Briasoulis, Αlexandros

Left ventricular assist devices (LVADs) have been increasingly used in patients with advanced heart failure, either as a destination therapy or as a bridge to heart transplant. Continuous flow (CF) LVADs have revolutionized advanced heart failure treatment. However, significant vascular pathology and complications have been linked to their use. While the newer CF-LVAD generations have led to a reduction in some vascular complications such as stroke, no major improvement was noticed in the rate of other vascular complications such as gastrointestinal bleeding. This review attempts to provide a comprehensive summary of the effects of CF-LVAD on vasculature, including pathophysiology, clinical implications, and future directions.

Data on the characteristics and outcomes of hospitalized patients with aortic aneurysms (AA) and HIV remain scarce. This is a cohort study of hospitalized adult patients with a diagnosis of AA from 2013 to 2019 using the US National Inpatient Readmission Database. Patients with a diagnosis of HIV were identified. Our outcomes included trends in hospitalizations and comparison of clinical characteristics, complications, and mortality in patients with AA and HIV compared to those without HIV. Among 1,905,837 hospitalized patients with AA, 4416 (0.23%) were living with HIV. There was an overall age-adjusted increase in the rate of HIV among patients hospitalized with AA over the years (14–29 per 10,000 person-years; age-adjusted p-trend < 0.001). Patients with AA and HIV were younger than those without HIV (median age: 60 vs 76 years, p < 0.001) and were less likely to have a history of smoking, hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes mellitus, and obesity. Thoracic aortic aneurysms were more prevalent in those with HIV (37.5% vs 26.7%, p < 0.001). On multivariable logistic regression, HIV was not associated with increased risk of aortic rupture (OR: 0.79; 95% CI: 0.61–1.01, p = 0.06), acute aortic dissection (OR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.51–1.06, p = 0.3), readmissions (OR: 1.04; 95% CI: 0.95–1.13, p = 0.4), or aortic repair (OR: 0.89; 95% CI: 0.79–1.00, p = 0.05). Hospitalized patients with AA and HIV had a lower crude mortality rate compared to those without HIV (OR: 0.75 (0.63–0.91), p = 0.003). Hospitalized patients with AA and HIV likely constitute a distinct group of patients with AA; they are younger, have fewer traditional cardiovascular risk factors, and a higher rate of thoracic aorta involvement. Differences in clinical features may account for the lower mortality rate observed in patients with AA and HIV compared to those without HIV.

Background The clinical characteristics of mTOR (mammalian target of rapamycin) inhibitors use in heart transplant recipients and their outcomes have not been well described. Methods and Results We compared patients who received mTOR inhibitors within the first 2 years after heart transplantation to patients who did not by inquiring the United Network for Organ Sharing (UNOS) database between 2010 and 2018. The primary end point was all‐cause mortality with retransplantation as a competing event. Rejection, malignancy, hospitalization for infection, and renal transplantation were secondary end points. There were 1619 (9%) and 15 686 (81%) mTOR inhibitors+ and mTOR inhibitors− patients, respectively. Body mass index, induction, cardiac allograft vasculopathy, calculated panel reactive antibody, and fewer days in 1A status were independently associated with mTOR inhibitors+ status. Over a follow‐up of 10.4 years, there was no difference in all‐cause mortality after adjusting for donor and recipient characteristics (adjusted subdistribution hazard ratio, 1.03 [0.90–1.19]; P =0.66). mTOR inhibitors+ were independently associated with increased risk for rejection (odds ratio [OR], 1.43 [1.11–1.83]; P =0.005) and basal skin cancer (OR, 1.35 [1.19–1.51]; P =0.012) but not for infection or renal transplantation. Conclusions mTOR inhibitors are used in <10% patients in the first 2 years after heart transplantation and are noninferior to contemporary immunosuppression regimens in terms of all‐cause mortality, infection, malignancy, or renal transplantation. They are associated with risk for rejection.

AbstractBackgroundConcerns about the impact of the new donor heart allocation system on posttransplant outcomes have emerged after its implementation. We sought to evaluate the characteristics and outcomes of left ventricular assist device (LVAD) recipients transplanted before and after the implantation of the new policy on October 18, 2018.MethodsData on bridge to transplantation of adult patients with LVAD between January 2015 and October 2021, with durable LVAD as a (BTT), was queried from the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) registry. The main outcomes were 30‐day all‐cause mortality, 30‐day fatal graft failure, 1‐year all‐cause mortality, treated acute rejection at 1 year and renal replacement therapy (RRT) for acute renal failure.ResultsIn our study, 7096 patients met the inclusion criteria including 2435 in the new allocation system. The transplanted patients in the new allocation system era had older donor age, longer ischemic time, and higher proportion of newer generation LVADs. Adjusted 30‐day all‐cause mortality was significantly lower for LVAD recipients in the new allocation system era (2.5% vs. 3.6%; sub‐hazard ratio [SHR] 0.36, 95% Confidence intervals [CI] 0.27–0.48, p < 0.001) without differences in the risk of fatal graft failure and 1‐year mortality (7.8% vs. 9.6%). Significantly lower adjusted 30‐day mortality with HVAD and HM3 devices than HM2 in the new allocation system era was found, without differences in 1‐year mortality. Acute allograft rejection requiring treatment was significantly lower (Odds Ratio 0.78, 95% CI 0.65–0.94, p = 0.01), whereas a trend toward higher risk of renal failure requiring RRT was identified.ConclusionsDespite changing donor characteristics and longer ischemic times, posttransplant outcomes in LVAD recipients have not worsened with the implementation of the new allocation system and this finding is related to the use of newer generation continuous flow LVADs.

Introduction: The number of patients with sarcoidosis requiring heart transplantation (HT) is on the rise. Hypothesis: The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of isolated HT in patients with sarcoid cardiomyopathy. Methods: Adult HT recipients were identified in the UNOS Registry between 1990 and 2020. Patients were grouped according to diagnosis. The cumulative incidences for the all-cause mortality and rejection were compared using Fine and Gray model analysis, accounting for re-transplantation as a competing risk. Moreover, we reviewed characteristics and outcomes of all HT recipients with previous diagnosis of sarcoid cardiomyopathy from a single-center. Results: A total of 30,874 HT recipients were included in the present study (n=240 sarcoidosis, n=1,431 non-ischemic restrictive cardiomyopathy, and n=29,203 non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy). During a total of 196,985 patient-years, all-cause mortality at the latest follow-up was not significantly different when comparing sarcoidosis to non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (adjusted subhazard ratio [aSHR] 1.4, 95% confidence intervals [CI]: 0.88-2.3, p=0.15) or restrictive cardiomyopathy (aSHR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.65-1.95, p=0.67). Accordingly, multivariable analysis suggested that 1-year mortality was not significantly different between sarcoidosis and non-ischemic dilated cardiomyopathy (aSHR 1.56, 95% CI: 0.9-2.7, p=0.12) or restrictive (aSHR 1.15, 95% CI: 0.61-2.18, p=0.66) cardiomyopathy. Additionally, no differences were observed regarding 30-day mortality after HT. Data from the single-center case review showed excellent long-term outcomes with sirolimus-based immunosuppression. Conclusions: Short- and long-term outcomes after isolated HT do not seem to be inferior in sarcoid cardiomyopathy when compared to common types of non-ischemic cardiomyopathy.

Abstract Background The number of patients with sarcoidosis requiring heart transplantation (HT) is increasing. The aim of this study was to evaluate outcomes of isolated HT in patients with sarcoid cardiomyopathy and compare them to recipients with non-ischaemic restrictive or dilated cardiomyopathy. Methods and results Adult HT recipients were identified in the UNOS Registry between 1990 and 2020. Patients were grouped according to diagnosis. The cumulative incidences for the all-cause mortality and rejection were compared using Fine and Gray model analysis, accounting for re-transplantation as a competing risk. Rejection was evaluated using logistic regression analysis. We also reviewed characteristics and outcomes of all HT recipients with previous diagnosis of sarcoid cardiomyopathy from a single centre. A total of 30 160 HT recipients were included in the present study (n = 239 sarcoidosis, n = 1411 non-ischaemic restrictive cardiomyopathy, and n = 28 510 non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy). During a total of 194 733 patient-years, all-cause mortality at the latest follow-up was not significantly different when comparing sarcoidosis to non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy [adjusted subhazard ratio (aSHR) 1.46, 95% confidence intervals (CIs): 0.9–2.4, P = 0.12] or restrictive cardiomyopathy (aSHR 1.12, 95% CI: 0.65–1.95, P = 0.67). Accordingly, multivariable analysis suggested that 1 year mortality was not significantly different between sarcoidosis and non-ischaemic dilated cardiomyopathy (aSHR 1.56, 95% CI: 0.9–2.7, P = 0.12) or restrictive cardiomyopathy (aSHR 1.15, 95% CI: 0.61–2.18, P = 0.66). No differences were observed regarding 30 day mortality, treated and hospitalized acute rejection, and 30 day death from graft failure after HT. Thirty-day mortality did not improve significantly in more recent HT eras whereas there was a trend towards improved 1 year mortality in the latest HT era (P = 0.06). Data from the single-centre case review showed excellent long-term outcomes with sirolimus-based immunosuppression. Conclusions Short-term and long-term post HT outcomes among patients with sarcoid cardiomyopathy are similar to those with common types of non-ischaemic cardiomyopathy.

Background: We sought to investigate temporal trends in patient characteristics, waitlist, and posttransplant outcomes after heart transplantation in the United States. Methods: Using data from the United Network of Organ Sharing, we identified adults listed for heart transplantation between 1991 and 2019. Patients were divided into 4 eras based on the 3 time points in which changes were made to the patient selection/allocation policy (Era 1=January 1991–January 1999; Era 2=January 1999–July 2006; Era 3=July 2006–October 2018; and Era 4=October 2018–March 2020), and patient characteristics, waitlist, and posttransplant outcomes were evaluated for each era. Results: Between 1991 and 2019, 95 179 patients were added to the heart transplantation waitlist. Compared with Era 1, patients listed in Era 4 were older (mean age: 50 versus 52 years) and with higher risk comorbidities (eg, 10% versus 28.8% diabetes, 23.3% versus 35.6% obese). Over the study period, 22 738 patients died or were permanently delisted for deterioration on the waitlist while 61 687 were transplanted. Compared with the preceding era, there was significant decrease in death or deterioration in the last 2 eras (sub-hazard ratio, 0.67 [95% CI, 0.65–0.70] for Era 3 versus Era 2 and sub-hazard ratio, 0.65 [95% CI, 0.58–0.73] for Era 4 versus 3). Across the years, 27.1% to 40.5% of those on the waitlist were transplanted. Among those transplanted, there was increase in the rates of in-hospital stroke (2.8% in Era 1 to 3.7% in Era 4), renal failure requiring dialysis (7.2%–17.1%), and length-of-stay (14–17days), P <0.001. However, this did not negatively impact short-term survival when compared with the preceding era (1-year graft survival from Era 1 to Era 4=84.1%, 86.4%, 90.4%, and 89.7%, respectively). Conclusions: There have been significant changes in the characteristics of patients listed for heart transplantation. Although transplant volume has increased, the wide supply-demand gap persisted. The last two changes in the allocation policy achieved their primary objective of reducing waitlist mortality.

Abstract Background The landscape of heart transplantation (HT) has changed significantly with respect to patient selection, surgical techniques, and patient outcomes. We sought to investigate temporal trends in patient characteristics, waitlist and post-transplant outcomes after HT in the U.S. Methods We queried the national database of the United Network of Organ Sharing (UNOS) to identify adults listed for HT in the U.S. between 1991 and 2019. Patients were divided into four eras based on the three time points in which changes were made to the patient selection/allocation policy (1999, 2006, and 2018), and patient characteristics as well as waitlist and post-transplant outcomes were evaluated for each era. Results Between 1991 and 2019, a total of 95,179 patients were added to the waitlist for HT in the U.S. Compared to era 1, patients listed in era 4 were older (mean age: 52.4 years), more female (27.6%) and ethnic minorities (40%), and with higher-risk comorbidities (28.8% diabetes, 35.6% obese). Over the study period, there were 22,070 waitlist deaths and 61,687 transplants. Compared to the preceding era, there was significant decrease in waitlist mortality in the last 2 eras (e.g., sub-hazard ratio for era 4 vs era 3 =0.37, 95% CI=0.32–0.44). For each year, only 27.1% to 40.5% of those on the waitlist were transplanted. Among those who were transplanted, there was increase in the rates of in-hospital stroke (2.8% in era 1 to 3.7% in era 4), renal failure requiring dialysis (7.2% to 17.1%), and hospital length of stay (14 to 17 days), p-values&lt;0.001 for all. However, this has not negatively impacted short-term survival when compared to the preceding era (1-year graft survival = 89.7% in era 4). Based on a projection model, we predict a 47% increase in living adult heart transplant recipients to to 44,366 in 2040. Conclusion There have been significant changes in the characteristics of patients listed for HT in the U.S., including an increasing proportion of high-risk co-morbidities. Although the transplant volume has increased, the wide supply-demand gap persisted. The last 2 changes in the allocation policy in 2006 and 2018 achieved their primary objective of reducing waitlist mortality. Funding Acknowledgement Type of funding sources: None.

Background: Prior studies have shown that hospital case volume is not associated with survival in patients with out-of-hospital cardiac arrest (OHCA). However, how case volume impact on survival for in-hospital cardiac arrest (IHCA) is unknown Methods: We queried the National Inpatient Sample (NIS) in the U.S. 2005-2011 to identify cases in which in-hospital CPR was performed for IHCA. Years > 2011 were excluded due to redesign of NIS that precludes case volume calculation. Restricted cubic spine was used to evaluate the association between hospital annual CPR volume and survival to hospital discharge. Further analysis was conducted with case volume in quartiles. Results: Across more than 1000 hospitals in NIS, we identified 137,466 cases (mean age 67, 45% female) of IHCA for which CPR was performed over the study period. Median [Q1, Q3] case volume was 68 [34, 100]. Compared to those in the 1 st quartile (q1) of case volume, hospitals in the 4 th quartile (q4) tends to have younger patients (mean=66 vs 68 yrs), higher comorbidities (median Elixhauser score=4 vs 3), large bed size (89 vs 37%), and in low income areas (37 vs 32%). After adjustment for patient and hospital factors, higher hospital case volume was inversely associated with lower rates of survival (Fig1). Risk-adjusted rates of survival from q1 through q4 were: 28.1%, 25.5%, 25.4% and 23.7%. We arrived at similar results when analysis was stratified by age, gender and hospital bed size (not shown) except that the difference across quartiles was more pronounced among small bed size hospitals (survival rate=27.4% in q1 vs 8.1% in q4). However, among those who survived to hospital discharge, nonroutine home discharge was higher among patients in q1 (73.9%) vs q4 (69.6%) Conclusion: Unlike OHCA, hospital case volume is inversely associated with survival to hospital discharge in patients undergoing CPR for IHCA. Hence, quality measures to reduce the incidence of CPR/IHCA have the potential to reduce in-hospital mortality