1037 Background: Folate receptor alpha (FRA the product of the FOLR1 gene) has been identified as a potential prognostic and therapeutic target in a number of cancers. A correlation has been shown between intense expression of FRA in breast tumors and poor prognosis, yet little is known about FOLR1/FRA expression across clinically relevant breast cancer subtypes. Methods: 131 breast cancer tumors including 4 benign, 33 ER+, 26 HER2+, and 68 triple negative (TN) were constructed into tissue microarrays (TMAs). FRA expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a high affinity FRA antibody. Tumor membrane staining intensity was scored by a pathologist as negative (0), weak (1+), moderate (2+) and strong (3+). The percent of cells within each tissue core stained at each intensity was recorded to calculate an H-score. The H-score is a weighted score that captured both the proportion of positive staining and intensity for each tumor. H-score values can range from zero (no membrane staining) to a maximum of 300 (100% membrane staining at 3+). H-scores for each patient sample were averaged over 3 TMA cores. The mean H-scores for each tumor subtype and the percentage of 3+ staining in >30% of tumor cells were compared by a Mann-Whitney test. The distribution of FOLR1 mRNA was completed using a TCGA RNA-seq dataset from 691 breast tumors classified as ER+, HER2+ and TN. FOLR1 levels of TN versus ER+ and HER2+ were compared by a Mann-Whitney test. Results: The mean H-score for the benign tumors was 0, ER+ (13.31), HER2+ (39.36), TN (119.02). The median H-score for the benign tumors was 0, ER+ (0), HER2+ (7.5), TN (127.5). The TN tumors mean and median H scores were significantly higher than benign, ER+ or HER2+ (p<0.001). The largest percentage of 3+ staining in >30% of tumor cells was observed in TN tumors (36.7%) and lowest in ER+ tumors (0%) (p<0.001). TN tumors had significantly higher levels of FOLR1 mRNA compared to ER+ and HER2+ subtypes (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Our data indicate that expression of FRA is highly prevalent in TN tumors and is supported by FOLR1 mRNA levels. Anti-FRA therapy may represent an important therapeutic intervention in TNBC who to this point have no active targeted treatment options.
Phase 3 trial of momelotinib (MMB) vs ruxolitinib (RUX) in JAK inhibitor (JAKi) naive patients with myelofibrosis (MF).
7000 Background: MMB, an oral JAKi, has been shown in early trials to reduce spleen volume, improve disease associated symptoms (Sx) and improve RBC transfusion (Tx) requirements in patients (pts) with MF. This study was designed to test non-inferiority of MMB vs RUX in splenic volume reduction and Sx amelioration, and superiority in Tx requirement, in JAKi naïve MF pts. Methods: Eligibility: MF, IPSS high risk, Int-2, or symptomatic Int-1; palpable spleen ≥5cm; platelets ≥ 50 K/μl, and no Gr ≥2 peripheral neuropathy (PN). Stratification by Tx dependency and platelets (<100, 100-200 and >200 K/μl). Pts were randomized 1:1 to 24 wks of MMB 200 mg qd + RUX placebo or RUX 20 mg bid (or modified per label) + MMB placebo, after which all pts could receive open label MMB. Assessments: spleen volume by MRI, and pt reported Sx using a daily eDiary of modified MPN-SAF Total Sx Score (TSS). Primary endpoint was splenic response rate (SRR; ≥35% reduction in volume from baseline) at 24 wks. Secondary endpoints, evaluated sequentially at 24 wks, were rates of TSS response (≥50% reduction from baseline), RBC Tx independence (TI), RBC Tx dependence (TD) and of RBC Tx . Results: 175 of 215 (81%) and 201 of 217 (93%) pts randomized to MMB and RUX, respectively, completed the 24 wk DB phase. Efficacy results are shown in Table. Most common Gr ≥3 AEs in the DB phase with MMB were thrombocytopenia (7%) and anemia (6%), and with RUX were anemia (23%), thrombocytopenia (5%) and neutropenia (5%). Gr ≥3 infections occurred in 7% of MMB and 3% of RUX pts. Treatment emergent PN occurred in 22 (10%) of MMB (all Gr ≤2) and 10 (5%) of RUX (9 Gr ≤2, 1 Gr 3) pts in DB phase, none discontinuing study drug for PN. Overall, AEs led to study drug D/C in 13% of MMB and 6% of RUX pts in DB phase. Conclusions: In pts with JAKi naive MF, 24 weeks of MMB is non-inferior to RUX for spleen response but not for symptom response. MMB treatment is associated with a reduced transfusion requirement. NCT01969838. [Table: see text]
SIMPLIFY-1: A Phase III Randomized Trial of Momelotinib Versus Ruxolitinib in Janus Kinase Inhibitor–Naïve Patients With Myelofibrosis
Purpose We evaluated the efficacy and safety of momelotinib, a potent and selective Janus kinase 1 and 2 inhibitor (JAKi), compared with ruxolitinib, in JAKi-naïve patients with myelofibrosis. Patients and Methods Patients (N = 432) with high risk or intermediate-2 risk or symptomatic intermediate-1 risk myelofibrosis were randomly assigned to receive 24 weeks of treatment with momelotinib 200 mg once daily or ruxolitinib 20 mg twice a day (or per label), after which all patients could receive open-label momelotinib. The primary end point was a ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume at 24 weeks of therapy. Secondary end points were rates of symptom response and effects on RBC transfusion requirements. Results A ≥ 35% reduction in spleen volume at week 24 was achieved by a similar proportion of patients in both treatment arms: 26.5% of the momelotinib group and 29% of the ruxolitinib group (noninferior; P = .011). A ≥ 50% reduction in the total symptom score was observed in 28.4% and 42.2% of patients who received momelotinib and ruxolitinib, respectively, indicating that noninferiority was not met ( P = .98). Transfusion rate, transfusion independence, and transfusion dependence were improved with momelotinib (all with nominal P ≤ .019). The most common grade ≥ 3 hematologic abnormalities in either group were thrombocytopenia and anemia. Grade ≥ 3 infections occurred in 7% of patients who received momelotinib and 3% of patients who received ruxolitinib. Treatment-emergent peripheral neuropathy occurred in 10% of patients who received momelotinib (all grade ≤ 2) and 5% of patients who received ruxolitinib (all grade ≤ 3). Conclusion In JAKi-naïve patients with myelofibrosis, 24 weeks of momelotinib treatment was noninferior to ruxolitinib for spleen response but not for symptom response. Momelotinib treatment was associated with a reduced transfusion requirement.
A phase 2 study of simtuzumab in patients with primary, post‐polycythaemia vera or post‐essential thrombocythaemia myelofibrosis
SummarySimtuzumab, a monoclonal antibody inhibitor of extracellular matrix enzyme lysyl oxidase‐like‐2, showed preclinical promise and was well tolerated in clinical studies. A phase 2, open‐label study of simtuzumab was conducted in patients with primary myelofibrosis (MF), post‐polycythaemia vera MF and post‐essential thrombocythaemia MF. Fifty‐four patients were randomized to receive simtuzumab alone (200 or 700 mg [n = 12 each group]) or simtuzumab (200 or 700 mg) with ruxolitinib (n = 15 each group) for 24 weeks. Simtuzumab alone or in combination with ruxolitinib showed no clinical benefit at 24 weeks. The mean serum simtuzumab trough concentrations appeared to increase dose‐proportionally between the 200‐mg and 700‐mg treatment groups. Therapy‐related serious adverse events were pyrexia, pain in extremity (both in 1 patient) and infusion reaction (in another patient). Bone marrow fibrosis (BMF) score was reduced at 24 weeks in 2 patients (16·7%) in the simtuzumab 700‐mg group, 1 (6·7%) in the simtuzumab 200‐mg + ruxolitinib group, and 2 (13·3%) in the simtuzumab 700‐mg + ruxolitinib group; similar numbers of patients had increased BMF. Simtuzumab alone or with ruxolitinib was well tolerated but did not produce clinical benefit nor consistently reduce BMF in patients with MF by 24 weeks.