Trabuco, Emanuel C.

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate long‐term failure rates and complications after retropubic and transobturator midurethral sling procedures for primary stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic medical centre. Population A previously described cohort of patients ( n = 1881) who underwent midurethral sling procedures (2002–2012) and a covariate‐matched cohort of patients with retropubic ( n = 570) or transobturator ( n = 317) slings. Methods Health record review with follow‐up extended by 9 years (through December 31, 2022). Main Outcome Measures Treatment failure (reoperation for recurrent SUI) and procedure‐associated complications. Results The duration of assessment was extended by 6.9 years for the retropubic group and by 6.4 years for the transobturator group. The median (IQR) follow‐up was 11.1 (5.1–14.5) years (retropubic, 11.4 [5.9–14.6]; transobturator, 9.6 [2.6–13.7]). Higher risk of reoperation was observed with transobturator (8.8%) than retropubic (4.4%) slings (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.29 [95% CI, 1.49–3.54]; p < 0.001; covariate‐matched analysis HR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.15–3.17]; p = 0.01). The increased risk of reoperation with a transobturator sling was higher when the procedure was combined with prolapse repair (unadjusted HR, 6.34 [95% CI, 3.09–13.02]; p < 0.001; covariate‐matched analysis HR, 3.96 [95% CI, 1.35–11.58]; p = 0.01). Higher rates of reoperation for urinary retention were observed for the retropubic group than for the transobturator group (covariate‐matched analysis HR, 8.39 [95% CI, 1.11–63.22]; p = 0.04). Conclusion In this long‐term follow‐up study, midurethral slings had a low failure rate. Women with SUI undergoing transobturator sling placement plus prolapse repair had a greater risk of reoperation. However, women with retropubic slings had a greater risk of urinary retention requiring intervention.

Importance Rectovaginal fistulas (RVFs) are challenging to treat, often requiring multiple surgical interventions. Research into novel therapies is limited by the lack of a sizeable and representative animal model. Given the similarities in porcine and human vaginal and rectal tissue, pigs are an ideal species for translation to human patients. Objective The objective of this study was to develop a feasible and reproducible RVF model in pigs. Study Design Six female pigs underwent RVF creation and were divided into 3 groups according to the following methods: (1) placement of 1-inch disc magnets across the rectovaginal septum, (2) a 1-inch round defect created using electrocautery and placement of a 1-inch stainless-steel gauge stent, (3) a 1-inch round defect using electrocautery without subsequent stenting. Fistulas were evaluated at 6 weeks with measurements and photographic documentation. The animals were euthanized between 12 and 14 weeks. The primary outcome of this study was fistula patency. Secondary outcomes were fistula dimension and histologic appearance of the fistula tract. Results All pigs did well with no infection or complications related to fistula creation. Both surgical methods reliably resulted in a patent fistula at 14 weeks: cautery alone and cautery with gauge stenting. Only 1 patent fistula in the magnet group was noted at the time of euthanasia. All patent fistulas showed histologic evidence of complete epithelialization of the fistula tract. Conclusions This study demonstrates 3 safe and feasible methods for RVF creation in pigs, with 2 methods showing increased reliability.

Objectives To evaluate the feasibility for use of electronic health record (EHR) data in conducting adverse event surveillance among women who received mid-urethral slings (MUS) to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in five health systems. Design Retrospective observational study using EHR data from 2010 through 2021. Women with a history of MUS were identified using common data models; a common analytic code was executed at each site. A manual chart review was conducted in a per-site random patient subset to establish a reference standard. Automated text processing (Text Processed Integrated (TPI)) was developed and evaluated at each site to determine the surgical approach and synthetic mesh implantation. Patients were characterized and surgical outcomes were ascertained over 730 subsequent days. Setting Five large tertiary care academic medical centers. Participants Across five health systems, 9,906 eligible patients (mean age 57–60 per site) were identified. Main outcome measures Determination of surgical approach, synthetic mesh implantation, and assessment of the duration of surveillance for mortality and reoperation rates following MUS implantation. Results In the TPI cohort analysis, 3,331 patients were identified. Surgical approach per site was retropubic (42% to 77%), transobturator (6% to 44%), single incision (0% to 24%), and adjustable sling (0% to <4%). Concordance rates for TPI using chart review were 71%–90% at each site for the surgical approach and 28%–85% for synthetic mesh implantation. Patient follow-up observation rates for mortality and reoperation ranged from 22% to 36% at 90 days, 15% to 30% at 365 days, and 8% to 19% at 730 days. Conclusion Using EHR data alone, identification of medical devices and surgical approaches was feasible among women with MUS surgery for SUI, but long-term follow-up ascertainment rates were low. Medical device surveillance using EHR data should be evaluated in the context of the clinical use case, as applicability may vary.

Importance Improving opioid stewardship is important, given the common use of opioids and resultant adverse events. Evidence-based prescribing recommendations for surgeons may help reduce opioid prescribing after specific procedures. Objective The aim of this study was to assess longitudinal prescribing patterns for patients undergoing pelvic organ prolapse surgery in the 2 years before and after implementing evidence-based opioid prescribing recommendations. Study Design In December 2017, a 3-tiered opioid prescribing recommendation was created based on prospective data on postoperative opioid use after pelvic organ prolapse surgery. For this follow-up study, prescribing patterns, including quantity of opioids prescribed (in oral morphine equivalents [OMEs]) and refill rates, were retrospectively compared for patients undergoing prolapse surgery before (November 2015–November 2017; n = 238) and after (December 2017–December 2019; n = 361) recommendation implementation. Univariate analysis was performed using the Wilcoxon rank sum and χ 2 tests. Cochran-Armitage trend tests and interrupted time-series analysis tested for significance in the change in OMEs prescribed before versus after recommendation implementation. Results After recommendation implementation, the quantity of postoperative opioids prescribed decreased from median 225 mg OME (interquartile range, 225, 300 mg OME) to 71.3 mg OME (interquartile range, 0, 112.5 mg OME; P < 0.0001). Decreases also occurred within each subgroup of prolapse surgery: native tissue vaginal repair (P < 0.0001), robotic sacrocolpopexy (P < 0.0001), open sacrocolpopexy (P < 0.0001), and colpocleisis (P < 0.003). The proportion of patients discharged following prolapse surgery without opioids increased (4.2% vs 36.6%; P < 0.0001), and the rate of opioid refills increased (2.1% vs 6.0%; P = 0.02). Conclusions With 2 years of postimplementation follow-up, the use of procedure-specific, tiered opioid prescribing recommendations at our institution was associated with a significant, sustained reduction in opioids prescribed. This study further supports using evidence-based recommendations for opioid prescribing.

AbstractObjectiveTo compare perioperative costs and morbidity between open and robotic sacrocolpopexy after implementation of enhanced recovery after surgery (ERAS) pathway.MethodsThe present retrospective cohort study of patients undergoing open or robotic sacrocolpopexy (January 1, 2014, through November 30, 2017) used an ERAS protocol with liposomal bupivacaine infiltration of laparotomy incisions. Primary outcomes were costs associated with index surgery and hospitalization, determined with Medicare cost‐to‐charge ratios and reimbursement rates and adjusted for variables expected to impact costs. Secondary outcomes included narcotic use, length of stay (LOS), and complications from index hospitalization to postoperative day 30.ResultsFor the total of 231 patients (open cohort, 90; robotic cohort, 141), the adjusted mean cost of robotic surgery was $3239 higher compared with open sacrocolpopexy (95% confidence interval [CI] $1331–$5147; P < 0.001). Rates were not significantly different for intraoperative complications (robotic, 4.3% [6/141]; open, 5.6% [5/90]; P = 0.754), 30‐day postoperative complications (robotic, 11.4% [16/141]; open, 16.7% [15/90]; P = 0.322), or readmissions (robotic, 5.7% [8/141]; open, 3.3% [3/90]; P = 0.535). The percentage of patients dismissed on postoperative day 1 was greater in the robotic group (89.4% [126/141] vs. 48.9% [44/90], P < 0.001).ConclusionsDecreased LOS associated with ERAS provided significant cost savings with open sacrocolpopexy versus robotic sacrocolpopexy without adverse impacts on perioperative complications or readmissions.

AbstractObjectiveTo assess the effect of Enhanced Recovery After Surgery (ERAS) with and without liposomal bupivacaine (LB) on opioid use, hospital length of stay (LOS), costs, and morbidity of women undergoing sacrocolpopexy.MethodsRetrospective cohort of women who underwent abdominal sacrocolpopexy between April 1, 2009 and November 30, 2017. Costs for relevant healthcare services were determined by assigning 2017 charges multiplied by 2017 Medicare Cost Report's cost to charge ratios. Outcomes were compared among periods with multivariable regression models adjusted for age, American Society of Anesthesiologists score, and concurrent hysterectomy and posterior repair.ResultsPatients were subdivided into pre‐ERAS (G1, n = 128), post‐ERAS (G2, n = 83), and post‐ERAS plus LB (G3, n = 91). The proportion of patients needing opioids during postoperative days 0–2 was significantly less for G3 (75.8%) compared with G1 (97.7%) and G2 (92.8%); P < 0.001). The median morphine equivalent units (MEU) with interquartile ranges, mean LOS, and adjusted mean standardized costs were significantly lower in G3 compared with the other two groups (35 [20–75] vs. 67 [31–109], and 60 [30–122] MEUs; 1.8 vs. 2.3 vs. 2.9 days; and $2391, $2975, and $3844, for G3, G2, and G1, respectively; P < 0.001).ConclusionImplementation of an ERAS pathway led to significant decreases in opioid use, LOS, and costs. Supplementation with LB further improved these measures.

Objective The aim of the study was to compare vaginal wound healing after exosome injection in a porcine mesh exposure model with (1) single versus multiple dose regimens and (2) acute versus subacute exposure. Methods Six 80-kg Yorkshire-crossed swine each had 2 polypropylene meshes implanted to create the vaginal mesh exposure model. Animals were divided into 3 groups based on number and timing of exosome injection: (1) single purified exosome product (PEP) injection (acute-single), (2) weekly PEP injections (acute-weekly, 4 total injections), and (3) delayed single injection (subacute-single). Acute and subacute injections occurred 1 and 8 weeks after mesh implantation, respectively. EdU, a thymidine analog, was given twice weekly after the first injection to track tissue regeneration. Euthanasia and tissue analysis occurred 4 weeks after the first injection. ImageJ was used to quantify epithelial thickness, cellular proliferation, and capillary density. Statistical analysis was performed using analysis of variance and post hoc Tukey test. Results Acute-single PEP injection tissues mirrored pilot study results, validating replication of protocol. Within the acute groups, weekly dosing resulted in 1.5× higher epithelial thickness (nonsignificant), 1.8× higher epithelial proliferation ( P < 0.05), and 1.5× higher regenerated capillary density ( P < 0.05) compared with single injection. Regarding chronicity of the exposure, the subacute group showed 1.7× higher epithelial proliferation (nonsignificant) and similar capillary density and epithelial thickness as compared with the acute group. Conclusions Exosome redosing resulted in significantly greater epithelial proliferation with significantly higher regenerated capillary density, leading to a trend toward thicker epithelium. Subacute exposure exhibited similar regeneration to acute exposure despite a delayed injection timeline. These results contribute to a growing body of preclinical research demonstrating utility of exosomes in pelvic floor disorders.