Pagliaro, Lance C.

696 Background: A number of treatments for metastatic renal cell carcinoma (RCC) have been FDA approved since December, 2005. Trials evaluating these agents excluded non-clear cell histologies and therefore the efficacy of these treatments remains unclear in patients (pts) with metastatic non-clear cell RCC (mncRCC). Methods: This is a single arm Phase II study designed to determine the efficacy of pazopanib in mncRCC. Treatment was pazopanib 800 mg by mouth daily until progression or intolerability of treatment. Dose reductions were allowed for toxicity with dose level -1 being 600 mg daily and dose level -2, 400 mg daily. Cycles were every 28 days. Main eligibility criteria included: (1) age ³ 18 years old; (2) histologic confirmation of ncRCC; (3) ECOG Performance Status (PS) 0, 1, or 2; (4) up to one prior treatment for mncRCC (5) measurable or non-measurable metastatic disease per RECIST criteria. The primary endpoint was overall survival rate at 12 months. Secondary endpoints were best tumor response rates after two cycles, PFS, OS and toxicity. Results: 38 pts were enrolled between May 16, 2013 and February 1, 2018. 35 pts were evaluable for primary endpoint. Median age 63 years old and 22/35 (62.9%) were male. Most common histology was papillary RCC, 14/35 (40%), and most common number of metastatic sites was 1. 29/35 (82.9%) had prior nephrectomy and 30/35 (85.7%) had no prior systemic therapy. Median number of cycles was 5. 12-month OS was 65.7% (90% CI, 50.5-78.9%). Best response in first 2 cycles: PR 11%, SD 60%, PD 9%, not evaluated 20%. Median PFS was 7.5 months (90% CI, 5.0-11.0); median OS 18.9 months (90% CI, 13.0-NE). Grade 3 / 4 AEs seen in 25 pts with hypertension, transaminitis and abdominal pain being most common (seen in >10%). Conclusions: There are limited data about the efficacy of available therapies for mncRCC. This study shows that pazopanib has similar efficacy compared to historical data in clinical trials using other TKIs in mncRCC. The safety profile of pazopanib in pts with mncRCC was found to be similar to that found in prior clinical trials studying pazopanib. Our findings warrant further investigation into the utility of pazopanib in metastatic ncRCC. Clinical trial information: NCT01767636.

139 Background: C may enhance response to immune checkpoint inhibitors by promoting an immune-permissive microenvironment. COSMIC-021 (NCT03170960), a multinational phase 1b study, is evaluating the combination of C with A in various solid tumors. We report interim results from Cohort 6 in mCRPC. Methods: Eligible pts were required to have radiographic progression in soft tissue after enzalutamide and/or abiraterone, measurable disease, and an ECOG PS of 0 or 1. Prior chemotherapy for mCSPC was permitted. Pts received C 40 mg PO qd and A 1200 mg IV q3w. CT/MRI scans were performed q6w for 52w and q12w thereafter. Bone scans were performed q12w. The primary endpoint is ORR per RECIST 1.1. Other endpoints include safety, ORR per irRECIST, duration of response (DOR), PFS, and OS. Results: As of Oct 2019, 44 mCRPC pts were enrolled with a median follow-up of 10.6 mo (range 3.4+, 17.9). Median age was 70 y (range 49, 90), 50% had ECOG PS 1, 34% had visceral metastases, and 61% had extrapelvic lymph node metastases. 27% of pts had prior docetaxel and 52% had ≥2 prior novel hormonal therapies. The most common any grade TEAEs were fatigue (57%), nausea (48%), decreased appetite (45%), diarrhea (39%), PPE (32%), and vomiting (32%). One Grade 5 TRAE of dehydration was reported in a 90 y/o. Median duration of treatment was 5.3 mo. The ORR per RECIST 1.1 among all pts was 32% (2 CRs [4.5%] and 12 PRs [27%]); 21 (48%) pts had SD giving a disease control rate of 80% in all pts. One pt with initial PD per RECIST 1.1 had an irPR per irRECIST. ORR per RECIST 1.1 was 33% in 36 pts with high-risk clinical features (visceral and/or extrapelvic lymph node metastases). Median DOR for all pts with response per RECIST 1.1 was 8.3 mo (range 1.38+, 9.76+). In 12 responders with at least 1 post-baseline PSA evaluation, 8 (67%) had a PSA decline ≥50%. Conclusions: The combination of C+A had a tolerable safety profile and demonstrated clinically meaningful activity with durable responses in men with mCRPC. Given the encouraging activity in these pts, especially in those with visceral and/or extra pelvic lymph node metastases, further evaluation of C+A in men with mCRPC is being pursued. Clinical trial information: NCT03170960.

6592 Background: Sex, age and ECOG performance status (PS) may affect immune response and the efficacy of cancer immunotherapy with immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI). We did a meta-analysis to assess the potential sex, age and ECOG PS differences of immunotherapy efficacy in advanced cancer. Methods: PubMed was searched up to January 15, 2019 for randomized controlled trials (RCT) comparing overall survival (OS) in patients with advanced cancer treated with ICI immunotherapy vs control therapy (without ICI). For sex difference analysis, pooled hazard ratio (HR) of death for men and women was calculated separately, and the heterogeneity between the two estimates was assessed using an interaction test by pooling study-specific interaction HR. Age ( < 65 vs ≥65) and ECOG PS (0 vs ≥1) difference was analyzed similarly. Subgroup analysis by cancer type and line of therapy (frontline vs subsequent) was explored. All analyses were done in Comprehensive Meta Analysis (v2) with random effects models. Results: Thirty phase 2/3 RCTs involving 17,728 patients were included. An OS benefit of immunotherapy was found for both men (HR 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.69-0.81, P < 0.01) and women (HR 0.79, 95% CI 0.69-0.90, P < 0.01); for both younger ( < 65; HR 0.75, 95% CI 0.68-0.83, P < 0.01) and older (≥65; HR 0.76, 95% CI 0.69-0.83, P < 0.01) patients; and for both ECOG PS 0 (HR 0.78, 95% CI 0.69-0.89, P < 0.01) and PS ≥1 (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.71-0.84, P < 0.01) patients. No significant difference of relative benefit from immunotherapy over control therapy was found in patients with different sex ( P = 0.283), age ( P = 0.906) or ECOG PS ( P = 0.783). In melanoma RCTs, compared with women (HR 0.77, 95% CI 0.64-0.94, P < 0.01), men (HR 0.56, 95% CI 0.42-0.76, P < 0.01) had more OS benefit from immunotherapy ( P = 0.037). No significant difference was found in other subgroup analyses by cancer types or line of therapy. Conclusions: Overall we found no evidence of association of sex, age, or ECOG PS with cancer immunotherapy efficacy. However, in melanoma, men might benefit more from immunotherapy than women.

5078 Background: Strategies integrating androgen targeted and locoregional therapies are being increasingly used in PCa with regional spread, but are rarely curative. Angiogenesis inhibitors delay progression in castration resistant PCa and may synergize with ADT through endothelial cell apoptosis in hormone naïve patients (pts). We hypothesized that the frontline combination of ADT with the potent VEGF inhibitor Axi would improve PCa control relative to ADT alone and allow for meaningful time off systemic therapy after surgical consolidation. Methods: Pts with either clinically detected LN+ (TxN1M0 or TxNxM1a) or very high risk for LN PCa were treated with ADT for 2 mos and then randomized 2:1 to respectively add open label Axi (5 mg PO bid) vs. continue ADT alone for 4 mos until surgery. Those responding with PSA ≤5 ng/mL were offered prostatectomy and extended pelvic lymphadenectomy (RP). ADT +/- Axi was withheld postoperatively and PSA measured q3 mos until 1 y. Primary objective: proportion of pts progression free (FFP) 12 mos after RP, defined as PSA ≤1.0 ng/mL and no radiation or ADT, aiming to detect a 35% difference favoring ADT+Axi. Results: 72 pts completed accrual. We report on the 54 pts with LN+ disease: median age 62 y (range 42-76), pretreatment PSA 22.9 ng/mL (range 3.6 - 404.4), 38 N1 / 16 M1a. Table shows presurgical therapy outcomes. Path responses in the prostate were similar between arms, but in 5 ADT+Axi vs. 0 ADT LN+ pts there was no residual nodal disease. Testosterone recovery: 24/26 ADT+Axi and 9/9 ADT RP pts by 6 mos. 21/36 ADT+Axi and 15/18 ADT pts have failed; 1 y FFP estimates 48.0% (SE 8.6%) and 16.7% (SE 8.3%), respectively (p = 0.02). 1 y undetectable PSA 9 pts (6 ADT+Axi). No grade 4 toxicities or unexpected side-effects were observed. Conclusions: 1 year after RP, ADT+Axi resulted in proportionally greater number of LN+ PCa pts off treatment and progression free than ADT alone. Tissue analysis is evaluating predictors of benefit to further develop angiogenesis inhibition as part of combination strategies for hormone naïve PCa. Clinical trial information: NCT01409200. [Table: see text]

TPS679 Background: AA has re-emerged as a promising anti-cancer agent based on recent knowledge of pharmacokinetics, discovery of unexpected mechanisms of action, and early phase trials with IV AA.(Shenoy et al, Cancer Cell 34: 2018, in press) We hypothesized that ccRCC would be particularly susceptible to anti-cancer effects of IV AA due to: a. TET dependent demethylation of the hypermethylated genome of ccRCC causing re-expression of tumor suppressors (Shenoy et al, AACR 2018 Targeting DNA methylation conf. A11; Hu et al, Clin Cancer Res 20:4349-60, 2014) b. H2O2 production causing intra-tumoral oxidative damage, hypothesized to be enhanced by high iron content in RCC microenvironment c. Intracellular accumulation of dehydroascorbic acid secondary to high HIF activity in ccRCC. Animal data and case reports support the hypothesis. Methods: Trial design: Patients (pts) with newly diagnosed metastatic/ unresectable ccRCC are randomized 1:1 to arm A (pazopanib 800 mg/d plus IV AA 1g/kg 3 times/week) or arm B (pazopanib 800 mg/d). Protocol treatment is for 10 cycles (unless PD, unacceptable AE, alternative therapy, or pt refusal), each cycle being 28 days. Primary endpoint is Treatment Failure-Free rate at 40 weeks (TFF40). Treatment Failure is defined as: Radiographic disease progression, off-protocol treatment due to AE, alternative therapy initiation (except metastasectomy post clinical benefit), or death. Secondary endpoints include OS, PFS, ORR and AE. Statistical methods: 82 eligible pts (41 in each in arm) will provide 81% power to detect a 19% increase of TFF40 from 45% in arm B to 64% in arm A assuming a one-sided type I error rate of 0.19 (EAST 6.4). Correlatives: Epigenetic mechanism: 5mC, 5hmC and H3K27me3 IHC, MeDIP/ hMeDIP seq, RNA seq. H2O2 mechanism: tumor microenvironment iron, tumor catalase IHC. Dehydroascorbic acid mechanism: HIF-1 alpha, HIF-2 alpha, GLUT-1 IHC. Key exclusion criteria: G6PD deficiency, renal disease (Cockcroft Gault CrCl < 55 ml/min). ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT03334409 Status: Open for accrual in 9/10 planned sites. Funding Source: Foundation. Clinical trial information: NCT03334409.

The diagnosis and treatment of rare genitourinary tumors is inherently challenging. The Rare Diseases Act of 2002 initially defined a rare disorder as one that affects fewer than 200,000 Americans. The lack of widely available clinical guidelines, limited research funding, and inaccessible clinical trials often lead to difficulty with treatment decisions to guide practitioners in rendering effective care for patients with rare genitourinary cancers. This article will discuss basic tenets of diagnosis and treatment as well as recent developments and clinical trials in rare non-urothelial bladder cancers and penile squamous cell cancers.

4519 Background: Tandem HDC with carbo/etoposide (CE) is curative for a portion of relapsed GCT pts. However, outcomes of refractory or high-risk relapsed pts remain poor. We tested a new HDC regimen of GemDMC, based on DNA damage repair inhibition. We combined BEV with HDC given their potential synergy and the high vascularity of GCT metastases. Methods: Eligibility: Intermediate (int)/high-risk (Beyer Model), creatinine ≤1.8 mg/dL and adequate organ function. HDC included BEV (5 mg/kg) preceding GemDMC (HDC #1) and ifosfamide/CE (ICE) (HDC #2). Following accrual of 42 pts, we amended the trial omitting BEV. The trial was powered to distinguish a target 50% 2-yr RFS from an expected 25% in this population. Results: We enrolled 69 male pts in cohorts 1 (BEV, N=42) and 2 (no BEV, N=27) (Table). Pts were heavily pretreated and most had refractory tumors. Main AE: mucositis and renal (4 HDC-related deaths in cohort 1, 1 in cohort 2). Tumor markers normalized in 90% pts with active tumors at HDC. After HDC, 19 pts were in CR and 28 in PRm- (of these, 22 had residual lesions resected with no viable tumor found in 20/22, 2 xRT, 4 monitored). Median f/u = 39 (2-105) mo. The 2-yr RFS rates in cohorts 1 and 2 = 52% and 78%, respectively. Their respective 2-yr OS rates = 55% and 81%. Conclusions: Sequential HDC with GemDMC–ICE shows encouraging outcomes in heavily pretreated and refractory GCT, exceeding the anticipated results. Addition of BEV increases toxicity but not tumor control. Clinical trial information: NCT00936936. [Table: see text]

e13073 Background: We observed several patients with a personal history of both RCC and myeloid malignancy, and aimed to explore a possible association, especially given the similarity in their epigenetic landscape, with both being characterized by widespread aberrant hypermethylation (Hu C et al, CCR 2014; Jiang Y et al, Blood 2009). Methods: Mayo Clinic’s ‘Advanced Cohort Explorer’ database was used to identify patients with a history of both RCC and a myeloid malignancy - Acute Myelogenous Leukemia (AML), Myeloproliferative Neoplasms (MPN), Myelodysplastic syndromes (MDS) - and to determine the clinical characteristics. The incidence of MDS in patients ≥65 years with a history of RCC was compared to that in the general population ≥65 years (SEER- Medicare database) as well as the general patient population at Mayo Clinic, using one sample test of proportions. Results: A total of 59 patients were identified, with both biopsy proven RCC and a myeloid malignancy during their life time (12 AML, 9 MPN, 9 low risk MDS and 29 intermediate- high risk MDS). The cohort was characterized by marked male predominance (4.4: 1). Median age at RCC diagnosis was 64 years (range 37-87) and myeloid malignancy was 75 years (range 44-90). 46/59 patients had the RCC antecedent, 10/59 concurrent and 3/59 subsequent to the myeloid malignancy with a median time of myeloid malignancy diagnosis after RCC diagnosis of 7.7 years. For patients ≥65 years, the risk of developing MDS with a history of stage I/II RCC and nephrectomy was 5.26 times that of the general population based on the SEER-Medicare database (Cogle, Blood 2011)(395/100,000 vs 75/100,000; p value < 0.001), and 3.07 times that of the general population at Mayo Clinic (395/100,000 vs 128.4/100,000; p value < 0. 001). Conclusions: We observed an association between RCC and myeloid malignancies, particularly MDS; with a history of RCC conferring a substantially increased risk of developing MDS. We hypothesize that the perturbation of epigenetic landscape in the form of widespread hypermethylation may explain, in part, the association between the two malignancies; and aim to explore the potential aberrancy of epigenetic regulators in our patient cohort with a genomic, epigenomic and transcriptomic analysis.