Mullin, Robert J.

Abstract Acinar cell carcinoma of the pancreas (ACC) is an uncommon malignancy, accounting for less than 1% of all pancreatic neoplasms. Because of its rarity, only a few retrospective studies are available to help guide management. We previously reported the case of a patient with metastatic ACC who achieved prolonged survival with doxorubicin as a result of personalized treatment designed in part on the basis of molecular and in-vitro data collected on analysis of the tumor and primary cells in culture developed from the liver metastasis. We now report the characterization of a patient derived xenograft (PDX) mouse model originating from this patient's ACC liver metastasis tissue. Antitumor activity of multiple drugs (5-FU, irinotecan, oxaliplatin, gemcitabine, bevacizumab, erlotinib, doxorubicin and imatinib) used as single agent therapy is demonstrated. Of the targeted and cytotoxic therapies used, oxaliplatin produced a dramatic and prolonged response to therapy even after withdrawal of treatment. Bevacizumab produced a significant response, as well. Serum lipase and tissue amylase levels correlated with the antitumor response to therapy. Thus, we have developed and characterized an ACC PDX model that may be used in drug discovery for the treatment of this rare cancer for which no standard of care exists. Note: This abstract was not presented at the meeting. Citation Format: Laura A. Marlow, Adam C. Mathias, Louis K. Dawson, William F. Durham, Kenneth A. Meshaw, Robert J. Mullin, Aidan J. Synnott, Ricardo Paz-Fumagalli, Murli Krishna, Daniel Von Hoff, Daniel L. Small, Gerardo Colon-Otero, John A. Copland. Therapeutic responses in a novel patient-derived xenograft mouse model for rare acinar cell pancreatic carcinoma. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1475. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1475

Abstract Patient derived xenografts (PDX) mouse models for many types of cancer have demonstrated therapeutic responses similar to those seen in patients. Thus, resected patient tumor tissue directly implanted into immune compromised mice followed by therapy and tumor growth analysis is thought to be the closest preclinical model to predict patient therapeutic responses. To date, few models are available for the different histotypes of thyroid cancer derived from follicular thyrocytes; these include papillary, follicular, Hurthle cell, squamous and anaplastic thyroid carcinoma. We have developed eight PDX models in athymic nude mice representing all of these subtypes. The models have been extensively characterized for mutational status (i.e. BRAF, telomerase, RAS, PTEN, TP53, RB, etc) as well as validation by short tandem repeat (STR) analysis to match that of the originating patient tumor tissue. Squamous and anaplastic thyroid cancers are rare tumor types with no FDA approved therapies. Each model demonstrated their own unique responses to radiation, cytotoxic or molecular targeted therapies such as doxorubicin, sorafenib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor), cisplatin, paclitaxel, sunitinib (tyrosine kinase inhibitor), erlotinib (EGFR inhibitor), trametinib (MEK inhibitor) and vemurafenib (BRAF inhibitor). We expect that these models may provide useful in vivo models for thyroid cancer research as well as models for therapeutic guidance based upon histotype, mutational status and response to therapies. Citation Format: Laura A. Marlow, Adam C. Mathias, Louis K. Dawson, William F. Durham, Kenneth A. Meshaw, Robert J. Mullin, Daniel L. Small, Aidan J. Synnott, Dragana Milosevic, Brian C. Netzel, Stefan K. Grebe, Kevin Wu, Robert C. Smallridge, John A. Copland. Characterization of novel thyroid PDX models and their response to combination therapies. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1458. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1458

Abstract Patient derived xenografts (PDX) mouse models for many types of cancer have been developed recapitulating therapeutic responses in the patient for which the PDX model was derived. Essentially, live surgically resected or biopsy tumor tissues are directly implanted into immune incompetent mice to develop in vivo models to test therapies, follow tumor progression (gene mutations that occur with patient tumor progression do so in mice) or to better understand drug resistance. However, the use of PDX models also has its limitations and challenges. Our laboratory has attempted to develop PDX models in athymic nude mice for numerous cancer histotypes such as bladder, brain, breast, colon, kidney, lung, melanoma, ovarian, pancreas, sarcoma and thyroid. While melanoma and colon cancers have very high tumor take rates (73 - 100%), the other cancer histotypes do not (14 - 50%). We share our experience for each cancer histotype and the techniques used to enhance the success rates in athymic nude mice. We also address the other challenges that include expansion of tumors after cryopreservation and conversion of human tumors to mouse tumors and spontaneous lymphomas. We provide methods to test for human versus mouse content that include QPCR and immunohistochemistry Citation Format: Laura A. Marlow, James L. Miller, Brandy Edenfield, Adam C. Mathias, Louis K. Dawson, William F. Durham, Robert J. Mullin, Daniel L. Small, Aidan J. Synnott, Kevin Wu, John A. Copland. Methods for developing patient derived xenografts in athymic nude mice. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 1453. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-1453

Abstract The success of clinical trials for patients with malignant melanoma (MM) designed from the “promising” results using pre-clinical models is minimal. With its increase in incidence, there is a dire need to develop both pre-clinical models comparable to clinical practice that have the capability to translate from bench-to-bedside and novel therapeutic agents for this life-threatening form of skin cancer. To address this concern, we have developed a panel of pre-clinical MM models including patient matched cell lines, patient cell-line derived xenograft models and patient tumor tissue-derived xenograft models. Patient derived xenograft (PDX) models are purported to most closely replicate a patient's response to therapy. Since the development of patient-derived cell lines and tumors grown in mice were more efficacious, their genetic, phenotypic, and therapeutic responses were compared to those of their corresponding patient-matched PDX model. Each model was molecularly characterized to confirm a match to that of the originating patient tumor tissue via protein immunohistochemistry (IHC), mRNA quantitative polymerase chain reaction (qPCR), DNA short tandem repeat (STR) analysis, and Sanger sequencing. Each pre-clinical model provided a genetic match to their respective patient tumor sample. All pre-clinical models were positive for the melanoma-specific markers (S-100 beta, HMB-45, and Melan-A) confirming a melanoma phenotype. Soft agar studies and tumor growth of our PDX and patient cell-line derived xenograft models confirmed tumorigenicity within our models providing the foundation to perform therapeutic studies. Mutation status data (i.e. BRAF, RAS), patient therapeutic clinical history and oncogene overexpression analysis (pERK, pAKT, PI3K, pmTOR, etc.) provide the platform and rationale behind the use of specific therapeutic agents per model. BRAF, NRAS and KRAS mutations were identified along with elevated pERK, pAKT and pmTOR in the models. Targeted therapies (trametinib/MEK inhibitor; vemurafenib/BRAF inhibitor; MK-2206/pAKT inhibitor; and everolimus/mTOR inhibitor) demonstrated dose dependent inhibition of cell proliferation in each of the models based upon oncogenic expression or mutations. In vivo experiments are in progress, which will allow comparison of the three models. The next steps include combination therapy to identify antitumor synergy targeting oncogenic signaling pathways. Citation Format: Antoneicka L. Harris, Laura Marlow, Adam Mathias, Louis Dawson, William Durham, Kenneth Meshaw, Robert Mullin, Daniel Small, Aidan Synnott, Kevin Wu, Dragana Milosevic, Brian Netzel, Stefan Grebe, Svetomir Markovic, John Copland. Characterization of novel patient derived melanoma xenografts and cell lines in response to targeted therapies. [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the 106th Annual Meeting of the American Association for Cancer Research; 2015 Apr 18-22; Philadelphia, PA. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2015;75(15 Suppl):Abstract nr 2417. doi:10.1158/1538-7445.AM2015-2417

Abstract Purpose: Topotecan resistance can result from drug efflux by P-glycoprotein (Pgp) and breast cancer resistance protein (BCRP) as well as survival signals initiated by epidermal growth factor receptor family members. The present studies were done to determine the effect of combining topotecan and the dual epidermal growth factor receptor/HER2 inhibitor lapatinib in tissue culture, a murine xenograft model, and a phase I clinical trial. Experimental Design: The effects of lapatinib on topotecan accumulation and cytotoxicity in vitro were examined in paired cell lines lacking or expressing Pgp or BCRP. Antiproliferative effects of the combination were assessed in mice bearing HER2+ BT474 breast cancer xenografts. Based on tolerability in this preclinical model, 37 patients with advanced-stage cancers received escalating doses of lapatinib and topotecan in a phase I trial. Results: Lapatinib increased topotecan accumulation in BCRP- or Pgp-expressing cells in vitro, and the combination showed enhanced efficacy in HER2+ BT474 xenografts. In the phase I study, nausea, vomiting, diarrhea, and fatigue were dose limiting. The maximum tolerated doses were 1,250 mg/d lapatinib by mouth for 21 or 28 days with 3.2 mg/m2 topotecan i.v. on days 1, 8, and 15 of 28-day cycles. Pharmacokinetic analyses showed that combined drug administration resulted in decreased topotecan clearance consistent with transporter-mediated interactions. Seventeen (46%) patients had disease stabilization. Conclusions: The lapatinib/topotecan combination is well tolerated and warrants further study.

Abstract Lapatinib (GW572016) is a selective inhibitor of both epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER-2 tyrosine kinases. Here, we explore the therapeutic potential of lapatinib by testing its effect on tumor cell growth in a panel of 31 characterized human breast cancer cell lines, including trastuzumab-conditioned HER-2-positive cell lines. We further characterize its activity in combination with trastuzumab and analyze whether EGFR and HER-2 expression or changes induced in the activation of EGFR, HER-2, Raf, AKT, or extracellular signal-regulated kinase (ERK) are markers of drug activity. We report that concentration-dependent antiproliferative effects of lapatinib were seen in all breast cancer cell lines tested but varied significantly between individual cell lines with up to 1,000-fold difference in the IC50s (range, 0.010-18.6 μmol/L). Response to lapatinib was significantly correlated with HER-2 expression and its ability to inhibit HER-2, Raf, AKT, and ERK phosphorylation. Long-term in vivo lapatinib studies were conducted with human breast cancer xenografts in athymic mice. Treatment over 77 days resulted in a sustained and significant reduction in xenograft volume compared with untreated controls. For the combination of lapatinib plus trastuzumab, synergistic drug interactions were observed in four different HER-2-overexpressing cell lines. Moreover, lapatinib retained significant in vitro activity against cell lines selected for long-term outgrowth (>9 months) in trastuzumab-containing (100 μg/mL) culture medium. These observations provide a clear biological rationale to test lapatinib as a single agent or in combination with trastuzumab in HER-2-overexpressing breast cancer and in patients with clinical resistance to trastuzumab. (Cancer Res 2006; 66(3): 1630-9)