Leon‐Ferre, Roberto A.

548 Background: TNBC is associated with higher risk of recurrence and poorer survival rates than other breast cancer subtypes. For node-positive TNBC or tumors larger than 0.5 cm, chemotherapy is generally recommended. For stage I TNBC, the benefit from chemotherapy, the optimal regimen, and whether to administer it in the neoadjuvant versus adjuvant setting remain controversial. Here, we report the treatment patterns and clinical outcomes of patients with stage I TNBC treated at Mayo Clinic. Methods: Using the Mayo Clinic Tumor Registry data, we identified patients with stage I TNBC treated between 2010 and 2021. We used the pathologic tumor (T) category for patients treated with upfront surgery and the clinical T category for patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy. We used the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test to compare recurrence-free survival (RFS) according to treatment groups, measured from the day of surgery. RFS was reported at a median follow-up of 3.9, 6.2, and 7.3 years for patients who received chemotherapy neoadjuvantly, adjuvantly, and surgery alone with no chemotherapy, respectively. Results: A total of 602 patients with Stage I TNBC were included, with a median age of 62 years. 290 (48%) underwent upfront surgery followed by adjuvant chemotherapy (pT1a: 2%, pT1b: 25%, pT1c: 74%), 127 (21%) received neoadjuvant chemotherapy followed by surgery (cT1a: 2%, cT1b: 11%, cT1c: 87%), and 185 (31%) underwent primary surgery without any chemotherapy (pT1mi/T1a: 33%, pT1b: 32%, pT1c: 35%). Most patients treated with neoadjuvant therapy received anthracycline/cyclophosphamide + taxane (70%), while most patients treated in the adjuvant setting received a non-anthracycline containing regimen (60%). The 5-year RFS was 96% (95% CI: 93-100%) for patients who received chemotherapy neoadjuvantly, 95% (95% CI: 92-98%) for those who received chemotherapy adjuvantly, and 85% (95% CI: 80-91%) for those treated with surgery alone and no chemotherapy ( P < 0.0001). 71 (56%) of the 127 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy achieved a pCR, with only 1 RFS event (at 14 months) in that group, compared to 4 RFS events among those not achieving pCR (at 12, 20, 28 and 75 months, respectively). Among patients not receiving chemotherapy (either adjuvantly or neoadjuvantly), the 5-year RFS rates were 94% for pT1mi/T1a, 92% for pT1b and 72% for pT1c (T1mi/a/b vs T1c, P = 0.009). Conclusions: In this large cohort of stage I TNBC, patients who received chemotherapy (adjuvantly or neoadjuvantly) had better 5-year RFS compared with those treated with locoregional therapy only. Among patients receiving chemotherapy, 5-year RFS was nearly identical regardless of whether chemotherapy was administered before or after surgery. Interestingly, patients undergoing upfront surgery were more likely to receive an anthracycline-sparing chemotherapy regimen.

e13042 Background: The conventional treatment paradigm for metastatic breast cancer (MBC) is to continue systemic therapy until disease progression. With improved systemic therapy options, some patients (pts) with MBC attain radiographic remission. Tumor-informed circulating tumor (ct)DNA detects molecular disease burden and may guide decision-making. We report on an institutional cohort of pts with MBC in which tumor-informed ctDNA testing was utilized prospectively to guide decisions on systemic therapy or surveillance imaging frequency. Methods: Utilizing an IRB-approved protocol, we retrospectively identified pts monitored with tumor-informed ctDNA using the Signatera™ mPCR-NGS assay (Natera, Inc) as part of routine clinical care in Mayo Clinic, Rochester. We then identified a subset with biopsy-proven MBC who attained radiographic remission of disease following systemic therapy, deemed by the treating medical oncologist as “exceptional responders”. Real-time ctDNA testing was used to inform a decision to either discontinue systemic therapy, treatment de-escalation (remove a component of multi-drug therapy), increase the time interval between restaging scans, or stay off therapy previously stopped due to toxicity . Data on breast cancer characteristics, imaging results, ctDNA test results, and outcomes were collected. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. Results: 10 pts met our study criteria. The median age at MBC diagnosis was 42 years (range 28-61); 5 pts had TNBC, 3 pts had HER2+, and 2 pts with ER+/HER2- MBC. Most pts (60%) were on first or second line therapy (range 1-5). The median duration of the most recent regimen was 27.5 months (range 10-70 months). All pts were without radiographic evidence of active cancer at the time of ctDNA testing with negative results (0 MTM/mL) at the time of clinical decision-making. 4 pts stopped all systemic therapy and proceeded with observation (1 trastuzumab, 1 trastuzumab deruxtecan, 1 pembrolizumab, and 1 talazoparib). 2 pts discontinued a targeted therapy (1 olaparib, 1 abemaciclib) while continuing endocrine therapy. 1 patient stopped targeted therapy (abemaciclib) due to a blood clot, and ctDNA testing guided the decision to not start another CDK4/6 inhibitor while continuing endocrine therapy. In 3 pts the frequency of restaging scans was decreased to either annually or semi-annually. The median follow-up after a ctDNA-informed decision was 11 months (range 1-41 months). At this time, no patient has converted to ctDNA-positivity, experienced resurgence or progression of disease, needed to change systemic therapy or increase imaging frequency. Conclusions: Tumor-informed ctDNA may offer additional confidence to oncologists and pts to deescalate systemic therapy or decrease the interval of imaging frequency in exceptional responders with MBC. Additional data to support this approach is needed.

Abstract Background: Endocrine therapy (ET) with aromatase inhibitors (AI) plus ovarian function suppression (OFS) is standard for premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer. However, many premenopausal women are intolerant of AI + OFS, leaving tamoxifen (with or without OFS) as their only option. Extensive studies have demonstrated that premenopausal women treated with neoadjuvant ET whose tumors exhibit Ki-67 ≤ 10% following 4 weeks of therapy (defined as endocrine sensitive disease (ESD)) achieve 5-year distant disease-free survival &gt; 96%. Problematically, only 41% of patients reach this ESD threshold with tamoxifen compared to 78% with AI+OFS (Nitz JCO 2022). (Z)-endoxifen (ENDX) is a potent selective estrogen receptor modulator (SERM) that inhibits ERα at plasma concentrations of 3-5 ng/ml and dually targets PKCβ1, a suspected oncogene in breast tumors, at concentrations ≥ 500 ng/ml. We therefore developed the EVANGELINE study (NCT05607004) is an open label, randomized neoadjuvant phase II study that includes a pharmacokinetic (PK) Run-in, aiming to evaluate whether ENDX +/- goserelin is non-inferior to exemestane plus goserelin with respect to ESD rate. Following the completed PK run-in portion of the study, where 40mg/day or 80mg/day ENDX were assessed, the 40 mg/day dose was selected for further evaluation in the second part of the trial. The second part is comprised of a randomized treatment cohort, for patients with a Ki-67% &gt;10% at preregistration randomized to either 40mg (Z)-endoxifen + goserelin or exemestane + goserelin neoadjuvant treatment and a Single Arm Treatment Cohort for patients who have a Ki-67 ≤ 10% at pre-registration assigned to 40mg/day (Z)-endoxifen monotherapy neoadjuvant treatment. Methods: To investigate ENDX further in premenopausal women, a multicenter study in the United States, was designed(EVANGELINE; NCT05607004). This phase 2, open-label, randomized, neoadjuvant trial includes a PK run-in phase designed to assess whether the 4-week ESD rate with (Z)-endoxifen + goserelin is non-inferior to that of exemestane + goserelin in premenopausal women with Stage IIA or IIB ER+/HER2- breast cancer with diagnostic Ki67 &gt; 10%. Additionally, a single arm Phase 2, open-label neoadjuvant Cohort was designed to assess the 4-week ESD rate with ENDX monotherapy in premenopausal women with Stage IIA or IIB ER+/HER2- BC with diagnostic Ki67 ≤10%. Subjects will undergo neoadjuvant treatment for six months before receiving surgical treatment in the involved breast. This study will additionally assess safety, tolerability, response rates, surgical outcomes, and monitor disease progression. Comprehensive biomarker evaluations will be conducted using paired tumor biopsies and blood samples collected at baseline and week four, as well as 6 month surgical specimens. Enrollment in the PK run-in phase (n-22) was completed in Fall 2024 with the second portion of the trial slated to begin early in 2025. Citation Format: Matthew P. Goetz, Vera J. Suman, Claudia Lopez, Hayley Erickson, Lonnissa Nguyen, Sandra S. Hammer, Lida Mina, Pooja Advani, Roberto Leon-Ferre, Karthik Giridhar, Felipe Batalini, Daniel Flora, Jason M. Jones, Nusayba A. Bagegni, Katie N. Hunt, Mara Piltin, Amy Degnim, James N. Ingle, Judy C. Boughey, Sarah A. Buhrow, Joel M. Reid, Matthew Schellenberg, John R. Hawse, Steven C. Quay. A randomized phase 2 non-inferiority trial of (Z)-endoxifen + goserelin and exemestane + goserelin as neoadjuvant treatment for premenopausal women with ER+/HER2- breast cancer (EVANGELINE) [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 2 (Late-Breaking, Clinical Trial, and Invited Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_2):Abstract nr CT237.

Abstract Purpose: While an addition of immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI), pembrolizumab, has improved outcomes of patients with TNBC, early-stage TNBC patients with residual cancer burden (RCB) II/III after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in combination with pembrolizumab (NAP) still have poor outcomes. Previously, we demonstrated that intratumoral HLA-DRA expression and interferon-alpha (IFNα) responses were associated with immune-inflamed phenotype and better outcomes in TNBC patients receiving chemotherapy. This study utilized the CosMx™ SMI to investigate in early-stage TNBC treated with NAP. Methods: Of 151 samples from TNBC patients treated with NAP at Mayo Clinic, 8 pre-treatment biopsy samples (5 pCR and 3 RCB II/III were analyzed using the CosMx™ SMI platform. Linear mixed models to assess differential expression (DE), adjusting for hierarchical data structures. DE analyses were expressed as log2-fold changes (logFC), with the Benjamini-Yekutieli method. GSEA and IPA for signaling pathway exploration. Results: 1.7 million cells were identified across 8 samples after stringent quality control. Immune cell profiling revealed higher B cells, plasma cells, plasmablasts, and T cells (CD4 and CD8) in responders, whereas fibroblasts and myeloid cells were enriched in non-responders. DE analysis showed significantly elevated expression of HLA-DRA (logFC 1.955, p&lt;0.001), other MHC class I and II components, and IFNα in responders. Tumor cells in responders exhibited the highest IFNα expression across cell types. GSEA and IPA analysis revealed enrichment in interferon signaling, antigen presentation, and the cGAS-STING pathway, which drives IFNα production. Spatial analysis categorized cells by their proximity to tumor cells: within 50 µm, 50-100 µm, and over 100 µm. T cells, particularly CD8 T cells, showed a distance-dependent distribution, with a higher abundance near tumor cells in responders. CD8 T cell activation scores declined with increasing distance from IFNα-positive tumor cells but remained consistently low near IFNα-negative tumor cells. IFNγ-positive CD8 T cells exhibited higher activation compared to IFNγ-negative cells, with activation levels influenced by proximity to tumor cells. Lastly, MHC expression in tumor cells was examined relative to CD8 T cell proximity. HLA-DRA and CIITA expression decreased as tumor cells were farther from CD8 T cells. Conclusions: This spatially resolved single-cell analysis highlights the pivotal role of tumor-immune interactions in response to pembrolizumab in TNBC. Our data suggest that tumor cells secrete IFNα through the activation of the cGAS-STING pathway, which activates T cells within close proximity, highlighting the potential role of cGAS-STING agonist as well as IFNα signaling and antigen presentation in augmenting TNBC responses to ICIs. Citation Format: Yi Liu, Saranya Chumsri, Yaohua Ma, Jodi M. Carter, Aziza Nassar, Edith Perez, Roberto A. Leon-Ferre, David Zahrieh, David W. Hillman, Judy C. Boughey, James Ingle, Krishna R. Kalari, Fergus J. Couch, Matthew P. Goetz, Keith L. Knutson, E. Aubrey Thompson. Spatially resolved single-cell analysis reveals cGAS-STING-mediated tumor-immune interactions via IFNα as determinants of pembrolizumab sensitivity in triple-negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 7130.

Abstract Background: Despite recent advances in the treatment of triple negative breast cancer (TNBC) many patients are still suffering from early recurrence, therapy resistance, and organ metastasis 1 to 3 years post-chemotherapy. TNBC cells with stem cell-like properties are resistant to standard of care chemotherapy and are responsible for early tumor relapse and poor outcome. Up-regulation of PD-L1 expression in Cancer Stem Cells (CSCs) has been associated with immune evasion capacity and promotion of their stem-like properties. In this study we identify two druggable stemness target, Aurora-A Kinase (AURKA) and NOTCH3, with positive feedback on intra-tumoral PD-L1 expression and cancer cell plasticity. Methods: MDA-MB 231, MDA-MB 231 LM and SUM149-PT TNBC cells were used both in 2D and 3D environment. Unique TNBC cells were established from metastatic PDX models. TNBC cells were treated with Alisertib (AURKA inhibitor, 50nM) or AV353 (NOTCH3 inhibitor, 200ng). Immunofluorescence and immunoblot were used to compare different biomarker expression. ALDH was measured using Aldefluor kit. Apoptotic cells were quantified in real-time using IncuCyte S3. In vivo studies; 1x106 MDA MB 231/LM cells were injected into the mammary fat pad of NSG-female mice and treated with Alisertib or AV353. Control groups were treated with pacebo. Results: Our study shows that AURKA and NOTCH3 pharmacological blockade reduced nuclear/undruggable PD-L1, that is not achieved clinically by using FDA-approved immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). Significantly, following stemness-targeted therapy with alisertib or AV353, reduction of intra-tumoral PD-L1 resulted in inhibition of tumor growth, decreased levels of CD44 expression, increased CD8+ T-cell tumor infiltration, impairment in the enrichment of ALDHhigh CSCs and enhanced chemosensitivity. In vivo pharmacological blockade of AURKA and NOTCH3 signaling pathways induced inhibition of tumor growth, apoptosis, and impairment of organ metastases. Conclusions: This study demonstrates that selective AURKA and NOTCH3 pharmacological blockade results in the inhibition of cancer cell plasticity that is linked to reduction of undruggable nuclear PD-L1 in TNBC cells. Our findings provide the strong preclinical rationale to develop novel clinical trials for patients with advanced TNBC that are refractory to chemotherapy and show limited response to FDA-approved ICIs. Citation Format: Antonino Bonaventura D'Assoro, Matthew Goetz, Carol Lange, Roberto Leon-Ferre, Tufia Haddad, James Ingle, Annapaola Montagner, Andrew Takchi, Ellie Babadi, Lucio Miele, Urban Lendahl, Urban Lendahl. Pharmacological blockade of AURKA and NOTCH3 oncogenic pathways to inhibit cancer cell plasticity in triple negative breast cancer [abstract]. In: Proceedings of the American Association for Cancer Research Annual Meeting 2025; Part 1 (Regular Abstracts); 2025 Apr 25-30; Chicago, IL. Philadelphia (PA): AACR; Cancer Res 2025;85(8_Suppl_1):Abstract nr 5978.

Introduction: The combination of chemotherapy and immunotherapy, commonly referred to as chemo-immunotherapy (CIT), has long been a cornerstone in the treatment of lymphoma. Although this approach has resulted in successful treatments for many patients (pts), a significant number continue to experience unfavorable results, underscoring the urgency for improved treatments. There is still a significant gap in knowledge about the immune profile of lymphoma pts, specifically in terms of (1) how their immune phenotype compare to those of healthy individuals and (2) how treatment affects their immune system. This study aimed to compare the immune profiles of lymphoma pts (at baseline) to that of matched healthy controls, and track the changes in the immune system during and after lymphoma treatment. Methods: Pts with newly diagnosed, untreated lymphoma, without prior history of cancer or autoimmunity were enrolled in the Dyna-RISC study. Whole blood samples were collected at baseline (BL), on day 1 of cycle 2 (C2D1), on day 1 of last cycle (CLD1), and 6 months after completion of therapy (6mo). Age- and gender-matched healthy individuals provided blood for baseline comparison. Samples were stained fresh with a pre-mixed lyophilized cocktail containing 30 metal-tagged monoclonal antibodies (Maxpar Direct Immune Profile Assay), fixed and cryopreserved. Samples were barcoded and acquired in batches on the Helios CyTOF (cytometry by time-of-flight) system. Cytometry data was analyzed using OMIQ. Differential abundance analysis was performed using relative frequencies of cell subsets (% of parent) using a false-discovery rate of 0.05 to account for multiple comparisons. Results: Between 11/2020 and 06/2021, 15 lymphoma pts were enrolled. Median age was 62 years (range 43-86), 5 pts (33%) were female. Five pts had follicular lymphoma (FL), 3 had diffuse large B-cell lymphoma (DLBCL),1 had primary mediastinal B-cell lymphoma (PBML), 1 had classic Hodgking lymphoma (cHL), 1 had mantle cell lymphoma (MCL), 1 had plasmablastic lymphoma (PBL), 1 had splenic marginal zone lymphoma (SpMZL), 1 had ALK- anaplastic large cell lymphoma (ALCL), 1 had subcutaneous panniculitis-like T-cell lymphoma (SPTCL). Four pts received bendamustine plus rituximab (BR) and 7 pts received R-CHOP. In total, more than 30 million cellular events were acquired, resulting in over 18 million analyzable live single-cell events after expert manual gating. A total of 27 cell subsets were identified within 9 major immune cell compartments. At baseline, lymphoma pts showed significant reduction (p&lt;0.05) of CD4+ naïve T cells (median 1.37%, range 0.33%-9.01%) compared to controls (median 9.28%, range 3.44-21.3%). Concurrently, lymphoma patients at baseline had significant elevation (p&lt;0.05) of intermediate monocytes (median 2.1%, range 0.64%-5.73%) compared to controls (median 0.8%, range 0.2%-2.73%). Naïve cytotoxic T cells were significantly increased (p&lt;0.05) in lymphoma pts at the 6mo timepoint (median 2.08%, range 0.7%-7.46%) compared to baseline (median 0.23%, range 0.03%-4.79%). A sub-group analysis restricted to patients who received either BR or R-CHOP with 6mo timepoint samples available (n=10), showed a significant reduction (p&lt;0.05) in the frequency of CD4+ central memory T cells in the BR group (median 0.76%, range 0.06%-1.02%) compared to the R-CHOP group (median 3.3%, range 2.19%-5.0%). Additional results describing the details of the immune profile dynamics at intermediate timepoints (C2D1, CLD1) will be presented at the conference. Conclusion: Our results suggest that lymphoma patients have an unfavorable immune profile (high intermediate monocytes combined with low naïve CD4+ T cells) at the time of diagnosis, compared to matched healthy individuals. Their immune profile is reshaped after treatment with increase in naïve cytotoxic T cells 6 months after therapy. Bendamustine-based treatment seems to particularly affect T cell recovery post-therapy, leading to a reduction in CD4+ central memory T cells, compared to patients treated with R-CHOP. These findings highlight the importance of studying baseline and treatment-mediated immune changes in lymphoma pts. This characterization is of special interest in the context of therapies that rely on the fitness of immune cells to mediate an effect, such as chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy and bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs).

ImportanceThe absolute benefit of chemotherapy for all patients with stage I triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC) is unclear, and biomarkers are not currently available for selecting patients with an excellent outcome for whom neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy may have negligible benefit. High levels of stromal tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes (sTILs) are associated with favorable survival in TNBC, but data solely in stage I TNBC are lacking.ObjectiveTo examine the outcomes of patients of all ages with stage I TNBC solely and who received neither neoadjuvant nor adjuvant chemotherapy, according to centrally reviewed sTIL levels at prespecified cutoffs.Design, Setting, and ParticipantsThis cohort study used the Netherlands Cancer Registry to identify patients diagnosed with stage I TNBC between January 1, 2005, and December 31, 2015, who were not treated with chemotherapy. Only patients who did not receive neoadjuvant and/or adjuvant chemotherapy were selected. The clinical data were matched with their corresponding pathology data provided by the Dutch Pathology Registry. Data analysis was performed between February and October 2023.Main Outcomes and MeasuresThe primary end point was breast cancer–specific survival (BCSS) at 5, 10, and 15 years for the prespecified sTIL level cutoffs of 30%, 50%, and 75%. Hematoxylin and eosin–stained slides were used for central review of histologic subtype, grade, and lymphovascular invasion. The International Immuno-Oncology Biomarker Working Group guidelines were used to score the sTIL levels; these levels were determined for 1041 patients.ResultsOf a total of 4511 females with stage I TNBC, patients who were not treated with chemotherapy were selected and tissue blocks requested; sTILs were scored in 1041 patients (mean [SD] age at diagnosis, 64.4 [11.1] years, median follow-up 11.4 [95% CI, 10.9-11.9] years) who were included in the analyses.. Most tumors (952 [91.5%]) were invasive carcinomas of nonspecial histologic subtype. Most patients (548 [52.6%]) had pT1cN0 tumors. Median (range) sTIL level was 5% (1%-99%). A total of 775 patients (74.4%) had sTIL levels below 30%, 266 (25.6%) had 30% or greater, 203 (19.5%) had 50% or greater, and 141 (13.5%) had 75% or greater. Patients with pT1abN0 tumors had a more favorable outcome vs patients with pT1cN0 tumors, with a 10-year BCSS of 92% (95% CI, 89%-94%) vs 86% (95% CI, 82%-89%). In the overall cohort, sTIL levels of at least 30% were associated with better BCSS compared with sTIL levels less than 30% (96% and 87%, respectively; hazard ratio [HR], 0.45; 95% CI, 0.26-0.77). High sTIL levels of 50% or greater were associated with a better outcome than low sTIL levels of less than 50% (HR, 0.27; 95% CI, 0.10-0.74) in patients with pT1C tumors, with a 10-year BCSS of 95% increasing to 98% with sTIL levels of 75% or greater.Conclusions and RelevanceResults of this study showed that patients with stage I TNBC and high level of sTILs who did not receive neoadjuvant or adjuvant chemotherapy had excellent 10-year BCSS. The findings further support the role of sTILs as integral biomarkers in prospective clinical trials of therapy optimization for this patient population.

e13036 Background: In January 2023, the FDA approved elacestrant for ESR1-mutated, ER+/HER2- MBC based on a companion diagnostic cell free (cf)DNA test (Guardant Health). In this study, we analyze the trends of liquid biopsy utilization at Mayo Clinic (MC) over a 3 year period to understand the impact of this drug approval on testing patterns and identify emergent alterations in patients (pts) with MBC. Methods: We extracted clinically performed Guardant 360 and Guardant 360 CDx ordered at MC sites in Rochester (MN), Florida (FL), Arizona (AZ), and across 9 additional Mayo Clinic Health System (MCHS) sites. Pts with MBC were identified using the EMR and analyzing visit diagnosis codes and staging information. Shifts in testing patterns were analyzed over a 3 year period from January 1, 2021 - December 31, 2023. Data was collected on the number of tests, serial testing, frequency of pathogenic mutations, and emergent mutations in ESR1 and PIK3CA. Chi-square test was used to compare the categorical values. Results: Between 2021-2023, 2,741 pts with MBC were seen across all sites. A total of 408 cfDNA tests were performed in 370 unique patients with MBC. Most pts (90%) had 1 test performed. The proportion of pts with MBC tested was 85/1350 (6.3%) in 2021, 77/1495 (5.2%) in 2022, and 208/1558 (13.4%) in 2023. The increased proportion of pts tested in 2023 was statistically significant compared to prior years (p<0.0001), while no difference was observed between 2021 and 2022 (p 0.19). Testing patterns varied by site, with FL ordering the highest number of tests, followed by MN and AZ. Of the 34 providers practicing during the entire period seeing more than 10 MBC pts, the number of providers ordering Guardant testing increased from 15/34 (2021) and 14/34 (2022) to 20/34 (2023), though not statistically significant (p 0.15). Of the 41% with EMR-documented staging available, testing was highest in the ER+/HER2- (81.3%) subtype, followed by TNBC (13.6%) and then HER2+ (5.2%). The most commonly identified mutations identified in the first testing were PIK3CA (41.1%), TP53 (40.5%), ESR1 (30.5%), and ATM (13.2%). D538G (8.0%), Y537N (4.4%), and Y537S (3.5%) were frequent emergent mutations seen in ESR1. Conclusions: We observed an increase in cfDNA testing at the start of 2023 which aligns with the FDA approval of elacestrant. We observed variation by site and individual providers that warrants further exploration to improve cfDNA testing in MBC pts at Mayo Clinic.

e12641 Background: Many promising agents or combinations regimens relevant to breast cancer lack sufficient clinical information for use in the neoadjuvant setting. To enable acceleration of drug development by reducing time and cost of clinical trial planning and conduct, the Phase I initiative PRE-ISPY Program was created. Methods: The PRE-ISPY Program is built within the I-SPY network, with the overall aim to streamline the regulatory pathway and the processes of trial design, contracting, activation, enrollment, execution, data gathering and analysis, as well as reporting of new therapeutic agents or combinations of relevance to breast cancer. Results: The PRE-ISPY trial is an open-label platform phase IB study designed to evaluate compelling single agent or combination regimens with the overall goal of moving promising drug regimens into I-SPY2 Trial and/or into other oncology-based trials in a timely manner. Graduation of a PRE-ISPY regimen to I-SPY2 is not mandatory. The primary objectives in each study Arm are to determine safety and to obtain preliminary efficacy data of the new regimen in patients with metastatic cancer, including a cohort of breast cancer patients. Each Arm may contain a Part 1 (dose finding) and a Part 2 (dose expansion). The new treatment can be tested also in patients with other solid malignancies than breast cancer, in which the treatment may be applicable, as specified in the design of the Arm. A breast cancer specific cohort is required in Part 2. Candidate treatment regimens are selected with advice from the I-SPY2 Agent Selection Working Group. The PRE-ISPY/Phase IB trial has multiple ongoing drug regimen Arms subsequently added as new protocol appendices through amendments to a Master protocol. There is no randomization; participants are enrolled, and treatment selected according to the relevance of therapy to their disease. Prospective companion biomarkers are evaluated. The current arms under study are PRE1: ALX-148 combined with trastuzumab deruxtecan; PRE2: tucatinib combined with zanidatamab; and PRE3: vidutolimod combined with cemiplimab. Selected agents or therapeutic combinations are tested through this protocol in the I-SPY Network Centers that participate in the PRE-ISPY Program. Toxicities are graded according to the National Cancer Institute Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events (CTCAE). Clinical responses are evaluated based on RECIST v1.1 criteria. Conclusions: Once safety is established, promising regimens can be rapidly transitioned to I-SPY 2.2 or other phase 2/3 trials. The first patient was enrolled on 2/1/2023. Clinical trial information: NCT05868226 .