Lachner, Christian

AbstractBackgroundAfrican Americans experience a high dementia burden yet are critically underrepresented in observational studies and clinical trials in memory and aging. Lack of adequate representation increases the likelihood that research findings may not generalize to African Americans. A deeper understanding of the barriers and facilitators that influence participation by younger and older African American adults is needed to support recruitment and retention in studies focused on early‐ and late‐onset neurodegenerative diseases.MethodAfrican American community leaders collaborated in design of an electronic survey that was distributed via social media focused on local zip codes. Survey respondents rated barriers and facilitators to research participation on a 0–3‐point Likert scale. Responses ≥2 corresponded with barriers/facilitators likely to influence participation decisions. Differences across age groups were evaluated using nonparametric Kruskal‐Wallis tests. Strategies to mitigate barriers and reinforce facilitators were further explored via community‐based focus groups.ResultSurvey data included responses from 240 African Americans (18‐44‐years, n = 76; 45‐64‐years, n = 83; ≥65‐years, n = 81). Requirement to undergo a diagnostic lumbar puncture was a substantial barrier to research participation across all age groups. Attending weekday visits (median = 2.0), including visits ≥2 hours (median 2.0), was a substantial barrier for individuals 18‐44‐years, but not older respondents (p = 0.001). Compensation for meals/transportation was beneficial across all age groups (median = 2.0; p<0.05). The option to attend visits in the local community or on weekends and access to door‐to‐door transportation were substantial facilitators for respondents <65‐years (median = 2.0) vs ≥65‐years (median = 0; p = 0.001). The option to complete some tests at home was a substantial facilitator for younger (18‐44‐years, median = 2.0) but not older respondents (≥65‐years, median = 0; p = 0.001). Focus group results supported survey findings and showed slight variations in priorities across age groups. Older participants (≥65‐years‐old) more frequently cited the longstanding effects of racism as a barrier to research participation compared to younger participants (45‐64‐years‐old; p = 0.008), who more frequently cited concerns regarding testing requirements (p = 0.034).ConclusionPerceived barriers and facilitators to research participation vary with age. Age‐specific strategies are needed to increase engagement, address disparities in recruitment, and promote retention of African American participants in studies of memory and aging across the lifespan.

AbstractBackgroundPerturbations in immune pathways are strongly associated with Alzheimer’s disease. A positive association between autoimmune diseases and frontotemporal dementia has been reported. We explored whether early onset Alzheimer’s disease (EOAD) would associate with autoimmune diseases.MethodWe compared 313 patients with EOAD from the Mayo Clinic Florida, Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center (ADRC) Registry with matched cognitively normal controls (NC) based on age (+/‐ 2 years) and gender at 1:2 ratio. NC were derived from Mayo Clinic Biobank Project, Rochester (N = 313) and the Mayo Clinic Study of Aging (N = 313). Data abstraction was performed by trained statisticians using ICD 9&10 codes corresponding to 40 specified autoimmune diseases and/or documentation of specified immunomodulatory treatment. Data was also abstracted via retrospective record review. We further reviewed clinical records from EOAD patients with neuropathologically confirmed Alzheimer’s disease patients enrolled in the ADRC (n = 10). Each autoimmune disease type was compared between cases and controls using Fisher’s exact test. All tests were two‐sided with alpha level set at 0.05 for statistical significance. Continuous variables were summarized as median (range) while categorical variables were reported as frequency (percentage). The prevalence of autoimmune disease in the general population was based off Hayter & Cook, 2012 and Roberts & Erdei, 2020. All data abstraction was done blinded to the clinical diagnosis and baseline demographics.ResultAutoimmune disease history was abstracted from 949 patient records (313 EOAD, 10 pathologically‐confirmed EOAD, 626 NCI). The median age was 57 years‐old. (EOAD range 28,65 yrs.; NC 30,66 yrs.). Autoimmune thyroiditis (p = 0.0008), ulcerative colitis (p = 0.011, psoriasis (<0.0001), rheumatoid arthritis (p = 0.0005), and Raynaud’s syndrome (p = 0.0021) were less prevalent in patients with EOAD compared to NC. Furthermore, patients with EOAD had a lower prevalence of immune mediated hematologic disorders.ConclusionPatients with EOAD have a lower prevalence of autoimmune diseases than NC. Immune activation identified in early onset AD patients may be unrelated to autoimmunity. Findings should be explored in late onset AD patients.

AbstractBackgroundAfrican Americans (AA) represent 12% of the United States population ≥65 years‐old, but 19% of persons with dementia. Inequalities in social determinants of health may influence access to healthcare resources contributing to increased dementia risk. Modifiable risk factors, including vascular risk factors and depression, may contribute up to 40% of dementia risk and are overrepresented in AA. Accordingly, risk factor modification in AA may improve disparities and decrease dementia risk.MethodDementia risk factors were evaluated in community‐dwelling AA (n = 261) and non‐Hispanic White (NHW; n = 193) participants who completed ≥2 research visits in studies of memory and aging at the Mayo Clinic Florida Alzheimer Disease Research Center. The association between modifiable risk factors and cognitive impairment (global Clinical Dementia Rating® [CDR] ≥0.5), and rates of decline in impaired participants (measured using the CDR Sum‐of‐Boxes; CDR‐sb) were compared between AA and NHW, while controlling for demographics, APOEe4 status, and Area Deprivation Index.ResultModifiable dementia risk factors were common in AA and NHW participants. The ADI was higher in AA denoting greater socioeconomic and environmental deprivation [7.8 (2.3) vs. 4.0 (2.1); p<0.001]. History of stroke/transient ischemic attack (OR, CI95% = 2.52, 1.08‐5.83) was associated with an increased odds of dementia in AA participants only, while depression was associated with an increased odds of dementia in both AA (3.10, 1.52‐6.30) and NHW (3.46, 1.14‐10.48) participants. Moreover, depression (β, CI95% = 1.55, 0.5‐2.6), p = 0.004) was associated with a faster rate of decline (CDR‐sb) in cognitively impaired AA participants. AA participants with depression were disproportionately less likely to report use of antidepressant medications than NHW counterparts (40/45, 89% vs. 21/44, 48%); p<0.001).ConclusionModifiable risk factors associated with dementia were common in AA and NHW participants. Depression was associated with dementia in both AA and NHW but uniquely associated with an accelerated rate of cognitive decline in AA participants. Disparities in use of antidepressant medications may contribute to these differences. Optimizing depression treatment in AA communities may improve cognitive trajectories and dementia risk in this population.

AbstractBackgroundFor blood‐based biomarkers to fulfill their potential to revolutionize diagnosis and management of Alzheimer’s disease (AD), additional research in diverse populations remains critical. Here, we analyzed a biracial sample to assess the profiles of blood‐based AD biomarkers and their relationships to cognition and medical comorbidities.MethodsSelf‐reported African‐American (AA; n = 267) and non‐Hispanic White (NHW; n = 268) participants evaluated through the Mayo Jacksonville Alzheimer’s Disease Research Center were matched on age, sex, and clinical diagnosis. Plasma AD biomarkers (Aβ42/40, p‐tau181, GFAP, NfL) were measured using the Quanterix SiMoA HD‐X analyzer. Cognition was assessed with the Mini Mental State Examination. Wilcoxon rank sum tests were used to assess for differences in plasma biomarker levels by sex. Linear models tested for associations of race, chronic kidney disease (CKD), and vascular risk factors with plasma AD biomarker levels, covarying for age and sex. Additional models assessed for interactions between race and plasma biomarkers in predicting cognition, further covarying for education.ResultsThe sample included adults aged 43‐100 years, with 69% women. Education was higher in NHW participants (median 16 vs. 12 years, p<0.001). APOE (apolipoprotein E) ε4 positivity was higher in AA participants (43% vs. 34%; p = 0.04). There were no differences in plasma AD biomarker levels between AA and NHW participants. These findings were unchanged after stratifying by cognitive status (unimpaired versus impaired). Although the association between p‐tau181 and cognition appeared stronger in NHW participants while the association between Aβ42/40 and cognition appeared stronger in AA participants, these findings did not survive after excluding individuals with CKD. Women displayed higher GFAP (p = 0.002) and lower p‐tau181 (p = 0.001) levels than men. Diabetes was inversely associated with GFAP levels (p<0.001).ConclusionsIn a biracial, community‐based sample, we observed that sex differences, CKD, and vascular risk factors contributed to variation in plasma AD biomarkers, while self‐reported race did not. Our results reinforce the critical need to account for sex and systemic medical comorbidities in equitably deploying blood‐based AD biomarkers in the general population.

AbstractBackgroundGlial activation plays a critical role in Alzheimer’s disease (AD) pathogenesis and is associated with amyloid‐β plaques and neurofibrillary tangles composed of phosphorylated tau (phospho‐tau). With approximately 40%‐60% of AD cases having limbic‐predominant age‐related TDP‐43 encephalopathy neuropathologic change (LATE‐NC), TDP‐43 pathology has become more the rule than the exception in AD brains. However, the effect of LATE‐NC in AD‐related glial activation is unknown.MethodWe analyzed the effect of TDP‐43 pathology on glial activation in three AD subtypes: hippocampal sparing (HpSp) AD, typical AD, and limbic predominant AD. Twenty cases of each subtype (n = 60 total) were selected from the FLorida Autopsied Multi‐Ethnic (FLAME) cohort. Cases were immunohistochemically evaluated on serial sections of the hippocampus in the CA1 and subiculum subsectors, and superior temporal, inferior parietal, and mid‐frontal cortices with antibodies to CD68 (phagocytosis), GFAP (astrogliosis), GT‐38 (conformation‐specific AD‐type tau), 6F/3D (amyloid‐β), and phospho‐Serine 409/410 of TDP‐43 (pTDP‐43). Digital pathology was employed to quantify immunohistochemical staining. Multivariable regression modeling was utilized to understand the relationship between glial activation and AD pathologies.ResultThe level of glial activation, defined as % of immunoreactive surface area for CD68 and GFAP, was lowest in HpSp AD (0.54%, 13%), whereas typical AD (1.3%, 33%) and limbic predominant AD (1.3%, 30%) had similar levels suggesting a ceiling effect, or plateau, of gliosis levels (both p<0.001). HpSp AD was more often male (p<0.001) and younger at disease onset (p<0.001) compared to both typical AD and limbic predominant AD. Multivariable regression modeling of CD68 (subiculum R2 = 0.60) identified advanced tau to be a significant predictor of CD68 in all brain regions. LATE‐NC stage predicted increased CD68 levels in limbic brain regions. Multivariable regression modeling of GFAP (CA1 R2 = 0.60) showed that Aβ was the strongest predictor of astrogliosis in CA1 and subiculum (p<0.001). Advanced tau in CA1 and parietal cortex, LATE‐NC in subiculum and temporal cortex, and APOE4 genotype in CA1 predicted a significant increase in GFAP.ConclusionThese findings highlight the significant role TDP‐43 pathology plays in affecting the microenvironment and interplay between neuroinflammation and neurodegeneration and have important implications for therapeutic strategies in AD with co‐morbid LATE‐NC.

AbstractBackgroundThe coarse‐grained plaque is a biochemically and morphologically distinct amyloid‐β (Aβ) deposit that was discovered in clinically‐defined atypical Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Unlike other Aβ deposits, this plaque is not observed in cognitively normal people. This study investigates the hypothesis that the coarse‐grained plaque is distinctly associated with AD neuropathologic change and glial activation within the context of AD subtypes.MethodSixty AD cases from the FLorida Autopsied Multi‐Ethnic (FLAME) cohort were assessed. We included 20 hippocampal sparing (HpSp) AD, 20 typical AD, and 20 limbic predominant AD. Immunohistochemistry was performed on the middle frontal, inferior temporal, and inferior parietal cortex for AD neuropathology (Aβ [6F/3D], phospho‐tau [AT8], tau [GT38]) and glial activation (CD68 [KP1] and GFAP). Digital pathology was used to quantify burden. Thioflavin‐S tangle counts were performed at time of neuropathologic diagnosis. Distinct deposit types, including classic cored plaques, coarse‐grained plaques, cerebral amyloid angiopathy (CAA)‐Type 1, and CAA‐Type 2, were semi‐quantitatively scored on Aβ (Fig. 1). Correlations between demographic, clinical, and neuropathologic characteristics were assessed using Spearman rho analysis and reported if p<0.05. An independent cohort of ∼100 HpSp AD cases will be assessed to validate initial findings.ResultIn the frontal cortex of HpSp AD, higher scores of classic cored plaques correlated with older age at onset and death, non‐APOE ε4 carriership, and less CAA‐Type 1 and Type 2 (Fig. 2). On the contrary, the severity of coarse‐grained plaques correlated with a younger age at onset and death, APOE ε4 carriership, higher scores for CAA‐Type 1, CAA‐Type 2, and increased burden of Aβ, GFAP, and CD68. Classic cored plaques correlated negatively with phospho‐tau and tau, whereas coarse‐grained plaques correlated positively with phospho‐tau, tau, and tangles. The two deposit types were negatively correlated with each other. Correlations were weaker but showed similar trends in other AD subtypes (Fig. 2) and regions.ConclusionWithin HpSp AD, classic cored and coarse‐grained plaques show distinct correlations with glial activation, (phospho‐)tau, and tangles. These results suggest opposite directions of association for these deposits on AD neuropathologic change that may impact clinical symptoms. These findings are relevant to therapies targeting overall Aβ pathology.

Objective This study was undertaken to evaluate the frequency of modifiable dementia risk factors and their association with cognitive impairment and rate of decline in diverse participants engaged in studies of memory and aging. Methods Modifiable dementia risk factors and their associations with cognitive impairment and cognitive decline were determined in community‐dwelling African American (AA; n = 261) and non‐Hispanic White (nHW; n = 193) participants who completed ≥2 visits at the Mayo Clinic Alzheimer Disease Research Center in Jacksonville, Florida. Risk factors and their associations with cognitive impairment (global Clinical Dementia Rating [CDR] ≥ 0.5) and rates of decline (CDR Sum of Boxes) in impaired participants were compared in AA and nHW participants, controlling for demographics, APOE ɛ4 status, and Area Deprivation Index. Results Hypertension, hypercholesterolemia, obesity, and diabetes were overrepresented in AA participants, but were not associated with cognitive impairment. Depression was associated with increased odds of cognitive impairment in AA (odds ratio [OR] = 4.30, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 2.13–8.67) and nHW participants (OR = 2.79, 95% CI = 1.21–6.44) but uniquely associated with faster decline in AA participants (β = 1.71, 95% CI = 0.69–2.73, p = 0.001). Fewer AA participants reported antidepressant use (9/49, 18%) than nHW counterparts (57/78, 73%, p < 0.001). Vitamin B12 deficiency was also associated with an increased rate of cognitive decline in AA participants (β = 2.65, 95% CI = 0.38–4.91, p = 0.023). Interpretation Modifiable dementia risk factors are common in AA and nHW participants, representing important risk mitigation targets. Depression was associated with dementia in AA and nHW participants, and with accelerated declines in cognitive function in AA participants. Optimizing depression screening and treatment may improve cognitive trajectories and outcomes in AA participants. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:518–529