Madsen, Annetta M.

ABSTRACT Objective To evaluate long‐term failure rates and complications after retropubic and transobturator midurethral sling procedures for primary stress urinary incontinence (SUI). Design Retrospective cohort study. Setting Academic medical centre. Population A previously described cohort of patients ( n = 1881) who underwent midurethral sling procedures (2002–2012) and a covariate‐matched cohort of patients with retropubic ( n = 570) or transobturator ( n = 317) slings. Methods Health record review with follow‐up extended by 9 years (through December 31, 2022). Main Outcome Measures Treatment failure (reoperation for recurrent SUI) and procedure‐associated complications. Results The duration of assessment was extended by 6.9 years for the retropubic group and by 6.4 years for the transobturator group. The median (IQR) follow‐up was 11.1 (5.1–14.5) years (retropubic, 11.4 [5.9–14.6]; transobturator, 9.6 [2.6–13.7]). Higher risk of reoperation was observed with transobturator (8.8%) than retropubic (4.4%) slings (unadjusted hazard ratio [HR], 2.29 [95% CI, 1.49–3.54]; p < 0.001; covariate‐matched analysis HR, 1.91 [95% CI, 1.15–3.17]; p = 0.01). The increased risk of reoperation with a transobturator sling was higher when the procedure was combined with prolapse repair (unadjusted HR, 6.34 [95% CI, 3.09–13.02]; p < 0.001; covariate‐matched analysis HR, 3.96 [95% CI, 1.35–11.58]; p = 0.01). Higher rates of reoperation for urinary retention were observed for the retropubic group than for the transobturator group (covariate‐matched analysis HR, 8.39 [95% CI, 1.11–63.22]; p = 0.04). Conclusion In this long‐term follow‐up study, midurethral slings had a low failure rate. Women with SUI undergoing transobturator sling placement plus prolapse repair had a greater risk of reoperation. However, women with retropubic slings had a greater risk of urinary retention requiring intervention.

Importance Racial and ethnic disparities exist in urogynecologic surgery; however, literature identifying specific disparities after sling operations for stress incontinence are limited. Objective The objective of this study was to evaluate racial and ethnic disparities in surgical complications within 30 days of midurethral sling operations. Study Design This retrospective cohort study identified women who underwent an isolated midurethral sling operation between 2014 and 2021 using the American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database. Women were stratified by racial and ethnic category to assess the primary outcome, 30-day surgical complications, and the secondary outcome, comparison of urinary tract infections (UTIs). Results There were 20,066 patients included. Mean age and body mass index were 53.9 years and 30.8, respectively. More Black or African American women had diabetes and hypertension, and more American Indian or Alaska Native women used tobacco. The only difference in 30-day complications was stroke/cerebrovascular accident, which occurred in only 1 Asian, Native Hawaiian or other Pacific Islander patient (0.1%, P < 0.0001). The most frequent complication was UTI (3.3%). Black or African American women were significantly less likely to have a diagnosis of UTI than non-Hispanic White (P = 0.04), Hispanic White (P = 0.03), and American Indian or Alaska Native women (P = 0.04). Conclusions Surgical complications within 30 days of sling operations are rare. No clinically significant racial and ethnic differences in serious complications were observed. Urinary tract infection diagnoses were lower among Black or African American women than in non-Hispanic White, Hispanic White, and American Indian or Alaska Native women despite a greater comorbidity burden. No known biologic reason exists to explain lower UTI rates in this population; therefore, this finding may represent a disparity in diagnosis and treatment.

Importance Data comparing perioperative outcomes between transvaginal, transabdominal, and laparoscopic/robotic vesicovaginal fistula (VVF) repair are limited but are important for surgical planning and patient counseling. Objective This study aimed to assess perioperative morbidity of VVF repair performed via various approaches. Study Design The American College of Surgeons National Surgical Quality Improvement Program database was used to identify women who underwent transvaginal, transabdominal, or laparoscopic/robotic VVF repair from 2009 to 2020. Associations of surgical approach with baseline characteristics, blood transfusion, prolonged hospitalization (>4 days), and 30-day outcomes (any major or minor complication or return to the operating room) were evaluated with χ2, Fisher exact, and Kruskal-Wallis tests. Multivariable logistic regression models assessed the adjusted association of approach with 30-day complications and prolonged hospitalization. Results Overall, 449 women underwent VVF repair, including 252 transvaginal (56.1%), 148 transabdominal (33.0%), and 49 laparoscopic/robotic procedures (10.9%). Abdominal repair was associated with a longer length of hospitalization (median, 3 days vs 1 day transvaginal and laparoscopic/robotic; P < 0.001), higher risk of prolonged length of stay (abdominal, 21.1%; transvaginal, 4.0%; laparoscopic/robotic, 2.0%; P < 0.001), major complications (abdominal, 4.7%; transvaginal, 0.8%; laparoscopic/robotic, 0.0%; P = 0.03), and perioperative transfusion (abdominal, 5.0%; transvaginal, 0.0%; laparoscopic/robotic, 2.1%; P = 0.01). On multivariable analysis, the abdominal approach was independently associated with an increased risk of prolonged hospitalization compared with laparoscopic/robotic (odds ratio, 12.3; 95% confidence interval, 1.63–93.21; P = 0.02) and transvaginal (odds ratio, 6.09; 95% confidence interval, 2.87–12.92; P < 0.001) but not with major/minor complications (P = 0.76). Conclusion Transvaginal and laparoscopic/robotic approaches to VVF repair are associated with lower rates of prolonged hospitalization, major complications, and readmission compared with a transabdominal approach.

ObjectiveTo compare outcomes of efficiency, safety, patient, and surgeon satisfaction between absorbable subcuticular staples and subcuticular suture for caesarean section skin closure.DesignA prospective, randomised, non‐blinded, parallel‐group trial.SettingMayo Clinic Family Birth Center in Rochester, MN, USA.PopulationAt least 18 years old and 24 weeks’ gestation, undergoing caesarean section. Exclusion criteria were body mass index >50, chorioamnionitis, intrauterine fetal death, and multifetal gestation.MethodsPatients were stratified by prior caesarean section, body mass index, and surgeon level and randomised to absorbable subcuticular staples or subcuticular suture. Electronic medical records and surveys were used.Main outcome measuresPrimary outcomes were total operating time, from incision start to close. Secondary outcomes included subcuticular skin closure time, patient and surgeon satisfaction, percutaneous injuries, pain (analgesic use), cosmesis, and wound complications.ResultsOf 220 randomised patients, 206 were included in the final analysis (103 per group). Baseline characteristics were similar. The primary outcome of total operative time was not significantly different between groups [54.0 (44.9–63.6) versus 58.0 (50.4–68.2) minutes, P = 0.053]. The subcuticular staple group had shorter subcuticular skin closure time [median 2.6 (1.8–4.0) versus 8.5 (6.2–10.5) minutes, P < 0.001]. There were no differences in analgesic use, wound complications, cosmesis or patient satisfaction. One needlestick injury occurred with suture. Surgeons were more likely to recommend (97% versus 85%, P = 0.004) and use (98% versus 82%, P < 0.001) absorbable subcuticular staples.ConclusionFor caesarean section skin closure, absorbable subcuticular staples did not result in significantly different total operative times compared with sutures. Analgesic use, wound complications, and cosmesis were comparable. Patient and surgeon satisfaction were high with both methods.Tweetable abstractAbsorbable subcuticular staples associated with a similar total operative time compared with suture.