Jarolı́m, Petr

BACKGROUND: Some, but not all, patients with heart failure (HF) develop pulmonary vascular disease (PVD), which contributes to poor prognosis. Mechanisms leading to PVD in HF are poorly understood. We aimed to analyze transpulmonary gradients of proteins consumed or elaborated across the lungs to identify mediators of PVD by unbiased proteomics. METHODS: Overall, 21 controls and 160 patients with HF with reduced ejection fraction underwent pulmonary artery catheterization with blood sampling from postcapillary (wedged balloon) and precapillary (unwedged) position to obtain transpulmonary gradients. The samples from controls and HF from the highest (Q4, n=40) and lowest quartile (Q1, n=40) of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were analyzed using the proteomic proximity extension assay (Olink) of 275 proteins. Venous blood concentrations or transpulmonary gradients were analyzed to identify biomarkers or potential mediators of PVD. RESULTS: Comparison of Q1 and Q4 of PVR identified PSP-D (pulmonary surfactant-associated protein D) as a marker of PVD. Examination of gradients across the lungs in high PVR HF revealed significant uptake of 18 proteins, mostly associated with inflammation (chemokines, oncostatin-M, MMP9 [matrix metalloproteinase 9]) or with TGF (transforming growth factor)/activin pathway (GDF2 [growth differentiation factor 2]/BMP9 [bone morphogenic protein 9]), and release of 5 proteins, notably IL (interleukin) 6 and IL33. In contrast, these protein gradients were negligible in controls and low PVR patients with HF. Active pulmonary release of IL6 contributed to systemic elevation of IL6 and correlated with right ventricular function. CONCLUSIONS: The lungs of patients with HF with high PVR display abnormal uptake and release of proinflammatory cytokines from IL6/gp130 family (IL6, IL33, oncostatin-M), along with increased transpulmonary uptake of GDF2/BMP9. The study shows that proteins orchestrating inflammation or pulmonary vessel remodeling in group 1 pulmonary hypertension, are also operating in patients with PVD due to HF. REGISTRATION: URL: https://www.clinicaltrials.gov ; Unique identifier: NCT06331208.

Abstract Background Some, but not all, patients with heart failure (HF) develop pulmonary vascular disease (PVD), which contributes to poor prognosis. Mechanisms leading to PVD in HF are poorly understood. Unbiased analysis of transpulmonary gradients may identify not only markers but also mediators of PVD by identifying proteins that may be consumed or elaborated across the lungs. Purpose Examine hemodynamics and transpulmonary proteome gradients in HFrEF and controls. Methods 21 non-HF controls and 160 patients with advanced HFrEF underwent pulmonary artery (PA) catheterization with blood sampling from the PA catheter in the wedged position (02sat > 90%, indicating pulmonary venous blood) and the un-wedged position to obtain transpulmonary proteome gradients. Samples from controls and HF from the highest quartile (Q4, n=40) and lowest quartile (Q1, n=40) of pulmonary vascular resistance (PVR) were analyzed using proteomic PEA assay of 275 proteins (Olink Target 96, panels CVII, CVIII, Inflammation). Pulmonary artery concentrations ("markers") or transpulmonary fold-change gradients (i.e. putative "mediators") of normalized protein expression (NPX) were plotted against significance; Benjamini–Hochberg FDR<0.05 considered as significant. Results Patients displayed typical characteristics of HFrEF (age 56±8y, NYHA 3.0 ±0.6, 87% males, LVEF 24±9.6%), Controls had similar anthropometrics, gender and age. Comparing all HF to Con, 38 markers of HF were identified (NPX fold-change>2), including 33 up (top 5: NTproBNP, BNP, GDF15, FGF23, IL8) and 5 down. HF patients in Q1 had median PVR 1.5 (IQR: 0.3-1.7) WU and those in Q4 had PVR 5.4 (4.3-6.6) WU. Comparison of Q1 and Q4 identified 3 protein markers of high PVR in PA blood from HF: chemokine CCL3, TNFRSF13B and surfactant protein-D (PSP-D). Examination of protein gradients from HF lungs (Figure) showed significant uptake of 14 protein mediators, most of which were associated with inflammatory responses (top 5: OSM, MMP9, CCL19, BNP, TR), and release of 8 mediators (top 4: IL-6, IL33, CCL4, CXCL10). In contrast, protein gradients were negligible in controls. Patients in Q4 PVR group were characterized by the highest pulmonary uptake of OSM (Oncostatin-M), lymphatic chemokine CCL19, BNP, MMP9, and had more significant transpulmonary release of IL6 and IL33. Across all patients, OSM lung uptake was the strongest correlate of transpulmonary pressure gradient (r=-0.3, p<0.001). Conclusions Lungs of patients with HF, and particularly those with high PVR, display abnormal uptake and release of proinflammatory CC and CXC chemokines and cytokines from IL1 and IL6 family, along with increased pulmonary uptake of IL6-type cytokine Oncostatin-M, a known mediator of lung inflammation and fibrosis, that acts via gp130/JAK/STAT, suggesting a novel role in PVD due to HF.Transpulmonary proteome in HF patients

Abstract Aims Patients with obesity frequently present with dyspnoea. Biomarkers that reflect wall stress are often used to evaluate circulatory congestion and help determine whether dyspnoea is of cardiac causes. Patients with obesity display greater external restraint on the heart, which may alter relationships between intravascular pressures and stress markers. Methods and results Subjects with unexplained dyspnoea ( n = 212) underwent cardiac catheterization with simultaneous echocardiography. Blood sampling was performed in a subset ( n = 58). Relationships between echocardiographic and blood biomarkers of circulatory congestion and directly‐measured haemodynamics were compared between participants with severe obesity [body mass index (BMI) ≥35 kg/m 2 , Group B) and those without (BMI <35 kg/m 2 , Group A). Circulatory congestion was assessed by pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (PCWP), and vascular distending pressure was assessed by left ventricular transmural pressure (LVTMP). As compared to Group A, participants in Group B displayed higher PCWP relative to N‐terminal pro‐B‐type natriuretic peptide, mid‐regional pro‐atrial natriuretic peptide, troponin T, and growth differentiation factor‐15 (all p < 0.01). In contrast, the relationships between LVTMP and the biomarkers were superimposable. Echocardiographic biomarkers revealed the same pattern: PCWP was higher for any E/e′ ratio in Group B compared to Group A, but the relationship between LVTMP and E/e′ was similar. In contrast, levels of C‐terminal pro‐endothelin‐1 and mid‐regional pro‐adrenomedullin were more robustly correlated with PCWP (r = 0.67 and r = 0.62, both p < 0.0001), with no differential relationship based upon BMI. Conclusions Non‐invasive haemodynamic markers underestimate circulatory congestion in patients with obesity, an effect that appears related to uncoupling between cardiac wall stress and intravascular pressures. This may lead to systematic under‐recognition of congestion in patients with obesity.

Abstract Aims Pulmonary hypertension (PH) represents an important phenotype among the broader spectrum of patients with heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but its mechanistic basis remains unclear. We hypothesized that activation of endothelin and adrenomedullin, two counterregulatory pathways important in the pathophysiology of PH, would be greater in HFpEF patients with worsening PH, and would correlate with the severity of haemodynamic derangements and limitations in aerobic capacity and cardiopulmonary reserve. Methods and results Plasma levels of C-terminal pro-endothelin-1 (CT-proET-1) and mid-regional pro-adrenomedullin (MR-proADM), central haemodynamics, echocardiography, and oxygen consumption (VO2) were measured at rest and during exercise in subjects with invasively-verified HFpEF (n = 38) and controls free of HF (n = 20) as part of a prospective study. Plasma levels of CT-proET-1 and MR-proADM were highly correlated with one another (r = 0.89, P &lt; 0.0001), and compared to controls, subjects with HFpEF displayed higher levels of each neurohormone at rest and during exercise. C-terminal pro-endothelin-1 and MR-proADM levels were strongly correlated with mean pulmonary artery (PA) pressure (r = 0.73 and 0.65, both P &lt; 0.0001) and pulmonary capillary wedge pressure (r = 0.67 and r = 0.62, both P &lt; 0.0001) and inversely correlated with PA compliance (r = −0.52 and −0.43, both P &lt; 0.001). As compared to controls, subjects with HFpEF displayed right ventricular (RV) reserve limitation, evidenced by less increases in RV s′ and e′ tissue velocities, during exercise. Baseline CT-proET-1 and MR-proADM levels were correlated with worse RV diastolic reserve (ΔRV e′, r = −0.59 and −0.67, both P &lt; 0.001), reduced cardiac output responses to exercise (r = −0.59 and −0.61, both P &lt; 0.0001), and more severely impaired peak VO2 (r = −0.60 and −0.67, both P &lt; 0.0001). Conclusion Subjects with HFpEF display activation of the endothelin and adrenomedullin neurohormonal pathways, the magnitude of which is associated with pulmonary haemodynamic derangements, limitations in RV functional reserve, reduced cardiac output, and more profoundly impaired exercise capacity in HFpEF. Further study is required to evaluate for causal relationships and determine if therapies targeting these counterregulatory pathways can improve outcomes in patients with the HFpEF-PH phenotype. Clinical trial registration NCT01418248; https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/results? term=NCT01418248&Search=Search