Borlaug, Barry A.

Abstract Aims Left ventricular (LV) ventricular-arterial coupling (VAC) refers to the ratio of afterload (effective arterial elastance) to contractility (end-systolic elastance) as an integrated marker of cardiac performance. We sought to determine whether the echocardiographic VAC ratio, defined using the ratio of LV end-systolic volume (LVESV) to stroke volume (SV), predicted mortality in the cardiac intensive care unit (CICU). Methods and results Mayo Clinic CICU patients from 2007 and 2018 were included. Ventricular-arterial coupling ratio was calculated as the Teichholz LVESV divided by the SV calculated from LV outflow tract Doppler. The primary outcome was in-hospital mortality and the secondary outcome was all-cause 1-year mortality. A total of 4685 patients were included with a median age of 69 (58, 79) years (37.2% females), with acute coronary syndrome in 54.9% and heart failure in 49.0%. A higher VAC ratio was associated with greater severity of illness, worse echocardiographic findings, and more use of critical care therapies. A total of 329 (7%) patients died during hospitalization. Patients with a higher VAC ratio had higher in-hospital mortality overall and in each admission diagnosis subgroup. After multivariable adjustment, patients with a VAC ratio >2 were at higher risk of in-hospital mortality (adjusted odds ratio 1.63, 95% confidence interval 1.17–2.28, P = 0.010). One-year mortality was higher for patients with a higher VAC ratio, especially VAC >2. Conclusion Ventricular-arterial uncoupling was associated with worse outcomes in an unselected CICU cohort. The echocardiographic VAC ratio is a simple non-invasive bedside measure that can be used for risk prediction in the CICU.

BACKGROUND: Despite favorable hemodynamic and neurohormonal effects, endothelin receptor antagonists have not improved outcomes in patients with heart failure (HF), possibly because they cause fluid retention. METHODS: In this randomized, double-blind, multicenter trial (SERENADE [Macitentan in Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction and Pulmonary Vascular Disease]), we evaluated the effects of an endothelin receptor antagonist, macitentan, in patients with HF, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥40%, and pulmonary vascular disease. After a 4-week placebo run-in (to ensure clinical stability), followed by a 5-week single-blind macitentan run-in, patients who did not exhibit fluid retention were randomized to macitentan or placebo. The primary end point was change in NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide; baseline to 24 weeks); secondary end points included change in KCCQ (Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire) clinical summary score (baseline to 24 weeks) and time to worsening HF by 52 weeks. RESULTS: Of 230 patients enrolled, 28 were excluded during the placebo run-in, 60 excluded during the macitentan run-in, and 142 were randomized. Macitentan had no effect on change in NT-proBNP (geometric mean ratio [macitentan/placebo], 1.02 [90% CI, 0.88–1.19]; P =0.79) or on secondary end points (placebo-corrected change in KCCQ clinical summary score, −3.5 [90% CI, −8.2 to +1.2]; P =0.22). Worsening HF occurred in 20 (28%) patients assigned to macitentan and 13 (18%) assigned to placebo (hazard ratio, 1.48 [90% CI, 0.83–2.67]; P =0.24). More macitentan-treated patients developed fluid retention (16 [23%] versus 10 [14%]) and cardiac adverse events (33 [46%] versus 22 [31%]) versus placebo. CONCLUSIONS: Despite a novel enrichment trial design to target pulmonary vascular disease and exclude treatment-related fluid retention in patients with HF and preserved/mildly reduced left ventricular ejection fraction, macitentan neither lowered NT-proBNP nor improved HF outcomes. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifiers: NCT03153111 and NCT03714815.

BACKGROUND: Exercise-induced hypertension (EIH) is common in adults with coarctation of the aorta (COA), but there are limited data about hemodynamics and outcomes in such patients. The purpose of this study was to assess changes in arterial load during exercise in patients with COA with versus without EIH, and the relationship to clinical outcomes. METHODS: We compared Doppler-derived arterial load indices (effective arterial elastance index, total arterial compliance index, systemic vascular resistance index), and clinical indices of disease severity (pulmonary congestion, aerobic capacity, and cardiovascular biomarkers) between adults with repaired COA and healthy controls. EIH was defined as systolic blood pressure (BP) at peak exercise >210 mm Hg in men or >190 mm Hg in women. RESULTS: In this prospective cohort study, we assessed patients with COA (n=41, age 43±14 years, 26 [63%] men) and healthy controls (n=41). Although both groups had similar resting systolic BP, the COA group had higher Doppler-derived arterial load indices at rest, as well as a greater rise in systolic BP and Doppler-derived arterial load indices at each stage of exercise, leading to a higher prevalence of EIH in the COA group (37% versus 10%; P =0.004). Compared with patients with COA without EIH (n=26, 63%), those with EIH had higher arterial load at rest and during exercise, as well as worse cardiac dysfunction, pulmonary congestion, and biomarkers of cardiovascular remodeling, despite no significant differences in resting systolic BP. CONCLUSIONS: BP assessment during exercise can improve risk stratification and identify patients who may benefit from intensification of medical therapy.

Abstract Heart failure with reduced or preserved ejection fraction is associated with elevated left atrial pressure at rest due to fluid overload or during exercise, leading to pulmonary venous congestion. Even with available treatments, heart failure hospitalizations remain high, and improvements in quality-of-life scores and functional capacity are modest. Thus, there is growing interest in non-pharmacological methods to decompress the left atrium and improve heart failure symptoms and outcomes. Left-to-right shunts have emerged as a potential therapeutic option to reduce left atrial hypertension, improve quality of life, and impact long-term outcomes. This nascent field carries both potential therapeutic promise and many unanswered questions. Recent data have questioned whether the effects of this therapy vary based on the left ventricular ejection fraction, pulmonary vascular resistance, and/or right ventricular structure and function. This review discusses the basis for left-to-right shunt therapies, synthesizes past and ongoing clinical trials, and offers future directions.

Background The immune response to infections may become dysregulated and promote myocardial damage contributing to heart failure (HF). We examined the relationship between infection‐related hospitalization (IRH) and HF, HF with preserved ejection fraction, and HF with reduced ejection fraction. Methods and Results We studied 14 468 adults aged 45 to 64 years in the ARIC (Atherosclerosis Risk in Communities) Study who were HF free at visit 1 (1987–1989). IRH was identified using select International Classification of Diseases ( ICD ) codes in hospital discharge records and was treated as a time‐varying exposure. HF incidence was defined as the first occurrence of either a hospitalization that included an ICD, Ninth Revision ( ICD‐9 ) discharge code of 428 (428.0–428.9) among the primary or secondary diagnoses or a death certificate with an ICD‐9 code of 428 or an ICD, Tenth Revision ( ICD‐10 ) code of I50 among any of the listed diagnoses or underlying causes of death. We used multivariable‐adjusted Cox proportional hazards models to assess the association between IRH and incident HF, HF with reduced ejection fraction, and HF with preserved ejection fraction. Median follow‐up time was 27 years, 55% were women, 26% were Black, mean age at baseline was 54±6 years, 46% had an IRH, and 3565 had incident HF. Hazard ratio (HR) for incident HF events among participants who had an IRH compared with those who did not was 2.35 (95% CI, 2.19–2.52). This relationship was consistent across different types of infections. Additionally, IRH was associated with both HF with reduced ejection fraction and HF with preserved ejection fraction: 1.77 (95% CI, 1.35–2.32) and 2.97 (95% CI, 2.36–3.75), respectively. Conclusions IRH was associated with incident HF, HF with reduced ejection fraction, and HF with preserved ejection fraction. IRH might represent a modifiable risk factor for HF pathophysiology.

Abstract Introduction Secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR) is a highly prevalent valve disease. STR and Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) share common features including exertional intolerance and high burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and pulmonary hypertension (PH), making it challenging to disentangle HFpEF from TR. The incidence of clinically-recognized HFpEF in STR and its impact on mortality are not well established. Purposes To define the incidence of newly diagnosed HFpEF and its impact on mortality in a cohort of patients with significant STR and to evaluate the likelihood of a larger hidden burden of HFpEF. Methods Patients with a first diagnosis of ≥moderate-severe STR between 2004-2019 at our institution were retrospectively included. Patients with left ventricle ejection fraction <50%, left-sided valve diseases, and intracardiac device leads were excluded. HFpEF was identified by manual chart review as well as by use of ICD codes. The estimated prevalence of HFpEF was evaluated using an H2FPEF score ≥6, which corresponds to a ≥90% probability of having HFpEF. Results Of 2118 patients (mean age 70 ± 14, 36% females), 1057 (50%) had systemic hypertension (HTN) and 1091 (51%) had AF, with median 2.3 years of follow-up. From this cohort, 536 (25%) patients were diagnosed with HFpEF based upon chart review during the follow up period, while ICD diagnosis was only present in fewer than 50% of these patients (254). High H2FPEF score was present in 880 patients (41.5%), of whom 383 received a chart diagnosis of HFpEF, while 153 patients with H2FPEF score <6 received a chart HFpEF diagnosis. The cumulative incidence of chart-based diagnosis of HFpEF was 20.8% (N=158) at 1-year and 38.6% (N=273) at 5-years in patients with an H2FPEF score ≥6 and 5.5%(N=60) at 1-year and 11.1%(N=111) at 5-years in those with a score <6 (Figure). In Cox regression analyses, the diagnosis of HFpEF during follow-up was associated with increased mortality (HR 2.14, CI 1.86-2.46, p < 0.001) after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diuretics, HTN, pulmonary hypertension, chronic kidney disease and AF. Conclusions The incidence of clinically documented HFpEF in a cohort of patients with significant STR at index evaluation is high (25%). Use of ICD code underestimates clinical recognition, with the actual burden of HFpEF probably being even greater, as indicated by an H2FPEF score ≥ 6. Among those with significant STR, HFpEF diagnosis is an independent risk factor for mortality.

BACKGROUND: Plasma NT-proBNP (N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide) is commonly used to diagnose heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its diagnostic performance in the ambulatory/outpatient setting is unknown because previous studies lacked objective reference standards. METHODS: Among patients with chronic dyspnea, diagnosis of HFpEF or noncardiac dyspnea was determined conclusively by exercise catheterization in a derivation cohort (n=414), multicenter validation cohort 1 (n=560), validation cohort 2 (n=207), and a nonobese Japanese validation cohort 3 (n=77). Optimal NT-proBNP cut points for HFpEF rule out (optimizing sensitivity) and rule in (optimizing specificity) were derived and tested, stratified by obesity and atrial fibrillation. Derived cut points were tested in 3 additional validation cohorts (cohorts 4–6) in whom HFpEF was diagnosed by resting catheterization only (n=260), previous hospitalization for heart failure (n=447), or exercise echocardiography (n=517), respectively. RESULTS: Current recommended rule-out NT-proBNP threshold <125 pg/mL had 82% sensitivity (95% CI, 77%–88%) with a body mass index (BMI) <35 kg/m 2 , decreasing to 67% (95% CI, 58%–77%) with a BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 . A lower rule-out NT-proBNP threshold <50 pg/mL displayed good sensitivity with a BMI <35 kg/m 2 (97% [95% CI, 95%–99%]), with a modest decline in sensitivity with a BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 (86% [95% CI, 79%–93%]); diagnostic thresholds were confirmed in validation cohorts 1 and 2 (91% [95% CI, 88%–95%] and 86% [95% CI, 80%–93%] with a BMI <35 kg/m 2 ; 80% [95% CI, 74%–87%] and 84% [95% CI, 74%–93%] with a BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 ). Current consensus age- and BMI-stratified rule-in thresholds demonstrated only 65% specificity (95% CI, 57%–72%). Rule-in NT-proBNP threshold ≥500 pg/mL had 85% specificity (95% CI, 78%–91%) with a BMI <35 kg/m 2 (87% [95% CI, 80%–94%] and 90% [95% CI, 81%–99%] in validation cohorts), with 100% specificity at a BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 (93% [95% CI, 81%–100%] and 100% in validation cohorts). With a BMI ≥35 kg/m 2 , lower rule-in thresholds (≥220 pg/mL) provided good specificity (88% [95% CI, 73%–100%]; 93% [95% CI, 81%–100%] and 100% in validation cohorts). Findings were consistent in validation cohorts 3 through 6 (sensitivity of <50 pg/mL, 93%–98%; specificity of ≥500 pg/mL, 82%–89%). NT-proBNP provided no incremental discrimination among patients with history of AF; ≥98% of patients with AF and dyspnea were found to have HFpEF in our cohorts. CONCLUSIONS: In patients with chronic unexplained dyspnea, current rule-in and rule-out NT-proBNP diagnostic thresholds lead to unacceptably high error rates, with important interactions by obesity and AF status. In our study, NT-proBNP provided little value in those with AF and dyspnea because the presence of AF is by itself a robust biomarker of HFpEF. Use of separate rule-in and rule-out diagnostic thresholds stratified by BMI reduces miscategorization and can guide more appropriate use of exercise testing for possible HFpEF.