Sarkaria, Jann N.

ABSTRACT Various types of radiation are utilized in the treatment of cancer. Equal physical doses of different radiation types do not always result in the same amount of biological damage. In order to account for these differences, a scaling factor known as the relative biological effectiveness (RBE) can be used. 137Cesium (137Cs) has been used as a source of radiation in a significant body of radiation therapy research. However, high-energy X-rays, such as 6 MV X-rays, are currently used clinically to treat patients. To date, there is a gap in the literature regarding the RBE comparison of these two types of radiation. Therefore, the purpose of this study was to investigate the RBE of 137Cs relative to that of 6 MV X-rays. To determine the RBE, five cell lines were irradiated [Chinese hamster ovary (CHO); human lung adenocarcinoma (A549); human glioma (U251); human glioma (T98); and human osteosarcoma (U2OS)] by both types of radiation and assessed for cell survival using a clonogenic assay. Three of the five cell lines resulted in RBE values of ~1.00 to within 11% for all survival fractions, showing the physical and biological dose for these two types of radiation were equivalent. The other two cell lines gave RBE values differing from 1.00 by up to 36%. In conclusion, the results show the range in biological effect seen between cell lines, and therefore cell type must be considered when characterizing RBE.

Abstract Glioblastoma (GBM) represents one of the most aggressive cancer types with the vast majority of patients succumbing to disease within the first five years. This dire prognosis reflects the limited efficacy of our frontline therapies which include radiation therapy and temozolomide (TMZ) chemotherapy. The cellular response to these therapies is critically mediated by DNA damage response signaling networks that are regulated by Ataxia Telangiectasia Mutated (ATM) and Ataxia Telangiectasia And Rad3-Related Protein (ATR). Preliminary studies from our laboratory suggest the ATR inhibitor VX-970 has single agent efficacy in both established and primary GBM cell lines. Moreover, combined treatment with TMZ demonstrated therapeutic responses that, following regression analysis, were deemed synergistic (p<0.001). Validation studies using siRNA confirmed ATR as a central mediator of TMZ sensitivity as knockdown of ATM elicited no added benefit when tested in combination. VX-970 also enhanced radiation effects in neurosphere formation assays to suggest it may also be used as a radiosensitizer. While the specific mechanism responsible for these observations has yet to be determined, VX-970 treatment was found to exert anti-proliferative effects in a dose-dependent manner. This collection of work suggests that ATR inhibition may represent a worthwhile treatment strategy in GBM. Citation Format: Danielle Burgenske, Ann Mladek, Jann Sarkaria. The selective ATR inhibitor VX-970 enhances the therapeutic effects of standards of care in glioblastoma [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on DNA Repair: Tumor Development and Therapeutic Response; 2016 Nov 2-5; Montreal, QC, Canada. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Mol Cancer Res 2017;15(4_Suppl):Abstract nr B21.

Significance Focal adhesion kinase (FAK) is an intensely studied protein involved in many medically relevant biological processes, including cancer. Despite the large interest in FAK, a promising strategy to target FAK therapeutically is elusive. Here, we show that a region within the FAK protein that contains autophosphorylation site tyrosine (Y) 397 is essential for FAK activity in vivo. Myosin-1E (MYO1E), an actin-dependent molecular motor protein, directly interacts with FAK to induce Y397 autophosphorylation, which, in turn, causes changes in gene expression commonly observed in aggressive cancer. Our findings are significant because they further delineate FAK function in vivo and identify the MYO1E–FAK interaction as a possible Achilles’ heel for cancer.

Abstract The extracellular matrix (ECM) is increasingly recognized as having a key role in cancer development. Advances in biomaterials design and preparation have led to highly defined sophisticated platforms that can recapitulate key features of the complex tumor microenvironment. We have developed a biomaterial tumor mimic that recapitulates systematically the main characteristics and heterogeneities of glioblastoma ECM. With the use of these 3D in vitro platforms we seek to understand the key features that make this cancer so challenging to treat. We are using this device in three different ways: (1) to further understand how particularities of brain tumor ECM affect cancer cells and assist in the diagnostic of different GBM tumor types, (2) provide new models for drug screening to afford more personalized therapies and (3) study the mechanisms of resistance to current therapies in order to identify more effective combinatorial treatments and new therapeutic targets. Glioblastoma (GBM) tumors are highly heterogeneous, both cell composition and ECM biophysical properties are key factors in cancer cell malignancy and treatment outcomes. Hyaluronic acid (HA), is the main component of the brain extracellular matrix and GBM is associated with aberrant HA secretion and overexpression of receptors associated with HA, such as CD44 and EGFR. We use a microfluidic system to culture GBM patient-derived cells within gelatin based hydrogels that contained gradually increasing concentrations of HA, in order to recreate the heterogeneity of the tumor mass. Cell proliferation and gene expression analyses demonstrate that biomimetic hydrogels support xenograft culture; cells remain viable, active, and upregulate matrix remodeling genes and others related to tumor growth. More importantly, we found that GBM cells respond to changes in the ECM composition presenting different gene expression profiles (VEGF, IL6, MMP2, MMP9, HAS3, CD44) depending on the particularities of every tumor, such as EGFR overexpression or PTEN suppression. These findings pave the way for new clinical tools that allow a more precise cataloging of GBM tumor types and tailoring treatments to individual patients. We have also used these platforms to evaluate potential therapeutic strategies for different GBM xenograft cells and to study the mechanisms of cell resistance. For this purpose, we first focused on the epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR), which has been identified as a molecular target and associated with worse clinical outcomes. Amplification, overexpression and mutation of the EGFR tyrosine kinase has been identified in 50% of GBM patients. The genetic aberration of EGFR (EGFR+) often comes with the overexpression of the mutant EGFR variant III (EGFRvIII). We characterized the 3D in vitro behavior of 3 patient-derived xenografts that represent these EGFR variants: GBM10 (EGFR, wild type), GBM12 (EGFR+) and GBM6 (EGFRvIII). We studied the relationship between the HA contained in the surrounding matrix and response of GBM cells to a tyrosine kinase inhibitor (TKI), erlotinib. We demonstrate that an interaction exists between CD44 and EGF receptors. Results indicate that while EGFR+ cells are sensitive to TKI in HA hydrogels, HA seems to collaborate with EGFRvIII signaling to stir cell activity. Our results indicate that a combination of both bound and cell secreted soluble HA may influence GBM sensitivity and resistance to erlotinib. Moreover, immunoblots that analyze PI3K pathway support the hypothesis that matrix-bound HA is a key factor in the negative response of vIII tumors to EGFR inhibitors, and that the benefits of EGFR inhibition in GBMs may be found in combination to other inhibitors of ECM signaling. In summary, we demonstrate that engineered tumor avatar biomaterials can be used to reproduce some of the main characteristics of brain tumor microenvironment and become a valuable tool in the mechanistic studies of tumor development and treatment efficacy. Citation Format: Sara Pedron, Amanda M. Pritchard, Jann N. Sarkaria, Mark A. Schroeder, Brendan A. Harley. Engineered biomaterials as essential tools to determine the mechanisms of resistance to tyrosine kinase inhibitors in glioblastoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference on Engineering and Physical Sciences in Oncology; 2016 Jun 25-28; Boston, MA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2017;77(2 Suppl):Abstract nr B05.

Abstract Clinical data indicate that certain regions within glioblastoma (GBM) have a relatively intact blood-brain barrier (BBB), but controversy surrounds whether associated heterogeneous delivery may limit efficacy for otherwise highly active drugs with poor brain distribution. In this study, the efficacy of molecularly targeted therapies was compared in relevant GBM patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models grown either as heterotopic or orthotopic tumors. The impact of further disrupting BBB integrity in non-responsive orthotopic tumors was evaluated by over-expressing vascular endothelial growth factor (VEGF) and measuring drug distribution by matrix-assisted laser desorption ionization mass spectrometry imaging (MALDI-MSI). The brain:plasma ratio for five targeted agents was determined by LC-MSMS and treatment efficacy was evaluated in target-relevant GBM PDX lines: erlotinib (brain:plasma = 0.02 ± 0.02; efficacy tested in GBM6), palbociclib (brain:plasma = 0.06; efficacy tested in GBM22), AZD1775 (brain:plasma = 0.05; efficacy tested in GBM22), SAR405838 (brain:plasma = 0.01 ± 0.003; efficacy tested in GBM108), and AZD4547 (brain:plasma = 0.045 ± 0.02; efficacy tested in GBM150). Each of these drugs was effective in relevant GBM PDX flank tumor models with a 27% to 218% prolongation in the median time to exceed their pre-specified endpoint compared to placebo treatment (p≤0.02 for each drug). In contrast, none of these drugs were effective in prolonging survival in the same target-relevant orthotopic tumor models (-6% to 8% extension in median survival; p>0.05 for each drug). Consistent with partial and heterogeneous disruption of the BBB, MALDI-MSI of erlotinib, AZD1775 or SAR405838 distribution within orthotopic tumors demonstrated highly heterogeneous drug levels with large regions within each tumor approaching the low drug levels observed within surrounding normal brain. To further evaluate whether heterogenous drug distribution in orthotopic tumors could account for poor treatment efficacy, GBM108 was transduced with lentiviral constructs encoding for VEGF or empty vector (EV). While both GBM108-sublines were readily detectable with gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the GBM108-VEGF tumors had a significantly more disrupted BBB, as evidenced by a more uniform and intense distribution of a brain-impenetrant TexasRed-dextran vascular marker. Similarly, the distribution of SAR405838, measured by MALDI-MSI, was markedly higher and more uniform in the GBM108-VEGF tumors when compared to the GBM108-EV tumors. Enhanced delivery of SAR405838 into orthotopic GBM108-VEGF models translated into a marked enhancement in treatment efficacy in comparison to GBM108-EV with a median survival prolongation of 37 vs. 4 days, respectively (p=0.0055). Collectively, these data highlight the importance of testing novel therapeutic agents in orthotopic tumor models and suggest that limited brain penetration for many molecules may significantly limit their efficacy in brain tumors that have a partially intact BBB. In the face of continued failure to develop effective targeted agents for GBM, these in vivo results highlight the importance of re-evaluating the dogma in neuro-oncology that the BBB is fully disrupted in GBM and, therefore, drug delivery across the BBB is not a major factor limiting treatment efficacy. Citation Format: Jann N. Sarkaria, David Calligaris, Daniel Ma, Karen Parrish, Ann C. Mladek, Janice Laramy, Minjee Kim, Shuangling Zhang, Mark Schroeder, Brett L. Carlson, Katrina Bakken, Aaron Johnson, Nathalie Agar, William Elmquist. The critical importance of the blood-brain barrier in modulating the response to otherwise highly effective targeted therapies in patient-derived orthotopic glioblastoma xenografts. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the AACR Special Conference: Patient-Derived Cancer Models: Present and Future Applications from Basic Science to the Clinic; Feb 11-14, 2016; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Clin Cancer Res 2016;22(16_Suppl):Abstract nr B25.

OBJECTIVE Defects in the apoptotic machinery and augmented survival signals contribute to drug resistance in glioblastoma (GBM). Moreover, another complexity related to GBM treatment is the concept that GBM development and recurrence may arise from the expression of GBM stem cells (GSCs). Therefore, the use of a multifaceted approach or multitargeted agents that affect specific tumor cell characteristics will likely be necessary to successfully eradicate GBM. The objective of this study was to investigate the usefulness of sulforaphane (SFN)—a constituent of cruciferous vegetables with a multitargeted effect—as a therapeutic agent for GBM. METHODS The inhibitory effects of SFN on established cell lines, early primary cultures, CD133-positive GSCs, GSC-derived spheroids, and GBM xenografts were evaluated using various methods, including GSC isolation and the sphere-forming assay, analysis of reactive oxygen species (ROS) and apoptosis, cell growth inhibition assay, comet assays for assessing SFN-triggered DNA damage, confocal microscopy, Western blot analysis, and the determination of in vivo efficacy as assessed in human GBM xenograft models. RESULTS SFN triggered the significant inhibition of cell survival and induced apoptotic cell death, which was associated with caspase 3 and caspase 7 activation. Moreover, SFN triggered the formation of mitochondrial ROS, and SFN-triggered cell death was ROS dependent. Comet assays revealed that SFN increased single- and double-strand DNA breaks in GBM. Compared with the vehicle control cells, a significantly higher amount of γ-H2AX foci correlated with an increase in DNA double-strand breaks in the SFN-treated samples. Furthermore, SFN robustly inhibited the growth of GBM cell–induced cell death in established cell cultures and early-passage primary cultures and, most importantly, was effective in eliminating GSCs, which play a major role in drug resistance and disease recurrence. In vivo studies revealed that SFN administration at 100 mg/kg for 5-day cycles repeated for 3 weeks significantly decreased the growth of ectopic xenografts that were established from the early passage of primary cultures of GBM10. CONCLUSIONS These results suggest that SFN is a potent anti-GBM agent that targets several apoptosis and cell survival pathways and further preclinical and clinical studies may prove that SFN alone or in combination with other therapies may be potentially useful for GBM therapy.

Abstract Cancer cells can resist the effects of DNA-damaging therapeutic agents via utilization of DNA repair pathways, suggesting that DNA repair capacity (DRC) measurements in cancer cells could be used to identify patients most likely to respond to treatment. However, the limitations of available technologies have so far precluded adoption of this approach in the clinic. We recently developed fluorescence-based multiplexed host cell reactivation (FM-HCR) assays to measure DRC in multiple pathways. Here we apply a mathematical model that uses DRC in multiple pathways to predict cellular resistance to killing by DNA-damaging agents. This model, developed using FM-HCR and drug sensitivity measurements in 24 human lymphoblastoid cell lines, was applied to a panel of 12 patient-derived xenograft (PDX) models of glioblastoma to predict glioblastoma response to treatment with the chemotherapeutic DNA-damaging agent temozolomide. This work showed that, in addition to changes in O6-methylguanine DNA methyltransferase (MGMT) activity, small changes in mismatch repair (MMR), nucleotide excision repair (NER), and homologous recombination (HR) capacity contributed to acquired temozolomide resistance in PDX models and led to reduced relative survival prolongation following temozolomide treatment of orthotopic mouse models in vivo. Our data indicate that measuring the combined status of MMR, HR, NER, and MGMT provided a more robust prediction of temozolomide resistance than assessments of MGMT activity alone. Cancer Res; 77(1); 198–206. ©2016 AACR.

AbstractBackgroundGlioblastoma (GBM) exhibits profound intratumoral genetic heterogeneity. Each tumor comprises multiple genetically distinct clonal populations with different therapeutic sensitivities. This has implications for targeted therapy and genetically informed paradigms. Contrast-enhanced (CE)-MRI and conventional sampling techniques have failed to resolve this heterogeneity, particularly for nonenhancing tumor populations. This study explores the feasibility of using multiparametric MRI and texture analysis to characterize regional genetic heterogeneity throughout MRI-enhancing and nonenhancing tumor segments.MethodsWe collected multiple image-guided biopsies from primary GBM patients throughout regions of enhancement (ENH) and nonenhancing parenchyma (so called brain-around-tumor, [BAT]). For each biopsy, we analyzed DNA copy number variants for core GBM driver genes reported by The Cancer Genome Atlas. We co-registered biopsy locations with MRI and texture maps to correlate regional genetic status with spatially matched imaging measurements. We also built multivariate predictive decision-tree models for each GBM driver gene and validated accuracies using leave-one-out-cross-validation (LOOCV).ResultsWe collected 48 biopsies (13 tumors) and identified significant imaging correlations (univariate analysis) for 6 driver genes: EGFR, PDGFRA, PTEN, CDKN2A, RB1, and TP53. Predictive model accuracies (on LOOCV) varied by driver gene of interest. Highest accuracies were observed for PDGFRA (77.1%), EGFR (75%), CDKN2A (87.5%), and RB1 (87.5%), while lowest accuracy was observed in TP53 (37.5%). Models for 4 driver genes (EGFR, RB1, CDKN2A, and PTEN) showed higher accuracy in BAT samples (n = 16) compared with those from ENH segments (n = 32).ConclusionMRI and texture analysis can help characterize regional genetic heterogeneity, which offers potential diagnostic value under the paradigm of individualized oncology.

Abstract Microtubule-targeting agents (MTA) have been employed in the treatment of many cancers for decades. BAL101553 is a highly soluble prodrug of BAL27862, a novel, small molecule, microtubule-depolymerizing agent that induces tumor cell death by activating the ‘spindle assembly checkpoint’. Given intravenously or orally, the drug penetrates the brain and has anti-cancer activity in diverse tumor models refractory to standard MTA or radiotherapy (RT). In this study, BAL101553 was evaluated in orthotopic xenografts from 16 GBM PDX models; 7 of 16 lines demonstrated significant (p<0.01) increases in median survival with BAL101553 versus placebo (range in median survival extension 24-87%). The combination of BAL101553 with conventional therapies for GBM (RT and temozolomide (TMZ) was then evaluated in select lines. In the MGMT methylated GBM12 line, combination of RT with TMZ increased survival compared to placebo (median survival 80 days vs. 23 days, respectively; p<0.001). Extended BAL101553 monotherapy provided a short but significant extension in survival (median survival 31 days, p<0.001), while extended BAL101553 dosing during and after RT/TMZ (median survival 85 days) did not extend survival relative to RT/TMZ alone (p = 0.56). In contrast, in the MGMT unmethylated GBM6 line, combination of RT and extended BAL101553 increased survival (median 90 days, p<0.001) relative to either treatment alone (median survival BAL101553 63 days; RT 69 days) or placebo (46 days). Additionally, the combination of BAL101553 with TMZ (median survival 70 days) was more effective than TMZ alone (median survival 60 days; p = 0.009). Consistent with the unmethylated MGMT status, the TMZ/RT combination (median survival 66 days) was similar to RT alone (p = 0.62), but the combination of extended BAL101553 with RT/TMZ (median survival 101 days; p<0.001 compared to other combination groups) was significantly more effective. To further evaluate whether BAL101553 is a true radiosensitizer, a second GBM6 study was performed. Also here, combination of RT (20Gy, 2wks) with extended BAL101553 dosing (median survival 66 days) significantly extended survival compared to RT alone (median survival 54 days; p = 002). Interestingly, when BAL101553 dosing was limited to 2 weeks with RT, there was no increase in median survival (58 days; p = 0.16). To evaluate effects on tumor repopulation during RT, the efficacy of an extended RT schedule (36 Gy, 6 wks) with or without 6 weeks of BAL101553 was evaluated. In this case, BAL101553 given during the RT schedule (median survival 78 days) extended median survival as compared to RT alone (61 days; p<0.001). Collectively, these data demonstrate that BAL101553 has broad single agent activity across a panel of GBM PDX models and suggests that combination with RT/TMZ therapy may provide additional benefits for survival extension. Citation Format: Ann C. Mladek, Jenny L. Pokorny, Heidi Lane, Felix Bachmann, Mark A. Schroeder, Katrina K. Bakken, Brett L. Carlson, Paul A. Decker, Jeanette E. Eckel-Passow, Jann N. Sarkaria. The novel tubulin-binding ‘tumor checkpoint controller’ BAL101553 has anti-cancer activity alone and in combination treatments across a panel of GBM patient-derived xenografts. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 107th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2016 Apr 16-20; New Orleans, LA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2016;76(14 Suppl):Abstract nr 4781.