Manrique, Oscar J.

Controversy exists regarding the influence of breast cancer–related lymphedema (BCRL) in the development of peripheral neuropathies. Our aim was to evaluate the association of secondary lymphedema with peripheral neuropathies in patients with breast cancer. We performed a systematic review by querying PubMed, EMBASE, Ovid Medline and Epub Ahead of Print, In-Process & Other Non-Indexed Citations, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases. The keywords “lymphedema” AND (“neuropathy” OR “carpal tunnel syndrome” OR “cubital tunnel syndrome” OR “neuropathic pain”) and synonyms in titles and abstracts were used to perform the search. Seventeen articles met the inclusion criteria. Discrepancies were found in studies that analyzed whether a cause-effect association exists between carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS) and secondary lymphedema. No evidence indicated that lymphedema predisposes to developing peripheral neuropathies such as CTS or brachial plexopathy. No studies found an association between patients with breast cancer at risk of or with lymphedema and the development or worsening of CTS. Carpal tunnel release can be safely performed in patients with BCRL. Neuropathic pain worsens with lymphedema, and treatment seems to improve the pain. Our study did not find enough evidence to conclude that BCRL is associated with the development of peripheral neuropathies. Carpal tunnel release is a safe procedure that can be performed in patients with BCRL and does not influence the development or worsening of lymphedema. Neuropathic pain seems to worsen after development of lymphedema, and treatment has been found to improve neuropathic pain.

SinopsisObjetivo:El objetivo de este estudio fue presentar diferentes opciones de manejo de heridas de difícil cicatrización utilizando colgajos libres microvasculares.Método:Se llevó a cabo una revisión retrospectiva de todos los pacientes con heridas traumáticas de difícil cicatrización, a quienes se les realizó reconstrucción con colgajo libre. Se analizaron datos demográficos, etiología de la herida, diagnóstico, tratamiento previo de la herida, tipo de colgajo utilizado, dimensiones del defecto y del colgajo, vasos receptores, complicaciones, y seguimiento.Resultados:En total, 20 pacientes fueron sometidos a reconstrucciones con colgajos libres. La edad promedio fue de 39,5 años. Se realizaron 20 colgajos libres, entre ellos: 3 de piernas cruzadas, 1 de piernas cruzadas con puente vascular, 2 osteocutáneos de peroné, 6 fasciocutáneos anterolateral del muslo, 3 perforantes de la arteria toracodorsal, 3 miocutáneos dorsal ancho, y 2 fasciocutáneos de la perforante de la arteria femoral profunda. Un paciente requirió revisión de anastomosis microvascular debido a un hematoma. El resto de los pacientes no presentó intercurrencias en el postoperatorio. Respecto al tratamiento previo, 12 pacientes recibieron terapia de presión negativa, mientras que 8 tuvieron desbridamientos quirúrgicos con subsecuente aplicación de hidrogel con plata iónica.Conclusión:Las heridas de difícil cicatrización no tienen una buena respuesta al tratamiento convencional con curaciones, injertos o colgajos locales, sino que requieren la transferencia de tejidos similares a los que se han perdido. Las técnicas microvasculares pueden ser una alternativa.

SinopsisObjetivo:El objetivo de este estudio fue presentar diferentes opciones de manejo de heridas de difícil cicatrización utilizando colgajos libres microvasculares.Método:Se llevó a cabo una revisión retrospectiva de todos los pacientes con heridas traumáticas de difícil cicatrización, a quienes se les realizó reconstrucción con colgajo libre. Se analizaron datos demográficos, etiología de la herida, diagnóstico, tratamiento previo de la herida, tipo de colgajo utilizado, dimensiones del defecto y del colgajo, vasos receptores, complicaciones, y seguimiento.Resultados:En total, 20 pacientes fueron sometidos a reconstrucciones con colgajos libres. La edad promedio fue de 39,5 años. Se realizaron 20 colgajos libres, entre ellos: 3 de piernas cruzadas, 1 de piernas cruzadas con puente vascular, 2 osteocutáneos de peroné, 6 fasciocutáneos anterolateral del muslo, 3 perforantes de la arteria toracodorsal, 3 miocutáneos dorsal ancho, y 2 fasciocutáneos de la perforante de la arteria femoral profunda. Un paciente requirió revisión de anastomosis microvascular debido a un hematoma. El resto de los pacientes no presentó intercurrencias en el postoperatorio. Respecto al tratamiento previo, 12 pacientes recibieron terapia de presión negativa, mientras que 8 tuvieron desbridamientos quirúrgicos con subsecuente aplicación de hidrogel con plata iónica.Conclusión:Las heridas de difícil cicatrización no tienen una buena respuesta al tratamiento convencional con curaciones, injertos o colgajos locales, sino que requieren la transferencia de tejidos similares a los que se han perdido. Las técnicas microvasculares pueden ser una alternativa.

Background Lymphedema treatment is an ongoing challenge. It impacts quality of life due to pain, loss of range of motion of the extremity, and repeated episodes of cellulitis. Different modalities have been used to evaluate lymphedema; some are more error-prone and some are more invasive. However, these measurements are poorly standardized, and intrarater and interrater reliabilities are difficult to achieve. This pilot study aims to assess the feasibility of ultrasound vibroelastography for assessing patients with extremity lymphedema via measuring shear wave speeds of subcutaneous tissues. Methods Patients with clinical and lymphoscintigraphic diagnosis of secondary lymphedema in the extremities without prior surgical treatment were included. A 0.1-s harmonic vibration was generated at three frequencies (100, 150, and 200 Hz) by the indenter of a handheld shaker on the skin. An ultrasound probe was used for noninvasively capturing of wave propagation in the subcutaneous tissue. Wave speeds were measured in the subcutaneous tissues of both the control and affected extremities. Results A total of 11 female patients with secondary lymphedema in the extremities were enrolled in this study. The magnitudes of the wave speeds of the region of interest in the subcutaneous tissue at lymphedema sites in the upper extremity (3.9 ± 0.17 m/s, 5.96 ± 0.67 m/s, and 7.41 ± 1.09 m/s) were statistically higher than those of the control sites (2.1 ± 0.27 m/s, 2.93 ± 0.57 m/s, and 3.56 ± 0.76 m/s) at 100, 150, and 200 Hz (P < 0.05), and at 100 and 200 Hz (P < 0.05) between lymphedema (4.33 ± 0.35 m/s, 4.17 ± 1.00 m/s, and 4.56 ± 0.37 m/s) and controls sites (2.48 ± 0.43 m/s, 2.77 ± 0.55 m/s, and 3.06 ± 0.29 m/s) in the lower extremity. Conclusions These preliminary data suggest that ultrasound vibroelastography may be useful in the evaluation of secondary lymphedema and can be a valuable tool to noninvasively track treatment progress.

Background Vascularized gastroepiploic lymph node flaps have become a popular option to treat patients with extremity lymphedema. Overall, 2 surgical approaches to harvest this flap have been described: laparoscopic and open. In this study, we analyzed complications, harvesting time, and patient satisfaction scores, comparing these 2 techniques. Methods Between 2012– and 2018, all patients with extremity lymphedema and candidates for the gastroepiploic flap harvest were included. Two groups were compared: open and laparoscopic approaches. Flap harvest time, postoperative pain, complications, return of gastrointestinal motility, time to discharge, and patient satisfaction scores were assessed. Results A total of 177 patients were included, of which 126 underwent laparoscopic harvest and 51 patients underwent open approach. Only 2 patients in the laparoscopic group had prior abdominal surgery not related to cancer treatment compared with 7 patients in the open approach (P < 0.01). Average surgical completion time for the laparoscopic versus open approach was 136 and 102 minutes, respectively (P < 0.02). Postoperative complications for the laparoscopic versus open were as follows: 1 patient developed pancreatitis and 2 developed ileus in the laparoscopic approach, whereas 3 patients developed ileus, 1 developed small bowel obstruction, 2 developed superficial site infection, and 1 developed minor wound dehiscence in the open approach. No patient required further surgical intervention. Average return of gastrointestinal function was 1 day (laparoscopic) and 2 days (open), respectively. On a pain scale, pain scores at postoperative day 1 and upon discharge were on average 3 versus 7 and 2 versus 5, respectively (P < 0.05). Lengths of hospital stay were on average 2 days in the laparoscopic group and 5 days in the open group (P < 0.001). Patient satisfaction scores based on pain and scars were significantly better in the laparoscopic group versus open group (P < 0.03). Conclusions These data support that a minimal invasive approach is ideal and efficient when resources are available. In addition, the lower complication rate and high patient satisfaction scores give promising feedback to continue offering this technique.