to validate this result in a large cohort of NETs and NECs. Clusterin immunohistochemistry was performed on tissue microarrays of 255 NETs [45 lung, 4 stomach, 8 duodenum, 75 pancreas (62 primary, 13 metastatic), 107 jejunoileum (69 primary, 38 metastatic), 16 appendix] and 88 NECs (43 visceral, 45 Merkel cell). Extent (%) and intensity (0, 1+, 2+, 3+) of staining were assessed and an H-score (extent x intensity) calculated. An average H-score >5 was considered positive. Clusterin expression was noted in 82.4% of 148 nonjejunoileal NETs (average H-score 183) and only 8.4% of 107 jejunoileal NETs (average H-score, 31), as well as 19.3% of NECs (average H-score, 36). Clusterin is frequently, strongly expressed by NETs of diverse anatomic sites, with the exception of jejunoileal tumors, in which it is only rarely, weakly expressed. It is occasionally, weakly expressed by NECs. Most metastatic NETs of occult origin arise in the pancreas or the jejunoileum. For cases in which an initial site of origin immunopanel (eg, islet 1, PAX6, CDX2) is ambiguous, addition of clusterin may be diagnostically useful, with absence of expression suggesting a jejunoileal origin.