Locke, Frederick L.

PURPOSE Idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel), two B-cell maturation antigen–directed chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have demonstrated remarkable efficacy in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). We compare safety, efficacy, and survival among patients with RRMM treated with standard-of-care (SOC) ide-cel or cilta-cel. METHODS Data were from a retrospective chart review of patients with RRMM leukapheresed by December 31, 2022, with the intent to receive SOC ide-cel or cilta-cel at 19 institutions. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach was used to compare outcomes by therapy type. RESULTS A total of 641 patients were leukapheresed by December 31, 2022, with ide-cel (n = 386) and cilta-cel (n = 255). Five hundred eighty-six patients were infused (n = 350 for ide-cel; n = 236 for cilta-cel) with a median follow-up of 12.6 and 13.0 months for ide-cel and cilta-cel, respectively. After IPTW, patient characteristics were well balanced. Cilta-cel was associated with higher likelihood of grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS; odds ratio [OR], 6.80 [95% CI, 2.28 to 20.33]), infections (OR, 2.03 [95% CI, 1.41 to 2.92]), second primary malignancies (OR, 1.77 [95% CI, 0.89 to 3.56]), and delayed neurotoxicity (OR, 20.07 [95% CI, 4.46 to 90.20]). Cilta-cel was also associated with better treatment responses (≥complete response: OR, 2.42 [95% CI, 1.63 to 3.60]), longer progression-free survival (hazard ratio [HR], 0.48 [95% CI, 0.36 to 0.63]), and longer overall survival (HR, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.46 to 0.97]). No associations were observed between therapy type and immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, any CRS, severe cytopenia at days 30 and 90, or nonrelapse mortality. We observed consistent findings when repeating the analyses restricting the ide-cel cohort to patients infused during the same time period as Food and Drug Administration approval for cilta-cel (≥March 2022). CONCLUSION Cilta-cel demonstrated superior efficacy and survival, with higher incidence of certain toxicities, compared with ide-cel.

PURPOSE Off-the-shelf, allogeneic CD19 chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell products may improve access to treatment versus autologous ones. We report the phase I experience of the allogeneic CD19 CAR T-cell product cemacabtagene ansegedleucel (cema-cel) and its predecessor, ALLO-501, in CD19 CAR T-naïve patients with relapsed/refractory large B-cell lymphoma (R/R LBCL). METHODS In the ALPHA2/ALPHA studies, the safety and efficacy of allogeneic CD19 CAR T cells were evaluated in CD19 CAR T treatment-naïve patients with R/R LBCL. Patients received healthy donor-derived, human leukocyte antigen–unmatched cema-cel/ALLO-501 following a 3-day lymphodepletion regimen of fludarabine (30 mg/m 2 once daily), cyclophosphamide (300 or 500 mg/m 2 once daily), and escalating doses of the anti-CD52 monoclonal antibody, ALLO-647. RESULTS As of September 26, 2024, 33 CD19 CAR T-naïve patients with LBCL (median age, 66 years; median number of previous therapies, 3) received allogeneic CAR T cells. CAR T-cell expansion was observed following infusion, with persistence observed up to 4 months. The overall and complete response (CR) rates were 58% and 42%, respectively; the median duration of response in patients with a CR was 23.1 months. The most common treatment-emergent adverse events were hematologic toxicities. No cases of graft-versus-host disease, immune effector cell–associated neurotoxicity syndrome, or grade ≥3 cytokine release syndrome were reported. CONCLUSION Allogeneic CD19 CAR T cells demonstrated promising overall and durable CR rates with a manageable safety profile in CD19 CAR T-naïve patients with R/R LBCL, supporting additional evaluation of cema-cel in patients with LBCL.

Abstract Chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell products axicabtagene ciloleucel (axi-cel), tisagenlecleucel (tisa-cel), and lisocabtagene maraleucel (liso-cel) are approved for relapsed/refractory (R/R) large B-cell lymphoma (LBCL). Emerging evidence indicates that delayed CAR T-cell infusion, including prolonged time from leukapheresis to infusion, known as vein-to-vein time (V2Vt), may adversely impact clinical outcomes. We conducted a systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-analysis to identify differences in V2Vt in patients with R/R LBCL treated with axi-cel, tisa-cel, or liso-cel. The impact of V2Vt (<28 days vs ≥28 to <40 days vs ≥40 days) on effectiveness and safety outcomes was evaluated in patients treated with axi-cel enrolled in a post-authorization safety study using the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research data. SLR and meta-analysis showed that patients treated with axi-cel had the shortest median V2Vt (30.6 days) compared with tisa-cel (48.4 days) or liso-cel (35.9 days). Real-world analysis of patients treated with axi-cel demonstrated that V2Vt ≥40 days was associated with significantly lower complete response rate than V2Vt <28 days (odds ratio [OR], 0.61) or ≥28 to <40 days (OR, 0.66) and significantly worse overall survival than V2Vt <28 days (hazard ratio [HR], 1.33) or ≥28 to <40 days (HR, 1.36). Higher prolonged thrombocytopenia rates were observed in patients with axi-cel V2Vt ≥28 to <40 days or ≥40 days compared with <28 days (OR, 1.44 or 1.95, respectively). Together, these results show the impact of V2Vt on patient outcomes with axi-cel therapy and that earlier infusion with CD19-CAR therapies may be beneficial.

*Authors contributed equally. Introduction. Two chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies have been FDA approved for patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM): idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel) and ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel). Prior work from our consortium identified racial and ethnic differences in safety and response to ide-cel among patients treated in the standard of care (SOC) setting; despite these differences, survival was similar across race and ethnicity. Here, we extend this work to investigate racial and ethnic differences in safety, efficacy, and outcomes in a larger cohort of patients treated with SOC ide-cel with longer follow-up and patients treated with SOC cilta-cel. Methods. Data for RRMM patients who underwent leukapheresis by 12/31/2022 and were treated with SOC ide-cel or cilta-cel were pooled across 19 institutions in the U.S. Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. We compared Non-Hispanic White, Non-Hispanic Black, and Hispanic (any race) patients, excluding other racial and ethnic groups due to small sample sizes that precluded sub-group investigations. Separately for each CAR T-cell therapy, racial and ethnic differences in baseline patient characteristics, safety, and treatment responses were examined using chi-square and Kruskal-Wallis rank sum tests. Kaplan-Meier survival curves and log-rank tests were used to examine progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) by race and ethnicity. Results. Among 332 RRMM patients treated with ide-cel, Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients comprised 17% and 10% of the cohort, respectively. Hispanic patients were younger at infusion compared to Non-Hispanic Black and Non-Hispanic White patients (55.5 vs. 63 vs. 66 years, p<0.001). Non-Hispanic Black patients had a higher disease burden (≥ 50% bone marrow plasma cell percentage) compared to Non-Hispanic White and Hispanic patients (35% vs. 20% vs. 19%, p=0.05), while a higher proportion of Non-Hispanic White patients had high-risk cytogenetics compared to Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients (37% vs. 23% vs. 10%, p=0.003). Non-Hispanic Black patients were more likely to develop severe (≥ grade 3) cytopenia at day 30 (p<0.001) and day 90 (p=0.01) post-infusion, and these differences were particularly driven by higher rates of severe neutropenia among Non-Hispanic Black patients at these time points. Non-Hispanic White patients were more likely to achieve a best response of partial response (PR) or better (82%) compared to Non-Hispanic Black (75%) and Hispanic patients (63%, p=0.02). No other racial and ethnic differences in baseline patient characteristics (including cytopenias), safety, PFS, and OS were observed (p>0.05). Among 222 RRMM patients treated with cilta-cel, Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients comprised 12% and 9% of the cohort, respectively. At baseline, Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients were more likely to have anemia (p=0.01), and Non-Hispanic Black patients were more likely to have thrombocytopenia (p=0.02) and neutropenia (p=0.06) compared to Non-Hispanic White patients. No other differences in baseline patient characteristics were observed by race and ethnicity. While not statistically significant, a higher rate of severe (≥ grade 3) cytopenia at day 90 post-infusion was observed among Non-Hispanic Black and Hispanic patients compared to Non-Hispanic White patients (33% vs. 44% vs. 21%, p=0.07), similar to the ide-cel cohort. This finding was primarily driven by higher rates of severe neutropenia among Non-Hispanic Black patients and higher rates of anemia among Hispanic patients. No other racial and ethnic differences in safety, responses to cilta-cel, PFS, or OS were not observed in the cilta-cel cohort (p>0.05). Conclusion. In a large cohort of RRMM patients treated with SOC ide-cel or cilta-cel, we observed a higher rate of cytopenias post-infusion and inferior ide-cel responses among racial and ethnic minority patients compared to Non-Hispanic White patients. Despite these differences, survival was similar across race and ethnicity, suggesting that both available CAR T-cell therapies for RRMM patients can be utilized across all populations. Future studies that include larger patient cohorts of racially and ethnically diverse patients should be conducted to confirm these findings and additionally evaluate long-term outcomes.

Introduction: Brexu-cel is an autologous anti-CD19 CAR T-cell therapy approved in the US and EU for treatment of adults with R/R MCL (after ≥2 prior therapies in EU) based on a high objective response rate (ORR; 93%; 67% complete response [CR] rate) in pts who received the pivotal dose (2×106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg; Cohort 1; N=60) in ZUMA-2 (NCT02601313; Wang et al, N Engl J Med 2020). After ~4 years (y) of median follow-up, Brexu-cel demonstrated a median overall survival (OS) of 46.4 months (mo) in 68 pts with R/R MCL in Cohort 1 (Goy et al. ASH 2023). Cohort 2 was established to assess a lower dose (0.5 x 106 anti-CD19 CAR T cells/kg); however, the risk/benefit ratio of the Cohort 1 dose was deemed the optimal dose before Cohort 2 reached full enrollment. Here we report primary outcomes of Cohort 2 and 5-y outcomes of Cohorts 1 and 2. Methods: Pts with R/R MCL and ≤5 prior therapies including a BTKi received optional bridging therapy (protocol-defined), lymphodepleting chemotherapy, and 1 infusion of brexu-cel. The primary endpoint was ORR (CR + partial response [PR]) per Lugano classification (Cheson et al. J Clin Oncol. 2014) by independent radiology review committee (IRRC) assessment. Key secondary endpoints were duration of response (DOR), best objective response (BOR), progression-free survival (PFS), OS, and safety. After ≥24 mo of assessment, pts could transition to long-term follow-up (LTFU), NCT05041309, where they were monitored for late-onset targeted/serious adverse events (AEs) possibly related to brexu-cel, presence of replication-competent retrovirus (RCR), and/or insertional mutagenesis. Descriptive statistics are reported herein. Results: As of the primary analysis data cutoff date, July 24, 2019, 17 pts enrolled in Cohort 2, 14 (82%) of whom were treated with brexu-cel with median follow-up of 16.0 mo (range, 13.9-18.0). Pt characteristics for Cohort 2 (N=14) were similar to Cohort 1; median (range) age and number or prior therapies was 61.5 y (52-73) and 3 (2-5); 100% US-treated, 79% male, 71% extranodal disease, 50% intermediate or high s-MIPI scores, 50% refractory to last therapy, and 43% had prior autologous stem cell transplantation. ORR was 93% (95% CI, 66.1-99.8) per IRRC; 64% had a CR (95% CI, 35.1-87.2), 29% had a PR (95% CI, 8.4-58.1) and 1 pt was not assessed. All 14 pts had ≥1 AE of any grade (Gr), with Gr ≥3 AEs occurring in 93% of pts; the most common being hypotension (50%), white blood cell count decrease (50%), anemia (43%), and neutrophil count decrease (43%). Rates of Gr ≥3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and neurological events were 7% and 43%, respectively. As of April 1, 2024, median follow-up (range) for Cohort 1 and 2 was 67.8 mo (58.2-88.6; N=68) and 72.3 mo (70.1-74.3; N=14), respectively. In Cohort 1, 24 pts were still alive (35%; 2 withdrew consent and 1 lost to follow up) and 44 pts died (65%). In Cohort 2, 8 pts were still alive (57%; 2 withdrew consent and 1 lost to follow up) and 6 pts died (43%). A total of 27 pts (Cohort 1, n=23; Cohort 2, n=4) enrolled in the LTFU study by data cutoff with a median follow-up time of 70.2 mo (range, 58.2-88.6). Median (95% CI) investigator-assessed DOR and PFS were 36.5 mo (17.7-48.9; n=60; 17 patients in ongoing response, all CR) and 25.3 mo (12.7-46.6; N=68) in Cohort 1; and 57.5 mo (4.7-not estimable [NE]; n=12; 3 pts in ongoing response, all CR) and 29.5 mo (3.3-NE; N=14) in Cohort 2. Median OS (95% CI) and 60-mo OS rates (95% CI) were 46.5 mo (24.9- 60.2) and 38.5% (26.7-50.1) in Cohort 1; and not reached (9.4-NE) and 53.6% (23.8-76.2) in Cohort 2. One pt had 3 ongoing AEs on LTFU, hypogammaglobulinemia and 2 viral infections that arose prior to LTFU. Two pts died on LTFU, both due to progressive disease; no new secondary malignancies or RCR cases were reported. Conclusions: Consistent with Cohort 1, brexu-cel demonstrated a high ORR, durable responses, and an expected safety profile in pts with R/R MCL in Cohort 2 despite the lower dose. However, small sample size limits interpretation of these results. With >5 y of median follow-up, pts in Cohort 1 and 2 continued to experience durable responses with high 60-mo OS rates. No new safety signals were detected and no secondary malignancies or RCR cases were reported in LTFU. Additionally, ZUMA-2 results are consistent with real-world outcomes of brexu-cel in the post BTKi R/R MCL setting (89% ORR and 81% CR rate; Wang Y, et al. J Clin Oncol. 2023). These results support the continued use of brexu-cel in R/R MCL.

Introduction. Ciltacabtagene autoleucel (cilta-cel) and idecabtagene vicleucel (ide-cel), two anti-B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA) CAR T therapies, have demonstrated remarkable responses and improved survival among patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM) in the clinical trials and standard of care (SOC) setting. Here, we compare safety, efficacy, and survival for patients treated with SOC ide-cel and cilta-cel. Methods. Data were from a retrospective chart review of RRMM patients leukapheresed by 12/31/2022 with the intent to receive SOC ide- or cilta-cel at 19 institutions in the US Multiple Myeloma Immunotherapy Consortium. An inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) approach was used to compare outcomes by therapy type (cilta- vs. ide-cel), balancing on age, sex, race and ethnicity, performance status, extramedullary disease, high-risk cytogenetics, prior BCMA therapy, bone marrow plasma cells, penta-refractory status, lymphodepleting chemotherapy, baseline ferritin, low cell dose, and bridging therapy response. Logistic regression and Cox proportional hazard models were used to examine the association of treatment type with safety, efficacy, and survival accordingly, while adjusting for IPTW weights. We employed propensity score matching utilizing the same covariates to identify the association of treatment type with progression-free survival (PFS) within relevant patient sub-groups. Results. A total of 641 patients were leukapheresed by 12/31/2022 with ide-cel (n=386) and cilta-cel (n=255). 586 patients were infused (n=350 for ide-cel; n=236 for cilta-cel) with a median follow-up of 13.0 and 12.6 months, respectively. After IPTW, patient characteristics were well-balanced. Patients treated with cilta-cel were more likely to have grade ≥ 3 cytokine release syndrome (CRS) (OR=5.52, 95% CI=1.76-17.30, p=0.004), infections (OR=2.07, 95% CI=1.44-2.97, p<0.001), and delayed neurotoxicity (NT) (OR=20.97, 95% CI=4.75-92.42, p<0.001) compared to patients treated with ide-cel. In the cilta-cel cohort, 24 patients (10%) experienced delayed NT compared to 2 patients (1%) in the ide-cel cohort. Although not statistically significant, patients treated with cilta-cel were more likely to have any second primary malignancies (SPMs) (OR=1.87, 95% CI=0.94-3.71, p=0.08) and any SPMs excluding non-melanoma skin cancers (OR=1.78, 95% CI=0.78-4.10, p=0.2) but no association was observed for odds of hematologic SPMs (OR=0.98, 95% CI=0.26-3.61). No association was observed for therapy type with any or severe immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome, any CRS, severe cytopenias, and non-relapse mortality. Compared to ide-cel, cilta-cel was associated with better treatment responses of ≥ complete response (OR=2.38, 95% CI=1.61-3.51, p<0.001) and ≥ partial response (OR=1.74, 95% CI=0.99-3.05, p=0.06). Patients treated with cilta-cel had a longer PFS and overall survival (OS) than ide-cel (HR=0.47, 95% CI=0.35-0.62, p<0.001 and HR=0.63, 95% CI=0.42-0.93, p=0.02, respectively), and these findings were similar in the intention to treat cohort (PFS: HR=0.44, 95% CI=0.34-0.55, p<0.001; OS: HR=0.55, 95% CI=0.41-0.73, p<0.001, respectively). We observed consistent findings when repeating the analyses restricting the ide-cel cohort to patients infused during the same time-period as FDA approval for cilta-cel (≥ March 2022), restricting to patients with data on all covariates, and restricting to sites that contributed data for both products. In a propensity matched population, (n=380; n=190 for cilta-cel and n=190 for ide-cel), patients treated with cilta-cel had superior PFS compared to those treated with ide-cel in most subgroups with respect to age and disease characteristics including extramedullary disease, high-risk cytogenetics, and elevated baseline ferritin (p<0.05). Conclusion. Our results suggest superior efficacy of cilta-cel with a higher incidence of certain toxicities compared to ide-cel in the SOC setting. This study provides valuable information for patient counseling and guiding the selection of CAR T-cell therapy for specific patient populations. Further validation through similar large-scale real-world experiences or prospective studies is needed to confirm our results and enhance applicability in the clinical setting. *DH, LP, & DD are co-first authors * YL, KP, & SS are co-last authors

Introduction: Recent efforts have shed light on the clinical and laboratory factors associated with toxicity and response to BCMA-directed CAR-T therapy in patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma (RRMM). However, a major limitation of current scoring systems lies in their assessment at time of lymphodepletion. Because they are not determined before apheresis, they are ill-equipped to guide patient selection, anticipate level-of-care, or plan pre-emptive toxicity management strategies. We therefore aimed to characterize early predictors of CAR-T toxicity and response. Study Design: In this multicenter observational study, we examined demographic, clinical, and laboratory data across three distinct timepoints: indication (e.g., treatment decision), apheresis, and pre-lymphodepletion (LD). CRS and ICANS were graded according to ASTCT criteria. Hematotoxicity (ICAHT) was graded using EHA/EBMT criteria. Early infections (day 0-100) were defined based on microbiologic data or as a clinical infection syndrome, and graded per Hill et al, Blood 2018. Kaplan-Meier estimates of progression-free (PFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared by log-rank test. Cox proportional hazard models were applied to explore associations between pre-apheresis risk factors and key toxicity and survival outcomes. The CAR-HEMATOTOX (HT) score - encompassing markers of inflammation (e.g., CRP, ferritin) and marrow reserve (e.g., hemoglobin, ANC, platelet count) - was determined at each timepoint (Rejeski et al, Blood 2021). Results: We included 530 RRMM patients treated with standard-of-care cilta-cel (n=184) or ide-cel (n=346) across nine centers. Median age was 65 (range 31-88), median ECOG was 1 (IQR 0-1), and patients received a median of 5 prior lines of therapy (IQR 4-7). The median time from indication to apheresis was 16 days (IQR 7-52), while the median time from apheresis to infusion was 56 days (IQR 46-69). The proportion of high-risk patients by HT score did not change between the pre-apheresis and LD timepoints (19% vs. 20%, p=0.82). Most patients stayed either low-risk (n=388, 73.2%) or high-risk (n=68, 12.8%). However, 35 patients (6.6%) shifted from high-to-low risk, while 39 patients (7.4%) progressed from low-to-high risk - reflecting their response to bridging therapies. We noted considerable differences in morbidity and mortality based on the pre-apheresis HT score. Compared to their low-risk counterparts (score 0-2, n=427), high-risk patients (score ≥3, n=103) were hospitalized longer (12 vs. 15 days, p=0.009) and required more frequent ICU admissions (6% vs. 12%, p=0.05). They exhibited more severe early cytopenias (G3+: 8% vs. 25%, p<0.001) and late cytopenias (G3+: 7% vs. 21%, p<0.001), resulting in increased use of TPO agonists and stem cell boosts. Grade 3 or higher ICANS was also more common in HThigh patients (3% vs. 11%, p=0.006), as were severe infections (14% vs. 27%, p=0.007). We found increased non-relapsed mortality in HThigh patients (1-yr NRM 4.6% vs. 16.1%, p<0.001), but no significant difference in the occurrence of secondary malignancies (p>0.9). With a median follow-up of 12.4 months, HThigh patients showed inferior PFS (1-yr PFS 29% vs. 63%, p<0.0001) and OS (1-yr OS 49% vs. 83%, p<0.0001). Transitioning from a low-to-high score was linked to poor survival (1-yr PFS 26%), while the shift from high-to-low risk was associated with favorable outcomes (1-yr PFS 51%). In a multivariable Cox regression model of pre-apheresis features, a high HT score (aHR 2.52, p<0.0001), prior anti-BCMA therapy (aHR 1.55, p=0.04), history of extramedullary disease (aHR 1.42, p=0.02), and penta-refractoriness (aHR 1.45, p=0.02) were independently associated with PFS. Notably, the presence of more than 3 of these high-risk features defined an ultra-high-risk cohort of 28 patients (5.3%) with particularly dismal survival (1-year PFS 15%). Conclusions: Leveraging granular pre-apheresis data from a large international cohort, we identify early markers of toxicity and response in CAR-T-treated RRMM patients. The HT score - reflecting baseline inflammation and hematopoietic reserve - identified high-risk patients likely to benefit from pre-emptive toxicity mitigation strategies such as prophylactic stem cell collection. Most importantly, we characterize a small yet ultra-high-risk group of RRMM patients in need of more effective bridging and therapeutic options.

Background: Cytokine release syndrome (CRS) and immune effector cell-associated neurotoxicity syndrome (ICANS) are known safety concerns following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapy. Axi-cel, a CAR T-cell therapy approved in the US for adults with R/R LBCL after ≥ 1 line of prior therapy (2L+), has been administered in the outpatient setting, where a common cause for post-infusion hospital admissions were CAR T-cell-related toxicities (Furqan et al., 2024). Due to reimbursement policies in the US, patients at higher risk for safety events requiring inpatient care within 3 days of infusion may not be ideal candidates for outpatient care. We sought to identify what pre-infusion characteristics may put patients more at risk for developing early CRS and ICANS after axi-cel. Methods : Patients receiving axi-cel for R/R LBCL 2L+ between 01/2021−10/2023 registered in the Center for International Blood and Marrow Transplant Research (CIBMTR) observational database were potentially eligible for analysis. Patients with prior non-transplant cellular therapy or missing data for analysis were excluded. Primary endpoints were onset of early CRS and early ICANS, defined as an any grade event within 3 calendar days of axi-cel infusion (date of infusion is defined as Day 0 and onset of CRS/ICANS before the end of Day 3 is an early event). Early Grade ≥ 2 and early Grade ≥ 3 CRS and ICANS (onset of CRS/ICANS before the end of Day 3 and maximum Grade ≥ 2 and ≥ 3 per ASTCT Criteria) were also evaluated. Patient demographics, ECOG PS, comorbidities, disease characteristics at diagnosis and prior to infusion, line of therapy (LoT), lab assessments prior to infusion, and infusion-related attributes were evaluated by univariate screening and multivariable regression for development of early CRS or early ICANS. Results: A total of888 patients from 105 centers were included in the analysis. Median age was 63 years (45% ≥ 65 years) and 66% were male. At LBCL diagnosis, 22% of patients had a histological transformation. Prior to infusion, 5% of patients had ECOG PS ≥ 2 and 70% had at least 1 clinically significant comorbidity. Half (50%) of patients received axi-cel with 1 prior LoT (2L) and 10% of patients underwent a prior autologous hematopoietic cell transplant. Median time from leukapheresis to infusion was 30 days (interquartile range [IQR] 27−34). Bridging therapy of any type was administered in 59%, and systemic bridging therapy in 48%, of patients and 14% of patients were intended to be treated in the outpatient setting. Thirty percent of patients had chemo-sensitive disease prior to infusion. Median follow-up post-infusion was 12.3 months (range 3−38). Median time to onset of CRS was 4 days (IQR 2−6) and 84% of patients experienced CRS at any time. Early any grade (Grade ≥ 3) CRS was observed in 47% (3%) of patients. In the multivariate analysis of early any grade CRS, only prior LoT (≥ 2 vs 1) was associated with lower risk (OR 0.71; 95% CI 0.55−0.94), but this association was not seen in the analyses of early Grade ≥ 2 nor early Grade ≥ 3 CRS. Notably, 47% and 52% of patients with ≥ 2 vs 1 prior LoT, respectively, only experienced early Grade 1 CRS (defined as fever only). In the analysis of early Grade ≥ 3 CRS, only ECOG PS 0−1 was associated with lower risk vs patients with ECOG PS ≥ 2 (OR 0.17; 95% CI 0.06−0.48). Median time to onset of ICANS was 7 days (IQR 5−9) and 47% of patients experienced ICANS at any time. Early any grade (Grade ≥ 3) ICANS occurred in 9% (5%) of patients. After multivariate adjustment, age < 65 vs ≥ 65 (OR 0.38 [95% CI 0.23−0.62]) and 1 vs ≥ 2 prior LoT (OR 0.58 [95% CI 0.36−0.95]) were associated with lower risk of early any grade ICANS. Age < 65 vs ≥ 65 was also associated with lower risk of early Grade ≥ 3 ICANS (OR 0.31 [95% CI 0.15−0.61]), as was ECOG PS 0−1 vs ECOG PS ≥ 2 (OR 0.30 [95% CI 0.11−0.83]). Comorbidities were evaluated and no significant associations with early CRS nor early ICANS were found. Conclusions: This analysis of readily available clinical variables in a real-world contemporary cohort of patients treated with axi-cel demonstrates that younger patients and patients with better ECOG PS have lower risk of early CRS and early ICANS. Axi-cel in 2L setting, vs 3L+, is associated with lower risk of early any grade ICANS and comparable early Grade ≥ 2 CRS, but a higher risk of early fever. These results further enable a more informed decision of patient selection for physicians, which is critical for the success of outpatient administration.