Wasson, Megan

Objective: The aim of this research was to evaluate intraoperative visual detection of endometriosis compared to final histopathologic diagnosis based on lesion type. Materials and Methods: This prospective clinical study at a tertiary-care, academic medical center involved 77 patients who had surgery by high-volume endometriosis surgeons for suspected endometriosis. Pelvic peritonectomy was performed with documentation of visual presence or absence of endometriosis and lesion type. Powder burn lesions were defined as typical lesions. White scarring, clear vesicles, red flame, and peritoneal pockets were defined as atypical lesions. Results: Of 1069 peritoneal specimens, there was visual detection of endometriosis in 352 (32.93%). Endometriosis was confirmed on histopathologic evaluation of: powder-burn, 65.8%; white scarring, 51.6%; clear vesicles, 45.7%; red-flame, 39.1%; and peritoneal pockets, 28.9% ( p = 0.003). Additionally, 11.3% of specimens with no visible endometriosis demonstrated a positive histopathologic diagnosis. Overall sensitivity was 68.36%; specificity was 78.15%; positive predictive value (PPV) was 49.72%; and negative predictive value was 88.66%. All lesions had high specificity (powder-burn, 96.20%; white scarring, 91.34%; clear vesicles; 92.54%; red-flame, 97.84%; and peritoneal pockets; 95.91%). PPV depended on lesion type (powder-burn, 65.75%; white scarring, 51.61 %; clear vesicles, 45.74%; red-flame, 39.13% peritoneal pockets, 28.95%). Conclusions: Visual detection of endometriosis during surgical evaluation is not reliable. The potential for atypical-lesion appearance and disease not macroscopically visible suggests a role for complete pelvic peritonectomy. (J GYNECOL SURG 39:235)

ABSTRACT Background Studies have found that women with endometriosis have a higher risk of female sexual dysfunction (FSD). Aim To evaluate the relationship between self-reported endometriosis and FSD utilizing validated surveys. Methods A cross-sectional analysis was conducted among sexually active women aged 18–90 who presented to 3 Mayo Clinic sites from 2015 to 2021. FSD was determined utilizing a combined endpoint of Female Sexual Function Index score ≤ 26.55 and Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised score ≥ 11. Associations between history of endometriosis and FSD were evaluated by fitting 3 multivariable logistic models and were stratified by menopause status. In the first model, the association was adjusted for age, BMI, race/ethnicity, marital status, and education. The second model adjusted for the variables in Model 1 and hormone therapy, hormonal contraceptive use, self-reported history of abuse within the last year, and co-morbidities including the history of diabetes, heart disease, hypertension, osteoporosis, and stroke. The third model adjusted for the variables in Model 1, Model 2, and anxiety, depression, relationship satisfaction, and SSRI/SNRI use. Outcomes The outcomes included self-reported endometriosis and female sexual dysfunction determined utilizing a combined endpoint of Female Sexual Function Index score ≤ 26.55 and Female Sexual Distress Scale-Revised score ≥ 11. Results Of 7118 patients (mean age 51.3), 92.2% were white, 78.4% were peri- or postmenopausal, 8.7% reported endometriosis history, and 57.2% met the criteria for FSD. Women with endometriosis were more likely to be overweight or obese, be smokers, have had a history of heart disease and osteoporosis, have had anxiety and depressed mood, have had a hysterectomy and bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy, and have used hormone therapy. Compared to those without endometriosis, women with endometriosis were significantly more likely to have FSD only among premenopausal women (74.2% vs 57.4%). Similarly, in multivariable analysis the relationship was only seen for premenopausal women in all 3 models (Model 1: OR 2.74 (95% CI 1.43–5.27); Model 2: OR 2.55 (95% CI 1.30–5.04); Model 3: OR 2.30 (95% CI 1.13–4.68)). Clinical Implications These findings highlight the opportunity for healthcare practitioners to evaluate sexual function in premenopausal women with endometriosis. For peri and postmenopausal women with endometriosis, the risk of FSD was lower than for premenopausal women with endometriosis. Strengths and Limitations This study analyzed the association between endometriosis and FSD in women by menopause status using validated tools that included a measure of distress associated with sexual dysfunction. Limitations include its cross-sectional design which does not allow for determination of the direction of this association. Conclusion The risk for FSD associated with endometriosis depends on menopause status. Endometriosis increased the odds of FSD only in premenopausal women.

INTRODUCTION: Access to care is a predictor of health outcomes for the aged female population. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the accessibility of obstetrician–gynecologists (ob-gyns) and gynecologic oncologists to the U.S. Medicare population, over time and by state. METHODS: The supply of ob-gyns and gynecologic oncologists was extracted from the Physician and Other Supplier Public Use File (POSPUF) database of Medicare Part B claims submitted to the U.S. Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services. This supply was compared to the number of providers normalized by the number of Original Medicare beneficiaries; values reported are providers per 100,000 beneficiaries by state from 2012 to 2019, obtained from the Kaiser Family Foundation. RESULTS: In 2019, the average number of ob-gyns per 100,000 beneficiaries across all states was 67.2 (standard deviation [SD] ±19.3), and ranged from 157.01 (District of Columbia) to 45.39 (Wyoming). The average number of gynecologic oncologists was 2.48 (SD±1.18), and ranged from 6.60 (District of Columbia) to 0.83 (Mississippi). From 2012 to 2019, the average absolute difference in number of ob-gyns across all states was −7.71±8.59 and ranged from+15.74 (Connecticut) to −37.32 (Alaska). For gynecologic oncologists, this difference was+0.10±1.04 and ranged from+5.22 (District of Columbia) to −1.84 (South Dakota). CONCLUSION: There is wide geographic variation in the accessibility and growth rate of ob-gyns and GYNONCs for the Medicare population. This provides insight into areas of the country where the supply of ob-gyns and gynecologic oncologists may not meet current and future demand.

Abstract Context Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) is a multimodal protocol aimed to improve quality of postoperative recovery, minimize complications, and optimize overall self-regulation. Preoperative gabapentin decreases postoperative pain but can be associated with prolonged postoperative somnolence and respiratory depression risk. Although it is known that gabapentin affects the postoperative course, it is unclear if the timing of preoperative administration affects this finding. Objectives This study aims to assess the optimal preoperative timing for gabapentin administration in patients undergoing gynecologic surgery to minimize postoperative somnolence risk. Methods A retrospective cohort study evaluated patients who underwent major gynecologic surgery and received preoperative gabapentin. Patients were grouped based on timing from gabapentin administration to surgical incision (<4 h group vs. ≥4 h group). Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative data were abstracted and compared. Univariate associations between the timing of gabapentin administration and the patient and surgical characteristics and outcomes were tested utilizing two-sample equal-variance t-tests, linear model ANOVA, or Fisher’s exact tests. Associations between the timing of gabapentin administration and the time until the Richmond Agitation Sedation Scale (RASS) score of 0 were modeled utilizing linear regression, adjusted for age, initial postoperative anesthesia care unit (PACU), RASS score, and postoperative narcotics. Results Each group contained 127 patients. Demographics were similar except for age (<4 h group mean=44.2 years; ≥4 h group mean=40.5 years; p=0.021), chronic pain (<4 h group=17.6%; ≥4 h group=43.3%; p<0.001), and surgical indication (<4 h group=pelvic pain [29.1%]; ≥4 h group=pelvic pain [51.2%]; p=0.007). The <4 h group had a similar postoperative narcotic administration (<4 h group mean morphine milligram equivalents [MME]=3.667; ≥4 h group mean MME=4.833; p=0.185). The minutes from surgical closure until the patient received a RASS score of 0 and initial PACU pain score (Visual Analogue Scale [VAS]) were similar. The initial PACU oxygen administration volume, hours from surgical closure until the patient transitioned to room air, and initial PACU respiratory rate were similar. The PACU duration, admission secondary to somnolence, and initial PACU Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) score showed no difference. Postoperative nausea/vomiting was decreased in the ≥4 h group (<4 h group=24.4%; ≥4 h group=13.4%; p-value=0.036), and urinary retention (<4 h group=14.2%; ≥4 h group=5.5%; p-value=0.033) was decreased in the ≥4 h group. Conclusions The timing of gabapentin administration less than or more than 4 h preoperatively in patients ≥18 years does not significantly affect postoperative somnolence or respiratory depression. Further, it does not have a significant effect on GCS scores or VAS scores.

ObjectivesThe study aim was to evaluate the diagnostic performance of the uterine sliding sign in predicting deeply infiltrating endometriosis in the setting of non‐physician sonographers performing but not interpreting the maneuver. The impact of uterine sliding sign has not been previously demonstrated in this practice setting.MethodsPhysicians' remote interpretations of transvaginal ultrasound examinations in 2016, before uterine sliding sign, were compared to examinations in 2019 after addition of uterine sliding sign to determine the diagnostic rates. Surgical and histopathological results were reviewed to determine sensitivity and specificity of the respective exam techniques.ResultsTwo hundred eighty‐five transvaginal ultrasounds were performed in 2016 and 390 sliding sign ultrasounds in 2019. The number of deeply infiltrating endometriosis cases identified increased significantly from 2% to 6% during the study period (chi‐square, Fisher's exact test p = .012). The sensitivity and specificity of routine pelvic sonography for detecting deeply infiltrating endometriosis improved from 36%/94% to 68%/98%.ConclusionsUterine sliding sign videos should be included in the standard sonographic protocol for patients presenting with chronic pelvic pain, endometriosis history, or sonographic evidence of endometriosis in the setting of physicians interpreting sonographic images obtained by non‐physicians.

Objective The aim of the study was to determine the rate of return to baseline functional status 3 months after surgery for pelvic organ prolapse (POP) in women 65 years or older. Methods This is a multicenter prospective cohort study of women older than 65 years undergoing POP surgery. Functional status was determined by the Activities Assessment Scale at the preoperative visit and 3 months after surgery. We compared a variety of clinical variables and preoperative functional status scores for women who worsened, improved, or returned to baseline functional status after surgery using univariable and multivariable analysis. Results A total of 192 women were enrolled in the study. Of 176 women who completed both sets of questionnaires, 59% improved, 35% returned, and 6% worsened from their baseline functional status. Variables significantly associated with postoperative functional status score were depression ( P < 0.002) and preoperative functional status score ( P < 0.001). The group that improved from baseline had the lowest (worst) preoperative functional status score (78.7 ± 16.4), whereas the group that worsened after surgery had the highest (best) preoperative functional status score (98.6 ± 2.2). After adjusting for age and depression, higher preoperative functional status score was predictive of failure to return to baseline functional status. Conclusions Most older women undergoing surgery for POP, including those with low preoperative functional status, return to or improve from their baseline functional status within 3 months of surgery. Women with higher functional status before surgery are less likely to report improvement in physical functioning after surgery.