Back to Authors

Tannoury, Chadi

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2369-432X

Mayo Clinic

Boston University

Citations 6

Optimizing Radiography Utilization: Multidisciplinary Expert Consensus Recommendations Endorsed by the Society of Academic Bone Radiologists, Society of Skeletal Radiology, American Society of Emergency Radiology,
Rilland, Eddy D. Zandee van , Fayad, Laura M. , Link, Thomas M. , Davis, Kirkland W. , Wu, Jim S. , Chang, Eric Y. , Chow, Lawrence C. , Desai, Shaun C., Fritz, Jan, Gorbachova, Tetyana , Gray, Mingyang L., Gross, Joel A. , Ha, Patrick K., Halle, Tyler R. , Hall, M. Kennedy, Lee, Mark A. , Mann, Edana D. , Obey, Mitchel R. , Osgood, Greg M., Patel, Zara M. , Rendon, Juan M. , Sabbatini, Amber K. , Tannoury, Chadi , Yu, Joseph S. , Boutin, Robert D. , Zandee van Rilland, Eddy D , Brown, Ian P , Chang, Eric Y , Chow, Lawrence C , Gatz, J David , Garner, Hillary W , Gorbachova, Tetyana , Guermazi, Ali , Halle, Tyler R , Hanna, Tarek N , Kornblith, Aaron E , Lopez-Ben, Robert R , Mann, Edana D , Moore, Christopher L. , Obey, Mitchel R , Patel, Zara , Raja, Ali S , Rendon, Juan M , Sabbatini, Amber K , Tannoury, Chadi , Yu, Joseph S , Boutin, Robert D , Link, Thomas M , Desai, Shaun C. , Fritz, Jan , Garner, Hillary W. , Gray, Mingyang Liu , Hall, M. Kennedy , Osgood, Greg Michael

Radiology | May 19, 2026 | Volume: 319 | Issue: 2 | Pages: No page available

10.1148/radiol.252309 Get It

Expert consensus recommendations from 21 academic centers were established for appropriate radiography utilization at 12 potentially low-yield anatomic sites through a multidisciplinary process endorsed by six major American medical societies.
C5 Palsy After Cervical Spine Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Review of 59 Cases
Thompson, Sara E., Smith, Zachary A. , Hsu, Wellington K. , Mroz, Thomas E., Fish, David E., Wang, Jeffrey C. , Fehlings, Michael G. , Tannoury, Chadi , Tannoury, Tony , Tortolani, P. Justin, Traynelis, Vincent C. , Gokaslan, Ziya L. , Hilibrand, Alan S. , Isaacs, Robert E., Mummaneni, Praveen V. , Chou, Dean , Qureshi, Sheeraz A. , Cho, Samuel K. , Baird, Evan O., Sasso, Rick C., Buser, Zorica , Bydon, Mohamad , Giacomo, Anthony F. De, Derakhshan, Adeeb , Jobse, Bruce C., Lord, Elizabeth L. , Massicotte, Eric M. , Steinmetz, Michael P. , Smith, Gabriel A. , Pace, Jonathan , Corriveau, Mark, Lee, Sung‐Ho , Cha, Peter I., Chatterjee, Dhananjay, Gee, Erica L., Mayer, Erik N. , McBride, Owen J., Roe, Allison K. , Yanez, Marisa Y., Stroh, D. Alex, Than, Khoi D. , Nassr, Ahmad , Mroz, Thomas E. , Arnold, Paul M. , Clarke, Michelle J. , Lubelski, Daniel , Cha, Peter I., Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G , Tannoury, Chadi

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 64S-70S

10.1177/2192568216688189 Get It

Study Design: A multicenter, retrospective review of C5 palsy after cervical spine surgery. Objective: Postoperative C5 palsy is a known complication of cervical decompressive spinal surgery. The goal of this study was to review the incidence, patient characteristics, and outcome of C5 palsy in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective review of 13 946 patients across 21 centers who received cervical spine surgery (levels C2 to C7) between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2011, inclusive. P values were calculated using 2-sample t test for continuous variables and χ 2 tests or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. Results: Of the 13 946 cases reviewed, 59 patients experienced a postoperative C5 palsy. The incidence rate across the 21 sites ranged from 0% to 2.5%. At most recent follow-up, 32 patients reported complete resolution of symptoms (54.2%), 15 had symptoms resolve with residual effects (25.4%), 10 patients did not recover (17.0%), and 2 were lost to follow-up (3.4%). Conclusion: C5 palsy occurred in all surgical approaches and across a variety of diagnoses. The majority of patients had full recovery or recovery with residual effects. This study represents the largest series of North American patients reviewed to date.
A Multicenter Study of the Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes of Cervical Dural Tears
O’Neill, Kevin, Fehlings, Michael G. , Mroz, Thomas E., Smith, Zachary A. , Hsu, Wellington K. , Kanter, Adam S. , Steinmetz, Michael P. , Mummaneni, Praveen V. , Chou, Dean , Qureshi, Sheeraz A. , Cho, Samuel K. , Baird, Evan O., Shaffrey, Christopher I. , Tannoury, Chadi , Tannoury, Tony , Gokaslan, Ziya L. , Hart, Robert A. , Isaacs, Robert E., Sasso, Rick C., Bumpass, David B. , Bydon, Mohamad , Corriveau, Mark, Giacomo, Anthony F. De, Derakhshan, Adeeb , Jobse, Bruce C., Lee, Sung‐Ho , Massicotte, Eric M. , Pace, Jonathan , Smith, Gabriel A. , Than, Khoi D. , Mroz, Thomas E. , Arnold, Paul M. , Nassr, Ahmad , Smith, Justin S. , Gum, Jeffrey L. , Lubelski, Daniel , Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G , Tannoury, Chadi

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 58S-63S

10.1177/2192568216688186 Get It

Study Design: Retrospective multicenter case series study. Objective: Because cervical dural tears are rare, most surgeons have limited experience with this complication. A multicenter study was performed to better understand the presentation, treatment, and outcomes following cervical dural tears. Methods: Multiple surgeons from 23 institutions retrospectively identified 21 rare complications that occurred between 2005 and 2011, including unintentional cervical dural tears. Demographic data and surgical history were obtained. Clinical outcomes following surgery were assessed, and any reoperations were recorded. Neck Disability Index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA), Nurick classification (NuC), and Short-Form 36 (SF36) scores were recorded at baseline and final follow-up at certain centers. All data were collected, collated, and analyzed by a private research organization. Results: There were 109 cases of cervical dural tears among 18 463 surgeries performed. In 101 cases (93%) there was no clinical sequelae following successful dural tear repair. There were statistical improvements ( P < .05) in mJOA and NuC scores, but not NDI or SF36 scores. No specific baseline or operative factors were found to be associated with the occurrence of dural tears. In most cases, no further postoperative treatments of the dural tear were required, while there were 13 patients (12%) that required subsequent treatment of cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Analysis of those requiring further treatments did not identify an optimum treatment strategy for cervical dural tears. Conclusions: In this multicenter study, we report our findings on the largest reported series (n = 109) of cervical dural tears. In a vast majority of cases, no subsequent interventions were required and no clinical sequelae were observed.
Prevalence and Outcomes in Patients Undergoing Reintubation After Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery: Results From the AOSpine North America Multicenter Study on 8887 Patients
Fehlings, Michael G. , Tetreault, Lindsay, Smith, Zachary A. , Hsu, Wellington K. , Tannoury, Chadi , Tannoury, Tony , Traynelis, Vincent C. , Mroz, Thomas E., Gokaslan, Ziya L. , Bydon, Mohamad , Giacomo, Anthony F. De, Jobse, Bruce C., Massicotte, Eric M. , Nagoshi, Narihito , Nakashima, Hiroaki , Gum, Jeffrey L. , Arnold, Paul M. , Mroz, Thomas E. , Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G , Tannoury, Chadi

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 96S-102S

10.1177/2192568216687753 Get It

Study Design: A multicenter, retrospective cohort study. Objective: To evaluate clinical outcomes in patients with reintubation after anterior cervical spine surgery. Methods: A total of 8887 patients undergoing anterior cervical spine surgery were enrolled in the AOSpine North America Rare Complications of Cervical Spine Surgery study. Patients with or without complications after surgery were included. Demographic and surgical information were collected for patients with reintubation. Patients were evaluated using a variety of assessment tools, including the modified Japanese Orthopedic Association scale, Nurick score, Neck Disability Index, and Short Form-36 Health Survey. Results: Nine cases of postoperative reintubation were identified. The total prevalence of this complication was 0.10% and ranged from 0% to 0.59% across participating institutions. The time to development of airway symptoms after surgery was within 24 hours in 6 patients and between 5 and 7 days in 3 patients. Although 8 patients recovered, 1 patient died. At final follow-up, patients with reintubation did not exhibit significant and meaningful improvements in pain, functional status, or quality of life. Conclusions: Although the prevalence of reintubation was very low, this complication was associated with adverse clinical outcomes. Clinicians should identify their high-risk patients and carefully observe them for up to 2 weeks after surgery.
Misplaced Cervical Screws Requiring Reoperation
Peterson, Jeremy , Smith, Zachary A. , Hsu, Wellington K. , Fehlings, Michael G. , Hart, Robert A. , Hilibrand, Alan S. , Rahman, RaʼKerry K., Tannoury, Chadi , Tannoury, Tony , Mroz, Thomas E. , Currier, Bradford L. , Giacomo, Anthony F. De, Fogelson, Jeremy L. , Jobse, Bruce C., Massicotte, Eric M. , Arnold, Paul M. , Nassr, Ahmad , Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G , Tannoury, Chadi

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 46S-52S

10.1177/2192568216687527 Get It

Study Design: A multicenter, retrospective case series. Objective: In the past several years, screw fixation of the cervical spine has become commonplace. For the most part, this is a safe, low-risk procedure. While rare, screw backout or misplaced screws can lead to morbidity and increased costs. We report our experiences with this uncommon complication. Methods: A multicenter, retrospective case series was undertaken at 23 institutions in the United States. Patients were included who underwent cervical spine surgery from January 1, 2005, to December 31, 2011, and had misplacement of screws requiring reoperation. Institutional review board approval was obtained at all participating institutions, and detailed records were sent to a central data center. Results: A total of 12 903 patients met the inclusion criteria and were analyzed. There were 11 instances of screw backout requiring reoperation, for an incidence of 0.085%. There were 7 posterior procedures. Importantly, there were no changes in the health-related quality-of-life metrics due to this complication. There were no new neurologic deficits; a patient most often presented with pain, and misplacement was diagnosed on plain X-ray or computed tomography scan. The most common location for screw backout was C6 (36%). Conclusions: This study represents the largest series to tabulate the incidence of misplacement of screws following cervical spine surgery, which led to revision procedures. The data suggest this is a rare event, despite the widespread use of cervical fixation. Patients suffering this complication can require revision, but do not usually suffer neurologic sequelae. These patients have increased cost of care. Meticulous technique and thorough knowledge of the relevant anatomy are the best means of preventing this complication.