Back to Authors

Pugliesi, G

Mayo Clinic

Mayo Clinic

Citations 1

Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction: incidence and impact on mortality in patients with secondary tricuspid regurgitation
Anand, Vidhu , Singh, Sumitabh , Pugliesi, G, Scott, Christopher G. , Pislaru, Sorin V. , Nkomo, Vuyisile T. , Borlaug, Barry A.

European Heart Journal - Cardiovascular Imaging | January 29, 2025 | Volume: 26 | Issue: Supplement_1 | Pages: No page available

10.1093/ehjci/jeae333.066 Get It

Abstract Introduction Secondary tricuspid regurgitation (STR) is a highly prevalent valve disease. STR and Heart Failure with preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) share common features including exertional intolerance and high burden of atrial fibrillation (AF) and pulmonary hypertension (PH), making it challenging to disentangle HFpEF from TR. The incidence of clinically-recognized HFpEF in STR and its impact on mortality are not well established. Purposes To define the incidence of newly diagnosed HFpEF and its impact on mortality in a cohort of patients with significant STR and to evaluate the likelihood of a larger hidden burden of HFpEF. Methods Patients with a first diagnosis of ≥moderate-severe STR between 2004-2019 at our institution were retrospectively included. Patients with left ventricle ejection fraction <50%, left-sided valve diseases, and intracardiac device leads were excluded. HFpEF was identified by manual chart review as well as by use of ICD codes. The estimated prevalence of HFpEF was evaluated using an H2FPEF score ≥6, which corresponds to a ≥90% probability of having HFpEF. Results Of 2118 patients (mean age 70 ± 14, 36% females), 1057 (50%) had systemic hypertension (HTN) and 1091 (51%) had AF, with median 2.3 years of follow-up. From this cohort, 536 (25%) patients were diagnosed with HFpEF based upon chart review during the follow up period, while ICD diagnosis was only present in fewer than 50% of these patients (254). High H2FPEF score was present in 880 patients (41.5%), of whom 383 received a chart diagnosis of HFpEF, while 153 patients with H2FPEF score <6 received a chart HFpEF diagnosis. The cumulative incidence of chart-based diagnosis of HFpEF was 20.8% (N=158) at 1-year and 38.6% (N=273) at 5-years in patients with an H2FPEF score ≥6 and 5.5%(N=60) at 1-year and 11.1%(N=111) at 5-years in those with a score <6 (Figure). In Cox regression analyses, the diagnosis of HFpEF during follow-up was associated with increased mortality (HR 2.14, CI 1.86-2.46, p < 0.001) after adjusting for age, sex, body mass index, coronary artery disease, diabetes mellitus, chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, diuretics, HTN, pulmonary hypertension, chronic kidney disease and AF. Conclusions The incidence of clinically documented HFpEF in a cohort of patients with significant STR at index evaluation is high (25%). Use of ICD code underestimates clinical recognition, with the actual burden of HFpEF probably being even greater, as indicated by an H2FPEF score ≥ 6. Among those with significant STR, HFpEF diagnosis is an independent risk factor for mortality.