Mao, Jialin

Objectives To evaluate the feasibility for use of electronic health record (EHR) data in conducting adverse event surveillance among women who received mid-urethral slings (MUS) to treat stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in five health systems. Design Retrospective observational study using EHR data from 2010 through 2021. Women with a history of MUS were identified using common data models; a common analytic code was executed at each site. A manual chart review was conducted in a per-site random patient subset to establish a reference standard. Automated text processing (Text Processed Integrated (TPI)) was developed and evaluated at each site to determine the surgical approach and synthetic mesh implantation. Patients were characterized and surgical outcomes were ascertained over 730 subsequent days. Setting Five large tertiary care academic medical centers. Participants Across five health systems, 9,906 eligible patients (mean age 57–60 per site) were identified. Main outcome measures Determination of surgical approach, synthetic mesh implantation, and assessment of the duration of surveillance for mortality and reoperation rates following MUS implantation. Results In the TPI cohort analysis, 3,331 patients were identified. Surgical approach per site was retropubic (42% to 77%), transobturator (6% to 44%), single incision (0% to 24%), and adjustable sling (0% to <4%). Concordance rates for TPI using chart review were 71%–90% at each site for the surgical approach and 28%–85% for synthetic mesh implantation. Patient follow-up observation rates for mortality and reoperation ranged from 22% to 36% at 90 days, 15% to 30% at 365 days, and 8% to 19% at 730 days. Conclusion Using EHR data alone, identification of medical devices and surgical approaches was feasible among women with MUS surgery for SUI, but long-term follow-up ascertainment rates were low. Medical device surveillance using EHR data should be evaluated in the context of the clinical use case, as applicability may vary.

Objective: The objective of this study was to compare endovascular aortic aneurysm repair (EVAR) versus open aortic repair (OAR) on mortality and reintervention after ruptured infrarenal abdominal aortic aneurysm (rAAA) repair in the Vascular Quality Initiative (VQI). Background: The optimal treatment modality for rAAA remains debated, with little data on long-term comparisons. Methods: VQI rAAA repairs (2004–2018) were matched with Medicare claims (VQI-VISION). Primary outcomes were in-hospital and long-term mortality. Secondary outcome was reintervention. Inverse probability weighting was used to adjust for treatment selection, and Cox Proportional Hazards models and negative binomial regressions were used for analysis. Landmark analysis was performed among patients surviving hospital discharge. Results: Among 1885 VQI/Medicare rAAA patients, 790 underwent OAR, and 1095 underwent EVAR. Median age was 76 years; 73% were male. Inverse probability weighting produced comparable groups. In-hospital mortality was lower after EVAR versus OAR (21% vs 37%, odds ratio: 0.52, 95% CI, 0.4–0.7). One-year mortality rates were lower for EVAR versus OAR [hazard ratio (HR) 0.74, 95% CI, 0.6–0.9], but not statistically different after 1 year (HR: 0.95, 95% CI, 0.8–1.2). This implies additional benefits to EVAR in the short term. Reintervention rates were higher after EVAR than OAR at 2 and 5 years (rate ratio: 1.79 95% CI, 1.2–2.7 and rate ratio:2.03 95% CI, 1.4–3.0), but not within the first year. Reintervention was associated with higher mortality risk for both OAR (HR: 1.66 95% CI, 1.1–2.5) and EVAR (HR: 2.14 95% CI, 1.6–2.9). Long-term mortality was similar between repair types (HR: 0.99, 95% CI, 0.8–1.2). Conclusions: Within VQI/Medicare patients undergoing rAAA repair, the perioperative mortality rate favors EVAR but equalizes after 1 year. Reinterventions were more common after EVAR and were associated with higher mortality regardless of treatment.