Back to Authors

O’Shannessy, Daniel J.

Mayo Clinic

Morphotek (United States)

Citations 2

Increased expression of folate receptor-α (FRA) in triple-negative breast cancer: A potential therapeutic target.
Crozier, Jennifer A. , Necela, Brian M. , Thompson, E. Aubrey , Geiger, Xochiquetzal J., Moreno‐Aspitia, Alvaro , McCullough, Ann E. , Pockaj, Barbara A. , Cunliffe, Heather E. , Kachergus, Jennifer M., O’Shannessy, Daniel J., Maltzman, Julia D., Andorfer, Cathy, Perez, Edith A. , Sun, Zhifu , Kalari, Krishna R. , Ballman, Karla V.

Journal of Clinical Oncology | March 11, 2020 | Volume: 31 | Issue: 15_suppl | Pages: 1037-1037

10.1200/jco.2013.31.15_suppl.1037 Get It

1037 Background: Folate receptor alpha (FRA the product of the FOLR1 gene) has been identified as a potential prognostic and therapeutic target in a number of cancers. A correlation has been shown between intense expression of FRA in breast tumors and poor prognosis, yet little is known about FOLR1/FRA expression across clinically relevant breast cancer subtypes. Methods: 131 breast cancer tumors including 4 benign, 33 ER+, 26 HER2+, and 68 triple negative (TN) were constructed into tissue microarrays (TMAs). FRA expression was analyzed by immunohistochemistry (IHC) using a high affinity FRA antibody. Tumor membrane staining intensity was scored by a pathologist as negative (0), weak (1+), moderate (2+) and strong (3+). The percent of cells within each tissue core stained at each intensity was recorded to calculate an H-score. The H-score is a weighted score that captured both the proportion of positive staining and intensity for each tumor. H-score values can range from zero (no membrane staining) to a maximum of 300 (100% membrane staining at 3+). H-scores for each patient sample were averaged over 3 TMA cores. The mean H-scores for each tumor subtype and the percentage of 3+ staining in >30% of tumor cells were compared by a Mann-Whitney test. The distribution of FOLR1 mRNA was completed using a TCGA RNA-seq dataset from 691 breast tumors classified as ER+, HER2+ and TN. FOLR1 levels of TN versus ER+ and HER2+ were compared by a Mann-Whitney test. Results: The mean H-score for the benign tumors was 0, ER+ (13.31), HER2+ (39.36), TN (119.02). The median H-score for the benign tumors was 0, ER+ (0), HER2+ (7.5), TN (127.5). The TN tumors mean and median H scores were significantly higher than benign, ER+ or HER2+ (p<0.001). The largest percentage of 3+ staining in >30% of tumor cells was observed in TN tumors (36.7%) and lowest in ER+ tumors (0%) (p<0.001). TN tumors had significantly higher levels of FOLR1 mRNA compared to ER+ and HER2+ subtypes (p<0.0001). Conclusions: Our data indicate that expression of FRA is highly prevalent in TN tumors and is supported by FOLR1 mRNA levels. Anti-FRA therapy may represent an important therapeutic intervention in TNBC who to this point have no active targeted treatment options.
A Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled Phase II Study of the Efficacy and Safety of Monotherapy Ontuxizumab (MORAb-004) Plus Best Supportive Care in Patients with Chemorefractory Metastatic Colorectal Cancer
Renfro, Lindsay A. , Hurwitz, Herbert I. , Safran, Howard , Guarino, Michael J., Kim, George P., Hecht, J. Randolph, Weil, Susan C., Heyburn, John, Schweizer, Charles, O’Shannessy, Daniel J., Díaz, Luis A. , Diaz, Luis A , Grothey, Axel , Strosberg, Jonathan , Marshall, John L , Wang, Wenquan

Clinical Cancer Research | October 30, 2017 | Volume: 24 | Issue: 2 | Pages: 316-325

10.1158/1078-0432.ccr-17-1558 Get It

Abstract Purpose: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the safety and efficacy of ontuxizumab (MORAb-004), a monoclonal antibody that interferes with endosialin (tumor endothelial marker-1) function, in patients with chemorefractory metastatic colorectal cancer and to identify a responsive patient population based on biomarkers. Experimental Design: This was a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, phase II study. Patients were randomly assigned in a 2:1 ratio to receive weekly intravenous ontuxizumab (8 mg/kg) or placebo plus best supportive care until progression or unacceptable toxicity. Tissue and blood biomarkers were evaluated for their ability to identify a patient population that was responsive to ontuxizumab. Results: A total of 126 patients were enrolled. No significant difference between the ontuxizumab and placebo groups was evident for the primary endpoint of progression-free survival (PFS), with a median PFS of 8.1 weeks in each group (HR, 1.13; 95% confidence interval, 0.76–1.67; P = 0.53). There were no significant differences between groups for overall survival (OS) or overall response rate (ORR). The most common treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) in the ontuxizumab group (vs. the placebo group, respectively) were fatigue (53.7% vs. 47.5%), nausea (39.0% vs. 35.0%), decreased appetite (34.1% vs. 27.5%), and constipation (28.0% vs. 32.5%). The most common grade 3/4 TEAE in the ontuxizumab group versus placebo was back pain (11.0% vs. 0%). No single biomarker clearly identified patients responsive to ontuxizumab. Conclusions: No benefit with ontuxizumab monotherapy compared with placebo for clinical response parameters of PFS, OS, or ORR was demonstrated. Ontuxizumab was well tolerated. Clin Cancer Res; 24(2); 316–25. ©2017 AACR.