Breen, William G.

Abstract Background This study aimed to determine whether proton craniospinal irradiation (CSI) decreased the dose to normal tissue and resulted in less toxicity than photon CSI for adult patients. Methods This single-institution retrospective analyzed differences in radiation doses, acute toxicity, and cost between proton and CSI for adult medulloblastoma patients. Results Of 39 total patients, 20 were treated with photon CSI prior to 2015, and 19 were treated with proton CSI thereafter. Median age was 28 years (range 18–66). The molecular subtype was most commonly sonic hedgehog (68%). Patients most commonly received 36 Gy CSI in 20 fractions with a boost to 54–55.8 Gy (92%). Proton CSI delivered significantly lower mean doses to cochleae, lacrimal glands, lens, parotid glands, pharyngeal constrictors, esophagus, lungs, liver, and skin (all P < .001). Patients receiving proton CSI had significantly lower rates of acute dysphagia of any grade (5% versus 35%, P = .044) and decreased median weight loss during radiation (+1.0 versus –2.8 kg, P = .011). Weight loss was associated with acute hospitalization (P = .009). Median follow-up was 2.9 and 12.9 years for proton and photon patients, respectively, limiting late toxicity and outcome comparisons. At the last follow-up, 5 photon patients had died (2 of progressive disease, 3 without recurrence ages 41–63) and 21% had experienced major cardiovascular events. At 10 years, 89% were alive and 82% were recurrence free. Conclusions This study demonstrates dosimetric improvements with proton CSI, potentially leading to decreased acute toxicity including dysphagia and weight loss during treatment.

Abstract Advances in diagnostic and treatment technology along with rapid developments in translational research may now allow the realization of precision radiotherapy. Integration of biologically informed multimodality imaging to address the spatial and temporal heterogeneity underlying treatment resistance in glioblastoma is now possible for patient care, with evidence of safety and potential benefit. Beyond their diagnostic utility, several candidate imaging biomarkers have emerged in recent early-phase clinical trials of biologically based radiotherapy, and their definitive assessment in multicenter prospective trials is already in development. In this review, the rationale for clinical implementation of candidate advanced magnetic resonance imaging and positron emission tomography imaging biomarkers to guide personalized radiotherapy, the current landscape, and future directions for integrating imaging biomarkers into radiotherapy for glioblastoma are summarized. Moving forward, response-adaptive radiotherapy using biologically informed imaging biomarkers to address emerging treatment resistance in rational combination with novel systemic therapies may ultimately permit improvements in glioblastoma outcomes and true individualization of patient care.

Ever since its introduction as a diagnostic imaging tool the potential of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in radiation therapy (RT) treatment simulation and planning has been recognized. Recent technical advances have addressed many of the impediments to use of this technology and as a result have resulted in rapid and growing adoption of MRI in RT. The purpose of this article is to provide a broad review of the multiple uses of MR in the RT treatment simulation and planning process, identify several of the most used clinical scenarios in which MR is integral to the simulation and planning process, highlight existing limitations and provide multiple unmet needs thereby highlighting opportunities for the diagnostic MR imaging community to contribute and collaborate with our oncology colleagues.Evidence Level5Technical EfficacyStage 5

Abstract Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have demonstrated remarkable response rates in relapsed or refractory Hodgkin lymphoma (HL). Still, most patients eventually progress. Patterns of progression after ICIs are not well described and are essential to defining the role of local therapies in combination with ICIs. We identified patients who received ICIs for HL between 2013 and 2022. Fludeoxyglucose-18 positron emission tomography (FDG-PET) before initiating ICI and at progression on/after ICI were reviewed, and areas of active HL were recorded. An exploratory analysis of treatable progression included patients with ≤5 sites of disease on pre-ICI FDG-PET and progression only at pre-ICI sites. Ninety patients were identified; 69 had complete records, and of these, 32 (52%) had relapsed at ICI initiation, 17 (25%) were refractory, and 16 (23%) received ICI as first-line therapy. Forty-five of 69 patients had ≤5 sites of disease (limited) on pre-ICI FDG-PET. Patients with >5 sites of disease had a higher risk of progression, and every site of disease >5 sites conferred an additional 1.2x higher chance of progression. At a median follow-up of 4.0 years, 41 of 69 patients had progressed on/after ICIs (cumulative incidence 66.4%), and of these, 22 of 41 patients progressed only at pre-ICI sites (cumulative incidence 39.4%). In an exploratory analysis, the cumulative incidence of a treatable progression among 45 patients with limited disease was 34%. The cumulative incidence of any progression among this cohort was 58.9%. More than one-third of patients with limited disease before ICIs experienced progression only at pre-ICI sites of disease. These patients could be candidates for radiation during or after ICIs.

Background Limited stage (stage I−II) disease is an uncommon presentation of mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), and its optimal management remains controversial. A British Columbia study (Leitch, Ann Oncol, 2003) and a Surveillance, Epidemiology and End Results (SEER) study (Murthy, Clin Lymphoma Myeloma Leuk, 2014) suggested the importance of radiotherapy (RT). A National Cancer Database (NCDB) study in the pre-BTK inhibitor (BTKi) era showed that chemotherapy (Chemo) plus RT (Chemo+RT) improved overall survival (OS) compared to Chemo or RT alone (Gill, Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys, 2015). However, a retrospective International Lymphoma Radiation Oncology Group study (Dabaja, Ann Oncol, 2017) reported comparable OS with Chemo+RT vs Chemo or RT alone. The potential differences in OS with different frontline therapy modalities may be modified by subsequent therapies for relapsed or refractory (R/R) disease. In this study, we used the NCDB data to analyze frontline treatment patterns and outcomes of limited stage MCL in the pre-BTKi vs BTKi eras. Methods The NCDB was queried to identify patients with stage I−II MCL diagnosed in 2004−2020. Because the first BTKi ibrutinib was approved by the FDA for R/R MCL in November 2013, we defined 2004−2013 as pre-BTKi era and 2014−2020 as BTKi era. Frontline treatment modalities were categorized to RT alone, Chemo alone, or Chemo+RT. Survival analysis was performed using the Kaplan-Meier method and the Cox proportional hazards model. Results Among 32,746 patients with newly diagnosed MCL in 2004−2020, 3,836 (11.7%) presented with stage I−II disease, with 2,428 having treatment information available. For patients diagnosed in the pre-BTKi era (n = 2005), 195 (9.7%) received RT alone, 1472 (73.4%) received Chemo alone, and 338 (16.9%) received Chemo+RT. For patients diagnosed in the BTKi era (n = 423), 45 (10.6%) received RT alone, 320 (75.7%) received Chemo alone, and 58 (13.7%) received Chemo+RT. Patients in the RT alone group were older (P <0.001) and had more females (P <0.001), but there were no statistically significant differences in Charlson-Deyo score, international prognostic index, or treating facility type (academic vs non-academic). For patients with stage I disease, in the pre-BTKi era, patients treated with Chemo+RT (n = 182) had improved OS compared to those treated with RT alone (n = 141) or Chemo alone (n = 647), with a 5-year OS of 75.4% vs 71.8% vs 61.4% (P <0.001). Similar results were observed in the BTKi-era, with a 5-year OS of 83.6% vs 69.5% vs 62.9% (P <0.001) for patients treated with Chemo+RT (n = 31), RT alone (n = 30), or Chemo alone (n = 130), respectively. After adjusting for age and sex, Chemo+RT was associated with improved OS compared to Chemo alone (pre-BTKi era, HR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.46−0.75, P <0.001; BTKi era, HR = 0.34, 95% CI = 0.14−0.79, P = 0.013), but not compared to RT alone (pre-BTKi era, HR = 0.62, 95% CI = 0.23−1.68, P = 0.343; BTKi era, HR = 0.77, 95% CI = 0.56−1.05, P = 0.10) (Figure 1A). For patients with stage II disease, in the pre-BTKi era, patients treated with Chemo+RT (n = 156) had improved OS compared to those treated with RT alone (n = 54) or Chemo alone (n = 825), with a 5-year OS of 70.0% vs 47.3% vs 58.4% (P <0.001). In the BTKi-era, patients treated with Chemo+RT (n = 27) or RT alone (n = 15) both had improved OS compared to those treated with Chemo alone (n = 190), with a 5-year OS of 77.2% vs 78.8% vs 61.9% (P = 0.004) . After adjusting for age and sex, Chemo+RT was associated with improved OS compared to Chemo alone in BTKi era only (pre-BTKi era, HR = 0.85, 95% CI = 0.67−1.07, P = 0.165; BTKi era, HR = 0.49, 95% CI = 0.25−0.95, P = 0.034), but not compared to RT alone (pre-BTKi era, HR = 0.78, 95% CI = 0.53−1.13, P = 0.185; BTKi era, HR = 0.97, 95% CI = 0.35−2.67, P = 0.952) (Figure 1B). Conclusions Treatment pattern for limited stage MCL has not changed significantly from the pre-BTKi era to the BTKi era, with approximately 15% of patients receiving Chemo+RT, 10% RT alone and 75% Chemo alone. In the BTKi era, Chemo+RT appeared to be associated with better OS compared to Chemo alone but not compared to RT alone. Interpretation of the results requires caution because (1) patient numbers are small in Chemo+RT and RT alone groups, (2) longer follow-up may be needed, and (3) selection of therapy was not random, eg, patients receiving Chemo alone may have had higher disease burden such as bulky disease and/or non-contiguous stage II involvement but these details are not available in NCDB.

Purpose The predominant pattern of relapse for patients with B-cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) who undergo anti-CD19 Chimeric Antigen Receptor T-cell Therapy (CART) involves sites previously involved by NHL. Bridging radiotherapy (BRT) has shown to be an effective bridging treatment with excellent local control rates. Our previous work defined limited/oligometastatic lymphoma as disease involving <5 sites. This study is the first to report on the role of BRT for patients with limited (<5 involved sites) disease prior to CART. Methods Following Institutional Review Board approval, a retrospective review from 2018 to 2023 across 3 Mayo Clinic sites (Arizona, Florida, and Minnesota) was performed and identified 139 patients with relapsed/refractory (r/r) B-cell NHL without bone marrow involvement who received CART and had <5 disease sites prior to leukapheresis. Ann Arbor staging was used to define the number of involved disease sites. An involved disease site included the Ann Arbor anatomical lymph node region(s) harboring the pathological lymph node(s) or any extranodal lesion. Bridging treatment (radiation and/or systemic therapy) was defined as treatment administered between leukapheresis and CART infusion. The primary endpoint was event-free survival (EFS),defined from CART infusion to any disease progression or initiation of post-CART consolidative/salvage therapy. Secondary endpoints included progression -free survival (PFS),defined from CART infusion to any disease progression, and overall survival (OS), defined from CART infusion to death. Results Prior to CART infusion, 44 (32%) patients received BRT and 95 (68%) did not. Bridging systemic therapy was given to 5 (11%) and 34 (36%) patients in the BRT and no BRT groups, respectively (p=0.003). The median number of involved disease sites prior to leukapheresis was 2 (range: 1-4). There was no significant difference in the baseline characteristics prior to CART infusion between the BRT and no BRT groups, except for extranodal involvement that was more common in the BRT group (Table 1). The median equivalent 2 Gy dose was 27 Gy (Interquartile range 23-34), and the most common BRT regimen was 20 Gy in 5 fractions. Among the 44 BRT patients, 34 received radiation to all visible PET-avid disease sites, and 10 received radiation to some but not all disease sites. The median follow-up was 20 months. The rate of grade ≥2 cytokine release syndrome was 41% in both groups (p=0.99). The rate of grade ≥2 immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome was 21% and 37% in the BRT and no BRT groups, respectively (p=0.059). There were no observed grade ≥3 BRT-related toxicities. Objective response rate by PET 5 point scale was higher in the BRT group (93% versus 79%; p=0.036). Crude rates of progression were 30% in BRT and 55% in no BRT patients, with 9/13 (69%) and 43/52 (83%) patients relapsing in pre-existing sites of disease present prior to CART infusion in the BRT and no BRT group, respectively. Seven (16%) BRT patients relapsed in the radiation field. The 2-year EFS was 50% in the BRT group and 39% in the no BRT group (p=0.01). The 2-year PFS was 55% in the BRT group and 45% in the no BRT group (p=0.017). The 2-year OS was 55% in the BRT group and 62% in the no BRT group (p=0.7). Intriguingly, patients who received BRT to all visible PET-avid disease sites (n=34) had further improvement in 2-year EFS (67% vs 39%, p=0.003) and 2-year PFS (71% vs 46%, p=0.008) compared to no BRT or patients who received BRT to some but not all visible disease sites (n=105). Nine patients (2 in BRT and 7 in no BRT groups) received consolidative radiotherapy for day 30 residual disease with only one patient subsequently experiencing progression. Twenty-five patients (6 in BRT and 19 in no BRT groups) received salvage/palliative RT for post-CART relapsed disease. Thirty-seven (39%) patients in the no BRT group remained without disease progression and did not receive radiation in the bridging, consolidative or salvage/palliative setting. Conclusion Bridging radiotherapy prior to CART infusion for patients with limited (<5 involved disease sites) r/r NHL appears to improve response rate, EFS, and PFS without causing significant toxicities. Approximately one third of patients who do not receive BRT will require subsequent post-CART radiation, and another third will remain free of radiation and disease progression.

Abstract PURPOSE 18F-DOPA is sensitive/specific for identifying areas of biologically aggressive disease for glioblastoma. We report the impact of 18F-DOPA on radiation treatment planning from a phase II study. METHODS Gross target volume (GTV) was defined by the boolean of high-risk PET (tumor/normal brain SUV > 2.0) and MRI T1 contrast enhancement (MRI-CE) including surgical cavity. The clinical target volume (CTV) included the GTV with 1cm margin. Using proton beam therapy, GTV ≤ 65 cc was treated with 25 (CTV), 30 (MRI-CE), and 35 (PET) GyE over 5 fractions with a simultaneous integrated boost. GTV > 65 cc received 30 (CTV), 35 (MRI-CE), and 40 (PET) GyE over 10 fractions. Radiation field design was compared to traditional 1.5cm CTV margin on MRI-CE. RESULTS Between May 2019 and October 2021, 39 patients were treated. The median MRI-CE tumor diameter was 5.2cm. The median PET volume was 7.9cc (range 0–64.9cc). The median MRI-CE volume was 35.1cc (range 8.6–114cc). High-risk PET was contained within: MRI-CE 18/39 (46%), MRI-CE + T2W FLAIR 13/39 (33%), MRI-CE + T2W FLAIR + outside GTV 4/39 (10%), outside GTV 2/39 (5%) and no uptake 2/39 (5%). Utilizing this planning technique, there was a 26% volume reduction in CTV to traditional 1.5 cm margin on MRI-CE. PET imaging in treatment planning allowed inclusion of high-risk disease that would have been excluded on traditional CTV in 23% of cases (range 1.6-33.8cc). PET was more predictive [HR 1.03 (95% CI 1.01, 1.05) p = 0.002] than MRI [HR 1.01 (95% CI 1.00, 1.03) p = 0.02] for death with each cc increasing risk of death by 3.1%. CONCLUSIONS The incorporation of 18F-DOPA in treatment planning yields a more targeted approach with reductions in both normal brain treated and risk of geographic miss compared to traditional CTV margins.

Abstract BACKGROUND Diffuse hemispheric glioma (DHG) is an uncommon infiltrating glioma, defined in the World Health Organization 2021 guidelines by a mutation in the H3F3A gene at codon 34 (H3.G34). DHG primarily affects children and young adults. Due to its rarity, there is paucity of knowledge regarding factors affecting overall survival (OS). We retrospectively assessed our institutional experience and present a review of the literature. METHODS We searched our institution’s pathology records to identify six cases of DHG. Demographic, clinical, diagnostic, treatment, and outcome data were recorded. We next searched for published articles regarding DHG cases via PubMed through May 2023. Four-hundred-fifty-four published individual cases of H3.G34 glioma were identified, 204 of which were hemispheric/supratentorial tumors with OS data reported, providing a combined 210 cases for analysis. 132 of these cases included MGMT promoter methylation status. 111 included extent of surgical resection. Kaplan-Meier and Cox regression survival analysis was performed. RESULTS Age range for DHG patients was 7-66 years (median 17). Median OS was 18.5 months (95% CI, 17-25). Greater extent of surgical resection and presence of MGMT promoter methylation were associated with better prognosis. Median OS for biopsy alone was 12 months (95% CI, 10-NA), subtotal resection was 16 months (95% CI, 14-23), and gross total resection was 27 months (95% CI 23-NA) – log-rank p< 0.001. OS for MGMT promoter unmethylated was 14 months (95% CI 12-22), MGMT promoter methylated was 24 months (95% CI, 17-30) – log-rank p=0.028. Contrary to previous reports, patient age was not found to impact prognosis (using 18, 21, and 40 years as cutoffs or as a continuous variable with Cox regression). CONCLUSION Extent of surgical resection and MGMT promoter methylation status are important prognostic factors for DHG. Unlike many primary brain tumors, survival does not appear to be significantly impacted by age.

Abstract BACKGROUND Leptomeningeal disease (LMD) is a devastating complication of cancer with median overall survival (OS) of 3-6 months following diagnosis. Proton craniospinal irradiation (pCSI) is a novel treatment option for LMD, permitting whole neuroaxis treatment with tolerable toxicity and improved efficacy compared to conventional photon whole brain radiation therapy and as needed focal spine radiotherapy. Despite this, patients experience progression and succumb to LMD. Addition of systemic therapy to pCSI may improve outcomes. METHODS In this single institution retrospective case series, we report feasibility of combination treatment with pCSI and immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) in patients with LMD from solid tumors. RESULTS Three patients were treated with pCSI (30 Gy in 10 fractions) and ICI. The first patient developed LMD related to large cell neuroendocrine carcinoma of lung primary, diagnosed by imaging and cytology, having previously undergone resection and stereotactic radiosurgery for brain metastases. Clinical and radiographic improvement was noted following pCSI, bevacizumab, and pembrolizumab therapy. Patient experienced disease progression and passed away only after ICI was held due to hypophysitis, with 6-month OS. The second patient developed LMD related to BRAF V600E mutant melanoma, diagnosed by imaging and cytology, having previously undergone ICI and BRAF-targeted therapy. Following pCSI, relatlimab, nivolumab, and BRAF-targeted therapy, the patient remains alive 7 months after LMD diagnosis despite radiographic progression treated with carboplatin, paclitaxel, intrathecal IL-2, ipilimumab, and bevacizumab. The third developed LMD related to BRAF-wildtype melanoma, diagnosed by imaging, having previously received ICI. Patient underwent pCSI followed by ipilimumab and nivolumab, progression-free 5 months after LMD diagnosis. CONCLUSION Addition of systemic therapy to pCSI is feasible for patients with LMD. Combination of ICI and pCSI may confer additional survival benefit, even among patients with prior exposure to ICI. These initial promising results warrant prospective evaluation.

Abstract PURPOSE For large brain metastases, it is unknown whether single fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (sSRS) or multi-fraction stereotactic radiosurgery (fSRS) is optimal. We aimed to compare rates of local progression and necrosis between sSRS and fSRS for large brain metastases. METHODS Patients with intact or resected brain metastases with a target volume ≥ 4.2 cc (corresponding to a diameter ≥ 2 cm) treated with Gamma Knife (GK) or linear accelerator-based SRS from 2014-2022 were included in this retrospective review. RESULTS A total of 343 large brain metastases in 276 patients were included; 171 lesions were treated with sSRS (96% with GK) and 172 lesions with fSRS (100% with linear accelerator). Median lesion volume was 19.8 cc and 8.4 cc for fSRS and sSRS, respectively. Resection was performed prior to SRS in 228 (66%), with the remaining 115 metastases treated intact. There was no difference in rate of local progression between sSRS versus fSRS, or between resected versus intact targets (p >0.8 for both). Cumulative incidence of local progression (with death as a competing risk) at 1 and 3 years for patients receiving sSRS was 24% and 30%, respectively, compared to 22% and 34% for fSRS. FSRS was associated with significantly higher rates of necrosis than sSRS (HR 5.58, 2.38-13.08, p < 0.001). This association remained significant after controlling for target volume. Cumulative incidence of necrosis (with death as a competing risk) at 1 and 3 years for patients receiving sSRS was 1% and 3%, respectively, compared to 10% and 18% for fSRS. Necrosis rates were significantly higher with fSRS for both intact and resected targets (P < 0.02 for both). CONCLUSION While local control for large resected or intact brain metastases appears similar after sSRS or fSRS, this retrospective study shows higher rates of necrosis after fSRS. Prospective validation is needed.