Gloviczki, Péter

As endografting technology advances, anatomical constraints limiting access and deployment have become less of a burden. While unsuitable candidates for endografting exist, these patients are becoming less frequent. To broaden the applicability of endovascular abdominal aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR), we have modified the bifurcated AneuRx™ device into a unilimb modular prosthesis, by placing an aortic extender cuff across the flow divider, thus excluding its contralateral limb. This technique was used with success in 3 groups of patients: with occlusion of 1 iliac artery, with a nontraversable iliac stenosis, or with a small calcific aortic bifurcation. In these patients, anatomy can make it difficult, if not impossible, to place a bifurcated stent graft. Whether as a planned preoperative procedure or as a ‘bail-out’ maneuver, this procedure has been successful in avoiding open surgical conversion.

Previous results following subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery were reported to be worse in post-thrombotic syndrome than in limbs with primary valvular incompetence. This report comprises a larger patient cohort with longer follow-up. The goal of this study was to determine if subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery is justified in patients with postthrombotic venous insufficiency. The clinical data of 91 consecutive patients who underwent subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery with or without superficial reflux ablation over a 7-year period from May 1993 to June 2000 were retrospectively analyzed. Fifty-four females and 37 males (median age, 53 years; range, 20-77) underwent 103 subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery procedures. Forty-two limbs were classified as C6 (active ulcer), 34 as C5 (healed ulcer), and 24 as C4 (lipodermatosclerosis). Thirty procedures were performed in post-thrombotic limbs. Concomitant superficial reflux ablation was performed in 74 limbs (72%); saphenous vein stripping had been previously performed in 29 (28%). Deep venous incompetence was present in 89% of limbs; 13% had venous outflow obstruction on plethysmography. Cumulative ulcer healing in post-thrombotic limbs was not significantly different from limbs with primary valvular incompetence; 30-, 60-, and 90-day healing rates were 44%, 72%, and 72% vs 39%, 70%, and 87%, respectively (p = 0.35). On univariate analysis, the presence of ulcer greater than 2 cm in diameter was associated with delayed ulcer healing (p = 0.02). Cumulative ulcer recurrence in all limbs was 4%, 20%, and 27% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively. Ulcer recurrence in post-thrombotic limbs was higher than in limbs with primary valvular incompetence at 1, 3, and 5 years; 16%, 47%, and 56% vs 0%, 8%, and 15%, respectively (p = 0.001). Recurrent ulcers were small, superficial, and easier to heal. Clinical improvement was significant even in post-thrombotic limbs; median clinical score decreased from 9.5 to 3 (p=0.001), and median outcome score was +2 (mean 1.9; range, -I to 3). Median clinical score in patients with primary valvular incompetence improved from 6 to 1.5 (p = 0.0001). Subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery with superficial reflux ablation promoted ulcer healing, improved clinical outcome, and resulted in a low long-term ulcer recurrence rate in limbs with primary valvular incompetence. Despite good clinical outcome in post-thrombotic limbs, ulcer recurrence was high. These results imply that the role of subfascial endoscopic perforator vein surgery with superficial reflux ablation in patients with post-thrombotic limbs continues to be controversial.

The purpose of this study was to examine the technical aspects of intraoperative duplex ultrasound (DUS) following carotid endarterectomy (CEA), suggest criteria to differentiate significant lesions requiring immediate surgical revision from normal or benign defects, and evaluate how frequently intraoperative DUS provides useful or unsuspected information. A retrospective study was performed on all patients who had both CEA and intraoperative carotid DUS between January 1,1990. and January 1,1995. A total of 155 DUS examinations were performed in 149 patients. Findings were grouped into three categories: normal; minor/insignificant lesions; and hemodynamically significant lesions based on the presence or absence of elevated peak systolic velocities, visible stenosis/thrombus, or intimal flap/dissection. Postoperative status was correlated with intraoperative DUS findings. Ninety-one (59%) examinations performed on 87 patients produced normal findings. Forty-seven (30%) examinations performed on 45 patients showed minor abnormalities consisting of insignificant residual plaque, residual external carotid artery stenoses, small intimal flaps, elevated velocities with no associated anatomic lesion, or an arterial kink. Fourteen patients (9%) had significant findings requiring immediate surgical revision. These consisted of large intimal flaps or dissection in six patients, marked residual plaque and significant stenosis in five patients, thrombus in two patients, and a kink in one patient. Three additional patients ( 2 %) had significant findings but were not revised for various reasons. No significant difference was identified in morbidity or mortality rates between those patients with normal findings, those patients with minor technical defects, and those patients with significant abnormalities undergoing immediate surgical revision. However, two of three patients who had significant abnormalities within the common carotid artery that were not revised suffered perioperative ipsilateral strokes. Intraoperative DUS is a safe and accurate method to assess the technical adequacy of CEA. Intraoperative DUS showed significant lesions in 11% of patients. Identification and immediate repair of significant technical defects may decrease perioperative complication rate and long-term restenosis rate.

The objective of this study was to assess the usefulness of a comparison of clinical failure and restenosis rates of endovascular procedures at 1 year in patients with peripheral arterial disease. The resulting comparison is presented as “clinical failure/restenosis coordinate.” The authors screened 171 papers describing the outcome of lower extremity angioplasty or stent placement. In 20 of them, authors reported detailed outcomes of interest, including baseline demographic measurements, location of arterial occlusive lesions, a measure of restenosis (measured by ankle-brachial indices, ultrasonography, or angiography), and clinical outcomes (mortality, repeat percutaneous transluminal angioplasty, or amputation). An overview of these 20 angioplasty papers was performed. Besides the usual meta-analyses of each end point separately, data were also plotted as coordinates of clinical failure versus restenosis. The clinical failure-to-restenosis coordinate was calculated and reported for percutaneous transluminal angioplasty of the aortoiliac and femoropopliteal distributions. Clinically reported outcomes in the literature were used to calculate the clinical failure/restenosis coordinate. This value was significantly different for various locations of the angioplasty and various baseline angiographic characteristics. A numeric coordinate pair of clinical failure and restenosis is identifiable in patients undergoing endovascular treatment of peripheral arterial disease. The varying coordinates may be important in elucidating the incidence and mechanisms of clinical failure after endovascular treatment. The coordinate reported in this article is hypothesis-generating about mechanisms of endovascular treatment failure. This coordinate is important in determining the role of restenosis in the clinical failure of endovascular therapy of peripheral arterial disease.

Subfascial endoscopic perforator surgery (SEPS) is a new, minimally invasive technique performed in patients with advanced chronic venous insufficiency. The objective of the operation is to interrupt incompetent medial calf perforating veins to decrease venous reflux and reduce ambulatory venous hypertension in critical areas above the ankle where venous ulcers most frequently develop. Patients with stasis skin changes and healed or active venous ulcerations are potential candidates for the operation. Preoperative evaluation is performed with duplex scanning of the superficial, deep and perforator system, to diagnose both obstruction and valvular incompetence. Results of the North American SEPS Registry (NASEPS) as well as experience in several individual centers confirmed that the operation has significantly fewer wound complications than the classic open surgical techniques, and that rapid ulcer healing can be achieved. At the Mayo Clinic an ulcer recurrence rate of 12% was observed, with recurrence significantly more frequent in post-thrombotic limbs than in patients with primary venous valvular incompetence. The NASEPS Registry report confirmed a 2-year cumulative ulcer recurrence rate of 28%; ulcer recurrence was significantly more frequent in post-thrombotic limbs, especially in those with deep venous obstruction. SEPS is a new, low-risk, outpatient procedure that effectively decreases perforator reflux in patients with venous ulcerations, and should be added to our armamentarium to treat patients with advanced chronic venous disease. Long-term prospective and randomized studies are, however, still required to provide level I evidence of late efficacy.

Background: There has been increasing recognition of the detrimental effect of peripheral arterial disease (PAD) on the health of Americans, and yet there is no common national program of public PAD education designed to diminish this effect. Format: To heighten awareness of this problem, a 2-day PAD Public Education Strategy Meeting was recently attended by representatives of 17 professional societies and public health associations whose missions support the prevention, diagnosis, treatment, and rehabilitation of vascular diseases. This Public Education Strategy Meeting was intended to provide the rationale and structure to create a national PAD public awareness campaign to diminish the health effect of PAD and to improve cardiovascular outcomes in the United States. This document (1) provides the rationale for creation of a national PAD public education program; (2) reviews the development and success of national hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, and Women’s Heart Health public education programs as models of educational efficacy; (3) elucidates how the work of many vascular professionals has led to a national consensus for creation of a national PAD public educational program; (4) provides an overview of the National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute PAD education meeting; and (5) outlines the “next steps” required to accomplish these goals. Outcome: This meeting achieved consensus that we share responsibility for developing accurate, unified messages to promote PAD awareness and improved care. Participants agreed

Strict morphologic criteria must be used for patient selection to achieve durable success with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). The goal of this study was to assess morphologic suitability (MS) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) for 2 currently approved bifurcated stent grafts and identify reasons for exclusion from EVAR. The authors reviewed the electronic charts of 1,795 consecutive patients who were diagnosed as having AAA between January 1999 and July 2001 at their institution. Three hundred and twenty patients had an AAA with a diameter of =5.0 cm, measured on computed tomography (CT). The records of 301 patients, 254 men, 47 women, with a mean age of 74 years were available for review, and these patients constituted the study cohort. Criteria used for MS included a proximal neck length =15 mm; neck diameter between 18 and 26 mm; neck angulation =60°; common or external iliac artery (CIA or EIA) diameters of 7–16 mm and 8–13 mm, respectively, for AneuRx (Medtronic Ave, Santa Rosa, CA) and Ancure (Guidant Cardiac and Vascular Division, Menlo Park, CA) bifurcated grafts. AAAs were suitable for AneuRx device in 14% of patients (43 of 301; 95% CI = 11–19%) and for Ancure in 5% (16 of 301; 95% CI = 3.1–9%). The main reason for exclusion was an inadequate proximal aortic neck (73%). The neck was too short in 49.5%, too wide in 64% and badly angulated in 12% of the patients. Iliac artery morphology precluded EVAR with AneuRx and Ancure devices in 52% and 80%. Both CIAs were too wide for EVAR in 43% and 77%, respectively. When iliac artery diameter =20 mm was accepted, iliac suitability for AneuRx increased from 49% to 70% and overall suitability increased from 14% to 20%. When more permissive criteria were used for MS (neck length =10 mm, neck diameter =30 mm, CIA =20), 39% of patients became candidates for EVAR. More than three fourths of the patients with an AAA =5.0 cm in size, seen in a tertiary referral center, are morphologically not suitable for EVAR using 2 currently approved bifurcated endografts. The main reasons for exclusion are a short or wide proximal aortic neck. Considerable changes in size of the devices and in proximal attachment techniques have to occur before most AAAs will be suitable for EVAR.

Advances in diagnosis and in endovascular and surgical treatments of both acute and chronic venous diseases have focused attention on several, previously clinically less important, details of venous anatomy. The time has come to standardize venous nomenclature so that general practitioners and specialists in the United States and abroad speak the same language. There is a need to adopt a universal terminology for the saphenous veins, to avoid the myriad of eponyms of perforators and, most importantly, to omit once and for all, the term “superficial” femoral vein when talking about a deep vein of the thigh. New anatomic names, such as the saphenous fascia and saphenous subcompartment, have to gain better recognition. To achieve the desired consensus on venous nomenclature, an international meeting was held in Rome, Italy, in 2001, under the auspices of the International Union of Phlebology. In this review on venous anatomy, we describe the most important previously published clinical recommendations from this conference, and suggest modifications based on their clinical experience using the new terminology.