Back to Authors

Diamandis, Eleftherios P.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1589-820X

Mayo Clinic

Mount Sinai Hospital

Citations 10

Quantitation of neurofilament light chain protein in serum and cerebrospinal fluid from patients with multiple sclerosis using the MSD R-PLEX NfL assay
Ulndreaj, Antigona , Sohaei, Dorsa , Pons-Belda, Oscar D., Fernandez-Uriarte, Amaia , Campbell, Christopher , Cheo, David, Stengelin, Martin , Sigal, George B. , Freedman, Mark S. , Scarisbrick, Isobel A. , Prassas, Ioannis , Diamandis, Eleftherios , Thebault, Simon , Diamandis, Eleftherios P.

Diagnosis | February 14, 2023 | Volume: 10 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 275-280

10.1515/dx-2022-0125 Get It

Abstract Objectives Neurofilament light (NfL) chain is a marker of neuroaxonal damage in various neurological diseases. Here we quantitated NfL levels in the cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) and serum from patients with multiple sclerosis (MS) and controls, using the R-PLEX NfL assay, which employs advanced Meso Scale Discovery ® (MSD) electrochemiluminescence (ECL)-based detection technology. Methods NfL was quantitated in samples from 116 individuals from two sites (Ottawa Hospital Research Institute and Mayo Clinic), consisting of patients with MS (n=71) and age- and sex-matched inflammatory neurological controls (n=13) and non-inflammatory controls (n=32). Correlation of NfL levels between CSF and serum was assessed in paired samples in a subset of MS patients and controls (n=61). Additionally, we assessed the correlation between NfL levels obtained with MSD’s R-PLEX ® and Quanterix’s single molecule array (Simoa ® ) assays in CSF and serum (n=32). Results Using the R-PLEX, NfL was quantitated in 99% of the samples tested, and showed a broad range in the CSF (82–500,000 ng/L) and serum (8.84–2,014 ng/L). Nf-L levels in both biofluids correlated strongly (r=0.81, p<0.0001). Lastly, Nf-L measured by MSD’s R-PLEX and Quanterix’s Simoa assays were highly correlated for both biofluids (CSF: r=0.94, p<0.0001; serum: r=0.95, p<0.0001). Conclusions We show that MSD’s R-PLEX NfL assay can reliably quantitate levels of NfL in the CSF and serum from patients with MS and controls, where levels correlate strongly with Simoa.
The roles of proteases in prostate cancer
Koistinen, Hannu , Kovanen, Ruusu‐Maaria , Hollenberg, Morley D. , Dufour, Antoine , Radisky, Evette S. , Batra, Jyotsna , Clements, Judith A. , Hooper, John D. , Diamandis, Eleftherios P. , Rannikko, Antti , Mirtti, Tuomas , Stenman, Ulf-Håkan , Batra, Jyotsna , Clements, Judith , Hooper, John D , Diamandis, Eleftherios , Schilling, Oliver , Rannikko, Antti , Mirtti, Tuomas , Radisky, Evette S , Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan

IUBMB Life | January 4, 2023 | Volume: 75 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 493-513

10.1002/iub.2700 Get It

Abstract Since the proposition of the pro‐invasive activity of proteolytic enzymes over 70 years ago, several roles for proteases in cancer progression have been established. About half of the 473 active human proteases are expressed in the prostate and many of the most well‐characterized members of this enzyme family are regulated by androgens, hormones essential for development of prostate cancer. Most notably, several kallikrein‐related peptidases, including KLK3 (prostate‐specific antigen, PSA), the most well‐known prostate cancer marker, and type II transmembrane serine proteases, such as TMPRSS2 and matriptase, have been extensively studied and found to promote prostate cancer progression. Recent findings also suggest a critical role for proteases in the development of advanced and aggressive castration‐resistant prostate cancer (CRPC). Perhaps the most intriguing evidence for this role comes from studies showing that the protease‐activated transmembrane proteins, Notch and CDCP1, are associated with the development of CRPC. Here, we review the roles of proteases in prostate cancer, with a special focus on their regulation by androgens.
Direct-to-Consumer Testing
Diamandis, Eleftherios P. , Grenache, David G., Joyner, Michael J. , Holmes, Daniel T. , Seccombe, Rodger, Li, Michelle , Joyner, Michael J , Diamandis, Eleftherios

Clinical Chemistry | December 20, 2016 | Volume: 63 | Issue: 3 | Pages: 635-641

10.1373/clinchem.2016.260349 Get It

A Spectrum of Views on Clinical Mass Spectrometry
Annesley, Thomas M, Diamandis, Eleftherios P. , Bachmann, Lorin M, Hart, Bradley R. , Javahery, Reza, Hanash, Samir , Singh, Ravinder , Smith, Richard , Diamandis, Eleftherios

Clinical Chemistry | November 10, 2015 | Volume: 62 | Issue: 1 | Pages: 30-36

10.1373/clinchem.2015.250258 Get It

Natriuretic Peptides in Heart Failure
Lin, Danny C C, Diamandis, Eleftherios P. , Maisel, Alan S. , Jaffe, Allan S. , Clerico, Aldo , Januzzi, James Louis , Jaffe, Allan S. , Diamandis, Eleftherios

Clinical Chemistry | April 4, 2014 | Volume: 60 | Issue: 8 | Pages: 1040-1046

10.1373/clinchem.2014.223057 Get It

Cobalt and Chromium Measurement in Patients with Metal Hip Prostheses
Estey, Mathew P., Straeten, Catherine Van Der , Tower, Stephen S. , Hart, Alister , Moyer, Thomas P. , Diamandis, Eleftherios P.

Clinical Chemistry | November 1, 2012 | Volume: 59 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 880-886

10.1373/clinchem.2012.193037 Get It

National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for Use of Tumor Markers in Testicular, Prostate, Colorectal, Breast, and Ovarian Cancers
Sturgeon, Catharine M., Duffy, Michael J. , Brünner, Nils, Chan, Daniel W., Babaian, Richard J., Bast, Robert C. , Dowell, Barry L., Esteva, Francisco J. , Haglund, Caj , Hayes, Daniel F. , Holten-Andersen, Mads , Klee, George G., Lamerz, R., Looijenga, Leendert H. J. , Nielsen, Hans Jørgen , Rittenhouse, Harry G., Semjonow, Axel, Shih, Ie‐Ming, Sibley, Paul, Sölétormos, György , Stephan, Carsten , Sokoll, Lori J. , Hoffman, Barry , Diamandis, Eleftherios P. , Stenman, Ulf‐Håkan , Lilja, Hans , Harbeck, Nadia , Molina, Rafael , Bast, Robert C , Diamandis, Eleftherios

Clinical Chemistry | November 28, 2008 | Volume: 54 | Issue: 12 | Pages: e11-e79

10.1373/clinchem.2008.105601 Get It

AbstractBackground: Updated National Academy of Clinical Biochemistry (NACB) Laboratory Medicine Practice Guidelines for the use of tumor markers in the clinic have been developed.Methods: Published reports relevant to use of tumor markers for 5 cancer sites—testicular, prostate, colorectal, breast, and ovarian—were critically reviewed.Results: For testicular cancer, α-fetoprotein, human chorionic gonadotropin, and lactate dehydrogenase are recommended for diagnosis/case finding, staging, prognosis determination, recurrence detection, and therapy monitoring. α-Fetoprotein is also recommended for differential diagnosis of nonseminomatous and seminomatous germ cell tumors. Prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is not recommended for prostate cancer screening, but may be used for detecting disease recurrence and monitoring therapy. Free PSA measurement data are useful for distinguishing malignant from benign prostatic disease when total PSA is &lt;10 μg/L. In colorectal cancer, carcinoembryonic antigen is recommended (with some caveats) for prognosis determination, postoperative surveillance, and therapy monitoring in advanced disease. Fecal occult blood testing may be used for screening asymptomatic adults 50 years or older. For breast cancer, estrogen and progesterone receptors are mandatory for predicting response to hormone therapy, human epidermal growth factor receptor-2 measurement is mandatory for predicting response to trastuzumab, and urokinase plasminogen activator/plasminogen activator inhibitor 1 may be used for determining prognosis in lymph node–negative patients. CA15-3/BR27–29 or carcinoembryonic antigen may be used for therapy monitoring in advanced disease. CA125 is recommended (with transvaginal ultrasound) for early detection of ovarian cancer in women at high risk for this disease. CA125 is also recommended for differential diagnosis of suspicious pelvic masses in postmenopausal women, as well as for detection of recurrence, monitoring of therapy, and determination of prognosis in women with ovarian cancer.Conclusions: Implementation of these recommendations should encourage optimal use of tumor markers.
Kallikreins are associated with secondary progressive multiple sclerosis and promote neurodegeneration
Scarisbrick, Isobel A. , Linbo, Rachel, Vandell, Alexander G., Keegan, Mark , Blaber, Sachiko I., Blaber, Michael , Sneve, D., Lucchinetti, Claudia F. , Rodriguez, Moses , Diamandis, Eleftherios P. , Rodriguez, Moses , Diamandis, Eleftherios

bchm | July 17, 2008 | Volume: 389 | Issue: 6 | Pages: 739-745

10.1515/bc.2008.085 Get It

AbstractTissue kallikrein KLK1 and the kallikrein-related peptidases KLK2–15 are a subfamily of serine proteases that have defined or proposed roles in a range of central nervous system (CNS) and non-CNS pathologies. To further understand their potential activity in multiple sclerosis (MS), serum levels of KLK1, 6, 7, 8 and 10 were determined in 35 MS patients and 62 controls by quantitative fluorometric ELISA. Serum levels were then correlated with Expanded Disability Status Scale (EDSS) scores determined at the time of serological sampling or at last clinical follow-up. Serum levels of KLK1 and KLK6 were elevated in MS patients (p≤0.027), with highest levels associated with secondary progressive disease. Elevated KLK1 correlated with higher EDSS scores at the time of serum draw and KLK6 with future EDSS worsening in relapsing remitting patients (p≤0.007). Supporting the concept that KLK1 and KLK6 promote degenerative events associated with progressive MS, exposure of murine cortical neurons to either kallikrein promoted rapid neurite retraction and neuron loss. These novel findings suggest that KLK1 and KLK6 may serve as serological markers of progressive MS and contribute directly to the development of neurological disability by promoting axonal injury and neuron cell death.
The Periurethral Glands do not Significantly Influence the Serum Prostate Specific Antigen Concentration
Oesterling, Joseph E., Tekchandani, Anita H., Martin, Sandra K., Bergstralh, Erik J., Reichstein, Esther, Diamandis, Eleftherios P. , Yemoto, Cheryl, Stamey, Thomas A., Diamandis, Eleftherios

Journal of Urology | January 17, 2006 | Volume: 155 | Issue: 5 | Pages: 1658-1660

10.1016/s0022-5347(01)66156-1 Get It