Berbari, Elie F.

Abstract Background The introduction of shotgun metagenomic sequencing (sMGS) methods that identify the presence of microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) in peripheral blood have shown promising results in various populations of patients. There is a pressing need to evaluate its application for osteoarticular infections (OAIs) in real-world setting. Baseline characteristics of the patients with suspected osteo-articular infections, including demographics, clinical characteristics, diagnosis, and KT results. Methods We retrospectively collected data on 73 adult patients who presented to the Mayo Clinic with suspected OAIs between 2019 and 2023, and for whom mcfDNA sMGS (Karius®, KT) testing was part of their diagnostic workup. We collected data on comorbidities, diagnostics, microbiological workout and its concordance with the KT. The primary objective was to evaluate its clinical impact on OAI diagnoses and management distinguishing into four categories: (1) KT was able to confirm an established diagnosis, (2) KT supported non-ID diagnosis, (3) KT established an unsuspected diagnosis, (4) KT did not add relevant information. Relevant microbiologic studies of patients with unsuspected diagnoses established by the KT (N=5) Results In our cohort KT was performed in 73 patients (Table 1). Among the infected individuals, KT yielded positive results in 22/43 (51.2%) cases. Out of these 22 cases, 11 (50%) showed agreement with conventional diagnostic workup, while in five (22.7%) cases, the KT established an unsuspected diagnosis, improving the diagnostic power from 11/43 (25.6%) to 16/43 (37.2%) (Table 2). Moreover, yielded a negative result in 19/26 (73.1%) patients with non-infectious diagnosis (Figure 1). Native Vertebral Osteomyelitis (NVO) diagnosis (p < 0.001) or OAIs with concomitant presence of endocarditis or endovascular infection (p = 0.005) were statistically associated with a definite, probable, or possible diagnostic certainty of KT result (Table 3). Overall, KT influenced antibiotic therapy in six cases (8.2%). Table 3 Factors associated with diagnostic certainty categories Conclusion This is the first retrospective study aiming to assess the real-world usefulness of the KT on the clinical management of patients with OAIs, with a special focus on NVO. It underscores KT's real-world application in cases where traditional diagnostic methods fall short. In highly complex OAIs cases, KT added 11.6% to the diagnostic power by establishing unsuspected diagnosis in 5 of 43 infective patients. Patients with NVO or OAIs with concomitant endocarditis or endovascular infections particularly benefited from KT testing. Figure 1 Distribution of KT results and their respective outcome according to the final diagnosis of suspected OAIs cases. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Abstract Background Culture-negative native vertebral osteomyelitis (CN-NVO) is increasingly common, rising from 0.3 to 1.8 cases per 100,000 between 1995 and 2008. The lack of microbial identification complicates optimal treatment and creates prognostic uncertainties. We describe our decade-long clinical experience with CN-NVO, focusing on patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes. Patient Characteristics Methods We retrospectively analyzed adult patients with radiographic evidence of NVO between January 1, 2011, and July 31, 2021. CN-NVO required clinical indicators such as back pain and fever, elevated inflammatory markers, and negative cultures from at least one spine biopsy. Patients with infected instrumentation were excluded. Diagnostic Evaluation Values represent median, lower quartile, and upper quartile for continuous variables unless otherwise specified, 2 whereas frequencies and percentages are presented for categorical variables. ^ All results returned negative *Biopsies number two and three did not result in additional findings or change clinical management. Results Seventy-two patients were included. Their characteristics are presented in Table 1. Most (77.8%) had received antibiotics within the 4 weeks preceding the biopsy. Disc space enhancement on MRI was the primary finding, with the lumbar spine being the most frequently involved (Table 2). Blood cultures were positive in 39.4% of the patients within 3 months of symptom onset. Streptococcus spp. (n=9, median time between positive culture and diagnosis: 6.5 days [IQR 2.25, 26.75]) and Staphylococcus aureus (n=7, 40 days [IQR 37.5, 51.5]) were most common. Definitive antibiotics were administered in 98.6% of the cases, primarily IV β-lactam + vancomycin. Oral antibiotics (PO) were used in 46.5% of the patients, primarily as step-down therapy (91%) (Table 3). Surgery was required in 8.5% of the patients for abscess drainage or relief of spinal cord compression. Treatment failure occurred in 9.4% of patients, and 37.5% died during the median follow-up of 568.5 days, with two deaths related to the infection. Treatment and Outcomes ^ defined as requiring another course of antibiotics and/or surgery for suspected ongoing infection ¶ Clinical findings include back pain or fevers; laboratory findings indicate abnormal or uptrend in inflammatory marker values # Defined as MRI findings concerning ongoing or worsening infection as per the interpretation of the Radiologist, Infectious Disease physician, and/or Orthopedic Surgeon Conclusion Patients with CN-NVO often require prolonged antibiotic therapy, typically combination regimens, with favorable treatment outcomes. Our treatment failure rate is similar to other studies, although comparability may be limited by heterogeneity in definitions. Mortality rates in the range of 6 and 36% have been reported, with the higher end driven mostly by comorbidities. Enhanced diagnostics and standardized treatment protocols are needed to further improve patient outcomes. Disclosures All Authors: No reported disclosures

Background Identifying a microorganism in patients with native vertebral osteomyelitis presents diagnostic challenges. Microorganism identification through culture-based methods is constrained by prolonged processing times and sensitivity limitations. Despite the availability of molecular diagnostic techniques for identifying microorganisms in native vertebral osteomyelitis, there is considerable variability in reported sensitivity and specificity across studies, leading to uncertainty in their clinical utility. Questions/purposes What are the sensitivity, specificity, and diagnostic odds ratios for 16S broad-range PCR followed by Sanger sequencing (16S) and metagenomic next-generation sequencing (NGS) for detecting bacteria in native vertebral osteomyelitis? Methods On June 29, 2023, we searched Cochrane, Embase, Medline, and Scopus for results from January 1970 to June 2023. Included studies involved adult patients with suspected native vertebral osteomyelitis undergoing molecular diagnostics—16S bacterial broad-range PCR followed by Sanger sequencing and shotgun or targeted metagenomic NGS—for bacteria detection. Studies involving nonnative vertebral osteomyelitis and cases of brucellar, tubercular, or fungal etiology were excluded. The reference standard for the diagnosis of native vertebral osteomyelitis was a composite clinical- and investigator-defined native vertebral osteomyelitis diagnosis. Diagnostic performance was assessed using a bivariate random-effects model. Risk of bias and diagnostic applicability were evaluated using the revised Quality Assessment of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (QUADAS-2) tool. After a manual screening of 3403 studies, 10 studies (5 on 16S, 5 on NGS) were included in the present analysis, from which 391 patients were included from a total of 958 patients overall. Quality assessment via QUADAS-2 criteria showed moderate risk of bias and good applicability. Results 16S showed 78% (95% confidence interval [CI] 95% CI 31% to 96%) sensitivity and 94% (95% CI 73% to 99%) specificity, whereas NGS demonstrated 82% (95% CI 63% to 93%) sensitivity and 71% (95% CI 37% to 91%) specificity. In addition, the diagnostic ORs were 59 (95% CI 9 to 388) and 11 (95% CI 4 to 35) for 16S and NGS, respectively. Summary receiver operating characteristic curves showed high test performance for 16S (area under the curve for 16S 95% [95% CI 93% to 97%] and for NGS 89% [95% CI 86% to 92%]). Certainty in estimates was moderate because of sample size limitations. Conclusion This meta-analysis found moderate-to-high diagnostic performance of molecular methods on direct patient specimens for the diagnosis of native vertebral osteomyelitis. When used as a complementary test to microbiological analyses, a positive 16S result rules in the diagnosis of native vertebral osteomyelitis, while further studies are needed to understand the role of NGS in the diagnosis of native vertebral osteomyelitis. When available, these tests should be used in addition to conventional microbiology, especially in complex cases with extensively negative standard microbiological test results, to detect fastidious bacteria or to confirm the causative bacteria when their isolation and pathogenicity are unclear. A large sample size is needed in future research to understand the use of these techniques as standalone tests for diagnosis. Level of Evidence Level III, diagnostic study.

The incidence of culture-negative NVO (CN-NVO) cases is increasing, presenting significant diagnostic and therapeutic challenges due to the inability to isolate causative organisms with conventional microbiological methods. Factors influencing the diagnosis of CN-NVO include prior antimicrobial therapy, low pathogen burden, fastidious or intracellular organisms, technical issues, and non-infectious mimickers. Diagnosis often relies on imaging modalities like magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and computed tomography (CT)-guided biopsy, though these methods can sometimes fail to yield positive microbiological results. Advanced diagnostic tools, such as polymerase chain reaction (PCR), metagenomic next-generation sequencing (mNGS), and cell-free DNA analysis, may be necessary to identify the pathogen. The causative pathogen cannot be isolated in some patients, among which an empirical antimicrobial therapy should be initiated. This narrative review discusses the management, monitoring, surgical indications, and outcomes for patients with CN-NVO.

Abstract Managing pelvic osteomyelitis (POM) in the setting of stage IV pressure injuries requires multidisciplinary evaluation as well as patient and caregiver engagement and is complicated by the lack of high-evidence data to guide best practices. In this review, we describe our approach to pressure injury and POM evaluation and management through multidisciplinary collaboration and highlight areas of future research that are necessary to enhance patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and improve the quality of life of those affected by POM.

Abstract Managing pelvic osteomyelitis (POM) in the setting of stage IV pressure injuries requires multidisciplinary evaluation as well as patient and caregiver engagement and is complicated by the lack of high-evidence data to guide best practices. In this review, we describe our approach to pressure injury and POM evaluation and management through multidisciplinary collaboration and highlight areas of future research that are necessary to enhance patient outcomes, reduce healthcare costs, and improve the quality of life of those affected by POM.

Abstract Background Recent advances in shotgun metagenomic sequencing (sMGS) for detecting microbial cell-free DNA (mcfDNA) in peripheral blood have shown promise across various patient populations. This study evaluates the application of sMGS for diagnosing osteoarticular infections (OAIs), a condition with significant diagnostic challenges. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis on 73 patients suspected of OAIs at the Mayo Clinic from 2019 to 2023, incorporating mcfDNA sMGS (Karius test [KT]) into their diagnostic evaluation. We categorized the clinical impact of KT on OAI diagnoses and management into 4 distinct outcomes. (1) KT was able to confirm an established diagnosis, (2) KT supported noninfectious diseases diagnosis, (3) KT established an unsuspected diagnosis, (4) KT did not add relevant information. Results In our cohort, KT was performed in 73 patients. Among the infected individuals, KT yielded positive results in 22 of 43 (51.2%) cases. Of these 22 cases, 11 (50%) showed agreement with conventional diagnostic workup, whereas in 5 (22.7%) cases, the KT established an unsuspected diagnosis. Native vertebral osteomyelitis diagnosis (P < .001) or OAIs with concomitant presence of endocarditis or endovascular infection (P = .005) were statistically associated with a definite, probable, or possible diagnostic certainty of KT result. Conclusions In complex OAIs, KT enhanced diagnostic accuracy by 11.6%, proving especially beneficial in diagnosing native vertebral osteomyelitis and infections with concurrent endocarditis or endovascular complications. Our findings underscore the utility of KT in the diagnostic workflow for challenging OAI cases, potentially altering clinical management for a significant subset of patients.

Abstract Background The first-line management strategy for acute periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) is debridement, antibiotics, and implant retention (DAIR). Suppressive antibiotic therapy (SAT) after DAIR is proposed to improve outcomes, yet its efficacy remains under scrutiny. Methods We conducted a multicenter retrospective study in patients with acute PJI of the hip or knee who were treated with DAIR in centers from Europe and the United States. We analyzed the effect of SAT using a Cox model landmarked at 12 weeks. The primary covariate of interest was SAT, which was analyzed as a time-varying covariate. Patients who experienced treatment failure or were lost to follow-up within 12 weeks were excluded from the analysis. Results The study included 510 patients with 66 treatment failures with a median follow-up of 801 days. We did not find a statistically significant association between SAT and treatment failure (hazard ratio, 1.37; 95% CI, .79–2.39; P = .27). Subgroup analyses for joint, country cohort, and type of infection (early or late acute) did not show benefit for SAT. Secondary analysis of country cohorts showed a trend toward benefit for the US cohort (hazard ratio, 0.36; 95% CI, .11–1.15; P = .09), which also had the highest risk of treatment failure. Conclusions The utility of routine SAT as a strategy for enhancing DAIR's success in acute PJI remains uncertain. Our results suggest that SAT's benefits might be restricted to specific groups of patients, underscoring the need for randomized controlled trials. Identifying patients most likely to benefit from SAT should be a priority in future studies.

Abstract Background Current approaches to diagnosing suspected native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) rely on imaging and microbiological workup, including blood and CT-guided biopsy cultures. These existing diagnostic methods often result in ambiguity, necessitating additional tests to distinguish NVO from its mimics. Our study aims to validate pilot findings demonstrating that an elevated neutrophil differential (PMN) in vertebral bone biopsy/ disc space fluid aspirate is associated with NVO. This may allow stratification of patients with suspected NVO into those who can be monitored closely versus those who may benefit from further invasive testing or empiric antibiotic therapy (Fig 1). Figure 1: Proposed workup of patients with suspected native vertebral osteomyelitis guided by disc space/ vertebral body neutrophil (PMN) differential. Methods This analysis examines a subset of patients from a prospective cohort study, enrolling adults referred to Mayo Clinic's neuroradiology department for spine biopsy. After collecting routine clinical specimens, the needle is rinsed with saline into an EDTA tube for automated cell count and differential analysis. To evaluate the predictive capacity of neutrophil (PMN) differential for NVO, logistic regression models were employed, and receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve analyses were conducted for various PMN percentage cutoff points. Results In this preliminary analysis, 39 patients were included, comprising 7 patients with NVO and 32 patients with alternative diagnoses. Baseline characteristics are presented in Table 1. All NVO patients received antibiotics within two weeks of the spine biopsy. The median biopsy sample PMN percentage for NVO patients was 83.0 (77.5-88.0), compared to 65.0 (56.5-69.5) for those without NVO (p=0.005) (Fig 2A). The estimated relationship between the probability of NVO and each measure across the full range of percentages is illustrated in Fig 2B. The optimal ROC curve point corresponds to a PMN differential of 72.5% (sensitivity=0.86, specificity=0.81) (Fig 3).Table 1:Baseline Characteristics of Patients Included in the Preliminary AnalysisFigure 2:A) Distribution of spine biopsy neutrophil percent by native vertebral osteomyelitis (NVO) status, B) Loess nonparametric smoother showing the relationship between the probability of NVO and biopsy sample neutrophil percentage.Figure 3:ROC curve analysis of neutrophil percent and NVO Conclusion This preliminary analysis indicates that an elevated PMN differential in spine biopsy samples may serve as a valuable diagnostic tool for NVO, with results seemingly unaffected by recent antibiotic intake. The PMN differential cutoff of 72.5% exhibited notable sensitivity and specificity. Investigations are ongoing to further validate these findings Disclosures Brett Freedman, MD, Clear Choice Therapeutics: Stocks/Bonds|Medtronic: Grant/Research Support|Neuroinnovations: Stocks/Bonds Aaron J. Tande, M.D., Musculoskeletal Infection Society: Board Member|Wolters Kluwer Health - Lippincott Williams & Wilkins: Publishing royalties, financial or material support