Obokata, Masaru

Abstract Aims Little data are available regarding prognostic implications of invasive exercise testing in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF). The present study aimed to investigate whether rest and exercise central haemodynamic abnormalities are associated with adverse clinical outcomes in patients with dyspnea. Methods and results Patients with exertional dyspnoea and ejection fraction ≥50% (n = 764) underwent invasive exercise testing and follow-up for heart failure hospitalization or death. There were 117 patients with events over a median follow-up of 2.7 (interquartile range 0.5–4.6) years. Among patients with normal resting pulmonary artery wedge pressure (PAWP) (<15 mmHg, n = 380 [50%]), increased exercise PAWP (≥25 mmHg) was present in 187 (24% of cohort) and was associated with 2.4-fold higher risk of events compared to those with normal exercise PAWP (<25 mmHg, n = 193 [25%]) (hazard ratio [HR] 2.44; 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.11–5.36; p = 0.03), while patients with elevated resting PAWP (≥15 mmHg, n = 384 [50%]) displayed even higher risk compared to HFpEF with normal resting PAWP (HR 2.24; 95% CI 1.38–3.65; p = 0.001). Similar findings were observed for rest/exercise right atrial pressure, and rest/exercise pulmonary artery pressures. Higher peak oxygen consumption was associated with decreased risk of events, and this relationship was solely explained by exercise cardiac output. In a multivariable-adjusted Cox model, each 1 standard deviation (SD) increase in exercise PAWP was associated with a 41% greater hazard of events (HR 1.41; 95% CI 1.13–1.76; p = 0.002), while each 1 SD decrease in exercise cardiac output was associated with a 37% increased risk (HR 0.63; 95% CI 0.47–0.83; p = 0.001). Conclusions Haemodynamic abnormalities currently used for diagnosis of HFpEF are associated with increased risk for adverse events. Treatments that reduce central pressures while improving cardiac output reserve may offer greatest benefit to improve outcomes in HFpEF.

Abstract Obesity and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) represent two intermingling epidemics driving perhaps the greatest unmet health problem in cardiovascular medicine in the 21st century. Many patients with HFpEF are either overweight or obese, and recent data have shown that increased body fat and its attendant metabolic sequelae have widespread, protean effects systemically and on the cardiovascular system leading to symptomatic HFpEF. The paucity of effective therapies in HFpEF underscores the importance of understanding the distinct pathophysiological mechanisms of obese HFpEF to develop novel therapies. In this review, we summarize the current understanding of the cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular features of the obese phenotype of HFpEF, how increased adiposity might pathophysiologically contribute to the phenotype, and how these processes might be targeted therapeutically.

Abstract Aims Obesity is a risk factor for heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), particularly in women, but the mechanisms remain unclear. The present study aimed to investigate the impact of central adiposity in patients with HFpEF and explore potential sex differences. Methods and results A total of 124 women and 105 men with HFpEF underwent invasive haemodynamic exercise testing and rest echocardiography. Central obesity was defined as a waist circumference (WC) ≥88 cm for women and ≥102 cm for men. Exercise‐normalized pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP) responses were evaluated by the ratio of PCWP to workload (PCWP/W) and after normalizing to body weight (PCWL). The prevalence of central obesity (77%) exceeded that of general obesity (62%) defined by body mass index ≥30 kg/m 2 . Compared to patients without central adiposity, patients with HFpEF and central obesity displayed greater prevalence of diabetes and dyslipidaemia, higher right and left heart filling pressures and pulmonary artery pressures during exertion, and more severely reduced aerobic capacity. Associations between WC and fasting glucose, low‐density lipoprotein (LDL) cholesterol, peak workload, and pulmonary artery pressures were observed in women but not in men with HFpEF. Although increased WC was associated with elevated PCWP in both sexes, the association with PCWP/W was observed in women but not in men. The strength of correlation between PCWP/W and WC was more robust in women with HFpEF as compared to men (Meng's test p = 0.0008), and a significant sex interaction was observed in the relationship between PCWL and WC ( p for interaction = 0.02). Conclusions Central obesity is even more common than general obesity in HFpEF, and there appear to be important sexual dimorphisms in its relationships with metabolic abnormalities and haemodynamic perturbations, with greater impact in women.

Abstract Aims Pulmonary hypertension (PH) and pulmonary vascular disease (PVD) are common and associated with adverse outcomes in left heart disease (LHD). This study sought to characterize the pathophysiology of PVD across the spectrum of PH in LHD. Methods and results Patients with PH-LHD [mean pulmonary artery (PA) pressure >20 mmHg and PA wedge pressure (PAWP) ≥15 mmHg] and controls free of PH or LHD underwent invasive haemodynamic exercise testing with simultaneous echocardiography, expired air and blood gas analysis, and lung ultrasound in a prospective study. Patients with PH-LHD were divided into isolated post-capillary PH (IpcPH) and PVD [combined post- and pre-capillary PH (CpcPH)] based upon pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR <3.0 or ≥3.0 WU). As compared with controls (n = 69) and IpcPH-LHD (n = 55), participants with CpcPH-LHD (n = 40) displayed poorer left atrial function and more severe right ventricular (RV) dysfunction at rest. With exercise, patients with CpcPH-LHD displayed similar PAWP to IpcPH-LHD, but more severe RV–PA uncoupling, greater ventricular interaction, and more severe impairments in cardiac output, O2 delivery, and peak O2 consumption. Despite higher PVR, participants with CpcPH developed more severe lung congestion compared with both IpcPH-LHD and controls, which was associated lower arterial O2 tension, reduced alveolar ventilation, decreased pulmonary O2 diffusion, and greater ventilation-perfusion mismatch. Conclusions Pulmonary vascular disease in LHD is associated with a distinct pathophysiologic signature marked by greater exercise-induced lung congestion, arterial hypoxaemia, RV–PA uncoupling, ventricular interdependence, and impairment in O2 delivery, impairing aerobic capacity. Further study is required to identify novel treatments targeting the pulmonary vasculature in PH-LHD.

Introduction: Obesity is common in heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and is directly linked with lower levels of physical activity (PA). Visceral adiposity (VAT) is more common in HFpEF than controls and may play a role in its pathogenesis, characterized by impaired exercise capacity (peak VO 2 ). The direct relationship between VAT and PA in HFpEF is unknown. Hypothesis: Compared to controls, HFpEF patients will have excess regional adiposity (VAT, subcutaneous (SAT), and intramuscular (IMAT)), and these fat depots will be associated with lower levels of chronic physical activity. Methods: HFpEF patients (n=51; age 70±9) and non-HFpEF controls (n=49; age 65±5) prospectively underwent body composition measurement by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging. Peak VO 2 was measured by standard cardiopulmonary exercise testing. PA was monitored continuously via accelerometry over two weeks. Data were binned in arbitrary accelerometry units, averaged and stored in 30-second epochs (counts per epoch, CPE). Models were adjusted for age, sex, and ideal body weight. Results: HFpEF were less active overall (3.15±0.80 vs 3.59±0.73 CPE), had less moderate intensity PA (10.13±0.04 vs 10.15±0.03 CPE), and less morning (3.83±1.15 vs 4.24±1.09 CPE) and afternoon (3.84± 1.20 vs 4.53± 0.97 CPE) (p<0.05 for all) PA. Patients with HFpEF spent a greater proportion of time sedentary (0.71±0.08 vs 0.67±0.08 CPE) and less time in moderate (0.04±0.03 vs 0.06±0.03 CPE) and vigorous (0.02±0.01 vs 0.03±0.03 CPE) PA (p<0.01 for all). Chronic PA was significantly associated with regional fat depots (VAT β= -0.003, 95% CI: -0.004-0.001; SAT β= -0.003, 95%CI: -0.004-0.001; IMAT β=-0.02, 95% CI: -0.04—0.01) as a combined cohort (p<0.01 for all). Muscle quality (β=0.28, 95%CI: 0.15-0.40), peak VO 2 (β=0.08, 95% CI: 0.03-0.13), and peak watts (β=0.01, 95% CI: -0.004-0.02) were associated with PA in HFpEF only (p≤0.01 for all). Conclusions: The amount and pattern of PA differs between HFpEF and controls, as do relationships between regional fat depots and PA, and the relationship of PA and peak VO 2 . Further investigation is needed to better understand the temporality and mechanisms related to the pathophysiology and severity of HFpEF.

Introduction: Obesity is prevalent in HFpEF, a syndrome that disproportionality affects women, and is associated with poor exercise tolerance (VO 2 ), reduced quality of life, and greater symptoms. Visceral adipose tissue (VAT), more than general obesity, is related to metabolic and cardiovascular dysfunction common to HFpEF. While fat deposition varies between sexes, these differences and the relation to exercise tolerance remain unclear in HFpEF. Hypothesis: Compared to sex-matched controls, HFpEF patients will demonstrate reduced lean mass, excess VAT, subcutaneous, visceral, and intramuscular fat, and will be associated with reduced VO 2 . Methods: HFpEF females (F) and males (M) (n=78; 37 F/41 M; age 70±9) and non-HFpEF controls (n=50; 30 F/20 M; age 65±5) prospectively underwent body composition measurement via dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and cardiopulmonary exercise testing for measurement of peak oxygen consumption (peak VO 2 ). Muscle quality calculated as peak Watts (W) achieved divided by MRI thigh lean mass. Results: HFpEF had greater VAT, subcutaneous (SAT) and intramuscular (IMAT), and poorer muscle quality than controls (all p<0.01). Exercise performance was lower in HFpEF (peak VO 2 : 14±4 vs. 22±6; peak W: 69±29 vs. 116±34; both p<0.01). HFpEF demonstrated increased odds for VAT (OR: 2.02, 95% CI: 1.22-3.37), SAT (OR: 2.05, 95% CI: 1.20-3.49), and IMAT (OR: 2.04, 95% CI: 1.35-3.39) (all p<0.01). Sex-stratification revealed increased odds of excess VAT in HFpEF females (OR: 2.76, 95% CI: 1.16-7.72, p=0.03), SAT in HFpEF males (OR: 3.64, 95% CI: 1.10-12.07, p=0.03), and IMAT in HFpEF females (OR: 2.38, 95%CI: 1.10-5.29, p=0.03) with a trend in males (OR: 1.67, 95%CI: 0.97-2.86, p=0.06). Impaired VO 2 was associated with all AT depots as a combined cohort and among controls (all p<0.01) and linked to poor muscle quality individually for men and women in HFpEF and controls (all p<0.01). Conclusion: HFpEF patients have significantly altered body composition profiles and reduced exercise tolerance compared to controls. Sex differences in regional fat deposition impact peak VO 2 and may serve a distinct role in the pathophysiology of HFpEF.

Abstract Background A substantial proportion of patients with heart failure (HF) with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) present with normal natriuretic peptide (NP) levels. The pathophysiology and natural history for this phenotype remain unclear. Methods and results Consecutive subjects undergoing invasive cardiopulmonary exercise testing for unexplained dyspnoea at Mayo Clinic in 2006–18 were studied. Heart failure with preserved ejection fraction was defined as a pulmonary arterial wedge pressure (PAWP) ≥15 mmHg (rest) or ≥25 mmHg (exercise). Patients with HFpEF and normal NP [N-terminal of the pro-hormone B-type natriuretic peptide (NT-proBNP) &lt; 125 ng/L] were compared with HFpEF with high NP (NT-proBNP ≥ 125 ng/L) and controls with normal haemodynamics. Patients with HFpEF and normal (n = 157) vs. high NP (n = 263) were younger, yet older than controls (n = 161), with an intermediate comorbidity profile. Normal NP HFpEF was associated with more left ventricular hypertrophy and worse diastolic function compared with controls, but better diastolic function, lower left atrial volumes, superior right ventricular function, and less mitral/tricuspid regurgitation compared with high NP HFpEF. Cardiac output (CO) reserve with exercise was preserved in normal NP HFpEF [101% predicted, interquartile range (IQR): 75–124%], but this was achieved only at the cost of higher left ventricular transmural pressure (LVTMP) (14 ± 6 mmHg vs. 7 ± 4 mmHg in controls, P &lt; 0.001). In contrast, CO reserve was decreased in high NP HFpEF (85% predicted, IQR: 59–109%), with lower LVTMP (10 ± 8 mmHg) compared with normal NP HFpEF (P &lt; 0.001), despite similar PAWP. Patients with high NP HFpEF displayed the highest event rates, but normal NP HFpEF still had 2.7-fold higher risk for mortality or HF readmissions compared with controls (hazard ratio: 2.74, 95% confidence interval: 1.02–7.32) after adjusting for age, sex, and body mass index. Conclusion Patients with HFpEF and normal NP display mild diastolic dysfunction and preserved CO reserve during exercise, despite marked elevation in filling pressures. While clinical outcomes are not as poor compared with patients with high NP, patients with normal NP HFpEF exhibit increased risk of death or HF readmissions compared with patients without HF, emphasizing the importance of this phenotype.

Abstract Aims Patients with obesity frequently present with dyspnoea. Biomarkers that reflect wall stress are often used to evaluate circulatory congestion and help determine whether dyspnoea is of cardiac causes. Patients with obesity display greater external restraint on the heart, which may alter relationships between intravascular pressures and stress markers. Methods and results Subjects with unexplained dyspnoea ( n = 212) underwent cardiac catheterization with simultaneous echocardiography. Blood sampling was performed in a subset ( n = 58). Relationships between echocardiographic and blood biomarkers of circulatory congestion and directly‐measured haemodynamics were compared between participants with severe obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m 2 , Group B) and those without (BMI <35 kg/m 2 , Group A). Circulatory congestion was assessed by pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and vascular distending pressure was assessed by left ventricular transmural pressure (LVTMP). As compared to Group A, participants in Group B displayed higher PCWP relative to N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide, mid‐regional pro‐atrial natriuretic peptide, troponin T, and growth differentiation factor‐15 (all p < 0.01). In contrast, the relationships between LVTMP and the biomarkers were superimposable. Echocardiographic biomarkers revealed the same pattern: PCWP was higher for any E/e′ ratio in Group B compared to Group A, but the relationship between LVTMP and E/e′ was similar. In contrast, levels of C‐terminal pro‐endothelin‐1 and mid‐regional pro‐adrenomedullin were more robustly correlated with PCWP (r = 0.67 and r = 0.62, both p < 0.0001), with no differential relationship based upon BMI. Conclusions Non‐invasive haemodynamic markers underestimate circulatory congestion in patients with obesity, an effect that appears related to uncoupling between cardiac wall stress and intravascular pressures. This may lead to systematic under‐recognition of congestion in patients with obesity.