Clinical Response and Complications are not Associated with Drug Levels in Patients with Severe Ulcerative Colitis on IV Cyclosporine Induction Therapy
Abstract Background IV ciclosporin therapy is effective in steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis. The optimal drug level to achieve response and minimize complications during induction therapy is not known. Aim The primary aim was to evaluate if serum ciclosporin drug levels are associated with increased risk of colectomy within 90 days of hospitalization. Secondary aims were to determine if ciclosporin levels are associated with avoidance of colectomy at 7 and 30 days, if ciclosporin levels are associated with drug-related and postoperative complications, and if patient-specific factors are associated with response to ciclosporin. Methods We conducted a retrospective analysis of 81 hospitalized patients with steroid-refractory ulcerative colitis treated with ciclosporin. Risk factors for colectomy within 7, 30, and 90 days, medication-specific and postoperative complications were compared by first, mean, and peak ciclosporin level during IV induction therapy. Results There were 47 patients (58%) who underwent surgery. There were no differences between initial, mean, and peak ciclosporin levels among responders and nonresponders and treatment-related or postoperative complications. Responders within 90 days had lower C-reactive-protein levels (20mg/L vs. 38mg/L, P = 0.01), lower serum albumin concentrations (3.4g/dL vs. 3.7g/dL, P = 0.03), and higher rates of kidney injury (50% vs 17%, P = 0.002). Conclusion Initial, mean, and peak serum levels of ciclosporin did not correlate with response or toxicity. However, C-reactive-protein levels levels and kidney injury may be helpful in predicting clinical response to ciclosporin.
The benefit of combination therapy depends on disease phenotype and duration in Crohn's disease
SummaryBackgroundThe impact of combination therapy on disease‐related morbidity in patients with established Crohn's disease (CD) or ulcerative colitis (UC) remains to be well‐defined.AimTo examine the effect of combination therapy on disease outcomes in CD and UC.MethodsUsing a multicenter prospective cohort, we classified CD and UC patients as being on monotherapy with anti‐TNF or on combination with an immunomodulator. The primary outcome was a composite of new IBD‐related surgery, hospitalisations, penetrating complications, need for corticosteroids or new biological at 1 year. Multivariable regression models adjusted for potential confounders.ResultsWe included 707 patients with CD (45% combination therapy) and 164 with UC (38% combination therapy). Combination therapy was not associated with reduction in the composite outcome in either CD (OR: 0.87, 95% CI: 0.63‐1.22) or UC (OR: 1.45, 95% CI: 0.63‐3.38). However, while no difference was noted in those with nonstricturing, nonpenetrating CD, a significant reduction in the likelihood of the outcome was seen in those with stricturing or penetrating CD (30% vs 39%, OR: 0.58, 95% CI: 0.37‐0.90). A stronger effect was also observed in those with disease duration <5 years (OR: 0.35, 95% CI: 0.14‐0.87) compared to those with a longer duration (OR: 0.75, 95% CI: 0.45‐1.27). A similar reduction in occurrence of composite outcome was noted with infliximab and with other anti‐TNF biologics.ConclusionThe benefit of combination immunomodulator‐biological therapy is stronger in those with complicated Crohn's disease, particularly early on in their disease course.