Back to Authors

Rowland, Charles M.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0317-5717

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 3

Examination Under Anesthesia for Evaluation of Anterior Shoulder Instability
Oliashirazi, Ali, Mansat, Pierre , Cofield, Robert H. , Rowland, Charles M.

The American Journal of Sports Medicine | July 19, 2017 | Volume: 27 | Issue: 4 | Pages: 464-468

10.1177/03635465990270041001 Get It

Thirty patients with unilateral, traumatic recurrent anterior instability were assessed by examination under anesthesia of both shoulders in the anterior, anteroinferior, inferior, posterior, and posteroinferior directions while the examiner controlled the patients' arm rotation. There were significant side-to-side differences in humeral head translation, depending on arm rotation. Humeral head translation was significantly greater in the abnormal shoulder only in the anteroinferior direction with 40° and 80° of external rotation of the arm. Defining an “abnormal” examination as grade 3 translation (translation of the humeral head up onto the glenoid rim) or grade 4 translation (translation of the humeral head over the glenoid rim, that is, dislocated) and translation two grades greater than the contralateral uninjured side, the test sensitivity was 83%, and the test specificity was 100%. Assessing humeral head translation by examination under anesthesia is a useful adjunct to the diagnostic tools for shoulder instability, but the number of tests should be expanded to include the anteroinferior and posteroinferior directions, and the tests should be done with the arm in varying degrees of rotation.
Association of Biceps Tendon Tears with Rotator Cuff Abnormalities: Degree of Correlation with Tears of the Anterior and Superior Portions of the Rotator Cuff
Williamson, Eric E. , Ly, Justin Q. , Adkins, Mark C., Emery, Robert L., Rowland, Charles M. , Beall, Douglas P. , Jones, Thomas Peter

American Journal of Roentgenology | February 28, 2013 | Volume: 180 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 633-639

10.2214/ajr.180.3.1800633 Get It

Most Patients with Abdominal Aortic Aneurysm Are Not Suitable for Endovascular Repair Using Currently Approved Bifurcated Stent-Grafts
Elkouri, Stéphane , Martelli, Eugenio , Gloviczki, Péter , McKusick, Michael A., Panneton, Jean M. , Andrews, James C. , Noel, Audra A., Bower, Thomas C., Sullivan, Timothy M. , Rowland, Charles M. , Cherry, Kenneth J., Hoskin, Tanya L. , Gloviczki, Péter

Vascular and Endovascular Surgery | March 31, 2006 | Volume: 38 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 401-412

10.1177/153857440403800502 Get It

Strict morphologic criteria must be used for patient selection to achieve durable success with endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR). The goal of this study was to assess morphologic suitability (MS) of abdominal aortic aneurysms (AAAs) for 2 currently approved bifurcated stent grafts and identify reasons for exclusion from EVAR. The authors reviewed the electronic charts of 1,795 consecutive patients who were diagnosed as having AAA between January 1999 and July 2001 at their institution. Three hundred and twenty patients had an AAA with a diameter of =5.0 cm, measured on computed tomography (CT). The records of 301 patients, 254 men, 47 women, with a mean age of 74 years were available for review, and these patients constituted the study cohort. Criteria used for MS included a proximal neck length =15 mm; neck diameter between 18 and 26 mm; neck angulation =60°; common or external iliac artery (CIA or EIA) diameters of 7–16 mm and 8–13 mm, respectively, for AneuRx (Medtronic Ave, Santa Rosa, CA) and Ancure (Guidant Cardiac and Vascular Division, Menlo Park, CA) bifurcated grafts. AAAs were suitable for AneuRx device in 14% of patients (43 of 301; 95% CI = 11–19%) and for Ancure in 5% (16 of 301; 95% CI = 3.1–9%). The main reason for exclusion was an inadequate proximal aortic neck (73%). The neck was too short in 49.5%, too wide in 64% and badly angulated in 12% of the patients. Iliac artery morphology precluded EVAR with AneuRx and Ancure devices in 52% and 80%. Both CIAs were too wide for EVAR in 43% and 77%, respectively. When iliac artery diameter =20 mm was accepted, iliac suitability for AneuRx increased from 49% to 70% and overall suitability increased from 14% to 20%. When more permissive criteria were used for MS (neck length =10 mm, neck diameter =30 mm, CIA =20), 39% of patients became candidates for EVAR. More than three fourths of the patients with an AAA =5.0 cm in size, seen in a tertiary referral center, are morphologically not suitable for EVAR using 2 currently approved bifurcated endografts. The main reasons for exclusion are a short or wide proximal aortic neck. Considerable changes in size of the devices and in proximal attachment techniques have to occur before most AAAs will be suitable for EVAR.