Back to Authors

Smith, Gabriel A.

https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8400-0176

Mayo Clinic

University Hospitals Cleveland Medical Center

Citations 6

Thoracic Duct Injury Following Cervical Spine Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Review
Derakhshan, Adeeb , Steinmetz, Michael P. , Corriveau, Mark, Lee, Sung‐Ho , Pace, Jonathan , Smith, Gabriel A. , Gokaslan, Ziya L. , Bydon, Mohamad , Fehlings, Michael G. , Mroz, Thomas E. , Lubelski, Daniel , Arnold, Paul M. , Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 115S-119S

10.1177/2192568216688194 Get It

Study Design: Multicenter retrospective case series. Objective: To determine the rate of thoracic duct injury during cervical spine operations. Methods: A retrospective case series study was conducted among 21 high-volume surgical centers to identify instances of thoracic duct injury during anterior cervical spine surgery. Staff at each center abstracted data for each identified case into case report forms. All case report forms were collected by the AOSpine North America Clinical Research Network Methodological Core for data processing, cleaning, and analysis. Results: Of a total of 9591 patients reviewed that underwent cervical spine surgery, 2 (0.02%) incurred iatrogenic injury to the thoracic duct. Both patients underwent a left-sided anterior cervical discectomy and fusion. The interruption of the thoracic duct was addressed intraoperatively in one patient with no residual postoperative effects. The second individual developed a chylous fluid collection approximately 2 months after the operation that required drainage via needle aspiration. Conclusions: Damage to the thoracic duct during cervical spine surgery is a relatively rare occurrence. Rapid identification of the disruption of this lymphatic vessel is critical to minimize deleterious effects of this complication.
C5 Palsy After Cervical Spine Surgery: A Multicenter Retrospective Review of 59 Cases
Thompson, Sara E., Smith, Zachary A. , Hsu, Wellington K. , Mroz, Thomas E., Fish, David E., Wang, Jeffrey C. , Fehlings, Michael G. , Tannoury, Chadi , Tannoury, Tony , Tortolani, P. Justin, Traynelis, Vincent C. , Gokaslan, Ziya L. , Hilibrand, Alan S. , Isaacs, Robert E., Mummaneni, Praveen V. , Chou, Dean , Qureshi, Sheeraz A. , Cho, Samuel K. , Baird, Evan O., Sasso, Rick C., Buser, Zorica , Bydon, Mohamad , Giacomo, Anthony F. De, Derakhshan, Adeeb , Jobse, Bruce C., Lord, Elizabeth L. , Massicotte, Eric M. , Steinmetz, Michael P. , Smith, Gabriel A. , Pace, Jonathan , Corriveau, Mark, Lee, Sung‐Ho , Cha, Peter I., Chatterjee, Dhananjay, Gee, Erica L., Mayer, Erik N. , McBride, Owen J., Roe, Allison K. , Yanez, Marisa Y., Stroh, D. Alex, Than, Khoi D. , Nassr, Ahmad , Mroz, Thomas E. , Arnold, Paul M. , Clarke, Michelle J. , Lubelski, Daniel , Cha, Peter I., Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G , Tannoury, Chadi

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 64S-70S

10.1177/2192568216688189 Get It

Study Design: A multicenter, retrospective review of C5 palsy after cervical spine surgery. Objective: Postoperative C5 palsy is a known complication of cervical decompressive spinal surgery. The goal of this study was to review the incidence, patient characteristics, and outcome of C5 palsy in patients undergoing cervical spine surgery. Methods: We conducted a multicenter, retrospective review of 13 946 patients across 21 centers who received cervical spine surgery (levels C2 to C7) between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2011, inclusive. P values were calculated using 2-sample t test for continuous variables and χ 2 tests or Fisher exact tests for categorical variables. Results: Of the 13 946 cases reviewed, 59 patients experienced a postoperative C5 palsy. The incidence rate across the 21 sites ranged from 0% to 2.5%. At most recent follow-up, 32 patients reported complete resolution of symptoms (54.2%), 15 had symptoms resolve with residual effects (25.4%), 10 patients did not recover (17.0%), and 2 were lost to follow-up (3.4%). Conclusion: C5 palsy occurred in all surgical approaches and across a variety of diagnoses. The majority of patients had full recovery or recovery with residual effects. This study represents the largest series of North American patients reviewed to date.
A Multicenter Study of the Presentation, Treatment, and Outcomes of Cervical Dural Tears
O’Neill, Kevin, Fehlings, Michael G. , Mroz, Thomas E., Smith, Zachary A. , Hsu, Wellington K. , Kanter, Adam S. , Steinmetz, Michael P. , Mummaneni, Praveen V. , Chou, Dean , Qureshi, Sheeraz A. , Cho, Samuel K. , Baird, Evan O., Shaffrey, Christopher I. , Tannoury, Chadi , Tannoury, Tony , Gokaslan, Ziya L. , Hart, Robert A. , Isaacs, Robert E., Sasso, Rick C., Bumpass, David B. , Bydon, Mohamad , Corriveau, Mark, Giacomo, Anthony F. De, Derakhshan, Adeeb , Jobse, Bruce C., Lee, Sung‐Ho , Massicotte, Eric M. , Pace, Jonathan , Smith, Gabriel A. , Than, Khoi D. , Mroz, Thomas E. , Arnold, Paul M. , Nassr, Ahmad , Smith, Justin S. , Gum, Jeffrey L. , Lubelski, Daniel , Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G , Tannoury, Chadi

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 58S-63S

10.1177/2192568216688186 Get It

Study Design: Retrospective multicenter case series study. Objective: Because cervical dural tears are rare, most surgeons have limited experience with this complication. A multicenter study was performed to better understand the presentation, treatment, and outcomes following cervical dural tears. Methods: Multiple surgeons from 23 institutions retrospectively identified 21 rare complications that occurred between 2005 and 2011, including unintentional cervical dural tears. Demographic data and surgical history were obtained. Clinical outcomes following surgery were assessed, and any reoperations were recorded. Neck Disability Index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA), Nurick classification (NuC), and Short-Form 36 (SF36) scores were recorded at baseline and final follow-up at certain centers. All data were collected, collated, and analyzed by a private research organization. Results: There were 109 cases of cervical dural tears among 18 463 surgeries performed. In 101 cases (93%) there was no clinical sequelae following successful dural tear repair. There were statistical improvements ( P < .05) in mJOA and NuC scores, but not NDI or SF36 scores. No specific baseline or operative factors were found to be associated with the occurrence of dural tears. In most cases, no further postoperative treatments of the dural tear were required, while there were 13 patients (12%) that required subsequent treatment of cerebrospinal fluid drainage. Analysis of those requiring further treatments did not identify an optimum treatment strategy for cervical dural tears. Conclusions: In this multicenter study, we report our findings on the largest reported series (n = 109) of cervical dural tears. In a vast majority of cases, no subsequent interventions were required and no clinical sequelae were observed.
Rare Complications of Cervical Spine Surgery: Pseudomeningocoele
Smith, Zachary A. , Hsu, Wellington K. , Fehlings, Michael G. , Fish, David E., Wang, Jeffrey C. , Hilibrand, Alan S. , Mummaneni, Praveen V. , Chou, Dean , Sasso, Rick C., Traynelis, Vincent C. , Mroz, Thomas E. , Buser, Zorica , Lord, Elizabeth L. , Massicotte, Eric M. , Sebastian, Arjun S. , Than, Khoi D. , Steinmetz, Michael P. , Smith, Gabriel A. , Pace, Jonathan , Corriveau, Mark, Lee, Sung‐Ho , Shaffrey, Christopher I. , Ailon, Tamir T. , Smith, Justin S. , Nassr, Ahmad , Arnold, Paul M. , Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 109S-114S

10.1177/2192568216687769 Get It

Study Design: This study was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study. Objectives: Rare complications of cervical spine surgery are inherently difficult to investigate. Pseudomeningocoele (PMC), an abnormal collection of cerebrospinal fluid that communicates with the subarachnoid space, is one such complication. In order to evaluate and better understand the incidence, presentation, treatment, and outcome of PMC following cervical spine surgery, we conducted a multicenter study to pool our collective experience. Methods: This study was a retrospective, multicenter cohort study of patients who underwent cervical spine surgery at any level(s) from C2 to C7, inclusive; were over 18 years of age; and experienced a postoperative PMC. Results: Thirteen patients (0.08%) developed a postoperative PMC, 6 (46.2%) of whom were female. They had an average age of 48.2 years and stayed in hospital a mean of 11.2 days. Three patients were current smokers, 3 previous smokers, 5 had never smoked, and 2 had unknown smoking status. The majority, 10 (76.9%), were associated with posterior surgery, whereas 3 (23.1%) occurred after an anterior procedure. Myelopathy was the most common indication for operations that were complicated by PMC (46%). Seven patients (53%) required a surgical procedure to address the PMC, whereas the remaining 6 were treated conservatively. All PMCs ultimately resolved or were successfully treated with no residual effects. Conclusions: PMC is a rare complication of cervical surgery with an incidence of less than 0.1%. They prolong hospital stay. PMCs occurred more frequently in association with posterior approaches. Approximately half of PMCs required surgery and all ultimately resolved without residual neurologic or other long-term effects.
Epidemiology and Outcomes of Vertebral Artery Injury in 16 582 Cervical Spine Surgery Patients: An AOSpine North America Multicenter Study
Hsu, Wellington K. , Kannan, Abhishek , Mai, Harry T., Fehlings, Michael G. , Smith, Zachary A. , Traynelis, Vincent C. , Gokaslan, Ziya L. , Hilibrand, Alan S. , Mroz, Thomas E., Bydon, Mohamad , Massicotte, Eric M. , Ray, Wilson Z. , Steinmetz, Michael P. , Smith, Gabriel A. , Pace, Jonathan , Corriveau, Mark, Lee, Sung‐Ho , Isaacs, Robert E., Wang, Jeffrey C. , Lord, Elizabeth L. , Buser, Zorica , Mai, Harry T., Nassr, Ahmad , Arnold, Paul M. , Mroz, Thomas E. , Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 21S-27S

10.1177/2192568216686753 Get It

Study Design: A multicenter retrospective case series was compiled involving 21 medical institutions. Inclusion criteria included patients who underwent cervical spine surgery between 2005 and 2011 and who sustained a vertebral artery injury (VAI). Objective: To report the frequency, risk factors, outcomes, and management goals of VAI in patients who have undergone cervical spine surgery. Methods: Patients were evaluated on the basis of condition-specific functional status using the Neck Disability Index (NDI), modified Japanese Orthopaedic Association (mJOA) score, the Nurick scale, and the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36). Results: VAIs were identified in a total of 14 of 16 582 patients screened (8.4 per 10 000). The mean age of patients with VAI was 59 years (±10) with a female predominance (78.6%). Patient diagnoses included myelopathy, radiculopathy, cervical instability, and metastatic disease. VAI was associated with substantial blood loss (770 mL), although only 3 cases required transfusion. Of the 14 cases, 7 occurred with an anterior-only approach, 3 cases with posterior-only approach, and 4 during circumferential approach. Fifty percent of cases of VAI with available preoperative imaging revealed anomalous vessel anatomy during postoperative review. Average length of hospital stay was 10 days (±8). Notably, 13 of the 14 (92.86%) cases resolved without residual deficits. Compared to preoperative baseline NDI, Nurick, mJOA, and SF-36 scores for these patients, there were no observed changes after surgery ( P = .20-.94). Conclusions: Vertebral artery injuries are potentially catastrophic complications that can be sustained from anterior or posterior cervical spine approaches. The data from this study suggest that with proper steps to ensure hemostasis, patients recover function at a high rate and do not exhibit residual deficits.
Incidence and Outcomes of Acute Implant Extrusion Following Anterior Cervical Spine Surgery
Smith, Gabriel A. , Pace, Jonathan , Corriveau, Mark, Lee, Sung‐Ho , Mroz, Thomas E., Fehlings, Michael G. , Hart, Robert A. , Hilibrand, Alan S. , Bumpass, David B. , Gokaslan, Ziya L. , Bydon, Mohamad , Fogelson, Jeremy L. , Massicotte, Eric M. , Steinmetz, Michael P. , Mroz, Thomas E. , Nassr, Ahmad , Arnold, Paul M. , Riew, Kiehyun Daniel , Fehlings, Michael G

Global Spine Journal | April 19, 2017 | Volume: 7 | Issue: 1_suppl | Pages: 40S-45S

10.1177/2192568216686752 Get It

Study Design: Multi-institutional retrospective case series of 8887 patients who underwent anterior cervical spine surgery. Objective: Anterior decompression from discectomy or corpectomy is not without risk. Surgical morbidity ranges from 9% to 20% and is likely underreported. Little is known of the incidence and effects of rare complications on functional outcomes following anterior spinal surgery. In this retrospective review, we examined implant extrusions (IEs) following anterior cervical fusion. Methods: A retrospective multicenter case series study involving 21 high-volume surgical centers from the AOSpine North America Clinical Research Network. Medical records for 17 625 patients who received cervical spine surgery (levels from C2 to C7) between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2011, were reviewed to identify occurrence of 21 predefined treatment complications. Results: Following anterior cervical fusion, the incidence of IE ranged from 0.0% to 0.8% across 21 institutions with 11 cases reported. All surgeries involved multiple levels, and 7/11 (64%) involved either multilevel corpectomies or hybrid constructs with at least one adjacent discectomy to a corpectomy. In 7/11 (64%) patients, constructs ended with reconstruction or stabilization at C7. Nine patients required surgery for repair and stabilization following IE. Average length of hospital stay after IE was 5.2 days. Only 2 (18%) had residual deficits after reoperation. Conclusions: IE is a very rare complication after anterior cervical spine surgery often requiring revision. Constructs requiring multilevel reconstruction, especially at the cervicothoracic junction, have a higher risk for failure, and surgeons should proceed with caution in using an anterior-only approach in these demanding cases. Surgeons can expect most patients to regain function after reoperation.